ATCH_5_CADET_SUPPORT_SERVICES_PPQ.pdf

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CADET SUPPORT SERVICES

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Ms. Erica Wilson, Email: erica.wilson.7@us.af.mil

FA7000-14-R-0004

file:///D:/far/Far02.doc%23T2101 file:///D:/far/FAR03.DOC%23b3104

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE

PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITIONS

E

EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG

VERY GOOD- Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

M

MARGINAL – Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U

UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E VG S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Followed approved quality control plan.

4. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

The contractor: E VG S M U N

5. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

6. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

7. Identified problems as they occurred.

8. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

9. Completed event set-up and tear-down in accordance with established timelines

10. Provided simultaneous management of numerous academic facilities and/or office buildings.

11. Conducted coordination and planning for athletic competitions similar to those conducted under NCAA

Division I requirements.

12. Conducted planning and execution of high visibility events/conferences.

13. Provided accurate inventory management, to include distribution, of clothing, furniture, and equipment.

14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

15. Cooperated with other Contractor personnel after award.

16. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

17. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

18. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________