Past Performance Questionnaire Command Post.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Renovate Command Post B-418 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA6712-15-R-0004
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question__5.docx | DOCX document | |
| Second_Site_Visit_Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum_2_amendment.doc | DOC document | |
| 27_15_00__Data_Cabling.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum_2_JLSS_12-0010.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions__4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions__3.docx | DOCX document | |
| A002CPPL_REVISION_1.pdf | ||
| Addendum_1_JLSS_12-0010.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_One.pdf | ||
| Questions__2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Question__1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sign-In_Sheet_Site_Visit.pdf | ||
| Drawings.zip | ZIP file | |
| Drawings.zip | ZIP file | |
| FA6712-15-R-0004 Rpr Command Post.doc | DOC document | |
| 911 B418 Construction Bid Specifications.pdf | ||
| PA1 13 Feb 15 Mod 5.txt | TXT text file |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FA6712-15-R-0004
SOURCE SELECTION SENITIVE
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 3.104
When filled in, this document become Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104
CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: (To be completed by offeror prior to sending to reference provider)
| a. |
| Contractor’s Name/Company: |
Address:
| b. |
| Point of Contact: |
| c. |
| Phone: |
| d. |
| Contract #/Contract Type: |
| e. |
| Project Title: |
| f. |
| Performance Period: |
Authorization is hereby given to provide information in SECTION B of this questionnaire to the government.
| Signature of Contractor Authorized Representative |
| Date |
Printed Name and Title of Authorized Contractor Representative
Instructions to respondents: Thank you for taking the time to fill out this past performance questionnaire. Please fill out the questionnaire and send back within the time frame the contractor has requested (this is TIME SENSITIVE and may adversely affect past performance rating, if not sent back timely). Please answer all questions honestly and accurately.
When completed, please mail, fax, or email to:
| 911 CONF/LGC | phone: 412-474-8123, DSN: 277-8119 | |
| Michael Tucker | fax: 412-474-8410, DSN: 277-8410 | |
| 2375 Defense Avenue | *email: michael.tucker.26@us.af.mil | |
| Coraopolis, PA 15108-4495 | *MS Word (*.doc) or Adobe readable (*.pdf) format only |
When responding to the following statements, rate the contractor by selecting the rating below that most accurately describes the contractor’s overall performance for each element (Quality Control, Timely Performance, etc…). If the statement is not applicable, then circle “N”. The letters correspond to the following:
(A) Acceptable: Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
(U) Unacceptable: Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Neutral: Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
SECTION B: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RESPONDENT)
| a. |
| Respondent’s Company: |
Address:
| b. |
| Point of Contact: |
| c. |
| Phone: |
| d. |
| Contract #/Contract Type: |
| e. |
| Project Title: |
Award Amount:
Final Amount:
| f. |
| Performance Period: |
Date of completion:
Authorization is hereby given to provide information in SECTION B of this questionnaire to the government.
| Signature of Respondent Authorized Representative |
| Date |
Printed Name and Title of Authorized Respondent Representative
RESPONSE SECTION
| A. |
| Quality Control |
| 1. |
| Was the quality of the workmanship sufficient? |
| A |
U
N
| 2. |
| Were the as-built drawings accurate and timely submitted? |
| A |
U
N
| 3. |
| Was identification/correction of deficient work accomplished timely? |
| A |
U
N
| B. |
| Timely performance |
| 1. |
| Were submittals provided on time? |
| A |
U
N
| 2. |
| Did the submittals clearly identify the proposed item? |
| A |
U
N
| 3. |
| Were progress schedules realistic? |
| A |
U
N
| 4. |
| Were progress schedules met? |
| A |
U
N
| C. |
| Management Effectiveness |
| 1. |
| General Business Practices |
a. Were experienced managers/supervisors provided who possessed the technical and administrative abilities necessary to manage the project and meet contractual requirements?
A
U
N
| b. Were experienced subcontractors hired? |
| A |
U
N
| c. Were subcontractors/suppliers paid timely? |
| A |
U
N
d. Was all contract work completed prior to requesting a final inspection, with no major deficiencies?
A
U
N
e. Were timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues provided after project completion?
A
U
N
f. Did the contractor cooperate to resolve problems, attend meetings (as applicable) and maintain effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution?
A
U
N
| 2. |
| Pricing |
a. Were price proposals submitted timely accurately representing the required work?
A
U
N
b. Was accurate, complete and reasonable supporting pricing information provided for modifications/change orders (not overinflated or underinflated)?
A
U
N
| 3. |
| Site Management/Superintendence |
a. Did the site Manager/Superintendent have sufficient authority to make decisions or take action during project performance?
A
U
N
| b. Was he/she consistently on site while work was being performed? |
| A |
U
N
c. Did he/she ensure compliance with contract and safety requirements?
A
U
N
d. Was prompt action taken by him/her to resolve problems with work quality?
A
U
N
| D. |
| Compliance with Labor Standards |
1.
Were payrolls submitted timely?
A
U
N
| 2. |
| Were payrolls completed and accurate? |
| A |
U
N
| 3. |
| Was the contractor compliant with all labors laws and regulations, with specific attention to the requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act? |
A
U
N
| E. |
| Compliance with Safety Regulations |
| 1. |
| Were workplace safety standards and regulations (OSHA, Federal, State, Local and Agency) met? |
A
U
N
| 2. |
| Did the contractor submit and implement/enforce an adequate health and safety plan? |
A
U
N
| F. |
| Compliance with Environmental and Other Standards |
| 1. |
| Did the contractor submit and implement an adequate environmental pollution control plan? (Including, but not limited to recycle and disposal of waste material, hazardous waste management and/or sediment and erosion control.)? |
| A |
U
N
Please include any additional comments as appropriate:
Do you know of any similar projects the company has completed or is in progress with, if so please provide agency and location?
Location:_____________________________________________________________________________
Please circle the most applicable:
1. I would enter into another contract with this contractor.
2. I might enter into another contract with this contractor.
3. I would not enter into another contract with this contractor.
Evaluator’s Signature:___________________________________________________________________
Evaluator’s Duty Title:___________________________________________________________________
Date: ________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .