Site_Visit_Official_Questions--30_Sep_15_(2)_Final.pdf

PDF 58 KB Posted

Attached to
T-38 Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4890-15-R-0007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to T-38 Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP), newest first.
File Type Posted
T-38_AMP_Pre-Proposal_Conf_letter_(2)-signed.pdf PDF
T-38_AMP_Required_Security_Clearances.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Industry_Day_Attendees_7_May_15.pdf PDF
T-38AMP_Site_Pictures_-_5_May_15.pdf PDF
Appendix_K_-_Aircraft_Inspection_Info.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ACC_T-38_FLEET_NMC_FY14.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Appendix_K_-_Combined_T-38A_AT-38B_Summary_Mx_Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AETC_FY14_T-38C_Stats.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Rm_100_(Storage).jpg JPG image
Bldg_52_(Hangar_Exterior_2).jpg JPG image
Rm_103_(CTK_1).jpg JPG image
Rm_121_(Break_Room).jpg JPG image
Hangar_3_Interior.JPG JPG image
Building_205_Support_Area_Walk-in.JPG JPG image
Building_205_Support_Area_Overflow_bulk.JPG JPG image
Building_205_Support_Area_Tool_checkout.JPG JPG image
QC_and_Team_Leads_Office_-_Room_135.jpg JPG image
Langley_Bldg_753_-_Hangar_200_Unused_Space_(Second_Floor).pdf PDF
Hangar_Bay_Rear.jpg JPG image
Langley_Bldg_753_-_Hangar_200_First_Floor_Plan.pdf PDF
Bldg_300_compressor_room.jpg JPG image
Bldg_580_Storage.jpg JPG image
Bldg_300_int_reverse_view.jpg JPG image
Holloman_Building_Pictures.pptx PPTX presentation
Bldg_300_gearbox_room.jpg JPG image
Bldg_578_int.jpg JPG image
Bldg_315_Fuel_Shop.jpg JPG image
Bldg_280_NDI_office.jpg JPG image
Bldg_280_NDI_Tool_and_Equip_rm.jpg JPG image
Bldg_282_Corrosion_-_Wheel_-_Tire_Back.jpg JPG image
Bldg_282_front.jpg JPG image
Bldg_282_Corrision_int.jpg JPG image
Bldg_218_SM_int.jpg JPG image
Bldg_282_int.jpg JPG image
Bldg_280_Machine.jpg JPG image
638_-_639_Test_Cell.jpg JPG image
Beale_Bldg_1243_(Dock_7).JPG JPG image
Flight_Shack_(Support_Section).JPG JPG image
AFI_21-101_CAF_Sup_1__Compliance_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AFI_10-220_IP.pdf PDF
1T-38C-6-WA-1.pdf PDF
Host_Base_Pubs_14_Apr_15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL_A002_Finance_Management_and_Contract_Cost_Report.pdf PDF
CDRL_A006_Environmental_Protection_Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL_A008_Incident_Report.pdf PDF
CDRL_A007_ESOH_Program.pdf PDF
FA4890-15-R-0007_DRAFT_L_ _M.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Industry_Day_Announcement.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_-_Market_Research_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_Draft_Performance_Work_Statement.docx DOCX document
Show all 50

T-38 Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOUO\\ Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 & 3.104

T-38 AMP Centralized Repair Facility Site Visit

Official Questions

1. Six or seven aircraft in the heritage air park are currently in need of paint. Will they be painted before start of new contract? Or will this additional work be negotiated?

General requirements concerning the static display aircraft at the Holloman AFB

Heritage are outlined in the PWS Paragraph 3.3.12.6. A portion of this paragraph identifies the paint requirement as follows, “Paint aircraft as required and approved by the Government to maintain appearance IAW AFI 84-103, U.S. Air Force Heritage

Program, T.O. 1-1-8, and T.O. 35-1-3. Maintain a database recording full paints and touch-ups.” The painting of the static display aircraft is a much less precedence than inspection, maintenance and painting of the active AMP aircraft. The T-38 AMP

Contractor Director of Maintenance in concert with the Government Program

Manager would develop a plan to paint aircraft on a non-interference basis to the AMP flying, inspection and maintenance plan. Two aircraft should be painted before initiation of the new contract. Appendix K has projected workload data for Heritage

Park aircraft per paint.

Verbal response: Done at location, weather permitting – no specific time

2. Which shops currently have electronic TOs and which will have electronic by start of new contract?

All support shops will have electronic TO capability by new contract start

3. TC Max tool control need to know number of sight licenses and implementation schedule…location specific

The T-38 AMP does not currently utilize TC Max. If, as expected, after new contract start, TC Max is implemented, the government will assign a reasonable transition timeline for conversion. All required site licenses would be purchased by government. If the implementation/transition to the new system created contractor costs the government would review justification and negotiate as necessary.

4. Are T-38As going to be upgraded with Martin Baker seats?

There are no official plans currently to convert the T-38 AMP T-38A/Bs to the

Martin Baker seats.

5. Will there be a follow-on site visit to an OL?

We have scheduled a site visit to the Langley operating location 15 Oct 100-1130. A memo providing general information and registration requirements was posted to

FBO 11 Sep 15.

6. Egress/chute re-pack and time-change items—Are chutes worked at Holloman or

Edwards? Does that pertain/apply to the new Martin Baker seat? Will on the T-8C be equipped with the new Martin Baker seat?

Egress/chute re-pack and time change items are government provided at Holloman and the OLs for the T-38A/Bs. The 4 T-38C will all have Martin Baker seats by the time the new contract begins. Martin Baker chute re-packs and time change items are accomplished at Edwards. Only the T-38Cs have/will have Martin baker seats.

7. Does the Battery Shop support customers other than the T-38 community?

The Holloman CRF Battery Shop services 10 Helicopter Ni-Cad batteries for the

Army Air Directorate (White Sands Missile Range, 1 C-12 lead acid battery for the

96 Test Group.

8. Will the Government consider re-addressing the “code-1” criteria as a measure for success and incorporate “code-2” criteria?

The government has re-evaluated the Metric against historical data and plans to utilize it in the new contract. Code 2 issues will have minimal impact.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .