Solicitation Amendment FA485524R00040001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

This Amendment changes the due date from 09 Apr 2024 at 3:00 PM MT, to 16 Apr 2024 at Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

3:00 PM MT.

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters has been revised.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award has been revised.

Questions and Answers to this solicitation are attached to this Amendment as Attachment 0001AA.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 09 Apr 2024 16 Apr 2024

Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

C.1 BOA Execution Business Rules

1. General

a) A BOA is not a contract pursuant to FAR 16.703(a)(3). An order issued pursuant to a BOA will become a binding contract at the time of the Government's acceptance of an Order proposal and award of an Order.

i. For a general description of work anticipated under the BOA, see Attachment 01 - Statement of Work, Section 1.3 - Classifications of Work.

b) A BOA will be valid for up to five (5) years beginning on the effective date of the initial BOA execution IAW DFARS 216.703(c), the period during which an order may be placed against a BOA may not exceed five (5) years.

c) IAW FAR 16.703(c)(2), a BOA shall be reviewed annually before the anniversary of its effective date and revised as necessary to conform to the changing requirements of the FAR and other applicable statutes and regulations. BOAs shall be changed only by modifying the agreement itself and not by individual orders issued under it. Modifying a BOA shall not retroactively affect orders previously issued under it. The terms of the BOA may need to be revised before the annual review due to changes in mandatory requirements. Prior to the annual review, the Contracting Officer will notify the contractor in writing informing it of the review and confirming the contractor wishes to have its BOA renewed. As BOAs are not contracts, either the Government or the contractor may elect not to renew the BOA at the annual review. The Government reserves the right to cancel the BOA if doing so is considered to be in the Government's best interest.

d) The Government will review BOA performance and requirements on an annual basis IAW FAR 16.703(c)(2), and to determine the necessity of on-ramping new BOA holders. The Government reserves the right to announce and issue a new solicitation for the purposes of: (i) adding additional BOA holders to expeditiously meet an increase in requirements; (ii) increase the small business pool of contractors; and (iii) increase competition. The Government may implement on-ramping procedures at anytime and utilizing the same basis for award established in the initial BOA Invitation. Any resulting BOAs awarded will include the same terms and conditions as the current basic BOA. Implementing these procedures will not affect the overall period of performance for the basic agreement.

FA485524R00040001

e) The BOA includes the Government's right to implement off-ramping procedures, which would result in the removal of BOA holders. The criteria for off-ramping may included, but not limited to BOA holders not proposing on Task Order Proposal Requests (TOPR) without justification, and/or unsatisfactorily meeting order requirements. If implemented, off-ramp procedures would remove BOA holders by not exercising the agreement during the annual review process or cancelling the BOA.

f) Only Cannon AFB 27th Special Operations Contracting Squadron (27 SOCONS) is authorized to execute, modify, and undertake annual reviews of BOAs resulting from this solicitation and only Cannon AFB 27 SOCONS is authorized to issue Task Order Proposal Requests (TOPR) and execute and modify orders issued under the Cannon AFB BOA.

2. Task Order Proposal Requests (TOPR)

a) Orders will only be competed amongst contractors that receive a BOA during the BOA Invitation Phase. An offeror must be a qualified BOA holder at the time a TOPR is issued. The Government will confirm that an offeror is a qualified BOA holder by checking the effective date of an offerors' BOA. The Period of Performance for orders issued against the BOA will be established in each Order and are effective for up to five (5) years from the Order effective date.

i. Depending upon the magnitude of construction, the TOPR will be solicited as either full and open competition amongst all BOA Holders or as a specific small business set-aside.

ii. Any TOPR above $10,000,000 will be subject to FAR Part 15, Contract by Negotiations and source selection procedures.

iii. Payment and Performance Bonds and Certificates of Insurance will only be required at the TOPR level after award of an Order.

b) Offerors are not required to propose those subcontractors used to establish capability in the BOA Invitation Phase;

however, offerors shall propose themselves and/or subcontractors that can meet the evaluation criteria and successfully complete the requirements of each Order.

c) Specific evaluation criteria will be identified in the TOPR. Evaluation factors may include Technical, Past Performance, Cost/Price, and Small Business Participation. Order source selection may be executed based on: (i) evaluation of price only; (ii) lowest price, technically acceptable (LPTA); or, best value trade-off process.

d) A Statement of Work/Objectives specific to the order requirement and the associated Performance Requirements Summary will be provided at the order level, as applicable.

e) Pricing information will only be required at the order level. Orders will be Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP). The contractor shall adhere to the prices proposed and agreed to in each individual order issued against the BOA. The contractor is not authorized to begin work on an order issued against the BOA until prices have been established. In the event the Contracting Officer requires work to begin prior to the establishment of pricing, failure to reach agreement on price may be disputed under the Disputes clause.

f) Offerors will certify business size standards at the order level.

g) Responsibility determinations will be made during the TOPR process. An otherwise successful offeror may not be eligible for award if it cannot be determined responsible for any of the reasons in FAR 9.104.

h) Contracting Officers will issue orders in compliance with the terms and conditions of the BOA.

C.2 Small Business Provisions, Joint Ventures, and Subcontracting

1. Set-Asides

a) This BOA Invitation is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. The Government's intent is to award no less than twelve (12) and no more than twenty (20) BOAs, with no less than three (3) HUBZone businesses, three (3) Women-Owned Small Businesses, three (3) Section 8(a) businesses, and three (3) Service-Disable Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB). This does not limit the Government's ability to award more, but simply states the intent.

2. Size Standards

a) SBA's size eligibility standards are found in Title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 121 (13 CFR Part 121). In order to ensure that an offeror qualifies as an eligible small business, prospective offerors are encouraged to review this regulation in its entirety. 13 CFR 121.103 in particular may assist a prospective offeror in assessing whether affiliation could apply; a finding by the SBA of affiliation between entities may result in a determination that an offeror is other than a small business and therefore ineligible for the Small-Business Set-Aside (SBSA) order award. An offeror with questions regarding size eligibility standards should contact its legal counsel and/or SBA Office of Government Contractor personnel; 8(a) Program participants may consult the cognizant SBA Business Opportunity Specialist.

b) The SBA is the sole authority for making determinations of small business status for small business programs; such determinations are binding on the offeror and on the Contracting Officer.

c) Generally, SBA determines the size status of a concern (including affiliates) as of the date the concern submits a written self-certification that it is small to the procuring agency as part of its initial offer including price. This determination will be done at the order level (TOPR) and will apply for the term of the order, not to exceed five (5) years. For orders that exceed five

(5) years, FAR 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Representation applies.

d) Joint Ventures (JVs)

i. Due to the complexity and the wide range of capabilities required by the contracts that will be solicited for at the order level (TOPR), JVs may be utilized. A JV must be an approved BOA Holder in order to propose as a Prime Contractor on an TOPR, and the JV must comply with the applicable requirements of Title13 of the CFR (see Part 121.103(h), 124.513, 125.15, 126.616, and 127.506).

ii. Entities proposing as a JV are encouraged to specifically review 13 CFR 121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation?" Subparagraph (h) (Affiliation based on joint ventures) prior to submitting a proposal. 13 CFR 121.103 provides several examples that may assist a prospective offeror in assessing whether affiliation could be applied to its JV. NOTE: In accordance with 13 CFR 121.103, a JV of two (2) or more business concerns may submit an offer as a small business without regard to affiliation so long as each concern is small under the size standard for NAICS 236220. In order for this affiliation exception to apply, however, the following conditions must be met: there must be a written JV agreement, the JV must do business under its own name and be identified in the System for Award Management (SAM), and the JV must not have been awarded more than three (3) contracts within a two (2) year period from the date of award of the first contract (i.e., as of the date that it submits an initial offer that leads to the award of a contract, the JV must not have been awarded any more than two (2) contracts in the previous two (2) years). As part of its BOA proposal during the BOA Invitation, a JV offeror will be required to submit a copy of its written JV agreement.

e) Subcontracting Arrangements

i. Offerors proposing subcontracting arrangements at the order level (TOPR) are encouraged to specifically review 13 CFR121.103, "How Does SBA Determine Affiliation?" subparagraph (h)(4) prior to submitting a proposal. A finding by the SBA of affiliation between an offeror and its subcontractor(s) may result in a determination that the offeror is other than a small business and therefore ineligible for the SBSA order award.

ii. For SBSA solicitations, offerors proposing subcontracting arrangements at the order level (TOPR) may be required to explain which of its subcontractors are similarly situated subcontractors pursuant to the definition provided in 13 CFR 125.1 for purposes of determining whether the arrangement includes the use of any ostensible subcontractors and thus treated as a JV and the entities are considered affiliated.

iii. There is no restriction on the number of JVs or subcontracting opportunities that an offeror may participate in.

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)

L.1 General Instructions

1. These instructions are a guide for preparing a proposal. These instructions describe the type and extent of information required, and they emphasize the significant areas to be addressed in the proposal. Review the Statement of Work (Attachment02) contained in this Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) Invitation for further insight into the areas that shall be addressed within the proposal. Include sufficient information to enable the Government evaluators to make a determination relative to the Offeror's understanding of the requirements in each of the evaluated areas.

1.1. It is the Government's intent to execute BOAs to Offerors who are qualified by receiving an Acceptable rating for Technical and Past Performance.

1.2. Cost/Price evaluations will not be performed at the BOA Invitation level.

2. The Government intends to execute BOAs based upon the content of initial proposals and without interchanges with Offerors after receipt of those initial proposals; as such, an Offeror's initial proposal should contain sufficient information to satisfy the technical requirements.

2.1. Offerors are cautioned to examine this solicitation in its entirety to ensure that its proposal contains all necessary information, provides all required documentation, and is complete in all respects.

2.2. The Government is not obligated to make another request for the required information nor does the Government assume the duty to search for data or to cure problems it finds in proposals.

3. The Government reserves the right to enter into interchanges with Offerors whose proposals are determined to be technically unacceptable, if it is in the Government's best interest to do so.

3.1. If interchanges are determined to be in the Government's best interest, the Government will only enter into interchanges with those Offerors whose proposals do not contain significant informational deficiencies.

3.2. Debriefing of Unsuccessful BOA awardees: It should be best practice to conduct a debriefing with any excluded offeror. 41 U.S.C. 3705(a) states that the relevant offeror may request in writing, within three (3) days after the date on which the excluded offeror receives notice of its exclusion, a debriefing prior to award; however, it is not required IAW FAR 16.703.

4. The BOA Invitation Process (both the evaluation of proposals and the placement of BOAs)is not a source selection process; as such, the source selection policies and procedures of FAR subpart 15.3 do not apply.

5. An Offerors' proposal shall be valid for 60 calendar days from the required submission date.

6. Late proposals will not be accepted. A proposal is considered late if it is not received prior to the submission due date and time.

7. For the purposes of this BOA Invitation:

7.1. An Offeror is defined as the prime contractor or Joint Venture (JV) that proposes an organizational capability for consideration for an executed

BOA.

7.2. A JV is defined as a team of two or more firms that have entered into a legally binding JV agreement. A firm proposing as a JV will be referred to as the Offeror.

8. Updates to the solicitation, to include amendments, notices, and other information will be made available on the Contract Opportunities section of the SAM.gov website. Offerors are advised to continuously monitor the SAM.gov website for new information. Offerors are deemed to have knowledge of all information that is posted to the SAM.gov website.

L.2 Proposal Preparation

1. The proposal shall be prepared in a clear, legible, practical manner. In addition, the Offeror shall write the proposal in English and shall be complete as described in these instructions. Failure to provide a proposal in compliance with the instructions specified as a Compliance Requirement of this BOA Invitation shall render the Offeror's proposal non-compliant. A proposal that has been determined non-compliant will not be evaluated and shall not be considered for receipt of an executed BOA. The Government is not obligated to engage in any exchanges with an Offeror who fails to provide all the required documents for evaluation.

2. No classified material shall appear anywhere in the proposal.

3. The Offeror must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE)Code at the time of proposal submission.

4. The Offeror shall not lock or password protect any file included in the proposal. Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) Files, where requested and required pursuant to the provisions of this BOA Invitation must be legible, must be viewable in Adobe Acrobat, and must be formatted to contain searchable text. a) All narrative elements of the proposal must be able to be searched for text. The Government will not accept scanned or image-only PDF files.

5. Compressed files (e.g. *.zip) and Executable files (e.g. *.bat, *.exe, *.jar, *.vb, *.wsf)WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

6. All File Formats shall be in Adobe PDF or MS Word (saved to .docx).

L.3 Proposal Submittal Instructions

1. Electronic responses shall be submitted to corey.isaacs.1@us.af.mil and bryton.lawson@us.af.mil and must be received in the email inbox of these personnel prior to the submission due date and time to be considered timely.

2. An Offeror may revise their submittal if the revision is received in the email inbox of the personnel listed in paragraph 1of this section prior to the submission due date and time. No revisions will be accepted after the due date and time for submission.

3. Do not assume submission will be instantaneous. File size and number of files to be uploaded will be factors to consider. Offerors should allow adequate time for submission completion because the entire proposal must be received by the due date and time for the proposal to be considered timely.

3.1 An Offeror may request a DoD Safe Upload link from the personnel listed in paragraph 1 of this section. The proposal must be uploaded and received prior to the submission due date and time to be considered timely.

4. To avoid rejection of an offer, the Offeror shall make every effort to ensure its electronic submission is virus free. Submissions or portions thereof submitted and which the automatic system detects the presence of a virus, or which are otherwise unreadable will be treated as unreadable pursuant to FAR 15.207(c).

L.4 Proposal Structure

1. The Offeror shall submit only one (1) proposal and that proposal shall address all the requirements of the BOA Invitation.

2. To be considered for this BOA, the Offeror must submit a complete response to this BOA Invitation using the instructions provided. If the Offerors' proposal fails to meet the terms and conditions of the BOA Invitation or takes exception to any of the terms and conditions of the BOA Invitation, the Offerors' proposal will not be acceptable, will not be evaluated, and will not be considered for execution of a BOA.

L.5Information to be Submitted: General Documents, Technical Capability Statement, and Past Performance

1. The Offeror shall include the following:General Documents.

1.1. , Solicitation, Offer and Award. One (1) executed signed copy of the BOA Invitation Cover sheet.Form SF1442

1.1.1 Required File Name: OfferorName_SF1442

1.1.2 File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

1.2. ,Required File Name: OfferorName_SF30_Amend# (e.g., OfferorName_SF30_Amend1) Amendment of SolicitationForm SF 30 /Modification of Contract. One (1) executed signed copy of all amendments issued, if applicable. Offerors may acknowledge Amendments (if applicable) on the SF1442.

1.3. Required File Name: Offerors Name_JV Joint Venture (JV) Information

NOTE: (if an Offeror is not proposing a JV, the following is not required). In order for the Government to review the JV partnership, the Offeror shall submit the following information):

1.3.1. A signed legal JV agreement prepared by an attorney, which clearly explains the responsibilities of each party to the JV agreement. in addition, the agreement shall clearly explain the formation of the JV and procedures for acceptance of product and payment. The JV agreement shall clearly identify the team lead company and the team lead company's point of contact, as well as their responsibilities explained in detail. In addition, company names, POCs, business size, number of employees (including all affiliates), and description of work to be performed by members of the JV shall be provided as part of the JV agreement.

1.3.2. Any updates to the JV agreement shall be submitted to corey.isaacs.1@us.af.mil within seven(7) calendar days after the JV agreement is signed.

1.3.3. A signed copy of any other agreements, either formal or informal, that identify the roles and responsibilities of each business concern in the JV.

1.3.4. If other than a small business concern is part of the JV, a copy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) approved SBA Mentor- Protege Agreement. The Offeror should be aware of the SBAs regulations regarding affiliations to determine business size.

1.3.5. Affiliation regulations are especially important for determining the size of JVs.

1.3.6. Required File Name: OfferorsName_JV

1.3.7. File Format: Adobe PDF or MS Word

2. Technical Capability Statement (TCS). Required File Name: OfferorName_TCS :

2.1. The Offeror shall provide a TCS that identifies the Offeror's core competencies, demonstrates how those cited core competencies relate to the construction efforts at Cannon AFB, and the ability to create a dynamic organization fully capable of supporting the Government's requirements by applying those core competencies. In order to demonstrate its technical capability, the Offeror must specifically address Team Identification / Self- Performance, Resource /Order Management, Bonding Capacity, Corporate Organizational Structure, Management Plan and Flexible Staffing Approach:

2.1.1. The Offerors shall provide a TCS that describes in detail its process for analysis and Team Identification / Self-Performance.

application of cited core competencies and previous experience which allow the Offeror to properly determine construction tasks it can self-perform without the use of subcontractors and a process for maintaining its subcontractors.

2.1.1.1. If an Offeror is citing the core competencies and previous experience of a parent or affiliate company as part of the identification of its own core competencies and previous experience, the Offeror shall explain how the resources of the parent company will be utilized in performance of the proposed effort.

2.1.1.2. The Offeror must identify its process for identifying, vetting, partnering, and leading subcontractors, as well as the Offeror's process for replacing and adding subcontractors, if necessary, due to non-performance or operational changes to the effort.

2.1.2. The Offerors shall provide a TCS that describes in detail the methods that it will employ to manage Resource / Order Management.

future order requirements from time of award to completion of the effort. In describing its resource / order management, the Offeror must provide, at a minimum:

2.1.2.1. The Offeror's approach for planning, allocating, and controlling resources and costs for awarded orders.

2.1.2.2. The Offeror's process for scheduling, budgeting, and accumulating expenditures(hours and dollars), identifying expenditures and schedule problems, and tracking individual order performance.

2.1.2.3. The Offeror's process for timely incorporation of subcontractor technical, schedule, and financial performance data into the Offeror's reports for individual orders. The format of the reports will be discussed at the TOPR level.

2.1.2.4. The Offeror's approach to ensuring proper training, licensing, certifications, and safety measures for the execution of awarded orders.

2.1.2.5. Start-Up Approach. The Offeror shall provide a TCS that describes the Offeror's generalized approach to providing seamless start-up processes that ensures all necessary personnel and subcontractors are in place for execution of future orders.

2.1.2.5.1. Include discussions of hiring actions to include preemployment drug screening, qualification verification, and requisition/issuance of access badges that will ensure timely execution of newly awarded orders and no impact to current operations.

2.1.3. The Offeror shall submit a prequalification letter from an A.M. Best "A" rated surety (not a bonding agent), that the Bonding Capacity:

Offeror is eligible to be bonded and what the single and aggregate bonding amounts for the Offeror are.

2.1.3.1. The minimum single bonding amount is $4,000,000 and the minimum aggregate bonding amount is $10,000,000.

2.1.3.2. For information regarding the SBA's Surety Bond Program, please visit https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/surety-bonds.

2.1.4. The Offeror shall provide a corporate organizational structure narrative (which can include tables Corporate Organizational Structure:

and diagrams) that demonstrates a comprehensive, realistic, and feasible organizational overview based on the following:

2.1.4.1. Identification of the command-and-control relationships within the Offeror's organization.

2.1.4.2. Demonstration of the command-and-control relationship must include identification of key positions identified in the SoW, as well as overseeing the execution of the overall effort. Management positions must indicate responsibility/role in responding to issues that may arise during execution of the effort per Section4 - Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.

2.1.5. The Offeror shall provide a management plan that details the Home Office Management and Support for orders per Management Plan.

Section 4 - Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.

2.1.5.1 Provide resumes for each of the following key personnel which demonstrates proper licenses, certifications, and experience per Section 4 - Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.

2.1.4.3.1.1.Program/Project Manager(s)

2.1.4.3.1.2. Quality Control Manager(s)

2.1.4.3.1.3. Site Safety and Health Manager(s)

2.1.4.3.1.4. Design Program/Project Manager(s)

2.1.4.3.1.5 Project Superintendent(s)

2.1.6. The Offeror shall provide a TCS that describes in detail the Offeror's approach to effectively and efficiently Flexible Staffing Approach.

support short- and long-term fluctuations in effort (increase/decrease). in describing its flexible staffing approach, the Offeror should address each of the following:

2.1.6.1. An effective and efficient approach to making use of existing staffing and Cross-Utilization/ Temporary Reallocation:

subcontractors to better support short-term requirement changes; provide better and more timely support; and, reduce costs through more efficient staffing. Cross-utilization should address an approach to ensuring safety, training, and certification requirements are met in a manner that would not impact quality of effort.

2.1.6.2. An effective and efficient approach to rapidly increase staffing and/or subcontracting capability during surges in Rapid Increase:

effort, for both short- and long-term increases in workload, where cross-utilization or temporary reallocation is not appropriate.

2.1.6.3. An effective and efficient approach to reduce staffing levels commensurate with decreased Responsible Reduction in Staffing:

requirements during periods of protracted reductions in workload while also ensuring retention of qualified employees.

L.6 Past Performance

1. Experience/Past Performance (Required File Name: OfferorName_Experience_Matrix)

1.1. The Offeror must provide its recent and relevant experience, as Experience/Past Performance Matrix.

a measure of the likelihood to ensure proper execution of any orders awarded under this BOA.

1.2. Experience shall be provided on the Experience Matrix (Attachment 07). The Government does not require additional documentation for experience other than a completed Experience Matrix. Additional documentation, if submitted, may not be evaluated by the Government.

2. Offerors shall identify no more than five (5) recent and relevant construction projects performed within three

(3) years of the release of this solicitation, with at least one (1) of the references submitted must have been performed by the Offeror and at least one (1) must contain a design element.

2.1. Recent is defined as a measure of time that has elapsed since the contract reference occurred. For the purpose of this requirement, recent is any contract under which any performance, delivery, or corrective action has occurred within three (3) years of the release of this solicitation.

2.3. Relevant is defined as similar in scope and complexity to this effort which are defined as follows:

2.3.1. Scope: For the purpose of this BOA, contractors shall submit general construction projects that involved multiple construction disciplines such as excavation, HVAC, plumbing, fire suppression, renovations, new contraction, flooring, masonry, etc. Design capability is of utmost importance to the Government.

2.3.2. Complexity: Two or more simultaneous construction projects that effectively utilized the same functional areas (electrical, mechanical, design, structural, fire protection, etc.) and resources.

2.4. If the Offeror is relying upon a reference from its parent or an affiliate company to satisfy this requirement, the Offeror must explain how the resources of the parent or affiliate company will be utilized in performance of this proposed effort.

2.5. If the contract referenced was performed by a company other than the Offeror (i.e., the company has a CAGE code different than the Offeror's CAGE code, whether it is a parent company, an affiliate, or a company being proposed as a subcontractor), the Offeror's authorized agents hall provide their signature certifying that the other entity granted the Offeror permission to submit the contract reference information as part of the Offeror's Experience Matrix.

2.6. The Government will further review offerors through the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

2.6.1. Offerors are encouraged to review their CPARS through https://www.cpars.gov/ to ensure the information has been reported accurately or identify any missing CPARS not showing for the 2023 / 2024 reporting periods.

FA485524R00040001

https://www.cpars.gov/

2.6.2. The BOA evaluation order of importance for CPARS ratings are: Technical/Quality of Product or Service; Schedule/Timeliness; and Management or Business Relations.

2.6.3.The past performance factor focuses on the quality of the work performed. Offerors without a record of relevant past performance will receive a neutral rating.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Evaluation Criteria M.1 Evaluation: The Government will execute a BOA with an Offeror whose proposal complies with the BOA Invitation requirements and is determined their overall proposal conforms to the instructions in Section L.

1. M.2 General Documents Evaluation:

1.1. Did the offeror provide a completed/ signed SF1442.

1.2. Did the offeror acknowledge amendments on the SF1442 or provide a completed SF30 (if applicable).

1.3. Did the offeror provide their completed Joint Venture Information (if applicable).

Rating Criteria: Technical acceptable or Not Technically Acceptable

2. M.3 Technical Factors

FACTOR1: Technical Capability Statement (TCS) Required File Name: OfferorName_TCS

2.1. SUBFACTOR-1: Team Identification / Self-Performance.

2.1.1. Must describe analysis and application of cited core competencies and previous experience it can self-perform without the use of subcontractors and a process for maintaining its subcontractors.

2.1.2. If an Offeror is citing the core competencies and previous experience of a parent or affiliate company as part of the identification of its own core competencies and previous experience, did the offeror explain how the resources of the parent company will be utilized in performance of the proposed effort.

2.1.3. Did the offeror identify its process for identifying, vetting, partnering, and leading subcontractors, as well as the Offeror's process for replacing and adding subcontractors, if necessary, due to non-performance or operational changes to the effort.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

2.2. SUBFACTOR-2: Resource/ Order Management.

2.2.1.Did the offeror describes in detail the methods that it will employ to manage future order requirements from time of award to completion of the effort.

2.2.2. Did the offeror show an approach for planning, allocating, and controlling resources and costs for awarded orders.

2.2.3. Did the offeror show a process for scheduling, budgeting, and accumulating expenditures (hours and dollars), identifying expenditures and schedule problems, and tracking individual order performance.

2.2.4. Did the offeror show a process for timely incorporation of subcontractor technical, schedule, and financial performance data into the reports for individual orders.

2.2.5. Did the offeror show an approach to ensuring proper training, licensing, certifications, and safety measures for the execution of awarded orders.

2.2.6. Did the offeror show a Start-Up Approach. The Offeror shall provide a TCS that describes the Offeror's generalized approach to providing seamless start-up processes that ensures all necessary personnel and subcontractors are in place for execution of future orders.

2.2.6.1. In the Start-Up Approach, did the offeror outline hiring actions to include pre-employment drug screening, qualification verification, and requisition/issuance of access badges that will ensure timely execution of newly awarded orders and no impact to current operations.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

2.3. SUBFACTOR-3: Bonding Capacity.

2.3.1. Did the offeror submit a prequalification letter from an A.M. Best "A" rated surety (not a bonding agent), that the Offeror is eligible to be bonded and what the single and aggregate bonding amounts for the Offeror are.

2.3.2. Is the minimum single bonding amount $4,000,000 and the minimum aggregate bonding amount $10,000,000.

2.3.3. Did the offeror submit (as applicable) information regarding the SBA's Surety Bond Program, please visit https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/surety-bonds.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

2.4. SUBFACTOR-4: Corporate Organizational Structure Narrative

2.4.1. Did the offeror provide a Corporate Organizational Structure Narrative (which can include tables and diagrams) that demonstrates a comprehensive, realistic, and feasible organizational overview based on the following:

2.4.2. Within the Corporate Organizational Structure Narrative did the offeror Identify the command-and-control relationships within the Offeror's organization.

2.4.3 Within the Corporate Organizational Structure Narrative did the offeror demonstrate the command-and-control relationship must include identification of key positions identified in the SoW, as well as overseeing the execution of the overall effort. Management positions must indicate responsibility/role in responding to issues that may arise during execution of the effort per Section 4 - Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

2.5. SUBFACTOR-5: Management Plan

2.5.1. Did the offeror provide a Management Plan. The Offeror shall provide a management plan that details the Home Office Management and Support for orders per Section 4 -Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work.

2.5.2. Does the Management Plan have the required resumes for each of the following key personnel which demonstrates proper licenses, certifications, and experience per Section 4 - Management Plan of Attachment 01 - Statement of Work:

2.5.2.1. Program/Project Manager(s)

2.5.2.2. Quality Control Manager(s)

2.5.2.3 Site Safety and Health Manager(s)

2.5.2.4. Design Program/Project Manager(s)

2.5.2.5. Project Superintendent(s)

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

2.6. SUBFACTOR 6: Flexible Staffing Approach.

2.6.1. The Offeror shall provide a TCS that describes in detail the Offeror's approach to effectively and efficiently support short- and long-term fluctuations in effort(increase/decrease). in describing its flexible staffing approach, the Offeror should address each of the following:

2.6.1.1. Within the did the offeror show a An effective and efficient Flexible Staffing Approach Cross-Utilization/ Temporary Reallocation:

approach to making use of existing staffing and subcontractors to better support short-term requirement changes; provide better and more timely support; and, reduce costs through more efficient staffing. Cross-utilization should address an approach to ensuring safety, training, and certification requirements are met in a manner that would not impact quality of effort.

2.6.1.2. Within the did the offeror show a An effective and efficient approach to rapidly increase Flexible Staffing Approach Rapid Increase:

staffing and/or subcontracting capability during surges in effort, for both short- and long-term increases in workload, where cross-utilization or temporary reallocation is not appropriate.

2.6.1.3. Within the did the offeror show a An effective and efficient Flexible Staffing Approach Responsible Reduction in Staffing:

approach to reduce staffing levels commensurate with decreased requirements during periods of protracted reductions in workload while also ensuring retention of qualified employees.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

M.4 Past Performance

FACTOR 2: (Required File Name: OfferorName_Experience_Matrix)Experience/Past Performance

3.1. SUBFACTOR-1:Experience Matrix

3.1.1. Did the offeror provide past performance on the Experience Matrix (Attachment 07).

3.1.2. Did the Experience Matrix identify recent and relevant construction projects performed within three (3) years of the release of this solicitation. Did the offeror identify at least one (1) of the references submitted with a design element.

3.1.3. Did the offeror show two or more simultaneous construction projects that effectively utilized the same functional areas (electrical, mechanical, design, structural, fire protection, etc.) and resources.

3.1.4. If the contract referenced was performed by a company other than the Offeror (i.e., the company has a CAGE code different than the Offeror's CAGE code, whether it is a parent company, an affiliate, or a company being proposed as a subcontractor), did the offeror show an authorized agent signature certifying that the other entity granted the Offeror permission to submit the contract reference information as part of the Offeror's Experience Matrix.

3.1.5. Points of contacts listed on the Experience Matrix will be contacted. Information gathered will supplement the technical acceptability rating.

Rating: Technically Acceptable / Not Technically Acceptable

3.2. SUBFACTOR-2: Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS):

3.2.1. The order of importance for CPARS factors are Technical/Quality of Product or Service; Schedule/Timeliness; and Management or Business Relations.

3.2.2. All offerors found Technically acceptable in the General Documents Evaluation, FACTOR 1: Technical Capability Statement (TCS), and FACTOR 2: Experience/Past Performance will be scored for CPARS.

3.2.3. CPARS reports on a rating scale from UNSATISFACTORY, MARGINAL, SATISFACTORY, VERYGOOD, and EXCEPTIONAL.

3.2.4. Contractors are rated in seven areas: Technical/Quality of Product or Service; Cost Control; Schedule/Timeliness; Management or Business Relations; Small Business Subcontracting; Regulatory Compliance; and Other.

3.2.5. The Government will review offerors CPARS reports for 2023 / 2024 and apply points only from the areas of Technical/Quality of Product or Service; Schedule/Timeliness; and Management or Business Relations.

3.2.6. The following point system will be applied to CPARS for the purpose of evaluation:

3.2.6.1. No performance record: Neutral = 0 Points

3.2.6.2. UNSATISFACTORY: Quality (-) 30, Schedule (-) 30, and Management (-) 30

3.2.6.3. MARGINAL: Quality (-) 20, Schedule (-) 20, and Management (-) 20

3.2.6.4 SATISFACTORY: Quality 10, Schedule 10, and Management 10

3.2.6.5. VERY GOOD: Quality 20, Schedule 20, and Management 20

3.2.6.6. EXCEPTIONAL: Quality 30, Schedule 30, and Management 30

Rating: Point System

110 E ALISON AVE BLDG 600, CP 575 785 2321

CANNON AFB, NM 88103-5321

UNITED STATES

COREY ISAACS, Email: corey.isaacs.1@us.af.mil Telephone: (575) 784-4243 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: