VanceRFPPastPerformanceQuestionsandResponses6Mar07PP.rtf

FA3002-06-R-0003

122 Past Performance Section L 1.12 Discussion Question Section L., paragraph 1.12 instructs that pages should be one and one half spaced. Does that requirement extend to responses on Government Attachments that we complete, such as Attachment 8?

Response Spacing on Government-provided attachments need not comply with the one and one half spacing requirement.

Discussion This section says that offerors may discuss efforts to resolve problems on prior contracts, but Section 4.1, Contents, does not provide direction for where in the Past Performance Volume offerors are to include this discussion.

Question Please clarify whether responses to Resolution of Problems should be addressed in the individual Past Performance Information Sheets or as a separate section within the Past Performance Volume.

Response Offerors should address Resolution of Problems (if applicable) within the Past Performance Volume. Create a separate tab within the volume, if required.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 Page 1 of2

Discussion This Item requires discussion of the cited contract’s relevance to Mission Capability Subfactor 4, Small Business Subcontracting Plan and SDB Participation Targets. This would appear to duplicate the information requested in Items J and K.

Question Please clarify the distinction among each of the requirements:Item H., response to Subfactor 4Item J., Compliance with Utilization of Small Business ConcernsItem K., Subcontracting Plan requirements Response Item H deals with the contractor's assessment of past performance relevancy to the Mission Capability subfactors. Item J deals with the utilization of small business concerns on the described contract. Item K pertains to whether or not the offeror met subcontracting goals on the described contract.

Discussion Requirement: “For Government contracts, provide current information on all three individuals.” However, the format of the Past Performance Information Sheet only appears to require two points of contact (although three may be provided if one were to exercise the option to include the QA person and the Site Manager):1 Quality Assurance Person and/or Site Manager2 Administrative Contracting Officer.

Question Please clarify the number and titles of the customer points of contact required.

Response Two points of contact are sufficient. The RFP will be amended to reflect this change.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007 Page 2 of 2