05Pre-ProposalConference-PastPerformance.ppt
PPT presentation 209 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vance AFB Aircraft Maintenance and Base Operating Support (BOS) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-06-R-0003
About this file
Past Performance
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Vance AFB Aircraft Maintenance and Base Operating Support (BOS) Services has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Develop America's Airmen Today ... for Tomorrow
Air Education and Training Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Past Performance Aircraft Maintenance and Base Operating Support 71st Flying Training Wing Vance AFB OK Capt Rebecca Welton
AETC CONS/LGCK
28 February 2007
Past Performance Information Sheets
| Provide on self and all partners or subcontractors proposed to perform any part of effort critical to overall success of the program |
| Submit information on contracts considered most relevant in demonstrating ability to perform proposed effort |
Past Performance Evaluation
| Government will use data obtained from offeror and other sources |
| Conduct in-depth review and evaluation of all performance data obtained |
| Review aspects of offeror's recent and relevant present and past performance |
| Determine how closely work performed under those efforts relates to current requirement |
| Focus on performance relevant to Mission Capability subfactors, the SDS, and the cost/price factor |
Performance Confidence Assessment
| Represents evaluation of offeror's present and past work record |
| Evaluate the offeror's demonstrated record of contract compliance in providing services that meet user's needs, including price and schedule |
| Assess Government's confidence in offeror's probability of successfully performing as proposed |
Recency & Relevancy
| Recency: |
| Contracts performed during the three (3) years from the date of the issuance of this solicitation |
| Relevancy: |
| Consider effort or portion of effort performed by offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract reviewed and evaluated |
| For prime contractors |
| Higher relevancy will be assessed for contracts that are most similar to the effort (i.e. actual aircraft maintenance or BOS contracts) |
| For proposed subcontractors |
| Higher relevancy will be assessed for contracts that are most similar to the portions of effort for which subcontractor being proposed |
| May contribute to overall higher relevancy score for offeror |
| Government not bound by offeror's opinion of relevancy |
Past Performance Relevancy
| Very Relevant | Past/present performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Relevant | Past/present performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Somewhat Relevant | Past/present performance effort involved some of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Not Relevant | Past/present performance effort did not involve any of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires |
Performance Problems
| When relevant performance record indicates performance problems |
| Consider number and severity of problems and appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised) |
| Review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions implemented and evaluate effectiveness |
| Offerors will be notified of any adverse past performance information and given opportunity to respond |
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .