FA3002-06-R-0003 Atch7.doc
DOC document 115 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vance AFB Aircraft Maintenance and Base Operating Support (BOS) Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3002-06-R-0003
About this file
FA3002-06-R-0003 Atch 7
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Vance AFB Aircraft Maintenance and Base Operating Support (BOS) Services has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA3002-06-R-0003
12 Feb 07
Attachment 7
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the Air Education and Training Command, Randolph AFB, TX. Any comments you could provide regarding the past performance of the contractor providing this form would be greatly appreciated. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 15.1004) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about an offeror’s past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, please do not divulge the name of the contractor nor discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.
The completed questionnaire should be e-mailed to Rebecca.jackson@randolph.af.mil. Email is preferred, but if you do not have access to email, you may fax your reply to the attention of Capt Jackson at 210-652-3445, or DSN 487-3445, or mail to:
Capt Rebecca Jackson
AETC CONS/LGCK
2021 First Street West
Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4302
If receipt of your email or fax is not acknowledged, please call Capt Jackson at 210-652-3073 or DSN 487-3073. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. We appreciate your help. Your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of the source selection.
Project Information:
1. Contractor (Prime/Sub): ______________________________________________________
2. Project Title / Contract Number: _______________________________________________
3. Description of Functions Performed by this Firm: _________________________________
Evaluator:
(The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential)
1. Name: _____________________________ Date: ____________________________
2. Phone Number: ______________________ Fax Number: ______________________
3. Address: ______________________________________________________________
4. Position held or function in relation to the project: _____________________________
CONFIDENCE RATINGS
Please answer the following questions about the contractor's previous or ongoing contracts. We will use the answers to assign a confidence assessment rating. To assist you, we are enclosing the past performance rating definitions. Please assign a performance rating of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory or Not Applicable for each question by circling the appropriate rating. We encourage you to provide a detailed narrative to support your ratings. We will keep the rater's name confidential.
Following are confidence ratings we would like you to assign to each question below:
| Rating |
| Rating Symbol |
| Definition |
| Exceptional/High Confidence |
| EXC |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Satisfactory/Confidence |
| SAT |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Marginal |
| MAR |
| Unsatisfactory/No Confidence |
| UNSAT |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral/Unknown Confidence |
| N/A |
| No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii) and (iv)). |
1. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
| a. |
| Effectiveness of contractor’s program/contract manager |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| b. |
| Effectiveness of corporate management involvement |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| c. |
| Effectiveness of contractor’s quality control program |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| d. |
| Quality of contractor’s performance |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| e. |
| Subcontractor’s quality of work |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| f. |
| Knowledge of key personnel in relationship to contract requirements |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| g. |
| Preparation and accuracy of reports |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| h. |
| Management of personnel training |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| i. |
| Conformance to contract requirements |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| j. |
| Contractor’s timely completion of contractual requirements |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| k. |
| Contractor’s performance within costs established in the contract |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| l. |
| Contractor’s effectiveness in reducing costs |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| m. |
| Reasonableness of costs proposed for modifications |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| n. |
| Contractor’s invoices are current and accurate |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| o. |
| Contractor’s financial stability during contract performance |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
Comments:
2. WORKFORCE
| a. |
| Ability to hire/train qualified personnel |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| b. |
| Adequacy of skill mix of employees |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| c. |
| Retention of employees and key personnel |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| d. |
| Management relationship with union |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| e. |
| Ability to refill vacant positions |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| f. |
| Manning to successfully meet PWS requirements |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
3. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
| a. |
| Customer satisfaction with services performed |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| b. |
| Contractor’s responsiveness in making adjustments to schedules or services to meet the needs of the government |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| c. |
| Contractor’s timely submission of reports |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| d. |
| Contractor’s response to modification requests |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| e. |
| Conformance to contract requirements (e.g. contract specific clauses and requirements) |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
4. MOBILIZATION AND CHANGEOVER
a.
| Success of mobilization/changeover |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| b. |
| Compliance with transition plan milestones |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| c. |
| Uninterrupted service to the government during mobilization/changeover |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| d. |
| Timely submission of required plans |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| e. |
| Timely completion of required inventories |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| f. |
| Success in hiring/training workforce |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
5. BUSINESS RELATIONS/SUBCONTRACTING
a.
| Cooperation with government in resolving problems |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| b. |
| Working relationship with technical personnel |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| c. |
| Relationship with contracting officer |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| d. |
| Relationship with subcontractors |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| e. |
| Tenacity and innovation in resolving problems |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| f. |
| Compliance with terms of its proposal |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
| g. |
| Achievements of small business subcontracting goals |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
6. GENERAL
a.
| Was the contractor issued any cure notices? |
| YES |
| NO |
| If yes, what were the circumstances? |
| b. |
| Were any show cause notices issued? |
| YES |
| NO |
| If yes, how many? What were the circumstances? |
| c. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? |
| YES |
| NO |
| If no, please state reasons for not recommending this contractor additional work. |
| d. |
| Based on all of this information, how would you rate the contractor’s performance? |
| EXC |
| VG |
| SAT |
| MAR |
| UNSAT |
| N/A |
7. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
We are attaching a summary description of the Vance AFB aircraft maintenance and base operating support functions that are provided in this solicitation. Please indicate the areas covered by your contract by marking them below:
· Aircraft maintenance for Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT)
· Flightline aircraft maintenance support/Sortie Generation (on- and off- equipment maintenance) for 209 (T-1, T-6, T-37 and T-38C) aircraft flying 93,000 hours and 64,000 sorties annually. These services also include flight-line support services, such as, aircraft ground handling, launch, recover, inspect, and repair all unit assigned aircraft, engines, and associated mission support equipment to include inputs into the Air Force’s management information systems (Core Automated Maintenance System (CAMS)). In addition, the service provider shall order all parts through the base supply or the Contractor Operated and Managed Base Supply (COMBS).
· Services include (Back-shop) maintenance. Including; engines, avionics, electrical-environmental, fuel systems, egress (aircraft ejection seat), hydraulics, aerospace ground equipment maintenance, and fabrication shops (sheet metal, machine, welding (aviation), Non Destructive Inspection (NDI) and chute (fabrication, repair, rigging, and packing of pilot life sustaining equipment).
· Services include a Regional Paint and Plastic Media Blasting (PMB) facilities supporting over 90 aircraft per year from four different locations.
· Services include intermediate level J69 and J85 engine maintenance supporting
· Services include off-station aircraft repair for T-1, T-6, T-37 and T-38.
· Services include providing Transient Alert service for visiting aircraft
· Support includes a Munitions Storage Area to receive, maintain, inspect, store, and account for munitions
· Services include calibration and certification of avionics test equipment by operating the Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory (PMEL)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .