Pre-proposalConfBrief 2 Apr 09.pdf

PDF 682 KB Posted

Attached to
Innovation, Integration, and Information (3IS) Support Contract Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2550-08-R-8009(RFP)
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Innovation, Integration, and Information (3IS) Support Contract, newest first.
File Type Posted
AttachL-5_Sample_Cover_Letter_for_Questonnaires.doc DOC document
FinalRFP-30Mar09.pdf PDF
Atch2 - DD 254.doc DOC document
MASTER RSVP LIST_1.xls XLS spreadsheet
3IS_Sect_C_PWS 24Mar09-1.pdf PDF
AttachL-3_Present_Past_Perf_Info_ Rel_Matrix.xls XLS spreadsheet
CDRLS-DIDS_16Mar09.pdf PDF
AttachL-6_Sample_Consent_Letter.doc DOC document
3ISQuestionsAnswers_24Mar09.xls XLS spreadsheet
AttachL-4_PPQ.docm DOCM document
AttachL-1_StaffTable.xls XLS spreadsheet
AttachL-2_Position_Description_Format.doc DOC document
AttachL-7_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter.doc DOC document
Final_RFP_Cover_Ltr_Signed.pdf PDF
PPQ_Subs.docx DOCX document
3ISQuestionsAnswers_20Apr09.xls XLS spreadsheet
3ISQuestionsAnswers_15Apr09.xls XLS spreadsheet
3ISQuestionsAnswers_14Apr09.xls XLS spreadsheet
3ISQuestionsAnswers_7Apr09.xls XLS spreadsheet
3IS Amendment01.pdf PDF
3IS_Sect_C_PWS7Apr09v1.docx DOCX document
AttachL-4_PPQ.docm DOCM document
3ISRFP_Amend_Synopsis.docx DOCX document
3IS Pre-Proposal Conf Attendees 3 Apr 09.pdf PDF
3IS_Sect_C_PWS3Apr09v1.docx DOCX document
FinalRFP-3Apr09.rtf RTF text file
FinalRFP-3Apr09.pdf PDF
AttachL-2_Position_Description_Format.doc DOC document
3ISQuestionsAnswers_3Apr09.xls XLS spreadsheet
FinalRFP-30Mar09.rtf RTF text file
AttachL-5_Sample_Cover_Letter_for_Questonnaires31Mar09.doc DOC document
AttachL-7_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter_31Mar09.doc DOC document
Atch2 - DD 254 30 Mar 09.doc DOC document
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Innovation, Integration, and Information Support (3IS)

Solicitation No.

FA2550-08-R-8009

Pre-Proposal Conference 3 Apr 09

Stacy Reed F R. Schnell

Contracting Officer Program Manager

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2

Overview

Contract Type

Contract Line Items (CLINS)

Budgeting/Finance

Period of Performance

Proposal Delivery

Evaluation Factors and Subfactors

Additional Information

Questions

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3

Contract Type

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)

ODC CLINS will be Cost Reimbursement (CR)

All other CLINS will be CPFF

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts are covered in

FAR Subpart 16.3 Cost-Reimbursement

Contracts

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 4

Contract Line Items (CLINS)

CLIN# CLIN TITLE CONTRACT TYPE

0001 Phase-In FFP

CLIN# CLIN TITLE CONTRACT TYPE

0101 AF TENCAP Base Year CPFF

0102 TENCAP ODC CR

0201 SIDC/ID Base Year CPFF

0202 SIDC/ID ODC CR

0301 595 SG Base Year CPFF

0302 595 SG ODC CR

0401 17 TS Base Year CPFF

0402 17 TS ODC CR

0501 SIDC/XR Base Year CPFF

0502 SIDC/XR ODC CR

0601 ASOS Base Year CPFF

0602 ASOS ODC CR

0701 SIDC Det 1 Base Year CPFF

0702 SIDC Det 1 ODC CR

PHASE-IN

BASE YEAR

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 5

Budgeting/Funding

The Government assumes the budget will be flat-lined, with at most, only inflationary increases in the future fiscal years

FY10 Budget - $17,750,000

FY11 Budget - $17,990,000

FY12 Budget - $18,000,000

FY13 Budget - $18,250,000

FY14 Budget - $18,500,000

FY15 Budget - $18,750,000

Total: $109,240,000

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 6

Budgeting/Funding

Budget by task/organization:

PM $320,000

IT $3,300,000

595 SG $800,000

ASOS $4,500,000

TENCAP $2,900,000

SIDC Det 1 $165,000

ID $2,800,000

17 TS $800,000

17 TS Det 2 $1,100,000

17 TS Det 3 $750,000

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 7

Period of Performance

Phase-In 15 Jun 10 – 14 Jul 10

Base Period 15 Jul 10 – 30 Nov 10

Option 1 1 Dec 10 – 30 Dec 11

Option 2 1 Dec 11 – 30 Nov 12

Option 3 1 Dec 12 – 30 Nov 13

Option 4 1 Dec 13 – 30 Nov 14

Option 5 1 Dec 14 – 30 Nov 15

Phase-Out TBD

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 8

General Information

“Offeror” includes subcontractors, teammates and/or joint venture partners, and key personnel

The Government reserves the right to award without discussions

Proposals shall be valid for a minimum of 180 days

Proposals shall NOT include classified information

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 9

Proposal Delivery

Deliver proposals to Bldg 210, Rm 270

Proposals due NLT 10 a.m. MST 29 Apr 09

Includes Past Performance Volumes &

Past Performance Questionnaires

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 10

Evaluation Factors and Subfactors

Evaluation Factors

Technical Proposal (Factor 1)

Present/Past Performance (Factor 2)

Cost/Price (Factor 3)

Weighting: The relative importance or weighting of each factor is as follows: Factor 2 (Present/Past

Performance) is more important than Factor 3

(Cost/Price).

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 11

Technical Proposal

Will be assessed as pass/fail at the subfactor level and an overall factor-level rating will be assessed

A failure in any Technical Proposal subfactor will result in an unacceptable rating for the Technical Proposal factor

Program Management (Subfactor 1)

Security (Subfactor 2)

Network Management (Subfactor 3)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12

Program Management

Staffing Plan

Must address all areas of the PWS

Ensure consistency between the proposed staffing plan, Past

Performance, and the Cost/Price volume

Full FTEs not required

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 13

Security

At proposal submission:

SCIF –1,500 square feet of certifiable space in

El Paso County

ITAR – Registration/pending registration with

State Department

Facility Clearance – Top Secret for all team members

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 14

Network Management

Network Operation & Administration, Information Assurance, and Integration

Understanding and capability managing

SIPRNet and either JWICS or NSANet

LAN/WAN of at least 30 CPUs

Certifications

IAW DoDD 8570 for at least 40% of proposed workforce in Information

Assurance, Systems Administration, and

Systems Engineering

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 15

Present/Past Performance

Rated at an overall factor level -

Recency: Current performance or performance completed within 3 years

Focus Area Relevancy Ratings: Relevant, Somewhat Relevant, Not Relevant

Determined by TEAM, not individual citations

Quality Ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not

Applicable

Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings:

Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, Unknown

Confidence

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 16

Relevancy - Program Management

Experience with management of prime contract; multiple subs; staffing with TS/SCI and SAP clearances; cost-type contract valued at $6M/yr; integrating security disciplines; and recruiting and retaining qualified personnel.

Relevant: All of the above

Somewhat Relevant: Some of the above

Not Relevant: None of the above

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 17

Relevancy - AF TENCAP

Experience with executing rapid (24 months or less) R&D projects in support of ISR and

SIGINT, COMINT, ELINT, IMINT, and MASINT and support of resolving deficiencies or enhancing capabilities for US joint fighter, bomber, and attack aircraft and munitions.

Relevant: All of the above

Somewhat Relevant: ISR and 3-4 of 5 INTs

Not Relevant: ISR and less than 3 INTs OR management and oversight but not execution of rapid R&D projects

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 18

Relevancy - Information Technology

Experience with information technology, to include maintenance/operations/administration of SIPRNet and either JWICS or NSANet; developing technical solutions; performing Info Assurance duties;

integrating multiple systems of like classification; and day-to-day operations of networks.

Relevant: All of the above

Somewhat Relevant: maintenance/operations/ administration of either SIPRNet, JWICS, or

NSANet level or system network security

Not Relevant: Management and oversight but not maintenance/operations/administration of information technologies at the SIPRNet level or system network security

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 19

Relevancy - Integration Division

Experience operating multiple systems across a wide area network (distributed operations);

C4I systems; and planning, designing, and executing modeling and simulations for exercises/wargames.

Relevant: All of the above

Somewhat Relevant: Some of the above

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 20

Relevancy – Space Education &

Training

Experience involving advanced instruction at the six ISD levels of learning (Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation).

Relevant: 4 of 6 ISD levels

Somewhat Relevant: 1-3 ISD levels

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 21

Relevancy – Test & Evaluation

Experience involving DoD test and evaluation in the role of Test Analyst and/or Test

Manager, to include planning, executing, and reporting on operational test and evaluations.

Relevant: All of the above

Somewhat Relevant: Non-DoD T&E experience OR managing DoD T&E

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 22

Cost/Price

Cost/Price Factor

This evaluation factor assesses each offeror’s total proposed cost (phase-in, basic, and all options) and evaluates each offeror’s proposal for reasonableness, cost realism and affordability

Probable Cost – determined by adjusting the proposed cost and fee (when appropriate) to reflect any additions or reductions in cost elements to realistic levels based on the cost realism analysis

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Additional Information

Team Evaluations

Network Management

Security

Don’t over think this

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 24

Questions?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .