Atch_11_Site_Visit__Statement_of_Events.docx

Solicitation Number: FA2521-15-R-0008 Title: Painting Various Facilities Subject: Site Visit on 8 Jul 15 Attendees:

· Patricia A. Bates, Contracting Officer

· Regina Butler, Technical Expert

· Ken Wilant, Technical Expert

· Rasnizi Cobb, Contract Specialist

· Christina Johnsen, Contract Specialist

· Brendan Scott, Coast to Coast Coatings

· Cleve Carter, Coast to Coast Coatings

· Larry Gashi, FCG Federal Services

· Gary Champley, FCG Federal Services

· Vic Hein, Tudor Villas Corp

· Rich Santorico, Tudor Villas Corp

· John Romanov, Tudor Villas Corp

· Mark Hein, Tudor Villas Corp

· Dave Tilley, HIS Painting Inc.

· Art Dever, Ostrom Painting Inc.

· Kevin Smith, SDB

· Jody McDowell, SDB

· John Albert SDB Site Visit Summary:

· The Contracting Officer stated the importance of carefully reading and complying with the instructions in Section L of the solicitation to ensure the proposal package is compliant. Section M of the solicitation defines the evaluation criteria.

· All of the above attendees visited two different "representative" back flow preventer locations and pictured below is of back flow preventer equipment at a single location.

· The sit visit continued with visiting two different "representative" facilities. Various building features were noted that will apply under a Paint IDIQ task order to include varying substrates (e.g., concrete block, stucco, EIFS, etc), spalling concrete, cracked concrete.

· Below are a list of questions and answers that were given for the subject soliciation:

1) Question: Will lead data be provided for structures that are to be painted?

Answer: This will task-order specific. Sampling to facilitate appropriate worker protection decisions is always the responsibility of the contractor.

2) Question: Worker pointed out corrosion on a metal door and asked if repairs might be a potential task order requirement.

Answer: Yes, such corrosion repair, followed by application of an appropriate protective coating, could be included in a typical paint project scope. In the event that the corrosion is too advanced or widespread for repair, replacement of the door might be required.

3) Question: Will environmental requirements be discussed?

Answer: No, the "Best Management Practices" for "Surface Cleaning/Washing/Wet Blasting Operations for Painting Preparation and Corrosion Control" are included as Attachment II in the Specifications document.

4) Question: Who is responsible for waste disposal?

Answer: Any hazardous (e.g., lead-based paint) waste stream will be disposed by the Air Force. The contractor is responsible for disposal of other waste streams, as defined in the Specifications.

5) Question: What is SAM?

Answer: “SAM” is System for Award Management, see FAR Clause 52.204-7 for more details.

6) Question: Is the site visit required to submit a proposal package?

Answer: No, the site visit was an invitation to view facilites at Patrick AFB that may or may not be part of future requirements on this IDIQ contract. Contractors were not required to attend the site visit to submit a proposal package. All information required to provide a proposal are captured in the solicitation package.

image1.png