RFI_Q_ _A_update_as_of_16_Oct.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP for Aircrew Instruction Support Services
- Solicitation number
- FA0021-16-R-0002
About this file
Q A Update 16 Oct
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 88 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| AFSOAWC AIRCREW INSTRUCTION SUPPORT |
| FA0021-16-R-0002 |
| Questions and Answers RFP |
| NO. | REFERENCE | PG. NO. | PARA. NO | ISSUE / COMMENT | QUESTION | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
| 1 | RFP | 69-70 | L0004, 3.1(f) and 3.4 | Paragraph 3.4 asks for duplicate copies of all Teaming Agreements and Letters of Intent for Team Members. However, Table L0003-1 does not include this section in Volume III. | Can the AF please confirm that duplicate copies of the Teaming Agreements and Letters of Intent are not part of the page restrictions of Volume III and should be included prior to Subfactor 1, Management Plan? | Teaming arrangements and Letters of Intent not required to be included in Volume III. See revised RFP. |
| 2 | RFP | 64-65 | Table L0003-1 | Table L0003-1 does not align with the paragraphs listed under L0004, Specific Proposal Preparation Instructions. For example, Volume II references paragraph 4.3 through 4.9, which is Present and Past Performance, not Price. Also, in Table L0003-1, Volume II, 5th row refers to 4.4 Other Cost/Pricing Information. I have been unable to find any reference to Other Cost/Pricing Information. | Can the AF please define Other Cost/Pricing Information and describe what should be included in this section. | RFP revised to fix paragraph references. Please see paragraph 2.4., Other than Cost/Pricing Information on revised RFP. |
| 3 | RFP | 69 | 3.1 (h) and (i) | These two items (h) Subfactor 2: Workforce Management Approach and (i) Subfactor 3: Quality Control Plan do not align with Table L0003-1, Volume III, Section L, paragraphs 3.7 and 3.8; or Section M, paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4. | Can the AF please confirm the exact makeup for Volume III - Factor 2 - Technical. | RFP revised. See latest version posted on FBO. |
| 4 | RFP | 61 | L0003, 2.4.1 | The paragraph describing the binder organization does not mention a title page. | Will the AF allow the Contractor to include a title page to each volume of the proposal that would not be part of the page limitations of each volume? | Binder Title/Labels will not be included as part of volume proposal page limitations. |
| 5 | RFP | 29 | H0002 | Line 10 states this is a 5 year contract | This should be a 3 year life | H0002 is removed. See FAR 52.219-14. |
| 6 | RFP & PWS | 58 | para 1-3; PWS para 2.4.1. | 2. Page 58 Para 1-3 Line 1 defines Contracting Officer abbreviation as (CO); The PWS in Para 2.4.1 line 2 defines it as (KO). | Which do you want to use? | PWS updated for consistency. Contracting Officer will be referred to as CO in this requirement. |
| 7 | RFP | 63, 70 | L0004 2.7; 3.7 | 3. Page 63 L0004 III 2.7 states there is a 20 page limit on the Transition, Team Make-up and Resumes Section and further states Resumes are limited to 2 pages each. Page 70 para 3.7 line 5 states each resume must include a Letter of Intent. Line 6 states the resume is limited to 2 pages, and then also states resumes are not included in the total page count for the section. | Does the 2 page limit for resumes include the Letter of Intent? Do resumes and letters of intent count for page count limit? | Revised page limitations for resumes and letter of intent for clarification. Please see revised RFP. |
| 8 | RFP | 69, 63 | 3.1; 2.6; 2.7; 2.8 | 4. Page 69 Para 3.1. Subfactors 2, 3, and 4 are different from those shown in L0004 III 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 on page 63. | See revised RFP. | |
| 9 | RFP | 76 | 3.3 | 5. Page 76 Para 3.3 3rd bullet should refer to “para 2.5 of the PWS” for clarification. | See revised RFP. | |
| 10 | PWS | 8 | 2.4.3 | Page 8 Para 2.4.3 lists personnel considered KEY as: Program Manager; MDS/Training Integrators; and the Program Manager (PM) | Does the Government desire the contractors to provide 2 Program Managers for this effort, one local and one at Corporate? The only other reference to Program Manager states it is an indirect position and a PM is not listed on the Team Make Up Position listing (para 2.5) | No. One Program Manager at corporate level. See revised PWS. |
| 11 | PWS | 10 | 2.7 | Deliverables | Should the Distribution List include the AFSOAWC Director of Quality to comply with instructions stated in Para 2.6? If so, what is the Office Symbol for the AFSOAWC Director of Quality? | COR assigned to this task order is AFSOAWC Director of Quality. |
| 12 | PWS | 12 | Page 12 line 1 PMATS should be shown as the Predator Mission Aircrew Training System for clarification. | See revised RFP. | ||
| 13 | PWS | 12 | 5.6.2 | Page 12 para 5.6.2 Third sentence is confusing, please clarify intent. | Revised paragraph 5.6.2 third sentence for clarification. | |
| 14 | PWS | 14 | Attachment Item 4 Duty Description states Inflight, Platform and Simulator Instructor CSO, yet the Minimum Requirements States the instructors will not conduct inflight instruction. | I believe the CSOs do conduct inflight training. | The Combat System Operator(s) (CSO) on the U-28 do fly/instuct. The CSO instructors for other platforms do not fly. | |
| 15 | RFP | SF33 Block 9 | When do you anticipate release of the RFP and when would be the suspense date? | We anticipate to release the RFP by 23 October 2015. Suspense date for proposals will be 16 November 2015 @ 1PM CST. |
&"Times New Roman,Bold"16 October 2015 &P of &N
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .