Report_Bridge_Inspection_5570-455P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway 1A15, B10
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Report Bridge Inspection_5570-455P

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/15

Report prepared by: WS

MILE POINT: 433.40

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 697.47 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

SLAB

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

CONCRETE

1A7 / 14

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK W IDTH:

CURB TO CURB W IDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

132.0 FT (40.2 M)

54.0 FT (16.5 M)

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

N/A 30 °

NO

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 433.40 (KM PT 697.47)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 4.75 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete continuous slab bridge is in good condition overall with only minor problems. These include accumulation of debris in the expansion joints, damaged joint filler and settlement at both abutments slope protection, minor erosion at both abutment slopes, trees growing from the edge of the slope protection, cracking of the wearing surface on the bridge and both approach slabs, particularly at ends. In addition, object marker signs should be spaced appropriately along the north shoulder of the underpass approach roadway to delineate the 1'-6" drop off.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/31/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.11 RESEAL JOINTS AT BOTH ABUTMENT/SLOPE PROTECTION INTERFACES.

222.9 APPROPRIATELY SPACE OBJECT MARKER SIGNS ALONG NORTH SHOULDER OF

UNDERPASS APPROACH ROADWAY TO DELINEATE SHOULDER DROP OFF.

60.11 FILL ERODED AREAS ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION. REMOVE TREES THAT ARE

GROWING ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION.

58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM EXPANSION JOINTS.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0 $0

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G N G N N N N N G

N G

G N G N N G N N G G F N

G N G N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1, 59.3 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

SIDES OVER PIERS.

58.2 MINOR TO MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION

JOINTS.

58.3 MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON WEARING

SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE NEAR ABUTMENTS. POSSIBLE

DELAMINATION ALONG CURBS (HOLLOW SOUND WHEN

HAMMERING).

58.5,6 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILS AND CURBS.

59.1, 60.3 BEARING PADS EXTEND 1/2" TO 2 1/4" PAST ABUTMENT BEARING

SEATS.

60.1,3 3 FULL VERTICAL CRACKS AT NORTH ABUTMENT. SEVERAL

HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACKS ON BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

MINOR LEAKAGE EVIDENT AT NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL ON

ENDS IN BEARING AREA.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING ON WINGWALLS.

60.11 SLOPE PROTECTION JOINT SEALS ARE TORN LOOSE AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS. MINOR SETTLEMENT OF SOUTH SLOPE PROTECTION.

MINOR SHRINKAGE CRACKING OF NORTH SLOPE PROTECTION.

MINOR EROSION AND UNDERMINING OF SOUTHEAST CORNER AND

NORTHWEST CORNER OF SLOPE PROTECTION. VINE GROWTH ON

SLOPE PROTECTION WITH TREES GROWING ALONG EDGE OF

SLOPE PROTECTION, DAMAGING SLOPE PROTECTION AND

ENCROACHING SUPERSTRUCTURE.

60.13 VINE GROWTH ON COLUMNS. BROKEN SEALANT IN SLOPE

PROTECTION JOINT AT BASE OF SEVERAL COLUMNS.

F G G G G N

N

G

G

G

INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/15

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

1. ALIGNMENT

61. CHANNEL N

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222.4,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND SETTLEMENT OF PAVEMENT

ALONG SOUTH APPROACH SLAB END; IRREGULAR CRACKING

ALONG NORTH APPROACH SLAB END. MINOR CRACKING OF

SURFACING SURROUNDING CATCH BASIN AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH

APPROACH.

222.9 NORTH SHOULDER OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY HAS UP TO A 1'-6"

DROP OFF.

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

((UNDERPASS ROADWAY

N N N G G G G G P

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 31 28

TYPE 3 17 15 29 26

TYPE 3S2 26 24 43 39

TYPE 3-3 32 29 53 48

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OS STRUCTURE

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-455P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 455P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1A7

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

187 - WILLIAMSON

161000010

STILL HOUSE HOLLOW ROA

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

5570455P0000000

4.75 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

433.40 (KM PT 697.47)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

01 - SLAB

54.0 FT (16.5 M)

132.0 FT (40.2 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.0 TONS (28.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 37.0 FT (11.3 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°56'19.80"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°00'04.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 8.0 FT (2.4 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

40.0 FT (12.2 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

30 °

NO

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.58 FT (0.79 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

17.08 FT (5.21 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-455P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH, TOWARD NASHVILLE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH; NOTE

DETERIORATION OF PAVEMENT STRIPPING

PHOTO #4 - CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE ALONG SOUTHBOUND

LANE NEAR SOUTH END

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING ON RAILINGS

AND CURBS; EAST RAILING NEAR SOUTH END

SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN SOUTH

EXPANSION JOINT, SIMILAR IN NORTH

EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #7 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH APPROACH SLAB; NOTE

LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING AT NORTH END OF NORTH APPROACH SLAB

PHOTO #9 - UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN; NOTE

VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #11 - HONEYCOMBING AND EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE, NORTH SPAN NEAR WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

EXTERIOR FACE OF SLAB, EAST SIDE ABOVE SOUTH PIER SHOWN;

NOTE VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #14 - VERTICAL CRACKING AT NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL; NOTE ALSO BROKEN SEALANT ALONG SLOPE

PROTECTION JOINT

PHOTO #15 - BROKEN CURB ALONG WEST EDGE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION; NOTE ALSO DETERIORATED

SEALANT IN JOINT AROUND BASE OF WEST COLUMN IN NORTH BENT

PHOTO #16 - CRACKING ON NORTHWEST WINGWALL FROM BEARING

SEAT AREA; NOTE WATER LEAKAGE; NOTE ALSO NOTE PROTRUDING

ELASTOMERIC MATERIAL; SIMILAR CONDITION AT SOUTHWEST

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE VINE

GROWTH

PHOTO #18 - SETTLEMENT OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - UNDERMINING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PROTECTION AT EAST SIDE

PHOTO #20 - CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION AROUND CENTER

COLUMN IN NORTH BENT; NOTE BROKEN SEALANT IN JOINT

PHOTO #21 - TREE GROWING ON UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURE AT

SOUTH SPAN, WEST SIDE; SIMILAR AT EAST SIDE

PHOTO #22 - VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST SIDE OF

STRUCTURE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .