Report_Bridge_Inspection_5570-443P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway 1A15, B10
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Report Bridge Inspection_5570-443P

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/16/13

Report prepared by: ES

MILE POINT: 425.60

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 684.92 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/16/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

1B4 / 000000

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

150.0 FT (45.7 M)

62.7 FT (19.1 M)

36.8 FT (11.2 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

N/A

39 °

NO

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 425.60 (KM PT 684.92)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 10.1 MILES FROM TN ROUTE 7

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete continuous multi-girder bridge is in good condition overall. The main problem is significant deformation of the elastomeric bearing pads at the abutments. These bearing pads should be replaced within the next 5 years in order to maintain proper bearing and distribution of loads from the superstructure to the abutments.

Other problems include minor to moderate gravel accumulation in the expansion joints with some leakage; vine growth on the south abutment slope protection, south pier, and deck underside; and a spalled area on the south face of the south pier at Girder #3. Also the concrete slope protection has settled, up to 1.5" at the south abutment and up to 1" at the north abutment.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: D.K. JOHNSON, J.S. SMITHDEAL (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

D. KEITH JOHNSON, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL BOTH EXPANSION JOINTS. 90 LF

58.10, 60.12,19

REMOVE VEGETATION FROM SOUTH PIER, SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PROTECTION, AND DECK UNDERSIDE.

1 LS

60.15 CLEAN AND PATCH SPALLING AREA ON SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER AT GIRDER

#3.

2 SF

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.1 REPLACE ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AT ABUTMENTS. 8 EA

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7

1. DECK SLAB G

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE F

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER (VEGETATION) G

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER (VEGETATION)

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER (VEGETATION)

F G N N N G N N G G N

G N G G N G N N G G G G

G N G N G G G

58.1

58.2

58.3

58.5,6

58.10, 60.12,19

59.1

59.2

59.6

60.1,3

60.6

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. MINOR TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS.

MINOR TO MODERATE GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION

JOINTS. MINOR LEAKAGE THROUGH SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT

EVIDENT (SEE 60.1,3). SOME BOLTS EXPOSED ON BOTH

EXPANSION JOINTS.

MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS

THROUGHOUT WEARING SURFACE. MINOR CRACKING ALONG

SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT. ROADWAY STRIPING IS CRACKED AND

FADED THROUGHOUT.

MINOR VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND

RAILINGS; MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF CURBS.

MINOR VINE GROWTH ON BOTH ABUTMENT SLOPES, SOUTH PIER,

AND DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER SPAN.

MODERATE RUSTING OF BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS AND NUTS.

MINOR RUSTING OF STEEL BEARING ASSEMBLIES. BEARING PADS

AT BOTH ABUTMENTS ARE MODERATELY TO SEVERELY DEFORMED.

MINOR AREA OF HONEYCOMBING ON UNDERSIDE OF GIRDER #2

NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT. MINOR STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF

GIRDER #4 AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

MINOR CRACKING AND DELAMINATION DEVELOPING INTO SPALLS

ON CLOSURE DIAPHRAGMS ALONG GIRDER EDGES IN SEVERAL

LOCATIONS.

MINOR TO MODERATE STAINING ON ABUTMENT ENDS DUE TO

LEAKAGE THROUGH EXPANSION JOINTS. MINOR VERTICAL

CRACKING OF BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS.

INSPECTION DATE: 3/16/13

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

1. ALIGNMENT

61. CHANNEL N

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.11 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON CONCRETE SLOPE

PROTECTION AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. SETTLEMENT OF SLOPE

PROTECTION AT BOTH ABUTMENTS: 1.5" AT SOUTH ABUTMENT, 1"

AT NORTH ABUTMENT; NO CHANGE SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

MODERATE DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEAL AT ABUTMENTS AND

PIERS.

60.13 MINOR GRAFFITI ON PIER STEMS. MINOR MAP CRACKING OF

NORTH PIER STEM, SOUTH FACE.

60.15 MODERATE SPALL ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER CAP UNDER

CENTER BAY.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE, LONGITUDINAL, AND RANDOM CRACKING OF

APPROACH PAVEMENT; MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OVER BOTH APPROACH SLABS AND AT ENDS.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT CORNERS OF

STRUCTURE; SLIGHTLY DAMAGED AT SOUTHEAST AND NORTHEAST

PARAPET ENDS, BUT STILL FUNCTIONAL. TEMPORARY FLASHER

ON WEST RAIL, CENTER SPAN.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3S2 24 22 40 36

TYPE 3-3 29 26 49 44

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 187 - WILLIAMSON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-443P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... DAVIS HOLLOW ROAD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 443P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570443P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 10.1 MILES FROM TN ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1B4 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 425.60 (KM PT 684.92)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 000000 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

62.7 FT (19.1 M)

150.0 FT (45.7 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 1 - EPOXY COATED REINF.

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 3 - POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°51'26.20"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°03'10.10"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 5.5 FT (1.7 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

36.8 FT (11.2 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

39 °

NO

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.50 FT (0.76 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

17.00 FT (5.18 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:87�03'10.10 http:35�51'26.20

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-443P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

ROADWAY STRIPING; CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL GRAVEL ACCUMULATION

IN EXPANSION JOINTS; EXPANSION JOINT

OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL EXPOSED EXPANSION

JOINT BOLTS; EXPANSION JOINT OVER SOUTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF WEARING SURFACE; SOUTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKS

THROUGHOUT WEARING SURFACE; CENTER

SPAN SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL

DETERIORATION OF ROADWAY STRIPING

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER APPROACH

SLAB ENDS; SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING OF

CURBS; EAST CURB, CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

RAILINGS; EAST RAILING OVER NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE IS SLIGHTLY

DAMAGED AT SOUTHEAST PARAPET END

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH, CENTER

SPAN; NOTE VINE GROWTH ON DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE; WEST BAY, SOUTH SPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK OVERHANGS; EAST OVERHANG, CENTER

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARING ANCHOR BOLTS AND

NUTS; SOUTH ABUTMENT, GIRDER #2 BEARING DEVICE SHOWN; ALSO

NOTE BEARING PADS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS ARE DEFORMED

PHOTO #17 - AREA OF HONEYCOMBING ON

UNDERSIDE OF GIRDER #2 NEAR SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CRACKING ON

CLOSURE DIAPHRAGMS ALONG GIRDER

EDGES; SOUTH ABUTMENT, EAST BAY SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND DELAMINATION DEVELOPING

INTO MINOR TYPICAL CRACKING AND DELAMINATION DEVELOPING

INTO SPALLS ON CLOSURE DIAPHRAGMS ALONG GIRDER EDGES;

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH ON SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

BOTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; SOUTH

ABUTMENT, EAST BAY SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS;

NORTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING ON CONCRETE SLOPE

PROTECTION AT BOTH ABUTMENTS; NORTH

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

JOINT SEAL AT ABUTMENTS AND PIERS;

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER,

SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #26 - VINE GROWTH ON SOUTH PIER

AND DECK UNDERSIDE, CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #27 - SPALL ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER CAP, UNDER

CENTER BAY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .