Report_Bridge_Inspection_5570-444P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway 1A15, B10
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Report Bridge Inspection_5570-444P

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

GARRISON CREEK ROAD BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER GARRISON CREEK ROAD & CREEK

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/13

Report prepared by: WU

MILE POINT: 427.60

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 688.14 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

GARRISON CREEK ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

1B2 / 000000

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

800.0 FT (243.8 M)

200.0 FT (61.0 M)

37.1 FT (11.3 M)

34.2 FT (10.4 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 427.60 (KM PT 688.14)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.2 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. GARRISON CREEK ROAD & CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete continuous box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate transverse cracking of the approach pavement at the ends of both of the approach slabs, moderate vegetation growth on the south abutment and wingwalls, small trees against the box girder underside in Span #3, and a moderate debris accumulation in the expansion joints. Also, the hatches near the abutments do not have locks and could be accessed easily.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: D.K. JOHNSON, J.S. SMITHDEAL (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

D. KEITH JOHNSON, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

222.4 SAW CUT AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER

APPROACH SLAB ENDS.

68 LF

60.12 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM SOUTH ABUTMENT AND WINGWALLS. 1 LS

59.11 REMOVE TREES GROWING AGAINST BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #3. 1 LS

58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM EXPANSION JOINTS. 1 LS $

59.11 INSTALL LOCKS ON BOTH HATCHES. 2 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G N N G

F G

(HATCHES/VEGETATION)

G N G G N G N N G G G

F(VEGETATION)

G N G N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS INSIDE BOX GIRDER.

58.2 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.3 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING

OF WEARING SURFACE. MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF

WEARING SURFACE ALONG SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT. MINOR

CRACKING AND FADING OF LANE MARKINGS.

58.5,6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS AND

RAILINGS THROUGHOUT; MODERATE ON RAIL POSTS AT RAILING

JOINTS.

58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ALONG

CURBLINES.

59.2 ANCHORAGE BLOCKS IN SPANS #2 AND #4 HAVE HAIRLINE

HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON BOTH FACES EXTENDING ALONG SIDE

WALLS UP TO 18'L. HAIRLINE HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF BLISTER

IN SPAN #3. HAIRLINE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING WITH

MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON INTERIOR WALLS OF BOX GIRDER AT

ISOLATED LOCATIONS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EAST,

EXTERIOR SIDE OF BOX GIRDER AT NORTH END. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #1. MINOR

VEHICULAR SCRAPES ON BOTTOM OF BOX GIRDER ON WEST SIDE

OF SPAN #3 NEAR PIER #3.

59.6 MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF NORTH END DIAPHRAGM.

59.11, 60.12 ACCESS HATCHES ARE NOT LOCKED.

TREES GROWING AGAINST BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #3.

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTH ABUTMENT AND

WINGWALLS; MINOR ON NORTH ABUTMENT.

G G G G G N

N

G

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G N G N

MED

SUFF

16 FT.

STONES, SILT

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N F G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.1 LEAKAGE STAINS ON ABUTMENTS FROM DECK EXPANSION JOINTS.

60.4 MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL, AND DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS. MINOR LEAKAGE STAINING AT

WINGWALLS UNDER JOINTS.

60.11 ABUTMENT SLOPES PROTECTED WITH RIPRAP.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL PIERS.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF APPROACH

PAVEMENT. MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT ENDS OF

BOTH APPROACH SLABS.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT CORNERS OF

STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY FLASHERS ON EAST RAIL, SOUTH

APPROACH AND WEST RAIL, NORTH APPROACH.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3 44 40 73 66

TYPE 3S2 47 43 79 72

TYPE 3-3 49 44 82 74

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GARRISON CREEK ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 187 - WILLIAMSON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-444P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... GARRISON CREEK ROAD & C

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 444P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570444P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... NO (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.2 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1B2 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 427.60 (KM PT 688.14)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 000000 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

200.0 FT (61.0 M)

800.0 FT (243.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 04 - TEE BEAM

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 2

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 1 - EPOXY COATED REINF.

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (54.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.2 FT (10.4 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°52'28.70"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°01'59.30"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

37.1 FT (11.3 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

34.2 FT (10.4 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.63 FT (0.80 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

15.00 FT (4.57 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:87�01'59.30 http:35�52'28.70

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-444P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS; EXPANSION

JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE; WEST

SHOULDER, SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

LANE MARKINGS; SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

CURBS; WEST CURB, SPAN #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

RAILINGS THROUGHOUT; WEST RAILING, SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS AND VEGETATION ALONG CURBLINES;

EAST CURBLINE, SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; NORTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT ENDS

OF BOTH APPROACH SLABS; NORTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #2

PHOTO #13 - DIAGONAL CRACKING ON EAST, EXTERIOR SIDE OF BOX

GIRDER AT NORTH END

PHOTO #14 - HONEYCOMBING ON GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #1

PHOTO #15 - VEHICULAR SCRAPES ON

BOTTOM OF BOX GIRDER ON WEST SIDE OF

SPAN #3 NEAR PIER #3

PHOTO #16 - TREES GROWING AGAINST BOX

GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN SPAN #3

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL DECK UNDERSIDE

VIEW LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #1

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE INSIDE BOX GIRDER; SPAN #1

SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF BLISTER IN SPAN

#3.; WEST BLISTER, NORTH FACE SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL HORIZONTAL CRACKING ON INTERIOR WALLS

OF BOX GIRDER; EAST WALL, SPAN #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL LEAKAGE STAINING AT

WINGWALLS UNDER EXPANSION JOINTS;

NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER,

SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON ALL PIERS; SOUTH

PIER, SOUTH FACE AT TOP SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #27 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .