Report_Bridge_Inspection_5570-448P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Natchez Trace Parkway 1A15, B10
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Report Bridge Inspection_5570-448P

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

TN ROUTE 46 BRIDGE

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER TN ROUTE 46 & PINEWOOD BRANCH

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/13

Report prepared by: ED

MILE POINT: 429.01

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 690.41 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

TN ROUTE 46 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/17/13

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

BITUMINOUS

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

CONCRETE

1B6 / NONE

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

800.0 FT (243.8 M)

200.0 FT (61.0 M)

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

N/A 0 °

NO

LOCATION

NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 429.01 (KM PT 690.41)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.15 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. TN ROUTE 46 & PINEWOOD BRANCH

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete continuous box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include moderate transverse cracking of the approach pavement at the ends of the approach slabs, damage to the expansion joint curb armor plate and a missing screw at the west side of the north expansion joint, a moderate accumulation of debris in the expansion joints, and exposed wires near the junction box at the west side of the north abutment. There is also hairline cracking of the diaphragms and the web walls in Span #4. The cracks in the web walls may be reflective of the internal post-tensioning tendons.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: D.K. JOHNSON, J.S. SMITHDEAL (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

D. KEITH JOHNSON, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

222.4 SAW CUT AND SEAL CRACKS ON APPROACH PAVEMENT AT ENDS OF APPROACH

SLABS.

68 LF

58.2 REPAIR JOINT ARMORING AND REPLACE MISSING SCREW AT NORTH EXPANSION

JOINT, WEST CURB.

1 LS

58.2 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM EXPANSION JOINTS. 1 LS

58.8, 60.12 PLACE EXPOSED WIRES IN PROTECTIVE CONDUIT AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH

SLOPE PROTECTION.

1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G N N G

N G

G N G G N G N N G G G

F(UTILITIES)

G N G N G G

G(VEGETATION)

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE

AND DECK OVERHANGS. EVIDENCE OF LEAKAGE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE IN SPANS #1 AND #3. EXPOSED TENDON ON DECK

UNDERSIDE DUE TO VOID IN CONCRETE ABOVE ANCHORAGE

BLOCK #2-EAST IN SPAN #3.

58.2 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS.

MINOR DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST EXPANSION JOINT CURB ARMOR

PLATE; MISSING SCREW IN EXPANSION JOINT ARMORING.

58.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE. MINOR

CRACKING AND FADING OF LANE MARKINGS.

58.5,6 MINOR VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT CURBS AND RAILINGS. MINOR

CRACKING AROUND PERIMETER OF RAIL POSTS AT BASE.

58.8, 60.12 SOLAR PANEL WITH CONDUIT CONNECTION TO JUNCTION BOX AT

WEST SIDE OF NORTH ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT. EXPOSED

WIRES AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH SLOPE PROTECTION.

59.2 EXTERIOR: MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX

GIRDER IN ALL SPANS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON OUTSIDE

OF BOX GIRDER WEB IN SPAN #1, BOTH SIDES, NEAR SOUTH PIER.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

OUTSIDE OF BOX GIRDER WEB IN SPAN #2, EAST SIDE, NEAR

SOUTH PIER. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE IN NORTH HALF OF

SPAN #3. MINOR POPOUTS WITH EXPOSED AND RUSTING REBAR

CHAIRS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

EAST WEB WALL IN SPAN #4; MINOR AREA OF HONEYCOMBING

NEAR CRACKING.

INTERIOR: FORMWORK INSIDE BOX GIRDER IN TWO LOCATIONS

AND ON ANCHORAGE BLOCKS. HAIRLINE LONGITUDINAL AND

DIAGONAL CRACKING OF WEB WALLS; CRACKS MAY BE

REFLECTIVE OF INTERNAL TENDONS. HAIRLINE LONGITUDINAL

CRACKS ON BOTH SIDES, SPAN #1 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. HAIRLINE

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF BLISTERS, SOME EXTEND INTO WEB

WALLS.

G G G G G F

N

F

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 8

G G N G N

MED

SUFF

20 FT.

SILT, GRAVEL

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N N F G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.6 MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGMS.

60.1,4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS AND

BREASTWALLS.

60.3 MINOR CRACKING OF BOTH ABUTMENT CAPS. MINOR STAINING ON

SOUTH ABUTMENT CAP.

60.6 MINOR VERTICAL, DIAGONAL, AND HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF

WINGWALLS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION AT BASE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

PROTECTION, EAST SIDE.

60.11 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS. MINOR SPALLING OF WEST CURB ON NORTH SLOPE

PROTECTION.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS NEAR TOP OF PIER WALLS.

60.15 MINOR CIRCULAR CRACKING ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH FACE OF

CENTER PIER CAP. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER CAPS AT

TOP.

60.19 SMALL TREE STUMP GROWING FROM BASE OF CENTER PIER.

222.4 MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

APPROACH PAVEMENT.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKER TAPE AT CORNERS OF

STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY FLASHERS ON EAST RAILING, SOUTH

APPROACH AND WEST RAILING, NORTH APPROACH. "HAZARDOUS

ROAD CONDITIONS" GATES ON SOUTH APPROACH.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 54

TYPE 3 44 40 73 66

TYPE 3S2 48 44 79 72

TYPE 3-3 49 44 82 74

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... TN ROUTE 46 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 187 - WILLIAMSON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-448P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... TN ROUTE 46 & PINEWOOD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 448P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5570448P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.15 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1B6 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 429.01 (KM PT 690.41)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

200.0 FT (61.0 M)

800.0 FT (243.8 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 1 - CONCRETE

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 04 - TEE BEAM

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 2

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (33.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.0 TONS (54.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°53'29.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°01'26.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 29.0 FT (8.8 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

37.0 FT (11.3 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

6.0 FT (1.8 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

0 °

NO

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

1 - CONCRETE

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.63 FT (0.80 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

17.42 FT (5.31 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-448P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - DAMAGE TO NORTHWEST EXPANSION JOINT CURB ARMOR

PLATE; NOTE MISSING SCREW

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF

DEBRIS IN EXPANSION JOINTS; EXPANSION

JOINT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE; SPAN #3

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL VERTICAL AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON RAILINGS; WEST RAILING, SPAN #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL CRACKS AROUND PERIMETER OF RAIL POSTS AT

BASE; EAST RAILING, SPAN #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOUTH APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #2

PHOTO #11 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

OUTSIDE OF BOX GIRDER WEB IN SPAN #2, EAST SIDE, NEAR SOUTH

PIER

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER IN ALL SPANS; SPAN #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER

INTERIOR LOOKING NORTH, SPAN #1

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE;

SPAN #1 SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - EXPOSED TENDON ON DECK UNDERSIDE DUE TO VOID IN

CONCRETE ABOVE ANCHORAGE BLOCK #2-EAST IN SPAN #3

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING OF

WEB WALLS; WEST WALL, SPAN #2 SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF BLISTERS; SPAN

#3, EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - EXPOSED WIRES AT WEST SIDE

OF NORTH SLOPE PROTECTION

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - EROSION AT BASE OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION, EAST SIDE

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT BOTH

ABUTMENTS; NORTH ABUTMENT SLOPE

SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - SPALLING OF WEST CURB ON NORTH SLOPE

PROTECTION

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF

PIER CAPS AT TOP; SOUTH PIER, NORTH FACE

SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #27 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .