Report_Bridge_Inspection_5570-454P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Natchez Trace Parkway 1A15, B10
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-16-B-00015
About this file
Report Bridge Inspection_5570-454P
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 433.00
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY OVER COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 3/21/13
Report prepared by: ES
MILE POINT: 433.00
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 696.83 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 433.00 INSPECTION DATE: 3/21/13
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
BITUMINOUS
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
N/A
CONCRETE
1A10 / 44
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
55.2 FT (16.8 M)
54.0 FT (16.5 M)
40.5 FT (12.3 M)
37.5 FT (11.4 M)
N/A 21 °
NO
LOCATION
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 433.00 (KM PT 696.83)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 4.35 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. COUNTY ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This single span prestressed concrete box beam bridge is in good condition overall. The main problems include cracking of the wearing surface and approach pavement over the abutments and at the approach slab ends, moderate cracks and spalling on the north abutment bearing seat and the deck overhang on the east side of the south abutment, and vegetation growth along the wingwalls.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: E.A. JARRELL, A.D. MITCHEM (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
E.A. JARRELL
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/1/13
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.3, 222.4 SAW CUT AND SEAL CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH PAVEMENT
OVER ABUTMENTS AND APPROACH SLAB ENDS.
160 LF
58.1, 60.3 REPAIR SPALLING AND CRACKS ON NORTH ABUTMENT AND ON DECK OVERHANG
AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
12 SF
58.10, 59.11, 60.12
REMOVE VEGETATION FROM ON AND AROUND STRUCTURE. 1 LS
58.7, 222.9 CLEAN ALONG CURBLINES AND CLEAR CLOGGED CATCH BASIN INLET AT EAST
SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION)
G G N N N N N N G
F G
(VEGETATION)
F G G G G N
F
F
G
G
58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS. MINOR SPALL ON BOTTOM OF
DECK OVERHANG AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT.
58.2,3 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING
SURFACE OVER ABUTMENTS; ASPHALT BEGINNING TO BREAK UP.
EXPANSION JOINTS PAVED OVER; EVIDENCE OF LEAKAGE ON
SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
58.5,6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILINGS. MINOR
MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS.
58.7 MINOR TO MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG
CURBLINES.
58.10, 59.11, 60.12
SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZE TREES GROWING ADJACENT TO
WINGWALLS. MINOR VINE GROWTH THROUGHOUT
SUBSTRUCTURE AND EXTENDS ONTO UNDERSIDE OF DECK AND
BOX BEAMS.
59.1,2 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAMS; BOX BEAM #1 NOT
BEARING EVENLY AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; APPEARS TO BE AS-BUILT.
60.1,3 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BEARING
SEAT AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. MODERATE SPALL (21"L X 9"H X 3-1/2"D)
ON BEARING SEAT AREA OF NORTH ABUTMENT BETWEEN BOX
BEAMS #4 AND #5. MINOR SPALLING ON EAST CORNER OF NORTH
ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT. SEE ALSO 58.2,3.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING
ALONG EDGES OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL, EAST END.
60.6 SEVERAL MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH (MSE) PANELS OUT OF
ALIGNMENT, UP TO 1". JOINT MATERIAL LOOSE BETWEEN MSE
PANELS AND CAPS AT ALL WINGWALLS.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. F
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. G
WEEP HOLES7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. F
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER (VEGETATION) 12. F
PIER(S)
N13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
N15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
N17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER9.
ALIGNMENT8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(CATCH BASIN)
N N N F G G G G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
222.1 MODERATE SPALL (18"L X 8"W X 4"D) ON APPROACH SLAB
UNDERSIDE, NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTH APPROACH.
222.4 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT
OVER APPROACH SLAB ENDS. MINOR RANDOM CRACKING OF
APPROACH PAVEMENT; MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AT NORTH
APPROACH.
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT CORNERS OF
STRUCTURE.
222.9 CATCH BASIN INLET CLOGGED AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH APPROACH.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 19 17 31 28
TYPE 3 17 15 29 26
TYPE 3S2 26 24 43 39
TYPE 3-3 32 29 53 48
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE AT MP 433.00
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5570-454P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 454P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1A10
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
187 - WILLIAMSON
161000010
COUNTY ROAD
NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY
5570454P0000000
4.35 MILES TO TN ROUTE 46
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
433.00 (KM PT 696.83)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
05 - BOX BEAMS - MULTIPLE
54.0 FT (16.5 M)
55.2 FT (16.8 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 3 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.0 TONS (28.1 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/13 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 37.5 FT (11.4 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°56'02.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 87°00'17.70"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 9.0 FT (2.7 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
40.5 FT (12.3 M)
34.0 FT (10.4 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
6.0 FT (1.8 M)
6.0 FT (1.8 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
21 °
NO
37.5 FT (11.4 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
1 - CONCRETE
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.58 FT (0.79 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
17.33 FT (5.28 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5570-454P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD TUPELO
PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
CURBS; EAST CURB NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING
OF WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENTS;
WEARING SURFACE OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT;
SOUTHBOUND LANE OF SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH
PAVEMENT OVER APPROACH SLAB ENDS; SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINE;
EAST CURBLINES NEAR NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - CATCH BASIN INLET CLOGGED AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH
APPROACH
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TREES GROWING
ALONG WINGWALLS; NORTHWEST WINGWALL
SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS; EAST
OVERHANG AT MIDSPAN SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL VINE GROWTH
PHOTO #14 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAM #1 NOT BEARING
EVENLY AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL
VINE GROWTH ON SUBSTRUCTURE AND BOX BEAMS
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL MSE WINGWALL PANELS OUT OF ALIGNMENT;
END OF NEW WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON BEARING SEATS; SOUTH ABUTMENT AT CENTERLINE SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - SPALL ON BEARING SEAT AREA OF NORTH ABUTMENT
BETWEEN BOX #4 AND #5
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL LOOSE JOINT MATERIAL BETWEEN MSE PANELS
AND CAPS AT ALL WINGWALLS; NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - VERTICAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND SPALLING
ALONG EDGES OF NORTH ABUTMENT BACKWALL, EAST END
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL VINE GROWTH THROUGHOUT SUBSTRUCTURE;
EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .