Attachment 9-Key Personnel Resume Template.docx

EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

TECHNICAL

Specialized Experience Comment by SAMPLES, JOSHUA D TSgt USSF SPOC 50 CONS/PKB: Removed based on 17 Ma 21 meeting and now consolidated with Past Performance evaluation

1) Design and Construction Projects. The Offeror shall submit between three (3) and five (5) projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity. Additionally, the Offeror shall submit between two (2) and three (3) projects performed by the Lead Design Entity. Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members. Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

2) Teaming Experience. In one page, the Offeror shall demonstrate any previous teaming experience between current team members. Teaming experience information is limited to projects that are well underway (defined below) or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

3) Special Requirements. Three (3) or more of the construction projects submitted and two (2) or more of the design projects shall clearly demonstrate experience with repair/renovation and new construction - no smaller than 5,000 square feet in area. Work areas include electrical, HVAC, utility projects, building renovation, civil works (e.g. paving both asphalt and concreter), roofing, and other projects in support of the sustainment, restoration, and maintainability of base operations.

4) Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar projects of similar or greater value. Submit projects that are currently well underway (at least 60% design and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation. The proposed prime construction and lead design entities shall have performed in the same role as the prime or lead entities on the projects submitted. If projects were design-build, so identify them.

Project information shall CLEARLY include:

Evaluation Criteria:

The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

10) Experience on similar projects within the RA at Schriever AFB may be rated more favorably.

Project Management Plan

1) Provide information that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, and proposed contract duration. Limit the information to Ten (10) pages or less. The successful offereor’s Project Management plan becomes part of the contract

2) Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s). Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing the how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list of key personnel to be provided.

3) Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Describe typical technical approach to design and construction. Include considerations for management of work within the Schriever AFB Restricted Access (RA) area. Include any considerations of fast-tracking design and construction, panelized construction, pre-engineered components, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs and achieve an aggressive schedule while minimizing impact to the base. The Government is looking for ways to minimize impacts of the construction scope within the Schriever AFB RA area.

Evaluation Criteria: Comment by SAMPLES, JOSHUA D TSgt USSF SPOC 50 CONS/PKB: Moved to Separate Evaluation Document

The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

1) Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. This will be rated as unacceptable if the Offeror has not selected and committed to use its lead design entity (ies).

2) Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Proposals that clearly and concisely demonstrate a thorough understanding of the constraints and impacts (schedule, budget, security, accreditation, etc.) of construction and working within the Schriever AFB RA may be rated more favorably.

The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs and support an aggressive schedule including such things as fast-tracking, etc.

Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience Submission Requirements:

1) For key personnel provide a brief resume using the Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Indicate the position title on each project listed in resumes. Provide the name, owner, dollar amount, date of completion, and brief scope of each resume project.

Include resumes for the following key personnel:

2) Refer to Appendix A of Section 01 11 00_SATOC SOW for minimum experience requirements.

3) Provide copy of professional engineer/architect license.

Evaluation Criteria: Comment by SAMPLES, JOSHUA D TSgt USSF SPOC 50 CONS/PKB: Moved to separate evaluation document

The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

1) The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform the design, and to perform construction.

2) Resumes that do not clearly state the personnel’s specific duties and job title on previous projects may be rated less favorably.

3) Project Managers that hold active architect or engineer professional registration will be rated more favorably.

4) Key personnel that have experience with working in the Schriever AFB RA may be rated more favorably.

5) Key personnel that exceed the required minimum years of experience in their position may be rated more favorably.

6) Previous design-build experience may be rated more favorably.

7) Previous Federal government project experience may be rated more favorably.

Seed Project – Will add once the seed project is developed.

PAST PERFORMANCE

Submission Requirements:

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal.

If available, submit Construction Contract Administration Support System (CCASS) or Architect- Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were designed and/or constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. For projects cited in Specialized Experience not covered in the CCASS / ACASS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire.

1) CPARS/CCASS/ACASS Evaluations (Will I be allowed to utilize?)

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS/CCASS/ACASS past performance information directly from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) at http://www.ppirs.gov. PPIRS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto PPIRS will require the following: All firms must have purchased and installed a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate. If you do not have this certificate, you cannot access your information. Additional information about the PKI certificate is posted in red at the top, center portion, of the http://www.ppirs.gov web page. You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto PPIRS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the Central Contractor Registry at http://www.ccr.gov . If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the CCR help desk by emailing them from the email link on the http://www.ccr.gov/help.asp web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

There are two other ways to obtain a copy of CCASS / ACASS evaluations as follows: (1) Contact your government point of contact for the project you mentioned, and ask them if they can send you a copy, or (2) Apply for “Contractor Corporate Senior Management Representative” access on the following CCASS / ACASS web page: http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/. This type of access is issued to only one person within the firm, typically a member of senior management. In addition to access to your completed CCASS / ACASS performance evaluations, you will also be able to view status of evaluations which have not yet been completed. Following receipt of your faxed application request, you will be emailed a logon and access instructions. This type of access will only let you see CCASS / ACASS information, so it is not as complete as PPIRS access which allows access to evaluations prepared by non-DOD federal agencies, as well as the DOD agencies which use CCASS / ACASS. Be aware that you will also need to have a PKI certificate to access the CCASS / ACASS system. This is a DOD requirement.

2) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

3) Government Utilization of Alternate Information Sources for Past Performance

The Government will assess the past performance on projects submitted under the Specialized Experience and reserves the right to conduct telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal or to review personal knowledge. In addition, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance of the Offeror on the submitted projects and any other previous work. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

Evaluation Criteria:

1) The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements, considering the degree of success of the D-B team's recent (well under way or turned over no longer than 5 years preceding the date of this solicitation), relevant experience. See explanation of “well underway” and relevancy under “Specialized Experience”.

2) Relevancy: The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience as well as from other sources described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing an overall past performance rating assigned to Past Performance. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

3) Performance: The Government will next consider how well the offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. Past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which document successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation, for example, but not limited to telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal, CCASS/ACASS or other agency performance databases, offeror furnished references, or personal knowledge. The Government also places a higher value on projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing an overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. The past performance confidence ratings are described below:

4) Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, The Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment rating will be considered “Unknown Confidence”.

Seed Project – Will add once the seed project is developed.

ATTACHMENT

COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE - CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last five years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Your Firm’s Name

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

(g) Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed :

(h) At Completion Construction Cost

(i) Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out

(j) Dates Construction: Began Completed

(k) Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known

(l) Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages?

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

(m) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company)

(n) Current Telephone Number of Reference POC

COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE - DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last five years indicating experience with projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project.

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Your Firm’s Name

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner

(f) General Scope of Construction Project

(g) Summary of Your Role in Design of this Project, including “Secure Area” (in accordance with UFC 4-010-05 and ICD/ICS 705) design

(h) Identify Estimated (“E”) or Actual (“A”) Construction Cost

(i) Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted

(j) Dates Design: Began Completed

(k) Dates Construction: Began Completed

(l) Your Performance Evaluation, if known

(m) Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages?

(If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation)

(n) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company)

(o) Current Telephone Number of Reference POC

ATTACHMENT 9

KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Provide information, listed below, on separate sheets showing qualifications of: prime contractor’s project manager responsible for design and construction, the design manager, the designers of record for architecture, interior design, structural, civil, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical, and mechanical/plumbing. For construction, include the on-site manager and general superintendent (in charge of self-performed work). Use a continuation sheet, if needed. NOTE: Match the positions on this page to the list of key personnel in the narrative submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

(a) Your Name and Title

(a) Your Assignment on this Project

(b) Name of Your Firm

(c) No. of Years: With this Firm With other Firms

(d) Education: Degree(s)/Year/Specialization

(e)

(f) Active Registration, if any: No. , State(s) , First Year/ Current Year /

(g) Describe Your Specific Experience and Qualifications Relevant to this Project (List Projects):

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

· How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

o o o o

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name: Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

VG

S

M

U

N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

VG

S

M

U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes

No

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):