Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-26-R-000047
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for offerors responding to the Northeast Region Construction Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) solicitation. The questionnaire is an evaluation tool rather than a substantive document describing contract requirements, and serves as an appendix to the solicitation that prospective contractors must complete as part of their proposal submission. The template does not contain specific performance metrics, evaluation criteria details, or substantive requirements; instead, it functions as a standardized form through which offerors will document their relevant past performance experience to demonstrate their capability to execute highway, street, and bridge construction services within the Northeast Region.
As a template document, this file establishes the framework that small business concerns must use when responding to the MATOC solicitation for the Federal Highway Administration's Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division. Offerors will use this questionnaire to provide evidence of their experience with construction services similar to those anticipated under the contract, which may include pavement construction, embankment work, culvert installation, bridge repairs, and related highway infrastructure projects. The completion of this questionnaire is a mandatory component of proposal evaluation for the MATOC contract opportunity, which offers an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity structure with a shared ceiling of $60,000,000 among up to four award recipients.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Firms Name and Project Number:
Today’s date:
Reference’s name, phone number, and title:
Name of Firm:
Project Name and what agency was the work performed for:
Nature of work performed:
Date work was performed and if completed within original work schedule:
Was this Contractor the Prime or Sub on this contract:
If Prime, were Subs used:
If Subs used, Type and Extent of Subcontracting:
Did the Prime have good relations and control of subs:
Were there problems with the project?
Was the contractor cooperative in addressing problems and changes? In what ways?
Did they submit many claims?
Evaluate the firm as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory in the following areas:
Thoroughness of site investigations
Project management and adherence to schedules
Meeting cost limits/cost control
Cooperativeness and responsiveness
Quality assurance and quality control
Overall ranking (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)
If you had the opportunity, would you want to work with this contractor again? Why? Why not?
Would you recommend this firm for future work? With or without reservations?
Any additional comments:
image1.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .