Attachment 15 - Present Past Performance Questionnaire PPPQ.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STORAGE AIDS SYSTEM FOR F35 PARTS WAREHOUSE
- Solicitation number
- FA488720Q0005
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA488720Q0005 Attachment 15: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire, 16 June 2020 The 56th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command is in the process of competitively soliciting for a complete design and installation of a Storage Aid System for the F-35 Parts Warehouse.
One of the considerations in quote evaluation is the evaluation of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the quoted effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later 4:00PM Mountain Standard Time on 6 July 2020.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire shall be filled out electronically and e-mailed to dimitri.pfeifer@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official solicitation records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this solicitation.
1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Program Description:
G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):
H. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
I. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
J. Description of work performed:
K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:
D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):
E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
F. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s quoted actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
| Technical Performance |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. How well did the contractor perform against the delivery schedules of the contract? In the remarks below, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual delivery dates and, if schedule slips occurred, state the number of slips and cumulative schedule variance.
| Management Effectiveness: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
8. Identified problems as they occurred.
9. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
10. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
11. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
12. Was responsive to contract changes.
13. Provided adequate project supervision.
14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
16. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
| Quality of Materials, Service, and Workmanship |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. How would you rate the contractor’s overall workmanship?
2. How would you rate the contractors ability to maintain adequate equipment to perform contract requirements?
3. How would you rate the contractor’s overall quality of service?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall quality of products, equipment and materials provided on this contract?
| Price Performance |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract price?
C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted prices and perform within contract price?
C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?
Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?
☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he/she promised in his/her quote, I [ click and select an item ] award to him/her today given that I had a choice.
REMARKS:
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail to: dimitri.pfeifer@us.af.mil Direct any questions to: SrA Dimitri Pfeifer, 623-856-2769
For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .