Att H - Reference Check Form.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP 26-87488 IVH Electronic Health Record (EHR)Bid Documents
Solicitation number
RFP 26-87488
Issued by
Tippecanoe County, Indiana

About this file

This is a Reference Check Form issued by the State of Indiana Department of Administration for RFP 26-87488, with Jake Ward serving as the procurement specialist point of contact. The form is designed to solicit feedback from vendors' previous clients regarding their performance and qualifications. References must submit completed forms to idoareferences@idoa.in.gov with the subject line clearly stating "RFP 26-87488 Reference - COMPANY NAME" by October 28th, 2026 at 3:00 PM Eastern Time.

The form requests comprehensive evaluation of vendor performance across multiple dimensions, including length of engagement, stakeholder communication, financial audit history, corrective action requests, quality of services and staff, engagement and communication effectiveness, resource allocation capability, cost and schedule performance, and overall vendor rating. References are asked to rate vendors on a four-point scale (poor, satisfactory, above average, or superior) with supporting explanations for each rating. The form also provides space for additional comments that the State should consider during reference evaluation and allows references to decline participation if necessary.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Vendor Networking Opportunities List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att G - Q&A Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP 26-87488 IVH EHR Main Document.docx DOCX document
Att L - AI - Technical Proposal Questions.docx DOCX document
Att A - IVOSB.docx DOCX document
Att F- Technical Proposalv2.docx DOCX document
Att N - Resource Usage Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att B - Sample Contract.docx DOCX document
Att B3 - IOT-SaaS.docx DOCX document
Att B1 - IOT-IaaS.docx DOCX document
Att B2 - IOT-PaaS.docx DOCX document
Att J - Attestation Form.docx DOCX document
Att E - Business Proposal.docx DOCX document
Att D - Cost Proposalv.2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att C - Indiana Economic Impact Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att I - Pre-proposal Network Form.docx DOCX document
Att M - Infrastructure Overview.docx DOCX document
Att K - Scope of Workv2.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment HState of Indiana Contact:

Jake Ward, Procurement Specialist jacward@idoa.in.gov Indiana Department of Administration

Reference Check Form

RFP 26-87488

Reference Check Form Due Date:

October 28th, 2026 @ 3:00PM Eastern Time

INSTRUCTIONS: You have been asked by the vendor listed below to provide a reference as they are responding to the current solicitation with the state of Indiana. This is a standard form created by the State of Indiana and your input is very much appreciated. During this competitive process, a representative from the State of Indiana, may contact you directly for more detail. If you have any questions, please contact the State of Indiana contact listed in the box in the top left side of the form.

Please provide the information requested below and submit this reference check form to:

idoareferences@idoa.in.gov:

The subject line of the email submissions must clearly state the following:

RFP 26-87488 Reference – COMPANY NAME

VENDOR NAME

REFERENCE CONTACT INFORMATION

Reference Company Name

Contact Name

Contact Title

Company Mailing Address

Company City, State, Zip

Company Website Address

Contact Telephone Number

Contact Fax Number

Contact Email

Industry of Company

QUESTIONS: Please provide a response to each of the questions listed below regarding the vendor listed above.

1. If you decline to provide a reference, please indicate that below and provide any comments you would be willing to share regarding the reason.

2. How long did you/have you and/or members of your team worked with the vendor? Please provide the specific dates of service.

3. With what type of internal and external stakeholders did the vendor have to communicate with?

4. Has the vendor been cited for any financial audit issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?

5. Has the vendor been subject to any requests for corrective action to cure performance issues? If you are able to, please describe the issue briefly, and any corrective actions required. Did the vendor ultimately address the issue(s) in a satisfactory manner?

6. Would you rate your experience with the quality of services/work provided by vendor as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

7. Would you rate the vendor's knowledge of your business as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

8. Would you rate the overall quality of the vendor’s staff as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

9. Would you describe the quality of the vendor’s engagement and communication with stakeholders (internal and external) throughout the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

10. Would you rate the vendor’s ability to provide appropriate staff and resources for the project, as needed, at all times as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

11. Would you rate the vendor's performance regarding cost and/or schedule overruns on the project as poor, satisfactory, above average or superior? Please elaborate on why you are giving the vendor this rating.

12. Are there any other topics you believe Indiana should consider during its reference evaluation or comments you would like to share?

13. Would your overall rating of the vendor be poor, satisfactory, above average or superior?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .