Updated_Page_56.pdf

PDF 18 KB Posted

Attached to
International Forest Research, Development, Technical and Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
AG-3187-S-12-0164
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington Office Acquisitions

About this file

RFP -Page 56

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to International Forest Research, Development, Technical and Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30Amend_0006.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_56_Jan_7_2012.pdf PDF
AG-3187-S-12-0164_Amendment_00050001.pdf PDF
QA_1-3-2013.pdf PDF
SF30.pdf PDF
QA_Final.pdf PDF
Amend_0003_AG-3187-S-12-0164_.pdf PDF
7_Lebanon_Sample_Task_Order_REVISED.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_59.pdf PDF
Amend002SF30Cover.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_50.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_10.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_51.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_9.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_7.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_4.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_49.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_60.pdf PDF
Sample_Work-plan_LRI.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_52.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_44.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_15.pdf PDF
0164Attachment1_Budget_Template_REVISED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Updated_Page_58.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_57.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_45.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_8.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_48.pdf PDF
121213_IP_Pre_Proposal_Conference_Presentation.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_5.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_46.pdf PDF
Updated_Page_6.pdf PDF
Amend0001.pdf PDF
0164Attachment1_Budget_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
0164_-5_Lebanon_Project_Performance_Monitoring_Framework.pdf PDF
0164_-4_Agreement_with_USAID.pdf PDF
0164_-7_Lebanon_Sample_Task_Order.pdf PDF
0164_-3_Past_Performance_Wrkst.docx DOCX document
SF33.pdf PDF
0164-8_Letter_of_Acknowledgment.doc DOC document
0164-6_Lebanon_Project_Branding_Agreementpdf.pdf PDF
RFP_AG-3187-S-12-0164.pdf PDF
0164_-2_Transition_Activities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 43

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AG-3187-S-12-0164

SECTION M--EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

BASIS OF AWARD

This acquisition is in accordance with FAR 15 - Best Value Continuum. Award will be made to that offeror whose proposal is (1) technically acceptable and (2) technical/cost relationship is the most advantageous to the Government. The critical factor in making any cost/technical trade-off is not the spread between the technical ratings, but rather, the significance of that difference. The significance of the spread of ratings will be determined on the basis of what the difference might mean in terms of the performance and what it would cost the Government to take advantage of it. Award may not necessarily be made for technical capabilities that would appear to exceed those needed for the successful performance of the work. The Government reserves the right to make cost/technical tradeoffs that are in the best interest of and advantageous to the Government.

Award may be made without further discussions. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms, from price and technical standpoint, which the offeror can submit to the government.

The Government may, after evaluation of the proposals, conduct further oral or written discussions as appropriate, with any or all offerors. Failure to provide all information requested for evaluation or clearly document minimum experience and qualifications may render the proposal as unacceptable.

M.1. EVALUATON FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Government anticipates awarding one IDIQ contract to the Offeror whose proposal is the most advantageous to the Government, technical and cost factors considered. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria below. The Government reserves the right to hold discussions; however it may make an award based on initial offers received without discussions of such offers.

M.2. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Offeror’s Proposal will be evaluated through the use of four (4) Technical Evaluation Factors listed below and one (1) Cost Factor. The Technical Evaluation Factors are listed in descending order of importance. Sub factors (a and b) are equal in importance.

Factor 1 Technical Approach

a) Capabilities and Experience

b) Technical Approach

Factor 2 Management Approach

a) Management and Staffing Plan

b) Resumes for Key Personnel

Factor 3 Response to the Sample Task Order

a) Technical and Management Approach

b) Costs

Factor 4 Past Performance

a) Past Performance Summaries mpedwardsen Highlight

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .