Attachment 3 - QASP DRAFT.docx
DOCX document 122 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FEMA Housing Inspection Services Programs Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70FB8022I0FEMAHIS
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for the Individual and Households Program (IHP) Field Services Contract. The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the contractor's performance, including what will be monitored, how monitoring will take place, who will conduct the monitoring, and how monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
The QASP outlines the government roles and responsibilities, performance standards, and surveillance methods such as direct observation, desktop monitoring, and analysis of contractor progress reports. It defines Selective Service Performance Areas (SSPAs) and associated performance thresholds and measurement calculations that will be used to determine the contractor's performance rating on a scale of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. The QASP also details an incentive structure based on customer satisfaction survey results.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INDIVIDUAL AND HOUSEHOLDS PROGRAM (IHP)
FIELD SERVICES CONTRACT
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Contract # Date
PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance of the IHP Field Services contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the Contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent when evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it as needed. However, the Government will coordinate changes with the Contractor. Updates will ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and an enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions are available to the Contractor and government officials implementing surveillance activities.
The following FAR clauses apply to the measures used to validate and confirm compliance:
52.246-4 Inspection of Services – Fixed-Price, 52.246-6 Inspection-Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour
GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel will oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO will ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, compliance with the contract terms, and safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO will assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for the technical administration of the contract and will ensure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. At the conclusion of the contract or when requested by the CO, the COR will provide documentation to the CO in support of quality support monitoring. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitment or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes they deem may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the CO for action.
Task Monitor (TM) –The Task Monitor assesses the Contractor’s response to the requirements contained within the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) with a primary focus on the Selective Service Performance Areas (SSPAs) contained within this QASP outline. Results of QASP will be submitted to the COR for delivery to the Contractor post Task Order release.
Program Manager (PM) – The Program Manager assists in analyzing performance scoring thresholds and calculations for a final QASP rating.
CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The Contractor shall provide representatives as points of contact for sharing data with government personnel during the QASP evaluation.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The Government will use the performance thresholds from the PRS, associated SSPAs and the standards contained in this QASP to determine the Contractor’s damage assessment and JIT Task Order performance rating.
METHOD OF QUALITY SURVEILLANCE
The COR, or their designee will use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
Direct Observation (QC) FEMA will periodically observe the Contractor’s field Quality Control (QC) assessment process throughout the Task Order activation period. The Contractor’s field QC program will compare the initial assessment to that of a subsequent evaluation of the same dwelling confirming a compliant product and QC score. The results of the QC assessment will follow the Contractor’s QMS and FEMA provided guidance. Subsequent QC results are to be reported to FEMA when errors (non-conformities) are identified and exceed the threshold contained within Technical Exhibit 6 FEMA Corrections. All non-conforming assessments shall be corrected at no cost to the Government.
Desktop Monitoring (QA) FEMA will periodically review assessments completed by the Contractor through the National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS), and through the use of Government generated reports for Quality Assurance. Assessments that are not conforming to FEMA provided guidance will be returned to the Contractor as a FEMA Correction, per Technical Exhibit 6 FEMA Corrections at no cost to the Government.
Customer Complaints Customer complaints are retained by FEMA throughout the contract period. Complaint follow up, timeliness and resolution are contained within the Customer Service Performance Application (CSPA) database. Contractor responsiveness to complaints are inclusive of SSPA # 4.G Cooperative Management.
100% Assessment FEMA will monitor assessments completed during the Task Order Activation period for adherence to the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS), PRS, and FEMA provided guidelines.
Progress or Status Meetings Bi-weekly conference calls between FEMA and the Contractor are typically conducted during heighted activity as means to monitor Contractor performance.
Analysis of Contractor's Progress Reports FEMA will measure the delivery and content of the Contractor’s submitted progress reports per the requirements of the PWS, PRS, and this QASP.
QASP Evaluation Matrix The QASP evaluation matrix is the template used to identify specific areas that will be measured throughout the task order activation period and contains performance elements for use in preparing the final rating.
Selective Service Performance Areas (SSPAs) and associated number are contained within the PRS. The PRS defines the specific minimum acceptable threshold and objective for each activity measured.
PWS Objective – This is the deliverable to be measured contained within the PWS.
Method of Surveillance – Describes the item, object, and or method used to monitor the performance area.
Performance Measurement – Further defines surveillance when applying a scoring threshold calculation for measurement.
2024 IHP Field Services Attachment #3
Calculation – The scoring threshold identifying point deductions for non-compliant work. The total score to be achieved is 100. The final result of this measurement will be rated per Section 7.
Attachment 3 QASP Draft 1 April 4, 2024
SSPA #1 Quality and Customer Service
| SSPA |
| PWS |
| Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Performance Measurement |
| Calculation |
(Points to be subtracted from 100 Score)
| 1.B. - Complete one QC assessment within 48 hours of the first returned assessment. |
| 5.16 |
| Met Requirement for all Assessments subject to QC. |
| Contractor and FEMA provided reports |
| All assessments subject to QC except those returned as Withdrawn, No contact and Inaccessible. |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 5 |
1.B - Each assessor received a Quality Control assessment within 7 days of returning their first assessment.
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 10 |
1.B – Quality Control assessments were performed on a minimum of 3 and 3% of each assessor's initial assessments and minimum of 3 and 3% of all appeal assessments, unless waived by FEMA.
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 20 |
SSPA #2 Completed Assessments and Production
| SSPA |
| PWS |
| Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Performance Measurement |
| Calculation |
(Points to be subtracted from 100 Score)
| 2.G – Production, Option 1 Peak Activity |
| 5.15 |
| Met production requirement for Days 3 - 18 (16 days) |
| FEMA generated reports |
| Point deduction for each missed day’s production. |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 3 points for each missed day for a max. deduction of 48 points |
| 2.G – Production, Option 2 Non-Peak Activity |
| 5.15 |
| Met production requirement for Days 2 - 9 (8 days) |
| FEMA generated reports |
| Point deduction for each missed day’s production. |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 6 points for each missed day for a max. deduction of 48 points |
| 2.G – Production, Option 3 Hybrid |
| 5.15 |
| Met required daily quantity of assessors and subsequent daily production requirement when transitioning to Option 1 or Option 2 |
| FEMA generated reports |
| Task Order specific point deduction to include failing to meet a daily count of assessors arriving to the field, and the remainder for missed production days. |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 3 points for each missed day for a max. deduction of 48 points |
SSPA #3 Timeliness
| SSPA |
| PWS |
| Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Performance Measurement |
| Calculation |
(Points to be subtracted from 100 Score)
| 2.J – Geographical Aging |
| 1.4 |
| No one county, parish or independent city’s average time to return assessments exceeds the average time where the majority of work was returned |
| FEMA generated reports |
| Point deduction when exceeding this requirement |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 5 |
| 2.K – Correction Aging |
| 5.17 |
| The average FCOR aging shall not exceed |
3.0 calendar days
| FEMA generated reports |
| Point deduction when exceeding this requirement |
| Failed to meet Requirement |
| 10 |
SSPA #4 Reports and Cooperative Management
| SSPA |
| PWS |
| Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Performance Measurement |
| Calculation |
(Points to be subtracted from 100 Score)
4.B – Staffing and Surge Event Reports
5.19.4
5.19.8
| 4.G – Cooperative Management |
| 1.4 |
| All Corrective and Preventative Action (CAPA) required for nonconformities identified through the task order were initiated per the Contractor’s QMS and/or at FEMA’s request with acceptable responses provided to FEMA within 3 business days of the nonconformity. |
| All contractor provided CAPA response(s) will be validated by the COR/TM for content and accuracy. |
| Contractor’s response contained acceptable acknowledgement of the nonconformity and method to prevent the situation in future task orders and delivered within 3 business days of notice or request of the nonconformity. |
| Failed to meet requirement |
| 1 |
| 1.15 |
| Invoices submitted not later than the third Monday after the end of the contractor’s accounting period. |
When a holiday falls on a Monday, invoices shall be submitted on Tuesday.
| Contractor submitted invoices |
| · 100% of invoices submitted no later than the third Monday after the end of the Contractor’s accounting period. |
· Greater than 75% of invoices submitted no later than the third Monday after the end of the Contractor’s accounting period.
· Less than 75% of invoices submitted on Mondays but not later than the third Monday after the end of the Contractor’s accounting period.
· When a holiday falls on a Monday, invoices shall be
· submitted on Tuesday.
These percentages shall be calculated based on the summary of invoice submission during the period of performance subject to CPARS reporting.
To be considered submitted, the invoice shall be received by the Government in the agreed to format with all required supporting documentation deemed acceptable by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).
* Percentage points shall not be deducted for instances when invoices are submitted on Tuesday due to a holiday.
Just in Time Activation, measured as a separate Task Order
| Component |
| PWS |
| Threshold |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Performance Measurement |
| Calculation |
(Points to be subtracted from 100 Score)
| Just In Time (When Initiated) |
| 5.8 |
| A daily count of personnel to be badged, trained and ready for field deployment identified through each Contractor’s proposal. |
| Contractor provided reports using a spreadsheet provided by FEMA and verified by the COR. |
| Contractor met threshold metrics identified in the Proposal and verified by FEMA |
| Met Task Order activation |
performance between Day 1 and Day 5?
Met proposed count of candidates to arrive and complete daily fingerprinting and or adjudication at the badging center?
Met proposed count of assessors to be trained daily?
Met proposed count of assessors to field ready to receive work.
Ratings Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or fails to meet a given standard. A rating scale is used to determine level of performance outcomes and applies to the items identified from the QASP Evaluation Matrix. The following ratings shall be used:
| Rating |
| Description |
| Exceptional 95 and Above |
| Performance meets and exceeds the majority of contractual requirements benefiting the Government. |
| Very Good 90-94.99 |
| Performance meets and exceeds some contractual requirements for the Government’s benefit. |
| Satisfactory 85-89.99 |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. |
| Marginal 75 to 84.99 |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being evaluated reflects moderate problems for which the contractor’s actions within this Task Order were marginally effective or not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory Less than 75 |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions within this Task Order were ineffective. |
Task Order Release Performance Reporting QASP Result communication and acceptance procedures are contained within the PRS (Attachment 2).
Frequency of Measurement Measurements by FEMA may be monitored throughout the task order period for any or all of the SSPAs contained within the PRS. Reports of interim results will be communicated throughout the Task Order period. Minimally, a final QASP results acceptance document is prepared and communicated according to the timelines shown within the PRS.
Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings The COR and Task Monitor conduct reoccurring conference calls to discuss the progress status of Task Order accomplishments to include performance, quality, and field challenges with approaches to overcome.
Incentive Damage assessment Task Orders issued under this contract are subject to a financial incentive. The incentive is designed so that achieving this additional threshold is not easily obtained requiring the Contractor and their personnel to excel in areas of customer service, timeliness, and quality.
Incentive – Customer Satisfaction
The Task Order incentive is based on the cumulative score of the three categories. The maximum points that may be earned is 100, whereby each point represents the percentage of the incentive to be awarded.
| Category |
| PWS/PRS |
| Incentive is based on the average customer service survey results conducted by FEMA |
| Calculation |
| Customer Service |
| PWS 5.4 |
| Survey results conducted by FEMA |
| The average score of the 8 questions based on a 5-point metric |
| Q1 – Assessor explained the reason for the assessment. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q2 – Assessor provided responses that were easy to understand. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q3 – Assessor answered the survivor’s questions. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q4 – Assessor explained what is to happen next. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q5 – Assessor’s response was timely. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q6 – Assessor presented themselves in a professional manner. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q7 – The amount of time the assessor spend on the assessment was acceptable. |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Q8 – Overall assessment experience |
| 1 – 5 Points |
| Incentive range |
| Score |
| ≥ 4.85 |
| 30 |
| ≥4.65 < 4.85 |
| 22.5 |
| ≥ 4.45 <4.65 |
| 15 |
| ≥ 4.25 < 4.45 |
| 7.5 |
| < 4.25 |
| 0 |
| Timeliness |
| PWS/PRS |
| Incentive Range is based on location and average time to return completed assessments |
| Score |
| Routine Aging |
| PWS 1.4 |
PRS SSPA #3A
| CONUS |
| OCONUS |
| ≤ 2 days 12 hours 0 minutes |
| ≤ 4 days 12 hours 0 minutes |
| ≤ 2 days 18 hours 0 minutes |
| ≤ 5 days 0 hours 0 minutes |
≤ 3 days 0 hours 0 minutes
≤ 5 days 12 hours 0 minutes
| ≤ 3 days 6 hours and 0 minutes |
| ≤ 6 days 0 hours 0 minutes |
| Quality |
| PWS/PRS |
| Incentive is based on the percentage of FCORs to the count of completed assessments returned. |
| Incentive Range |
| Score |
| Quality Assurance |
| PWS 5.16, 5.17 |
PRS SSPA #1.A
| FCOR / Completed Assessments |
| ≤ 1.750% |
| 30 |
| ≤ 2.000% |
| 22.5 |
| ≤ 2.250% |
| 15 |
| ≤ 2.500% |
| 7.5 |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .