7-Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet MH26-11 - FINAL.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MH26-11 - Tow and Wrecker Services
- Solicitation number
- MH26-11
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation MH26-11 - Tow and Wrecker Services, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing. The RFP seeks to establish multiple contracts for tow and wrecker services for vehicles owned by eligible users, excluding privately owned vehicles. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of 24 months. The evaluation process requires vendors to pass all mandatory minimum requirements, achieve a minimum technical score threshold of 480 points out of 800 possible points, and attain a total evaluation score of at least 600 points out of 1,000 to be considered for award. Multiple awards may be granted based on vendors meeting both the technical score threshold and total score threshold.
The scoresheet allocates 80 percent of total evaluation points to technical criteria and 20 percent to cost evaluation, with technical criteria evaluated across seven categories: Equipment Capabilities (30 points), Types of Vehicles that can be towed (30 points), Staffing/Driver availability (24 points), Yards (28 points), USDOT and UDOT certifications (30 points), Additional Services and Customer Service (10 points), and Returns, Refunds, and Warranties (8 points). Cost evaluation is conducted separately for Category 1 (Light and Medium Duty Tows) and Category 2 (Heavy Duty Tows), with the lowest cost vendor serving as the baseline for cost point calculations. The State of Utah will assess an administrative fee of one-quarter of one percent (.25%) of contract value.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Attachment C - Cost Proposal MH26-11 Tow and Wrecker Services - FINAL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 4-Attachment B - SOW - MH26-11 Tow and Wrecker Services - FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment D - Technical Criteria - MH26-11 Tow and Wrecking - FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| RFP Evaluation Scoresheet |
| Solicitation #MH26-11 - Tow and Wrecker Services |
| This file is provided for tansparency in how the RFP is scored. Vendors do not complete any information on this file. |
| Evaluation Process: |
1. Vendors must pass all listed minimum mandatory requirements to be considered.
2. Vendors must receive the minimum amount of technical points as stated in Attachment D - Technical Criteria, in order to proceed to the cost evaluation stage.
3. Cost points are awarded and combined with the Vendor's technical score. The Cost evaluation is described in detail in Attachment C - Cost Sheet.
4. Vendors who meet the minimum total RFP score as described in the RFP information will be awarded a State of Utah Cooperative Contract.
Evaluator Instructions:
1. Copy this tab and create a tab for every proposal that will be scored
2. Complete only the Yellow Boxes. (Blue = general information; Green = information specificic to this RFP)
3. After scoring is complete, email the file to the State Purcahsing Agent conducting the RFP.
Vendor Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror has uploaded fully completed technical response (Attachment D) | prerequisite | |
| 2 | Offeror has uploaded fully completed cost sheet (Attachment C) | prerequisite |
Score Descriptions 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Equipment Capabilities | Attachment D | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Types of Vehicles that can be towed | Attachment D | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Staffing / Driver availability | Attachment D | 24 | 15.0% | 120.00 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Yards | Attachment D | 28 | 17.5% | 140.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | USDOT and UDOT certifications | Attachment D | 30 | 18.8% | 150.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | Additional Services and Customer Service | Attachment D | 10 | 6.3% | 50.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | Returns, Refunds, and Warranties | Attachment D | 8 | 5.0% | 40.00 | 0.00 |
| 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Attachment D | 60% | 480.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
COST EVALUATION DETAIL + TECHNICAL SCORE
| Cost for Category 1: Light and Medium Duty Tows | RFP Section | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Attachment C | 20% | 200.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Category Summary | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 80% | 800.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 20% | 200.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 600 point minimum for an award | ||
| Cost for Category 2: Heavy Duty Tows | RFP Section | Lowest Cost | Vendor's Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Attachment C | 20% | 200.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Category Summary | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 80% | 800.0 | 0.0 | |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 20% | 200.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | 600 point minimum for an award |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .