27SEPGT1 - Scorecard - final.docx

DOCX document 115 KB Posted

Attached to
27SEPGT1 | Comprehensive Support for IDEA Part B SPP/APR | RFR
Solicitation number
BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-130975
Issued by
Essex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria scorecard for the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's (DESE) request for responses (RFR) to provide comprehensive support for IDEA Part B State Performance Plan and Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) activities. The project encompasses seven modules focused on data collection, analysis, and reporting; stakeholder engagement; technical assistance and professional development; continuous improvement; and State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) development and implementation. The contract opportunity, identified as 27SEPGT1, is covered under World Trade Organization (WTO) regulations and is valued over $250,000 annually.

The scorecard establishes eight non-negotiable required qualifications that bidders must satisfy to advance in the evaluation process, including demonstrated experience with IDEA Part B SPP/APR activities, knowledge of Results-Driven Accountability (RDA) and OSEP reporting requirements, statistical analysis capabilities, accessible communication materials development, technical information communication to diverse audiences, state-level stakeholder engagement experience, data confidentiality compliance, and ability to begin work immediately upon contract execution. The evaluation comprises nine additional criteria scored on a zero to five-point scale with multipliers, totaling 100 possible points. Scoring categories include the Supplier Diversity Program Plan (25 points maximum), preferred qualifications and organizational experience (15 points), module-specific required and preferred expertise (15 and 10 points respectively), technical approach and project management (15 points), staff qualifications and experience (5 points), communication and stakeholder engagement (5 points), budget and cost effectiveness (5 points), and equity and cultural responsiveness (5 points).

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
27SEPGT1 - Bid - Final UPDATED.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Q and A - final.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx DOCX document
FY26 State Forms - April 2026.pdf PDF
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 2 Module B - final - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 7 Module G - final.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment A - Final.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 3 Module C - final.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 5 Module E - final.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 2 Module B - final.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 1 Module A - final.docx DOCX document
Prompt Pay Discount - PPD Form.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 4 Module D - final.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Measures - Final.docx DOCX document
Supplier Diversity Plan Language.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Attachment 6 Module F - final.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
27SEPGT1 - Bid - Final.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx DOCX document
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Demonstrated experience supporting IDEA Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) activities.
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
Demonstrated knowledge of IDEA Part B requirements, Results-Driven Accountability (RDA), and OSEP reporting requirements
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Demonstrated ability to conduct high-level statistical analysis on aggregated and disaggregated student-level data.
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
Demonstrated experience developing accessible reports, presentations, infographics, and public-facing communication materials.
Yes |_|
No |_|
5
Demonstrated ability to communicate technical information to diverse audiences including families, LEAs, advisory groups, and policymakers.
Yes |_|
No |_|
6
Demonstrated experience supporting state-level stakeholder engagement and target setting activities.
Yes |_|
No |_|
7
Demonstrated ability to maintain confidentiality and comply with all Department data-sharing and security requirements.
Yes |_|
No |_|
8
Ability to begin work immediately upon contract execution.
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 27SEPGT1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-130975 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Supplier Diversity Program Plan (Any Bidder responding to an RFR Bid, valued over $250,000 annually, must submit the SDP Form uploaded to COMMBUYS with this Bid, at the time of submission with a percentage 1% or greater. This form will be part of the evaluation on this scorecard and points will be calculated as follows: 1 % - 1.9% = 5 points, 2% - 2.9% = 10 points, 3% - 3.9% = 15 points, 4% - 4.9% = 20 points, 5% or higher = 25 points
(x5)
25
2
Preferred Qualifications and Relevant Organizational Experience:

The bidder demonstrates organizational experience and expertise that exceeds the minimum required qualifications, including experience supporting multiple SEAs, statewide General Supervision systems, QA 23-01 implementation, equity-focused data analysis, stakeholder engagement, technical assistance systems, continuous improvement planning, and OSEP clarification and reporting activities.

(x3)
15
3
Module-Specific Required Experience and Expertise:

The bidder demonstrates that it possesses the required qualifications identified for each proposed Module in Attachment A. Consideration will be given to the bidder's demonstrated technical knowledge, subject matter expertise, organizational experience, and ability to successfully perform the specific activities required for the Module(s) proposed.

(x3)
15
4
Module-Specific Preferred Experience and Expertise:

The bidder demonstrates experience and expertise that exceeds the minimum module-specific required qualifications identified in Attachment A. Consideration will be given to specialized experience, successful completion of comparable projects, innovative practices, and demonstrated leadership directly related to the proposed Module(s).

(x2)
10
5
Technical Approach, Project Management, and Vendor Coordination:

The bidder presents a clear, feasible, and comprehensive approach for completing the proposed scope of work and deliverables. Consideration will be given to the bidder's technical approach, project management methodology, staffing plan, communication protocols, coordination with the Department and other vendors, quality assurance processes, risk management strategies, and ability to successfully manage timelines, deliverables, and contract requirements.

(x3)
15
6
Experience and Qualifications of Staff:

The bidder demonstrates that proposed staff possess the knowledge, experience, and capacity necessary to successfully perform the proposed work. Consideration will be given to relevant IDEA experience, technical expertise, project leadership, and the bidder’s ability to provide sufficient staffing resources throughout the contract period.

(x1)
5
7
Communication, Stakeholder Engagement, and Accessibility:

The bidder demonstrates experience communicating complex information to diverse audiences and developing accessible materials and presentations. The response reflects the bidder’s ability to facilitate stakeholder engagement, support public reporting, and effectively incorporate stakeholder feedback into continuous improvement efforts.

(x1)
5
8
Budget and Cost Effectiveness:

The bidder provides a clear, reasonable, and well-supported budget that aligns with the proposed scope of work and deliverables. Consideration will be given to the appropriateness of proposed

(x1)
5
9
Equity and Cultural Responsiveness:

The bidder demonstrates an understanding of educational equity and the importance of addressing disparities affecting students with disabilities and historically marginalized populations. The response reflects the bidder’s ability to incorporate equitable and culturally responsive practices into data analysis, stakeholder engagement, technical assistance, and reporting activities.

(x1)
5
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .