CAVE Preproposal_Final_0001.pptx

Pre-Proposal Teleconference

CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK

REPACEMENT STRUCTURAL STEEL & ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT FOR #1 & #2 ELEVATORS AND REPLACE OLD/FAILING PRELIMINARY ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE

Solicitation: 140P2020R0112

NPS PMIS #: CAVE 169636/219342

THIS MEETING WILL BE RECORDED

JULY 28, 2020

E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

OPENING

INTRODUCTIONS

ATTENDEES LIST WILL BE INCLUDED IN AN AMENDMENT

PURPOSE OF THE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/VIRTUAL SITE VISIT

QUESTIONS AFTER PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

DIRECT ALL QUESTIONS TO Victoria Nosal and Vicki Supler, BY E-MAIL: Victoria_nosal@nps.gov; vicki_l_freese-supler@nps.gov.

ALL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS BY AMENDMENT TO THE SOLICITATION.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (SOLICITATION DOCUMENT) SHALL ONLY BE CHANGED BY FORMAL AMENDMENT ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER AT THE WEBSITE beta.sam.gov.

Cut-off day for questions is August 6, 2020, 1500 MT.

CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK

TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS

CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

SPECIFICATIONS

REPORTS

SCOPE OF WORK

Base Work: Elevators 1 & 2 Demolition of all existing elevator 1 & 2 system components including cards, counterweights, elevator ropes, overspeed governor, pit equipment, machine room equipment, and wiring.

Demolition of existing structural steel supports & guiderails Hazardous material abatement of remaining lead-coated structural members.

Furnish & install 2 new complete elevator systems.

Furnish & install new structural stainless steel elevator frame and guiderails.

Remove and replace machine room roof structure & roofing.

New elevator shaft drainage, shaft lighting and architectural upgrades for elevators 1, 2, 3 & 4.

Special Concerns:

Elevated radon levels within the cave/shaft. Appropriate monitoring for employee safety required.

Lower lobby historic tile and existing shaft gutter/drain system is historic, coordination with NPS Cultural Resources required.

Optional Work: Volume 1: Primary Electrical System Replacement Demolition of existing primary electrical system including underground electrical distribution , switchgear, transformers, panelboards, pullboxes, etc.

Provision of grounding and surge protection to NFPA 70.

Coordination with local utility (Xcel Energy) to replace existing substation.

Modifications to existing electrical installation to accommodate reconnection.

PLC control system.

New lighting and emergency lighting system and controls.

Provision of temporary power as necessary to meet maximum outage durations per specs.

All associated equipment pads, trench covers, building penetration patching/painting, ground surface reinstatment / reseeding, etc.

Demolition of existing generator and provision of new 480V 60Hz 1000kVA standby diesel generator. New generator pad / enclosure in new location.

Provision of new 12.47kV and Low Voltage distribution, duct bank, conduits, raceways, switchboards, switchgear, ATS, and transformers.

Optional Work: Volume 1: Primary Electrical System Replacement

Special Concerns:

Trenching: refer to geotechnical and GPR / Electrical resistivity reports to understand subsurface conditions, including depth of subsurface rock and presence of underground voids.

Cultural Resources: Historic stone walls, walks, roads and archeologically sensitive areas must be protected from damage. Archeological monitor shall be provided by the contractor for all excavations.

Natural Resources: Noise restriction during bat flight. Provide tree protection.

Contractor Use of Site Confine construction operations to areas where work is permitted as indicated on drawings.

BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government will conduct a source selection using the Best Value Continuum Tradeoff Process defined at FAR Part 15.1. The Contracting Officer (CO) will obligate and award a contract to the offeror who submits a proposal the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines conforms to solicitation requirements; is fair and reasonable; and provides the best value to the government considering all evaluation factors combined as detailed below.

2. The Government may accept other than the lowest priced proposal when the perceived benefits of a higher priced proposal merit the price differential.

3. Additionally, pursuant to FAR 52.215-1(f), Contract Award, contained herein:

The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

The Government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the CO later determines them to be necessary.

EVALUATION FACTORS

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE: FACTORS 1 -4 are listed in descending order of Importance. Relative importance of the subfactors are equal in importance.

Overall: All evaluation factors other than price (technical and past performance), when combined are approximately equal to price.

VOLUME I, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

FORMAT: Submit one (1) electronic copy ORGANIZATION: Include a Table of Contents named as follows:

FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH AND SCHEDULE

FACTOR 2 – PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND KEY PERSONNEL

FACTOR 3 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND SAFETY

VOLUME I, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

FACTOR 4: PAST PERFORMANCE

OTHER SUBMITTALS (to be include in the Business Proposal): PROPOSED EQUALS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

Factor 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH & SCHEDULE Subfactor 1-A Technical Approach: Offeror’s means and methods to complete a technical aspect of required work in this solicitation. Submit a written narrative limited to 10 pages describing your technical approach for the specific elements below. Pictures can be included and will count towards the page limitation.

Subfactor 1-A Technical Approach cont.

Means and Methods to complete the work in accordance with the plans and specifications including a discussion relative to the following elements:

i. Methods to perform electrical distribution replacement work including a discussion relative to the completion of trenching, providing and maintaining temporary power, rock excavation, installation of electrical components and other aspects of the project. The narrative shall also include a description of the proposed equipment, staging/work areas and working in areas of a culturally sensitive nature to accomplish the work activities.

ii. Methods to perform structural steel beam removal and installation, elevator removal and replacement, and protection of in-place existing sensitive equipment and/or machinery. The narrative shall also include working in confined spaces and as applicable, a description of the proposed equipment and staging/work area to accomplish the work activities.

Subfactor 1-A Technical Approach cont.

Natural/Cultural/Historic Protection and Preservation: Please explain the approach and execution of the work in order to protect the park resources, natural, historic, archeologic, and cultural resources while maintaining park operations and minimize impacts to Park visitors.

Logistics: Describe the Offeror’s proposed logistics for coordinating all transportation, staging, hauling, material deliveries, installation and disposal given the limited site access and areas available for construction activities, including any long lead items.

Factor 1 TECHNICAL APPROACH & SCHEDULE Subfactor 1A: Technical Approach Offeror will be evaluated based on their understanding of the complexities of the project by addressing the following:

A realistic, detailed description of proposed phasing and sequencing of work which demonstrates an understanding of the means and methods to complete the work in accordance with the plans and specifications including a logical, reasonable completion of trenching, providing and maintaining temporary power, rock excavation, installation of electrical components and other aspects of the project including the equipment to be utilized. Offerors with a clear and realistic plan will be evaluated more favorably.

A realistic, detailed description of proposed phasing and sequencing of work which demonstrates an understanding of the means and methods to complete the work in accordance with the plans and specifications including a logical, reasonable completion of the structural steel beam removal and installation, removal and replacement of elevators, and protection of in-place existing sensitive equipment and/or machinery and other aspects of the project including the equipment to be utilized. Offerors with a clear and realistic plan will be evaluated more favorably.

Subfactor 1A: Technical Approach

Offeror will be evaluated based on the extent of Offeror’s experience working in proximity to sensitive natural, archeologic, and cultural resources while maintaining park operations, resources, and minimizing impacts to Park visitors. Offerors with a clear and realistic plan will be evaluated more favorably.

Offeror will be evaluated on the proposed logistics for material delivery, staging, installation and disposal, including long lead items, given the limited site access and areas available for construction activities, delivery and transport methodology. Offerors with a clear, thoughtful, and well-reasoned plan will be evaluated more favorably.

Subfactor 1B: Schedule Submit proposed construction schedule for this project showing completion within the required period of performance contained in this solicitation with accompanying schedule narrative. Submit schedule in MS Project Gantt Chart format; assume a Notice to Proceed (NTP) date of November 1, 2020; for the Period of Performance ending 607 calendar days from issuance of the NTP. Include specific activities required for this project and a clear critical path with major milestone, identification of long lead items, and applicable predecessor activities. In the Offeror’s accompanying narrative, explain schedule logic, critical path activities, and key considerations and constraints, which includes procuring and receiving long lead items. There is no preprinted form for this submittal.

Factor 1: Technical & Schedule Subfactor 1B: Schedule Offerors will be evaluated on the basis of demonstrating their ability to schedule work by developing a critical path schedule for this project which illustrates completing the work within the specified dates, in the most efficient manner, while considering the following:

Offeror will be evaluated on ability to provide effective project management and coordination for this project, including understanding of and ability to anticipate and address significant project constraints, hurdles and challenges.

Offeror will be evaluated on the perceived strength of the preliminary project schedule which should include logic for sequencing as well as appropriate time for submittal review and preparation of shop drawings, if required. In addition, the perceived completeness of the schedules CPM, work breakdown, durations, dependencies, logical milestones, float and determination of critical path, will be evaluated more favorably. Offeror’s schedule should show logical ties, clearly identify the critical path for the project and match the proposed written approach presented in Subfactor 1A. Proposals that demonstrate a logical approach on how work will be sequenced will be evaluated more favorably.

Factor 2: Project Experience and Key Personnel Subfactor 2A – Project Experience Submit the “Project Experience” form addressing specific experience elements up to 8 relevant project, no less than 5, completed in the last 5 years. Submit separate forms for each project. Key trades, if evaluated are subject to substitution requirements in Section H of this solicitation and resulting contract. Submit the same project information for Past Performance Experience Company’s ability, experience, and technical competence performing the following types of installations in a culturally sensitive, remote environment and restricted spaces.

Both medium voltage and low voltage distribution systems, conduits, cables, switchboards, switchgear, transformers, underground ductbank, and standby/emergency generator with installations appropriate and compatible with the specific site requirements, including temporary power during construction to provide minimal interruption to park operations.

Extensive rock trenching in a sensitive cultural & natural environment for duck bank installation.

Structural steel beam removal and installation and protection of in-place existing sensitive equipment and/or machinery while working Extensive rock trenching in a sensitive cultural & natural environment for duct bank installation.

Structural steel beam removal and installation and protection of in-place existing sensitive equipment and or machinery while working in restricted, difficult access locations in an operation facility with public visitation.

Complete elevator system replacement including electrical system upgrades and replacement.

Factor 2 Project Experience and Key Personnel cont.

Subfactor 2A Project Experience Offeror will be evaluated on the extent of their experience on both medium voltage and low voltage distribution systems, conduits, cables, swithboards, switchgear, transformers, rock trenching for underground ductbank, and standby emergency generator with installations appropriate and compatible with the specific site requirements, including temporary power during construction to provide minimal interruption to park operations. Offerors will be evaluated based on demonstrated experience and capability to perform similar work on projects of similar size and complexity. Offerors who have demonstrated relevant capabilities and experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent of their experience with structural steel beam removal and installation, removal and replacement of elevators, and protection of in-place existing sensitive equipment and/or machinery while working in restricted, difficult access locations in an operational facility with public visitation. Offerors will be evaluated based on demonstrated experience and capability to perform similar work on projects of similar size and complexity. Offerors who have demonstrated relevant capabilities and experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Subfactor 2A Project Experience Offerors will be evaluated on the extent of their experience with complete elevator system replacement including electrical upgrades and replacement. Offerors will be evaluated based on demonstrated experience and capability to perform similar work on projects o similar size and complexity. Offerors who have demonstrated relevant capabilities and experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Subfactor 2B Key Personnel Experience:

Submit resumes for key personnel that includes each individual’s years of experience in proposed position, duties and experience in projects of same/similar scope, complexity, magnitude and schedule as identified in this solicitation at Section H and listed below. All personnel proposed are subject to substitution requirements contained in this solicitation. There is not preprinted form for this submittal.

The Government is requesting all key positions be performed by separate people.

In addition to the key personnel denoted above, the Offeror shall provide qualification information for the following key trades:

If your firm is not self-performing the key trades denoted above, then please provide no more than 3 project the Offeror’s key electrical subcontractor and key steel fabricator/installers subcontractor has performed in the past 5 years. Projects shall coincide with project experience subfactors listed.

Factor 2: Project and Key Personnel Experience

Qualifications of key personnel and specialty trades will be evaluated in keeping with the goals of the project. Offeror shall address the qualifications, prior experience, capabilities and roles and responsibilities of the proposed key personnel and specialty trades. The proposal should also identify the proposed key personnel and key trades proposed by the prime and its subcontract team including the communication plan. Offerors will be evaluated as follows:

Offeror will be evaluated on the education, experience and qualifications of key personnel for both the prime contractor and subcontractors in the same or similar key personnel positions on projects similar in scope, complexity and magnitude as this requirement. Offerors who have demonstrated relevant

Subfactor 2B Key Personnel Experience (continued):

capabilities and experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Offeror will be evaluated on the qualifications, credentials, certifications, and experience of key personnel for both the prime contractor and subcontractors, based on how the proposed project team will enhance and ensure a well coordinated outcome for the project. Key personnel who are more qualified and have more relevant experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Offeror will be evaluated on the education, experience and qualifications of the specialty trades for both the prime and subcontractors in the same or similar

Subfactor 2B Key Personnel Experience (continued):

specialty trade on projects similar in scope, complexity and magnitude as this requirement. Offerors who have demonstrated relevant capabilities and experience will be evaluated more favorably.

Thorough, detailed and complete narratives will be rated more highly than those not providing sufficient detail or discussion of the Offeror’s proposed key personnel and specialty trades.

Factor 3: Management Approach and Safety Subfactor 3A – Management Approach: Management Approach is the Offeror’s organizational structure and business processes to manage, control, and oversee your firm’s operations. Submit a written narrative limited to 10 pages describing your management approach to the specific elements below. Pictures can be included and will count toward the page limitation. There is no preprinted form for this submittal.

Organizational Chart cont.: Describe how the quality control requirements will be incorporated into all activities. Describe how the quality control requirements will be incorporated into all activities. Describe how the quality control requirements will be performed to ensure the Government receives a quality project. If proposed dedicated personnel are currently assigned as dedicated personnel on other ongoing projects, the Offeror shall explain expected completion date(s) and/or provide evidence of approved personnel’s availability for this project. The aforementioned requirement is for full-time dedicated personnel for participation on this project and at the jobsite. Provide letters of commitment of key prime and proposed subcontractor personnel identified for inclusion of this contract.

Risks: Identify any potential management risks and the Offeror’s proposed management solutions to mitigate negative impacts.

Factor 3: Management Approach and Safety (subfactors equal importance)

Subfactor 3B – Safety Submit an overview of your company’s construction safety program and an assessment of the safety risks associated with this construction project. Describe changes or tailoring to your company’s Construction Safety Program required to address this specific projects’ risks, including safety and environmental practices regarding demolition, and construction. Include the names, resumes, and specific safety training completed for the proposed Project Site Safety Manager for this project. Additionally submit a copy of the proposed prime’s and each key subcontractors current experience modification rate for the past 3 years.

Factor 3: Management Approach and Safety (subfactors equal importance) Subfactor 3B – Safety: Offerors will be evaluated regarding the effectiveness of the safety information and the levels of project understanding, risk mitigation, and qualifications and capabilities of proposed safety personnel. Offerors with lower EMR rating will be rated more favorably. Information not demonstrating these attributes will be rated less favorably.

Thorough detailed and complete narratives will be rated more highly than those not providing sufficient detail or discussion of the Offeror’s proposed safety program.

Factor 4: PAST PERFORMANCE Offeror shall provide a copy of the form entitled “Past Performance Questionnaire” that is include in the solicitation for construction projects of the same scope and complexity as the contemplated contract. Past Performance on contracts with the Federal Government, other public agencies, por private organizations will be considered. The past performance information submitted may be that of the Offeoro’s firm or its proposed subcontractors. Subcontractor past performance will only be considered if the past performance correlates to the work the subcontract will be performing on the contemplated contract.

Offeror shall complete Sections A and B of each questionnaire to provide applicable information for each contract. Then send the questionnaire to the individuals you have referenced in Section C of the questionnaire. See the attachment itself for detailed information. Offeror must not review the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission of its offer. The questionnaire must be submitted by the client/evaluator reference directly to the Contracting Officer prior to the closing date of the solicitation, or they will not be considered.

Offeror should disclose any instances in which its past performance on a particular contract may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory by attaching a narrative to the applicable Past Performance Questionnaire. The offeror should relate pertinent facts and circumstance and describe any remedial action taken or to be take to correct the deficiency. Failure to disclose such instances may result in a determination that the offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the Offeror’s past performance record.

The Government reserves the right to limit the number of references it ultimately contacts and to contact references or use sources other than those provide by the Offeror to obtain information related to past performance. Other sources include, but are not limited to, the Past-Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). Federal State or local governmental agencies; and private sector businesses. Limited exchanges between the Government and an Offeror may occur to clarify the relevance of an Offeror’s past performance information and adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously has an opportunity to respond.

Factor 4: PAST PERFORMANCE (continued) Submittal process for the Past Performance Questionnaire is as follows:

Complete Section A (Contractor Information) and B (Contract Information) only of the attached Past Performance Questionnaire and forward to your client reference. The reference shall be someone who was substantially involved with the project and can provide a complete, objective assessment of your performance. Direct them to complete and submit the survey to the email addresses and point of contacts noted in Section E. of the questionnaire by the due date and time for proposal receipt.

Submit copies of the questionnaire that you forwarded to your references with their questionnaire Section C (Reference) point of contact information in Technical Proposal Volume I.

Submit a narrative disclosing any instances of past performance that may be considered less than fully satisfactory. Describe pertinent facts, circumstances and any remedial action taken or to be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to disclose such instances could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror's past performance record. The offeror shall be responsible for any follow-up communication required to ensure that all the forms are completed by the reference and are emailed to the NPS point of contacts no later than the date and time proposals are due.

Offerors will be evaluated on the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. The Government is not bound by the Offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained. Offeror will be evaluated on basis of adequacy of documentation and references for past performance on previous comparable projects, (scope, size, magnitude, complexity and degree of subcontracting/teaming) either as the general contractor, or as a team with proposed subcontractors; and on previous customer satisfaction relative to Offeror’s capability, efficiency, effectiveness, conformance to terms and conditions of contracts; reasonableness and cooperativeness; and commitment to customer satisfaction. Offerors demonstrating a higher level of successful past performance on the evaluated areas will be more favorably evaluated. Offerors demonstrating successful accomplishment of the construction team on previous projects of comparable scope, size, complexity, and magnitude will be evaluated more favorably. Instances where the Offeror proposed innovative solutions to avoid increased costs during construction will be evaluated more favorably. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for who information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

Thorough, detailed and complete narratives will be rated more highly than those not providing sufficient detail or discussion of the Offeror’s past performance on previous projects similar in scope, size, complexity and magnitude.

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

1. FORMAT: Submit one (1) original hard copy and one (1) copy hard copy and two (2) electronic copies on USB flash drives.

2. ORGANIZATION: Include a Table of Contents with tabs for hard copy formats and folders and files for electronic formats named as follows:

SF1442

AMENDMENTS

SECTION B PRICE SCHEDULE

SF 24 BID BOND

SECTION K REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

GENERAL REFERENCES

SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

(continued) SF1442: Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award, (Construction, Alteration, or Repair): Complete blocks 14 through 20C only. An official having the authority to contractually bind the offeror’s company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with the procedures prescribed in FAR 4.102. The SF-1442 will be reviewed for completeness.

AMENDMENTS: Do not acknowledge amendments through FedConnectAcknowledge. All solicitation amendments using one of the methods set forth in Block 11 of Standard Form 30. Amendment acknowledgements will be reviewed for timely and proper acknowledgement.

SECTION B CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE: Enter the proposed dollar amount for each line item in the Price Schedule, including any optional items, if applicable. Also provide a separate Schedule of Values for each line item in the Section B Contract Price Schedule. Each SOV shall show the line item price broken down by major work components. In addition, please provide the Offeror’s detailed cost proposal utilizing the attached format breaking down each item of work – including labor, equipment, materials overhead and profit.

(continued) SF 24 BID BOND: Submit Standard Form 24, Bid Bond duly executed between the offeror and the bonding company. Refer to clause 52.228-1.

SECTION K REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS: Submit a completed copy of provision 52.204-8 shown in section “K” of this solicitation. Complete all required representations and certifications if they are not available at www.SAM.gov. Your firm must maintain current, active registration at www.SAM.gov to be eligible for award and you are encouraged to complete SAM registration before submitting your offer.

GENERAL REFERENCES: Complete and submit the attached “General References,” form. Information will be used in determining Responsibility pursuant to FAR 9.103.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN: SB NOT REQUIRED USE FORM PROVIDED

NPS GOALS: SB 43%, SDB 5%, WOSB 5%, HUBZONE 3% SDVOSB 3% Proposed goals < NPS goals shall include rationale as to why goals can not be met

Contract Line Items BASE for greater description see Spec 01 27 00 -1

CLIN 1 -Structural steel and elevator equipment demo, architectural and MEP systems demo, abatement of hazardous materials

CLIN 2 – Replacement of elevator structural steel

CLIN 3 – Replacement of elevator equipment, architectural & MEP upgrades

Optional for greater detail see Spec 01 27 00-2

CLIN 4 – Electrical demolition, primary electrical site distribution, distribution apparatus and feeders, electrical secondary service & distribution, electrical temporary power CLIN 5 – Furnishing and installing new generator system and removing the old system CLIN 6 – Concrete encasement of ductbanks

The ON-SITE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE 7:45 am MT, July 30, 2020 Email confirmation of attendance to vicki_l-fresses-supler@nps.gov and Victoria_nosal@nps.gov by COB Today.

Agenda 7:45 a.m. – Meet at West Visitor Center Parking Lot near dumpster 8:00 a.m. – NPS pit tours, attendees take elevators 3&4 to view elevator 1&2 pit.

9:30 a.m. – NPS Personnel will ride attendees on top of elevator 1 & 2 cabs to view shaft conditions.

9:30 a.m. – Machine room and roof will be open for viewing.

1:00 p.m. – Self tour of electrical alignment. Electrical rooms at Superintendent’s Building, Maintenance and Visitor Center will be open for viewing.

Come prepared with appropriate PPE to ride on elevator cabs.

Appropriate COVID-19 precautions shall be adhered to.

The ON-SITE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE 7:45 a.m. – Meet at West Visitor Center Parking Lot near dumpster

Location: 32°10'31.7"N 104°26'42.4"W

Thank You For Your Interest in This Project E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior image2.jpeg image3.jpeg image4.emf image5.emf image6.emf image7.tmp image8.png image9.png image1.jpeg