1-Attachment 10 - Solicitation No. BPM006379 - Experience and Capacity Response.docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR074216
- Contract number
- CTR074216
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an Experience and Capacity Response for a Request for Proposal (RFP) Solicitation No. BPM006379 issued by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) for Capacity Development/Technical Assistance to Small Public Drinking Water Systems. The proposal is submitted by AARC Consultants, LLC, a national consulting firm established in 2012 as a subsidiary of AARC Environmental Inc., with corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas and a regional office in Phoenix, Arizona.
AARC is proposing to provide 15 different service deliverables, including asset management plans, capacity development activities, training, construction administration, water system design, regulatory plan development, permit applications, corrosion control assessments, environmental documentation, preliminary engineering reports, rate studies, risk and resiliency assessments, and water master planning. The services are specifically targeted at small public water systems serving fewer than 10,000 people, with the goal of enhancing technical, managerial, and financial capacities. The firm has extensive experience in these areas, demonstrated through multiple past projects across various states including Washington, Florida, Texas, and California, with project costs ranging from $8,000 to $3,250,000. The proposal highlights AARC's expertise in water system operations, emergency planning, sustainability, and regulatory compliance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 10 – Experience and Capacity Response
THE STATE MAY DETERMINE YOUR PROPOSAL NON-RESPONSIVE IF YOU DO NOT FULLY RESPOND.
The Offeror shall provide a narrative response to each section that demonstrates their understanding of the Scope of Work requirements and describes the company’s overall experience and capacity in providing the Services stated in this Solicitation. If there is a section that is not applicable to the Services required by the Scope of Work, you may mark it “N/A”.
Offeror shall provide a response either after each section or in a separate document entitled: “Attachment 10 - Experience and Capacity Response.” If a separate document is used, please clearly designate each section and double-check to ensure that each question has been answered. If any information provided is considered CONFIDENTIAL by Offeror, the information must be specifically included in the Confidential Information Designation Attachment and related documentation to be assessed for confidential treatment under A.A.C. R2-7-103.
1.0 Company Profile. The Offeror must include a narrative description of its organization. The narrative must include the following:
1.1 Date Established and ownership (public, partnership, subsidiary, etc.);
1.2 Is the Offeror a national or local company;
1.3 Address of “Main Office” (e.g. Corporate Headquarters and any satellite offices responsible for performance of proposed tasks;
1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience in regards to the Scope of Work (limit the response to this question to one page, font size 10 pt or greater);
1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted Offer. In addition, identify key point of contact for Task Order Offer Requests.
1.6 Full disclosure of any potential conflict of interest between the Offeror and any State employee who functions or has responsibilities in the review or approval of the undertaking or carrying out of the Contract;
1.7 A Statement of whether, in the last five (5) years, the Offeror has filed (or had filed against it) any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, whether voluntary or involuntary, or undergone the appointment of a receiver, trustee, or assignee for the benefit of creditors, and if so, an explanation providing relevant details and current status;
1.8 A Statement of whether there are any pending Securities Exchange Commission investigations involving the Offeror, and if such are pending or in progress, an explanation providing relevant details and an attached opinion of counsel as to whether the pending investigation(s) may impair the Offeror’s performance in a Contract under this Solicitation;
1.9 A Statement documenting all open or pending litigation initiated by Offeror or where Offeror is a defendant or party in any litigation that may have a material impact on Offeror’s ability to deliver the contracted Services;
1.10 A Statement documenting all open or pending litigation initiated by Offeror or where Offeror is a defendant or party in any litigation with a public sector client;
1.11 Full disclosure of any public sector contracts terminated for cause or convenience in the past five (5) years;
1.12 Full disclosure of any criminal or civil offense.
Offeror Response:
1.0 and 1.1 AARC Consultants, LLC (AARC) was established in 2012 as a subsidiary of AARC Environmental Inc., a renowned Environmental, Health, and Safety consulting firm. AARC operates as a limited liability company, leveraging the extensive 31-year history and expertise of its parent company to offer regulatory compliance services to clients across both public and private sectors.
1.2 AARC is a national company with a broad presence across the United States, supported by regional offices strategically located to serve clients nationwide.
1.3 Address of Corporate Headquarters:
2000 W. Sam Houston Parkway S., Suite 850 Houston, Texas 77042 Address of Regional Office Responsible for Performance of Proposed Tasks:
2 North Central Ave., Suite 1800 Phoenix, AZ 85004 1.4 Tailored Comprehensive Services for Diverse Client Needs In alignment with the Scope of Work outlined by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), AARC is well-equipped to enhance the technical, managerial, and financial capacity of small public water systems serving fewer than 10,000 people. Over the last 5 years, AARC has served 164 small municipal systems nationwide. Our experience includes developing asset management plans, conducting specialized engineering studies, providing construction administration and engineering services, and implementing sustainability and resiliency strategies. Specializing in resiliency, emergency management, and sustainability, AARC serves businesses and governmental entities by conducting third-party risk and resilience assessments, identifying physical and cybersecurity vulnerabilities, developing plans of action to manage all-hazards risks, designing sustainable infrastructures, providing expert advice on Homeland Security matters, and offering turn-key environmental, health, safety, and security compliance services. AARC’s extensive background in environmental compliance and infrastructure design uniquely positions us to support ADEQ’s objectives, ensuring small water systems achieve and maintain compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act and ADEQ requirements. Figure 1 illustrate the full range of services and extensive experience offered by the AARC Team:
Request for Proposal
Solicitation No. BPM006379 Capacity Development/Technical Assistance to Small Public Drinking Water Systems
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) 1110 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007
Figure 1. Major services and extensive experience offered by AARC Group.
Solicitation Attachment – Experience and Capacity Response | Revision No. 1 | Revised 11-22 1.5 Organizational Chart Figure 3 illustrates the proposed Organizational Chart for this project.
Figure 3. AARC Organizational Chart.
Primary Point of Contact for Task Order Offer Requests and Other Inquiries Name: Rick Chainani Title: President Address: 2 North Central Ave., Suite 1800, Phoenix, AZ 85004 Tel: (48 0 ) 6 3 1-7 7 7 0 E-mail: rchainani@aarcgroup.com
1.6 Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest AARC confirms that there are no potential conflicts of interest between our organization and any State employee who is involved in the review, approval, or execution of the Contract.
1.7 Statement on Bankruptcy or Insolvency Proceedings AARC confirms that in the last five (5) years, the company has not filed for bankruptcy or insolvency, nor has it had any such proceedings filed against it. Additionally, there has been no appointment of a receiver, trustee, or assignee for the benefit of creditors.
1.8 Statement on Pending Securities Exchange Commission Investigations AARC confirms that there are no pending Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) investigations involving the company.
1.9 Statement on Open or Pending Litigation AARC hereby affirms that there is no open or pending litigation, either initiated by AARC or where AARC is a defendant or party, that may have a material impact on our ability to deliver the contracted services.
1.10 Statement on Litigation with Public Sector Clients AARC hereby affirms that there is no open or pending litigation initiated by AARC or where AARC is a defendant or party involving a public sector client.
1.11 Disclosure of Terminated Public Sector Contracts AARC hereby discloses that there have been no public sector contracts terminated for cause or convenience in the past five (5) years.
1.12 Disclosure of Criminal or Civil Offenses AARC hereby affirms that there have been no criminal or civil offenses involving the company or its principals.
2.0 Company Experience
2.1 If Offeror is proposing to provide services for Item #3 - Capacity Development Training (technical, managerial, financial), from Table 1, on page 3, Offeror shall respond to the following question #1:
Question 1:
ADEQ offers technical, managerial and financial training through its Capacity Development program. Does your company have experience providing training, in person and/or virtual, on topics of water system operations and management? What subject matter are you offering to train on and what is the level of expertise of the proposed trainer(s)?
Offeror Response:
2.1 AARC has extensive experience providing both in-person and virtual training on a wide range of topics related to water system operations and management. Our expertise spans technical, managerial, and financial aspects, ensuring that water systems are sustainable and compliant with regulatory requirements.
Training Topics and Expertise:
1. Risk Assessment and Emergency Planning
· Emergency Response: We offer training on developing and implementing emergency response plans, including conducting tabletop and functional exercises.
· Hazard Mitigation Planning: Our approach includes identifying potential hazards and implementing strategies to mitigate their impact on water systems.
· Sustainability Planning: We provide guidance on creating long-term sustainability plans, including greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting and environmental compliance.
2. Technical, Managerial, and Financial Improvements for Small Water Systems
· Experience: Managed 55 water systems serving populations ranging from 25 to 14,000, with project costs ranging from $25,000 to $3 million.
· Results: Successfully implemented multiple treatment technologies, well projects, storage, transmission, distribution improvements, and fire flow enhancements. Achieved improved regulatory compliance and service levels through economies of scale and shared services.
· Trainer: Project Manager David Siburg has extensive experience managing complex water systems both in the U.S. (Washington State) and internationally (Saudi Arabia), serves as the lead trainer. His background includes decades of experience with the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and advisory roles with the EPA and various state agencies.
3. Environmental Compliance and Corrosion Control
· Environmental Compliance: We offer training on various environmental compliance issues, including GHG accounting and adherence to EPA standards.
· Corrosion Control: Our training covers corrosion control methods, including material selection, environmental assessments, and the implementation of protective measures to maintain infrastructure integrity.
Level of Expertise of Trainers
· David Siburg, Project Manager: With over 30 years of experience in water system operations, David has served in leadership roles within the AWWA, advised the EPA, and contributed to significant improvements in small water systems. His experience includes developing sustainable solutions for water systems in Washington State, as well as providing consultation on water and sanitation issues globally, including in Saudi Arabia and the Pacific Islands.
· Marie Shadden, Lead Master Trainer: With over 40 years of experience in hazard mitigation and emergency management, Marie has developed and facilitated training programs for federal, state, and local agencies, including the FBI’s Hazardous Materials Response operations. She is recognized for her expertise in disaster preparedness, recovery, and continuity of operations planning. Her work includes designing physical security programs for the Atlanta Department of Watershed Management, later adopted throughout the water industry. Marie holds certifications from the EPA, FBI, and FEMA, and is highly regarded for her contributions to the training of emergency operations and business continuity.
· Anthony Hurley, Lead Risk & Resilience Advisor and Master Trainer: With 37 years of experience in utility operations, Anthony has managed all aspects of operations, including emergency management and physical security, for a Fortune 200 Corporation. He has responded to numerous natural disasters across the U.S. and internationally. Anthony is a certified instructor with FEMA and ASIS International, holding certifications such as Master Exercise Practitioner (MEP) and Certified Protection Professional (CPP®). He has also taught at the FEMA Emergency Management Institute and NYU School of Professional Studies, contributing to training programs in emergency management and security.
Our training programs are designed to equip water system operators and managers with the knowledge and tools needed to address the unique challenges faced by small water systems, ensuring they can operate efficiently, sustainably, and in compliance with all regulatory requirements.
2.2 Project Descriptions:
For each deliverable from Table 1, on page 3, that the Offeror is proposing to provide:
Submit up to three (3) examples of your previous work as well as years of experience providing this deliverable. An example might cover more than one deliverable depending on the project. At the top of each page, include the deliverable “Item #(s)” and “Deliverable Description(s)” title from the table below. Limit each example to one (1) page. Use font size 10 pt or greater.
Each example shall include the following information:
a. Project Name;
b. Project Location (City and State);
c. Estimated Project Cost;
d. Project Begin and End Date;
e. Brief Description of the Project; and
f. Names of the project manager and key personnel that worked on the project if they are currently employed with your firm.
Offeror Response:
2.2 Item # 1 - Deliverable Description: Asset Management Plans Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 30 Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Kitsap Public Utility District (PUD)-Kingston |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $32,000 |
| 2010-2013 |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, created an inventory and assessment system to manage Assets, the CIP and reduce Risk. |
| Project Manager (PM): David Siburg |
| Kitsap PUD-Seabeck |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $15,000 |
| 2010-2013 |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, created an inventory and assessment system to manage Assets, the CIP and reduce Risk. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| Kitsap PUD-Gamblewood |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $24,000 |
| 2010-2013 |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, created an inventory and assessment system to manage Assets, the CIP and reduce Risk. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
Item # 2 - Deliverable Description: Capacity Development Activities Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 35 Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Kitsap PUD-Kingston |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $5,000-$1,500,000 |
| 1987-2013 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Microbial Issues, Taste and Odor, Secondary Contaminants, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fire flow and Supporting Infrastructure, Undersized Distribution Systems, |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
| Kitsap PUD-Seabeck |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $25,000-$575,000 |
| 1997-2000 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Inadequate Supply, Saltwater Intrusion, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fire flow and Supporting Infrastructure, |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
| Kitsap PUD-Navy Yard Park |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $4,000-$250,000 |
| 2000-2008 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Microbial Issues, Taste and Odor, Secondary Contaminants, Inadequate Supply and Poor Groundwater Quality, Failing Storage, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fire flow and Supporting Infrastructure, Low Water Pressure, Undersized Distribution Systems, Failing Distribution Systems, Lack of Meters (Source and Customer) |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
Item # 3 - Deliverable Description: Capacity Development Training (technical, managerial, financial) Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 30+ Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| AWWA Webinar |
| Denver, CO |
| $2,500 |
| 2007 |
| Managing More with Less – Working smarter, Not Harder: A Small System Experience. AWWA Webcast, Denver, Colorado, 2007. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| AWWA Annual Conference |
| Atlanta, GA |
| $2,500 |
| 2008 |
| Leadership for Innovation and Change. AWWA Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2008. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| AWWA Annual Conference |
| San Diego, CA |
| $2,500 |
| 2009 |
| Regional Approaches to Sector Improvement and Consumer Confidence in Small Water Systems (Capacity Leveraging). AWWA Annual Conference and Exposition, San Diego, California, 2009. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
Item # 4 - Deliverable Description: Construction Administration & Construction Management Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 40+ Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Lake County Water and Wastewater Improvements |
| Lake County, OH |
| $30,000,000 |
| 1981-1987 |
| This project was part of the Clean Water Act. The population of Lake County, OH was approximately 230,000. Lake County negotiated to take over the responsibility from Cuyahoga County to provide Water and Wastewater to the residents of Lake County. The project involved new Wastewater and Water Treatment Facilities along with collection transmission and distribution for both services. |
| Bruce Colle, E.I.T. (P.E.) Resident Engineer in Charge of Construction |
| Highway Park Water Distribution System |
| Lake Placid, FL |
| $800,000 |
| 1992 |
| Community of 2,700 people on private wells and septic. Abandonment of shallow wells due to contaminants. Designed and Permitted a deep well withdrawal, complete treatment system with sodium hypochlorite chlorination and above ground storage tank for distribution. Including new distribution system with back flow prevention. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. Manager of Construction Inspection and Engineering |
| River Ranch Water and Wastewater Improvements |
| Yee Haw Junction, FL |
| $900,000 |
| 2000-2004 |
| Upgrade, I&I Study of Existing Wastewater Collection System, Revision of Water Treatment from Chlorine Gas to Sodium Hypochlorite. Servicing a community of approximately 48 single-family homes, 119 residential units, 192 condominium units, 367 RV sites, and around 10 general service customers. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. Manager of Construction Inspection and Engineering |
Item # 5 - Deliverable Description: Design of water system improvements
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Highway Park Water Distribution System |
| Lake Placid, FL |
| $800,000 |
| 1992 |
| Community of 2,700 people on private wells and septic. Abandonment of shallow wells due to contaminants. Designed and Permitted a deep well withdrawal, complete treatment system with sodium hypochlorite chlorination and above ground storage tank for distribution. Including new distribution system with back flow prevention. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| City of Sebring WWTF Upgrades |
| Sebring, FL |
| $3,480,000 |
| 1991-1994 |
| Upgrade of WWTF from Type II Anerobic Treatment to Type III Oxidation Ditch with Reuse Transmission. Funding Assistance through the Rural Economic Development Council. Servicing a Population of 8,900. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| River Ranch Water and Wastewater Improvements |
| Yee Haw Junction, FL |
| $900,000 |
| 2000-2004 |
| Upgrade analysis, I&I Study of Existing Wastewater Collection System, Revision of Water Treatment from Chlorine Gas to Sodium Hypochlorite. Servicing a community of approximately 48 single-family homes, 119 residential units, 192 condominium units, 367 RV sites, and around 10 general service customers. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
Item # 6 - Deliverable Description: Developing regulatory plans (e.g., O&M, EOP, ERP, cybersecurity) Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 25 Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Styrene Local Exhaust Ventilation System Design and Regulatory Plan Development |
| Austin, TX |
| $150,000 |
| 2024 |
| A large South Korean firm contracted with AARC environmental to design a local exhaust ventilation system for their Sheet Molding Compound (SMC) plant as well as develop the regulatory plan for submission to the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for air permitting. |
| Dr. Michael Pankonien, P.E. (Principal) |
Bruce Collie, P.E. (PM)
| Spill Prevention Countermeasures and Control (SPCC) Regulatory Plan |
| Channelview, TX |
| $50,000 |
| 2024 |
| A large marine dock oil and chemical facility contracted with AARC Environmental to develop a SPCC for their facility and submit this regulatory plan to the environmental regulator for approval. |
| Dr. Michael Pankonien, P.E. (PM) |
| Risk Management Plan (RMP) development |
| Brownsville, TX |
| $40,000 |
| 2023-2024 |
| A large automotive parts manufacturing facility contracted with AARC Environmental to develop a Risk Management Plan (RMP) for their facility and submit this regulatory plan to the environmental regulator for approval. |
| Dr. Michael Pankonien, P.E. (PM) |
Item # 7 - Deliverable Description: Drinking water permit applications (e.g., ATC, AOC, APP, AZPDES)
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Numerous |
| Nevada, Ohio, Florida, Kansas, Georgia, Texas |
| Excess of $1,000,000 |
| 1987-Present |
| Projects included Collection, Treatment, Distribution and Transmission for Residential, Commercial, and Industrial. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| Grand Avenue Watermain |
| Phoenix, AZ |
| $380,000 |
| 1988 |
| Design and Installation for 1,250lf of 36”-DIP watermain for the City of Phoenix. Including a jack and bore under 5-points Intersection (Grand Avenue, Van Buren, and 7th Avenue). |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| Cactus Gardens Mobile Home Park |
| Tucson, AZ |
| $228,000 |
| 1989 |
| Design of MHP improvements including roads, water and wastewater for the 80-lot community. Developer CS&W out of Phoenix. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
Item # 11 - Deliverable Description: Preparing Corrosion Control Assessments & Treatment Recommendations
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Publix Distribution Warehouse |
| Lakeland, FL |
| $380,000 |
| 1991-1992 |
| This one-million-square-foot warehouse development impacted 14 acres of isolated wetlands, so 28 acres were created through the permitting process. A muck transfer creation plan was used rather than planting from nursery sources. The site also included creative design solutions. Water provided by the City of Lakeland lacked required flow as required by NFPA so a 500,000-gallon aboveground storage tank for fire flow and a 40,000-gallon underground fire storage facility were used to capture run-off from fire suppression in the warehouse's oil and alcohol storage area. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| Florence Villa and Eloise Redevelopment |
| Winter Haven, FL |
| $1,220,000 |
| 1994-1996 |
| The Florence Villa project required the redevelopment of a 90-acre enclave surrounded by the City of Winter Haven and Lake Conine. The area was economically depressed and consisted of three phases developed in the 1920s, 1950s and 1960s. Assignments included community involvement, informational Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) funding program was required to enhance storm water treatment facilities discharging into Lake Conine. Responsibilities for the Florence Villa Project included engineering, permitting and construction management services and cost estimates for development. Improvements included a community center, new water and sewer systems, new roadways and drainage, new sidewalks and rezoning for commercial development. Meetings and coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Coordination with the |
The Eloise revitalization project included a complete revitalization for new infrastructure. Improvements for the community included more than 5-miles of new water and sewer main lines and road reconstruction and associated drainage improvements. Due to the age of the water mains which were cast iron leaded joint, upgrades to DIP were selected to avoid corrosion. Assignments included field survey data collection, aerial photography, traffic studies, right of way mapping, wetland & environmental assessments, geotechnical investigations, roadway, drainage and potable water/fire system design. Site design for a community center, permitting & regulatory agency/utility coordination and construction cost estimates for the projects along with construction services.
Bruce Colle, P.E.
| Highway Park Water Treatment Facility |
| Lake Placid, FL |
| $800,000 |
| 1992 |
| Due to shallow aquifer health risks deep well, withdrawal was required for this community. Abandonment of existing wells, transmission mains and treatment facility design was required for this project. The treatment facility and distribution system was designed to serve a future population of 6,000 households. Method of treatment was sodium hypochlorite and pressure distribution was accomplished using soft start VSD pumps and hydro-pneumatic tanks. GPS technology was utilized to provide design savings in locating all existing wells and septic tanks. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
Item # 12 - Deliverable Description: Preparing Environmental Documents/Archeological Surveys Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 30 Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Marine Corps’ Mountain Warfare Training Center (MWTC), Walker Military Operating Area (MOA) EA/BA |
| Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport CA |
| $750,000 |
| 2018-2020 |
| Establishing Special Use Airspace (SUA) above the MWTC near Bridgeport, CA. MCIWEST wrote the SOW and cost estimate, secured the funding from HQMC (DC-Aviation) and selected and managed NEPA project team (both the Navy/USMC and Contractor). This project Implemented/installed the first-ever (since 1951) “restricted airspace” above the installation above the 60,000 acres of leased USFS public lands. Includes public engagement. |
| Zachery Likins, Marine Corps Installations Command - WEST (MCIWEST) |
Regional Environmental (NEPA) Planning & Conservation Program Manager (2007-2022)
| Marine Corps Off-Installation Training Access & Corridor Analysis (OITACA) Feasibility Study |
| Southwest U.S. Deserts (Mojave and Sonora) on BLM public Lands; CA, AZ & NV |
| $1,500,000 |
| 2016-2018 |
| Conduct select Military Readiness Training on BLM (public) Lands. MCIWEST performed the initial technical feasibility and impact assessment for conducting troop movements (military readiness training) across BLM (and USFS/similar) public lands across CA, AZ and NV. MCIWEST Planning and Conservation Program Manager wrote the SOW and cost estimate, in cooperation with MCIWEST Range & Training Area Management Department (RTAMD) and awaited funding from HQMC/TECOM. MCIWEST Role: MCIWEST NEPA Manager, performed the constraints analysis of Biology, Archaeology, and Regulatory Consultations with USFWS, BLM, FAA, CA-SHPO, Native American Tribal governments. (2017-2019) |
| Zachery Likins, Marine Corps Installations Command - WEST (MCIWEST) |
Regional Environmental (NEPA) Planning & Conservation Program Manager (2007-2022)
| Marine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC) Land Expansion EIS/BA |
| MCAGCC at Twenty-nine Palms, CA |
| $3,250,000 |
| 2010-2014 |
| Land Expansion of the training base into BLM public lands (Johnson Valley) adjacent to MCAGCC at Twenty-nine Palms, CA. Adding more than 150,000-acres to MCAGCC training lands, and adding special use airspace above. Role: MCIWEST NEPA Program Manager, Public Engagement, BLM interface. (MCAGCC Lead, with MCIWEST “in-support”). (HQMC funded, MCIWEST NEPA Co-Lead). Includes public engagement. |
| Zachery Likins, Marine Corps Installations Command - WEST (MCIWEST) |
Regional Environmental (NEPA) Planning & Conservation Program Manager (2007-2022)
Item # 13 - Deliverable Description: Preparing Preliminary Engineering Reports (PER)
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| River Ranch Water and Wastewater Improvements |
| Yee Haw Junction, FL |
| $900,000 |
| 2000-2004 |
| Upgrade analysis, I&I Study of Existing Wastewater Collection System, Revision of Water Treatment from Chlorine Gas to Sodium Hypochlorite. Servicing a community of approximately 48 single-family homes, 119 residential units, 192 condominium units, 367 RV sites, and around 10 general service customers. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| Lake Mead Crossings |
| Henderson, NV |
| $1,160,000 |
| 2007 |
| This 74-acre retail center accommodated 689,000 square feet of building footprints. The site was located in a low-pressure zone for domestic and fire water. Booster pump stations were designed with backup power to meet required design criteria. Off-site utility improvements included approximately 15,000 lineal feet of 16” water main. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
| Katy Watermain Extension |
| Katy, TX |
| $268,000 |
| 2014 |
| 800 lineal feet of 8”-PVC C-900 installed via boring with locking joints. Fire Hydrants, inline Gate Valves, TS&V to existing 12” Main, 60’ jack and bore with carrier pipe under high pressure gas main. Pressure Test, Bacteriological Test and Final Acceptance. |
| Bruce Colle, P.E. |
Item # 14 - Deliverable Description: Rate studies, rate reviews, rate cases Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 25+ Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Kitsap PUD-Kingston |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $25,000 |
| 1990-2013 (Annually) |
| Rate Review and Adjustment: Cost of Service Analysis; Revenue Requirement; Public Hearings and Adoption. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| Kitsap PUD-Seabeck |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $12,000 |
| 2000-2013 (Annually) |
| Rate Review and Adjustment: Cost of Service Analysis; Revenue Requirement; Public Hearings and Adoption. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| Kitsap PUD-Navy Yard Park |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $8,000 |
| 2000-2013 (Annually) |
| Rate Review and Adjustment: Cost of Service Analysis; Revenue Requirement; Public Hearings and Adoption. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
Item # 15 - Deliverable Description: Risk & Resiliency Assessments
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Risk and Resilience Assessment & Emergency Response Plan |
| Elsa, TX |
| $97,026 |
| 2024-Ongoing |
| All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Assessment and Emergency Response Plan for a public water system serving more than 5,600 residents. Continuing program support for training, tabletop exercise, physical security, cybersecurity, and document updates. |
| David Siburg (PM), |
Dr. Scott Thomas, Bruce Colle, P.E., Marie Shadden, and Jason Richards
| Risk and Resilience Assessment & Emergency Response Plan |
| Luling, TX |
| $89,995 |
| 2024-Ongoing |
| All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Assessment and Emergency Response Plan for a public water system serving more than 5,500 residents. Continuing program support for training, tabletop exercise, physical security, cybersecurity, and document updates. |
| David Siburg (PM), |
Dr. Scott Thomas, Bruce Colle, P.E., Marie Shadden, and Jason Richards
| Risk and Resilience Assessment, Emergency Response Plan, and Tabletop Exercise |
| La Junta, CO |
| $83,475 |
| 2020-Ongoing |
| All-Hazards Risk and Resilience Assessment, Emergency Response Plan, and Tabletop Exercises for a public water system serving more than 7,300 residents. Continuing program support for training, tabletop exercise, physical security, cybersecurity, and document updates. |
| David Siburg (PM), |
Dr. Scott Thomas, Marie Shadden, and Jason Richards
Item # 16 - Deliverable Description: System Evaluations Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 30 Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Kitsap PUD -Kingston |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $5,000-$1,500,000 |
| 1987-2013 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Microbial Issues, Taste and Odor, Secondary Contaminants, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fire flow and Supporting Infrastructure, Undersized Distribution Systems, |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
| Kitsap PUD - Seabeck |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $25,000-$575,000 |
| 1997-2000 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Inadequate Supply, Saltwater Intrusion, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fire flow and Supporting Infrastructure, |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
| Kitsap PUD -Navy Yard Park |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $4,000-$250,000 |
| 2000-2008 |
| Technical Issues Resolved: Microbial Issues, Taste and Odor, Secondary Contaminants, Inadequate Supply and Poor Groundwater Quality, Failing Storage, Inadequate Storage, Inadequate Fireflow and Supporting Infrastructure, Low Water Pressure, Undersized Distribution Systems, Failing Distribution Systems, Lack of Meters (Source and Customer) |
Managerial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Management Systems and Operational Processes, Inadequate Skilled Personnel, Inadequate Organizational Structures, Inability to Gain Customer Support and Understanding Financial Issues Resolved: Inadequate Rate Bases, Inability to Finance Improvements.
David Siburg (PM)
Item # 18 - Deliverable Description: Water Master Planning Years of Experience Providing This Deliverable: 25+ Years
| a. Project Name |
| b. Project Location |
| c. Project Cost |
| d. Project Timeline |
| e. Project Scope |
| f. Key Personnel |
| Kitsap PUD-Kingston |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $45,000 |
| Every 5 Years |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, took a practical but comprehensive approach to planning for sustainable capital maintenance and operations. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| Kitsap PUD-Seabeck |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $25,000 |
| Every 5 Years |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, took a practical but comprehensive approach to planning for sustainable capital maintenance and operations. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
| Kitsap PUD-Gamblewood |
| Kitsap County, WA |
| $5,000 |
| Every 5 Years |
| Taking an intentional TMF, triple-bottom-line approach, took a practical but comprehensive approach to planning for sustainable capital maintenance and operations. |
| David Siburg (PM) |
Request for Proposal
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
Select each of the item(s) that your firm is proposing to provide from the Table 1 below:
| Table 1: |
| Item # |
| Check Box |
| Deliverable Description |
| 1 |
| |X| |
| Asset Management Plans |
| 2 |
| |X| |
| Capacity Development Activities |
| 3 |
| |X| |
| Capacity Development Training (technical, managerial, financial) |
| 4 |
| |X| |
| Construction Administration & Construction Management |
| 5 |
| |X| |
| Design of water system improvements |
| 6 |
| |X| |
| Developing regulatory plans (e.g., O&M, EOP, ERP, cybersecurity) |
| 7 |
| |X| |
| Drinking water permit applications (e.g., ATC, AOC, APP, AZPDES) |
| 8 |
| |_| |
| Funding assistance (e.g., PPL, PFA, RD-Apply) |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| Legal assistance (e.g., forming corporate status, corporate documents) |
| 10 |
| |_| |
| Median Household Income Surveys |
| 11 |
| |X| |
| Preparing Corrosion Control Assessments & Treatment Recommendations |
| 12 |
| |X| |
| Preparing Environmental Documents/Archeological Surveys |
| 13 |
| |X| |
| Preparing Preliminary Engineering Reports (PER) |
| 14 |
| |X| |
| Rate studies, rate reviews, rate cases |
| 15 |
| |X| |
| Risk & Resiliency Assessments |
| 16 |
| |X| |
| System Evaluations |
| 17 |
| |_| |
| Water Loss Audits & Leak Detection |
| 18 |
| |X| |
| Water Master Planning |
| 19 |
| |_| |
| Water Quality Compliance Options Reports |
| 20 |
| |_| |
| Well Evaluations including water level measurements, zonal sampling & video logging |
3.0 Financial/Accounting Information
After the proposal due date, Offeror must provide evidence of financial stability and capability to fund all costs associated with providing the relevant Services throughout the term of the Contract. See details as provided in RFP Solicitation Special Instructions to Offerors, Section 7.0 Financial Stability. DO NOT submit financial information with Offer at this time.
3.0 The evidence of financial stability will be provided after the proposal due date as requested in the RFP.
4.0 Certificates/Licenses
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support Offeror’s ability to provide the proposed services, including any Arizona required business license(s) to provide these services. At a minimum, this shall include all certifications and licenses referenced in the Solicitation Attachment 8 - Organization Profile.
4.0 The following presents copies of all applicable certificates and licenses.
Request for Proposal
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
5.0 Proposed Project Members and Organization
Offeror to complete an Attachment 6 – Key Personnel form to identify each Key Personnel.
5.0 The following presents the Organizational Chart for this project.
6.0 Subcontractors
Offeror to complete Attachment 9 – Proposed Subcontractors to identify Proposed Subcontractors to be utilized to perform services within a resultant contract.
6.0 AARC does not intend to involve any subcontractors for this project.
Solicitation Attachment – Method of Approach | Revision No. 1 | Revised 11-22 image1.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image2.jpg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .