01519-2 Analytical Bid.pdf

AmandaV Rectangle

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 1

(Rev 2019-07-01)

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION

Competitive Solicitation: No. 01519

Bidder: Analytical Resources, Incorporated Type/print full legal name of Bidder

Bidder’s Address: _4611 S 134th Pl, Ste. 100, Tukwila, WA 98168 Type/print Bidder’s Address

Bidder Organization Type:

Check appropriate box

Corporation: X Domestic Foreign

Limited Liability Company (LLC): Domestic Foreign

Partnership: Domestic Foreign

Sole Proprietorship:

State of Formation: _Washington Type/print the state where the corporation, LLC, or partnership is formed – e.g., ‘Washington’ if domestic and the name of the state if ‘Foreign’ (i.e., not Washington)

Bidder, through the duly authorized undersigned, makes this certification as a required element of submitting a responsive bid. Bidder certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the following are true, complete, correct, and made in good faith:

1. UNDERSTANDING. Bidder certifies that Bidder has read, thoroughly examined, and fully understands all of the provisions in the Competitive Solicitation (including all exhibits) and the terms and conditions of the Master Contract and any amendments or clarifications to the Competitive Solicitation, and agrees to abide by the same.

2. ACCURACY. Bidder certifies that Bidder has carefully prepared and reviewed its bid and fully supports the accuracy of the same. Bidder further understands and acknowledges that Enterprise Services shall not be responsible for any errors or omission on the part of Bidder in preparing its bid. Bidder certifies that the facts declared here are true and accurate. Bidder further understands and acknowledges that the continuing compliance with these statements and all requirements of the Competitive Solicitation are conditions precedent to the award or continuation of the resulting Master Contract.

3. NO COLLUSION OR ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES. Bidder certifies that Bidder has not, either directly or indirectly, entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with this Competitive Solicitation.

Bidder certifies that Bidder’s bid prices have been arrived at independently, without engaging in collusion, bid rigging, or any other illegal activity, and without for the purpose of restricting

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 2

competition any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other bidder or competitor relating to (a) those prices, (b) the intention to submit a bid, or (c) the methods or factors used to calculate the prices offered. Bidder certifies that Bidder has not been and will not knowingly disclose its bid prices, directly or indirectly, to any other bidder or competitor before award of a Master Contract, unless otherwise required by law. Bidder certifies that Bidder has made no attempt and shall not make any attempt to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a bid for the purpose of restricting competition. Bidder, however, freely may join with other persons or organizations for the purpose of presenting a bid.

4. FIRM OFFER. Bidder certifies that its bid, attached hereto, is a firm offer which cannot be withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) days from and after the bid due date specified in the Competitive Solicitation. Enterprise Services may accept such bid, with or without further negotiation, at any time within such period. In the event of a protest, Bidder’s bid shall remain valid for such period or until the protest and any related court action is resolved, whichever is later.

5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Bidder certifies that, in preparing this bid, Bidder has not been assisted by any current or former employee of the State of Washington whose duties relate (or did relate) to this Competitive Solicitation, or prospective Master Contract, and who was assisting in other than his or her official, public capacity. Neither does such a person nor any member of his or her immediate family have any financial interest in the outcome of this bid.

6. NO REIMBURSEMENT. Bidder certifies that Bidder understands that the State of Washington will not reimburse Bidder for any costs incurred in the preparation of this bid. All bids become the property of the State of Washington, and Bidder claims no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items, or samples unless so stated in the bid.

7. PERFORMANCE. Bidder certifies that Bidder understands that its submittal of a bid and execution of this Bidder’s Certification certifies bidder’s willingness to comply with the Master Contract, if awarded such. By submitting this bid, Bidder hereby offers to furnish the goods and/or services solicited pursuant to this Competitive Solicitation in compliance with all terms, conditions, and performance requirements contained in this Competitive Solicitation and the resulting Master Contract or, if applicable, as detailed on a Contract Issues List, if permitted, in this Competitive Solicitation.

8. INSURANCE. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X BIDDER HAS REQUIRED INSURANCE. Bidder has attached a current, valid Certificate of Insurance with each and all of the required insurance coverages as specified in the Master Contract (note: Bidder must attach the Insurance Certificate).

OR

BIDDER WILL OBTAIN REQUIRED INSURANCE. Bidder does not have a current, valid Certificate of Insurance with each and all of the required insurance coverages as specified in the Master Contract but, if designated as the Apparent Successful Bidder, Bidder will provide such a Certificate of Insurance, without exception of any kind, to Enterprise Services within twenty-four (24) hours of such designation or notification by Enterprise Services or be deemed a nonresponsive bid.

OR

BIDDER DOES NOT HAVE REQUIRED INSURANCE. As detailed on the attached

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 3

explanation (Bidder to provide), Bidder does not have a current, valid Certificate of Insurance with each and all of the required insurance coverages as specified in the Master Contract and, if designated as the Apparent Successful Bidder would not be able to provide such a Certificate of Insurance to Enterprise Services within twenty-four (24) hours of such designation.

9. DEBARMENT. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO DEBARMENT. Bidder and/or its principals are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from contracting with any federal, state, or local governmental entity.

OR

DEBARRED. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), Bidder and/or its principals presently are debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from contracting with a federal, state, or local governmental entity.

10. CRIMINAL OFFENSE. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO CRIMINAL OFFENSE. Bidder has not, within the three (3) year period preceding the date of this Competitive Solicitation, been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against Bidder for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a governmental contract; violation of any federal or state antitrust statute; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property. Bidder further certifies that it is not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in this paragraph.

OR

CRIMINAL OFFENSE. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), within the three (3) year period preceding the date of this Competitive Solicitation, Bidder has been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against Bidder for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a governmental contract; violation of any federal or state antitrust statute; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property.

11. WAGE THEFT PREVENTION. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO WAGE VIOLATIONS. Bidder has NOT been determined by a final and binding citation and notice of assessment issued by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction to have willfully violated, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, any provision of RCW chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 within three (3) years prior to the date of the above-referenced Competitive Solicitation date.

OR

VIOLATIONS OF WAGE LAWS. Bidder has been determined by a final and binding http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48.082 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48.082 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.46 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.46 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.52

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 4

citation and notice of assessment issued by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries or through a civil judgment entered by a court of limited or general jurisdiction to have willfully violated, as defined in RCW 49.48.082, a provision of RCW chapters 49.46, 49.48, or 49.52 within three (3) years prior to the date of the above-referenced Competitive Solicitation date.

12. PAY EQUALITY. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X PAY EQUALITY FOR SIMILARLY EMPLOYED WORKERS. Bidder’s similarly employed individuals are compensated as equals. For purposes of this provision, employees are similarly employed if the individuals work for the same employer, the performance of the job requires comparable skill, effort, and responsibility, and the jobs are performed under similar working conditions. Job titles alone are not determinative of whether employees are similarly employed. Bidder may allow differentials in compensation for its workers based in good faith on any of the following: a seniority system; a merit system; a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; a bona fide job-related factor or factors; or a bona fide regional difference in compensation levels. A bona fide job-related factor or factors may include, but not be limited to, education, training, or experience that is: consistent with business necessity; not based on or derived from a gender-based differential; and accounts for the entire differential. A bona fide regional difference in compensation level must be consistent with business necessity; not based on or derived from a gender-based differential; and account for the entire differential.

OR

NO PAY EQUALITY FOR SIMILARLY EMPLOYED WORKERS. Bidder’s similarly employed individuals are NOT compensated as equals.

13. WORKERS’ RIGHTS (EXECUTIVE ORDER 18-03). Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO MANDATORY INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION CLAUSES AND CLASS OR COLLECTIVE ACTION WAIVERS FOR

EMPLOYEES. Bidder does NOT require its employees, as a condition of employment, to sign or agree to mandatory individual arbitration clauses or class or collective action waivers.

OR

MANDATORY INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION CLAUSES AND CLASS OR COLLECTIVE ACTION

WAIVERS FOR EMPLOYEES. Bidder requires its employees, as a condition of employment, to sign or agree to mandatory individual arbitration clauses or class or collective action waivers.

14. TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT OR CAUSE. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT OR CAUSE. Bidder has not, within the three (3) year period preceding the date of this Competitive Solicitation, had one (1) or more federal, state, or local governmental contracts terminated for cause or default.

OR

TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT OR CAUSE. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), within the three (3) year period preceding the date of this Competitive Solicitation, Bidder has had one (1) or more federal, state, or local governmental contracts terminated for cause or default.

http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48.082 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48.082 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.46 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.46 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48 http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.48

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 5

15. TAXES. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X TAXES PAID. Except as validly contested, Bidder is not delinquent and has paid or has arranged for payment of all taxes due to the State of Washington and has filed all required returns and reports as applicable.

OR

DELINQUENT TAXES. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), Bidder has not paid or arranged for payment of all taxes due to the State of Washington and/or has not timely filed all required returns and reports as applicable.

16. LAWFUL REGISTRATION. Bidder, if conducting business other than as a sole proprietorship (e.g., Bidder is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership) certifies as follows (must check one):

X CURRENT LAWFUL REGISTRATION. Bidder is in good standing in the State of Washington and the jurisdiction where Bidder is organized, including having timely filed all required annual reports.

OR

DELINQUENT REGISTRATION. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), Bidder currently is not in good standing in the State of Washington and/or the jurisdiction where Bidder is organized.

17. SUBCONTRACTORS. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X NO SUBCONTRACTORS. If awarded a Master Contract, Bidder will not utilize subcontractors to provide the goods and/or services subject to this Competitive Solicitation.

OR

SUBCONTRACTORS. As detailed on the attached explanation (Bidder to provide), If awarded a Master Contract, Bidder will utilize subcontractors to provide the goods and/or services subject to this Competitive Solicitation.

In such event, Bidder certifies that, as to the State, Bidder shall retain responsibility for its subcontractors, including, without limitation, liability for any subcontractor’s acts or omissions. Note: Bidder must provide the precise legal name (including state of organization), business address, and federal tax identification number (TIN) for each subcontractor. Note: If the TIN is a SSN, provide only the last four (4) digits.

18. REFERENCES. Bidder certifies that the references provided to Enterprise Services have worked with Bidder and that such individuals and firms have full permission, without any additional requirement or release, to provide such references and information to Enterprise Services. Bidder hereby authorizes Enterprise Services (or its agent) to contact Bidder’s references and others who may have pertinent information regarding Bidder’s prior experience and ability to perform the Master Contract, if awarded. Bidder hereby authorizes such individuals and firms to provide such references and release to Enterprise Services information pertaining to the same.

19. WASHINGTON SMALL BUSINESS. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

X WASHINGTON SMALL BUSINESS. Bidder is a Washington Small Business as defined to RCW

39.26.010 (i.e., Bidder is owned and operated independently from all other businesses

EXHIBIT A-1 – BIDDER’S CERTIFICATION PAGE 6

and has either: (a) fifty (50) or fewer employees; or (b) gross revenue of less than seven million dollars ($7,000,000) annually as reported on its federal income tax return or its return filed with the Washington State Department of Revenue over the previous three consecutive years) and Bidder has certified its small business status in WEBS.

OR

NOT WASHINGTON SMALL BUSINESS. Bidder is not a Washington Small Business as defined in RCW 39.26.010.

20. Veteran-Owned Business.

a. VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS. Bidder certifies as follows (must check one):

VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS. Bidder is a certified Veteran-Owned business under

RCW 43.60A.190 and is identified as such on WEBS (which is confirmed by the

Washington Department of Veterans’ Affairs).

OR

X NOT VETERAN-OWNED BUSINESS. Bidder is not a certified Veteran-Owned business under RCW 43.60A.190.

Bidder further certifies that it shall provide immediate written notice to Enterprise Services if, at any time prior to a contract award, Bidder learns that any of its certifications set forth herein were erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington, that the certifications herein are true and correct and that I am duly authorized to make these certifications on behalf of the Bidder listed herein.

BIDDER NAME: ___ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INCORPORATED _________________________________ Print Name of Bidder – Print full legal entity name of the firm submitting the Bid

By: ______________________________ Signature of Bidder’s authorized person

Title: Project Manager______ Title of person signing certificate

Date: __9/11/2019_

Amanda Volgardsen______________ Print Name of person making certifications for Bidder

Place: Tukwila, Washington___________ Print city and state where signed

Return this Bidder’s Certification to Procurement Coordinator at:

DESCPRMENVIRONPROC@des.wa.gov http://www.des.wa.gov/services/ContractingPurchasing/Business/Pages/WEBSRegistration.aspx http://www.des.wa.gov/services/ContractingPurchasing/Business/Pages/WEBSRegistration.aspx

EXHIBIT A-2 – BIDDER’S PROFILE PAGE 1

EXHIBIT A-2 – BIDDER’S PROFILE

Competitive Solicitation No.: 01519

BIDDER INFORMATION

Legal name (from Business License) and address:

Analytical Resources, Incorporated__ Business Name 4611 S 134th Pl, Suite 100____ Address Tukwila, WA 98168___ City, State, Zip Code

Washington State Department of Revenue Registration Number

Note: This is the Unified Business Identifier (UBI) _600 568 641___

Federal Tax ID No. (TIN):

Note: If your TIN is a Social Security number, provide only the last four digits.

_91-1282493___

Is your firm certified as a minority or woman owned business with the Washington State Office of Minority & Women’s Business Enterprises

(OMWBE)?

Yes No If yes, provide MWBE certification no.

Is your firm a self-certified Washington State small business?

Note: See definitions of ‘microbusiness,’ ‘minibusiness,’ and ‘small business,” set forth in

RCW 39.26.010.

Yes No

If yes, what is your business size?

Small Mini Micro

Is your firm certified as Veteran Owned with the Washington State Department of Veteran Affairs?

Yes No

If yes, provide WSDVA certification no.

EXHIBIT A-2 – BIDDER’S PROFILE PAGE 2

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POINTS OF CONTACT

Authorized Representative

Name: Susan Dunnihoo Email: limsadm@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6207

Contract Administrator

Name: Amanda Volgardsen Email: amanda.volgardsen@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6220

Sales Reporting Representative

Name: Mark Weidner Email: markw@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6204

Sales Reporting Alternate

Name: Bheng Orcilla Email : bheng.orcilla@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6208

Management Fee Representative

Name: Mark Weidner Email: markw@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6204

Management Fee Contact Alternate

Name: Susan Dunnihoo Email: limsadm@arilabs.com Phone: 206-695-6207

Address for Enterprise Services to send management fee invoices:

Company name: Analytical Resources, Inc.

Attn: Bheng Orcilla Address: 4611 S 134th Pl, Suite 100 City/State/Zip: Tukwila, WA 98168

ORDERING/SALES POINTS OF CONTACT (expand as necessary)

Name Phone Number E-mail Area of Responsibility

Bheng Orcilla 206-695-6208 Bheng.orcilla@arilabs.c om

Accounting

Amanda Volgardsen 206-695-6220 Amanda.volgardsen@a rilabs.com

Project Manager

Jacob Walter 206-695-6221 Jacob.walter@arilabs.c om

Sample Receiving Supervisor mailto:limsadm@arilabs.com mailto:limsadm@arilabs.com mailto:Bheng.orcilla@arilabs.com mailto:Bheng.orcilla@arilabs.com mailto:Bheng.orcilla@arilabs.com mailto:Bheng.orcilla@arilabs.com mailto:Amanda.volgardsen@arilabs.com mailto:Amanda.volgardsen@arilabs.com mailto:Amanda.volgardsen@arilabs.com mailto:Amanda.volgardsen@arilabs.com mailto:Jacob.walter@arilabs.com mailto:Jacob.walter@arilabs.com mailto:Jacob.walter@arilabs.com mailto:Jacob.walter@arilabs.com

EXHIBIT A-2 – BIDDER’S PROFILE PAGE 3

REFERENCES

Provide a minimum of three (3) commercial or government references for which bidder has delivered goods and/or services similar in scope as described in the Competitive Solicitation.

Reference 1

Company Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Email:

Anchor QEA Cindy Fields 206-903-3394 cfields@anchorqea.com

Reference 2

Company Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Email:

Dalton, Olmstead and Fuglevand Dave Cooper 206-731-7550 dcooper@dofnw.com

Reference 3

Company Name:

Contact:

Phone:

Email:

WOOD

Crystal Thimsen 206-342-1760 Crystal.thimsen@woodplc.com

WILL CALL/SERVICE LOCATIONS

Identify will call or service locations throughout the state.

Location Point of Contact Phone Number Area(s) of Responsibility

Tukwila, Washington Amanda Volgardsen 206-695-6220 Project Management

PURCHASE CARDS (I.E., CREDIT CARDS)

Please indicate which types of purchasing (credit) cards are accepted (note: any card fees must be included in the unit price of the bid):

Visa Master Card American Express Discover Other:

STATE OF OREGON – USE OF MASTER CONTRACT

This contract will be available to certain additional eligible purchasers in the State of Oregon (our ORCPP partners).

Bidder agrees to provide goods/services pursuant to the Master Contract to ORCPP members? Yes No

If required, indicate percent increase to bid pricing for delivery to ORCPP members: percent.

EXHIBIT A-2 – BIDDER’S PROFILE PAGE 4

Return this Bidder’s Profile to Procurement Coordinator at:

DESCPRMENVIRONPROC@des.wa.gov

01519 Analytical Laboratory Services Exhibit B Evaluation Questions

EXHIBIT B – NON-COST EVALUATION QUESTIONS

Competitive Solicitation No.: 01519

The Evaluation portion will have a maximum value of 35 points towards the total scoring. Each question is worth 5 points. Do not put your company name in the answers.

Question Answer

Provide most recent 3 Proficiency Testing results for the analyses/methods/matrix of interest 19A0299, 19D0307 included for reference

Provide sample data packages for samples of similar types to those to be analyzed. The data packages should include initial calibration data.

19A0299 and 19D0307 partial example data packages included for reference.

Provide Method Detection Limit values for the analytes/methods of interest

Reporting limits have been included for reference.

Provide Initial Demonstration of Capability data for the analytes/methods of interest.

Analytical lab methods require the lab to perform an Initial Demonstration of Capability (IDC) for the analytes of interest. The IDC normally includes 4 replicates of a solution with known concentration that is near the middle of the calibration range. The lab should provide the summary data for the IDC, which includes the mean recoveries and % Relative

Standard Deviations (RSDs). The lab does not need to submit any raw instrument data.

All IDOC information is up to date and filed, upon award of the contract this information can be sent separately.

How many years of experience analyzing samples of similar types to those to be analyzed

The company has over 25 years of experience testing the requested methods and parameters.

SOQ included for reference.

01519 Analytical Laboratory Services Exhibit B Evaluation Questions

Provide your Limit of Quantitation including reporting units for each Method bid.

These are included with the MDL/RL values.

Provide copies of current Accreditation certificates and fields of testing.

All certifications included for reference.

Scheduled Study WP18-3B Study Type WPCHEM_MICRO

Open Date 2018-07-11

Close Date 2018-08-24

Report Generated 2018-09-17

Laboratory Analytical Resources, Inc.

Bob Congleton

4055 37th AVE SW

Tukwila WA 98168 US

Account Number 49647437

US EPA Lab Code WA00037

Proficiency Testing – Evaluation Report – WP18-3B - WPCHEM_MICRO

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 2 of 368

Provider of the proficiency test

Sigma-Aldrich RTC, Inc.

2931 Solider Springs Road

Laramie, WY 82070 USA

PTService@sial.com

Statistical analysis and reporting

QuoData GmbH Quality & Statistics!

Release of the report

Mark Pooler

(QA manager)

Sign:

If you have any questions about your report, please call 800-576-5690 or email PTService@sial.com.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. A laboratory may not claim endorsement by ANAB, NELAC or any other federal agency.

Sigma-Aldrich RTC, Inc. is accredited by ANAB to perform PT programs for the scope of accreditation under ANAB Certificate # AP-1469.

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 3 of 368

Accreditors

Evaluations of this study will be sent to the accreditor(s) listed below. If any of the information listed below is not correct, please contact Sigma-Aldrich RTC immediately.

Accrediting Agency

Alaska DEC

Lab Certification

DEC Health Lab

5251 Dr. MLK Jr Ave

Anchorage AK 99507 US

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 4 of 368

Summary Results for WP18-3B PE1274-1.2ML Acid Compounds - WP

LRAB4858

Analyte Reported Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

EPA 625 10107401

Acids

Benzoic acid2

68.3 ug/L

77.5 ug/L

0 - 230 ug/L

-0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 5*

Parameters*: deviations:3

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

52.8 - 172 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7998, b:0.6264, c:0.1421, d:0.0397

2-Chlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

39.2 - 165 ug/L

1.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7292, b:1.4640, c:0.1518, d:0.0174

2,4-Dichlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

50.1 - 184 ug/L

1.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7362, b:2.8458, c:0.1433, d:0.0585

2,4-Dimethylphenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

45.6 - 205 ug/L

1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7496, b:1.4509, c:0.1601, d:0.0953

2,4-Dinitrophenol1,2 ug/L

86.5 ug/L

0 - 177 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6531, b:3.5920, c:0.1695, d:8.5727

2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol1,2 ug/L

97.7 ug/L

36.4 - 159 ug/L

2.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8108, b:3.6290, c:0.1573, d:2.1683

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)1,2

46.4 ug/L

38.8 ug/L

12.6 - 65.1 ug/L

0.9

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6821, b:2.2126, c:0.1529, d:0.5485

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 5 of 368

Analyte Reported Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol)1,2

88.2 ug/L

71.4 ug/L

5.22 - 138 ug/L

0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6531, b:2.1854, c:0.2008, d:0.7807

2-Nitrophenol1,2 ug/L

88.9 ug/L

37.7 - 140 ug/L

1.8

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7631, b:1.1486, c:0.1272, d:2.4547

4-Nitrophenol1,2

98.5 ug/L

92.9 ug/L

0 - 225 ug/L

0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5591, b:-1.0075, c:0.2511, d:1.9409

Pentachlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

43.9 - 175 ug/L

0.9

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8469, b:-0.7338, c:0.1561, d:1.5178

Phenol1,2

76.3 ug/L

97.5 ug/L

0 - 233 ug/L

-0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5570, b:0.5929, c:0.2530, d:1.0269

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol2

<3.0 ug/L ug/L

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:1, b:0, c:0, d:0

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol1,2

<15.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

61.5 - 202 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7880, b:0.8051, c:0.1406, d:0.0280

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 16/16 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 8041A (2000) 10176804

Acids

2,4-Dichlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

50.1 - 184 ug/L

-0.4

Acceptable

Analyst: YZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-10 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 6 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

Pentachlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

43.9 - 175 ug/L

0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: YZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-10 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

<2.5 ug/L

Analyst: YZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-10

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol1,2

<2.5 ug/L

Analyst: YZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-10 ug/L ug/L

61.5 - 202 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: YZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-10 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 5/5 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 8270D (2007) 10186002

Acids

Benzoic acid2

68.3 ug/L

77.5 ug/L

0 - 230 ug/L

-0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

52.8 - 172 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7998, b:0.6264, c:0.1421, d:0.0397

2-Chlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

39.2 - 165 ug/L

1.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7292, b:1.4640, c:0.1518, d:0.0174

2,4-Dichlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

50.1 - 184 ug/L

1.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2,4-Dimethylphenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

45.6 - 205 ug/L

1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7496, b:1.4509, c:0.1601, d:0.0953

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 7 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

2,4-Dinitrophenol1,2 ug/L

86.5 ug/L

0 - 177 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6531, b:3.5920, c:0.1695, d:8.5727

2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol1,2 ug/L

97.7 ug/L

36.4 - 159 ug/L

2.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8108, b:3.6290, c:0.1573, d:2.1683

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)1,2

46.4 ug/L

38.8 ug/L

12.6 - 65.1 ug/L

0.9

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6821, b:2.2126, c:0.1529, d:0.5485

4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol)1,2

88.2 ug/L

71.4 ug/L

5.22 - 138 ug/L

0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6531, b:2.1854, c:0.2008, d:0.7807

2-Nitrophenol1,2 ug/L

88.9 ug/L

37.7 - 140 ug/L

1.8

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7631, b:1.1486, c:0.1272, d:2.4547

4-Nitrophenol1,2

98.5 ug/L

92.9 ug/L

0 - 225 ug/L

0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5591, b:-1.0075, c:0.2511, d:1.9409

Pentachlorophenol1,2 ug/L ug/L

43.9 - 175 ug/L

0.9

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Phenol1,2

76.3 ug/L

97.5 ug/L

0 - 233 ug/L

-0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5570, b:0.5929, c:0.2530, d:1.0269

<3.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 8 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol1,2

<15.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 ug/L ug/L

61.5 - 202 ug/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-07-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 16/16 Score: 100% - Acceptable

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 9 of 368

PE1060-20ML Anions - WP

LRAB8103

Analyte Reported Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

EPA 300.0 (1989) 10275408

Minerals

Bromide1,2

4.14 mg/L

4.09 mg/L

3.32 - 4.85 mg/L

0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:1.0098, b:-0.0533, c:0.0400, d:0.0912

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 1/1 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 300.0 2.1 (1993) 10053200

Minerals

Chloride1,2 mg/L mg/L

140 - 178 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:1.005, b:0.0490, c:0.0376, d:0.3716

Fluoride1,2

2.29 mg/L

2.19 mg/L

1.78 - 2.60 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.9748, b:0.0156, c:0.0487, d:0.0277

Sulfate1,2

49.0 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.9880, b:-0.2130, c:0.0473, d:0.3309

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 3/3 Score: 100% - Acceptable

Nutrients

Nitrate as N1,2

15.6 mg/L

15.4 mg/L

12.8 - 17.9 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.9975, b:-0.0005, c:0.0506, d:0.0642

Nitrite as N1,2

2.28 mg/L

2.17 mg/L

1.85 - 2.49 mg/L

1.0

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:1.0017, b:-0.0030, c:0.0377, d:0.0250

Orthophosphate as P1,2

2.31 mg/L

2.38 mg/L

2.02 - 2.74 mg/L

-0.6

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16

Parameters*: a:1, b:0, c:0.05, d:0

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 10 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 3/3 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 353.2 (calc) 10238809

Nutrients

Nitrate as N1,2

16.3 mg/L

15.4 mg/L

12.8 - 17.9 mg/L

1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

EPA 353.2 2 (1993) 10067604

Nutrients

Nitrate+nitrite as N1,2

18.5 mg/L

17.5 mg/L

14.7 - 20.3 mg/L

1.0

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.9957, b:-0.0010, c:0.0509, d:0.0400

2.22 mg/L

2.17 mg/L

1.85 - 2.49 mg/L

0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 2/2 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 375.2 2 (1993) 10073004

Minerals

Sulfate1,2

50.4 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: AW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

EPA 9056A (2000) 10199607

Minerals

Bromide1,2

4.14 mg/L

4.09 mg/L

3.32 - 4.85 mg/L

0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Chloride1,2 mg/L mg/L

140 - 178 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 11 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

Fluoride1,2

2.29 mg/L

2.19 mg/L

1.78 - 2.60 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

49.0 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

49.0 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 5/5 Score: 100% - Acceptable

Nitrate as N1,2

15.6 mg/L

15.4 mg/L

12.8 - 17.9 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2.22 mg/L

2.17 mg/L

1.85 - 2.49 mg/L

0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2.28 mg/L

2.17 mg/L

1.85 - 2.49 mg/L

1.0

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2.31 mg/L

2.38 mg/L

2.02 - 2.74 mg/L

-0.6

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 4/4 Score: 100% - Acceptable

SM 4110 B-2000 (2000) 20076908

Minerals

Bromide1,2

4.14 mg/L

4.09 mg/L

3.32 - 4.85 mg/L

0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 12 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

Chloride1,2 mg/L mg/L

140 - 178 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Fluoride1,2

2.29 mg/L

2.19 mg/L

1.78 - 2.60 mg/L

0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

49.0 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 4/4 Score: 100% - Acceptable

Nitrate as N1,2

15.6 mg/L

15.4 mg/L

12.8 - 17.9 mg/L

0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2.28 mg/L

2.17 mg/L

1.85 - 2.49 mg/L

1.0

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

2.31 mg/L

2.38 mg/L

2.02 - 2.74 mg/L

-0.6

Acceptable

Analyst: KT

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16

SM 4500-Cl- G-2011 (2011) 20087325

Minerals

Chloride1,2 mg/L mg/L

140 - 178 mg/L

0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 13 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

SM 4500-F¯ C-1997 (1997) 20102403

Minerals

Fluoride1,2

2.36 mg/L

2.19 mg/L

1.78 - 2.60 mg/L

1.3

Acceptable

Analyst: CE

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

SM 4500-NO3¯ I 21st ED (2000) 20118552

Nutrients

Nitrate as N1,2

16.3 mg/L

15.4 mg/L

12.8 - 17.9 mg/L

1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Nitrate+nitrite as N1,2

18.5 mg/L

17.5 mg/L

14.7 - 20.3 mg/L

1.0

Acceptable

Analyst: UW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-15 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.9957, b:-0.0010, c:0.0509, d:0.0400

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 2/2 Score: 100% - Acceptable

SM 4500-P E-1999 (1999) 20124214

Nutrients

Orthophosphate as P1,2

2.29 mg/L

2.38 mg/L

2.02 - 2.74 mg/L

-0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: CE

Analysis Date: 2018-08-16

SM 4500-SO4¯ G-1997 (1997) 20134401

Minerals

Sulfate1,2

50.4 mg/L

48.3 mg/L

40.3 - 56.3 mg/L

0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: AW

Analysis Date: 2018-08-24 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 14 of 368

PE1268-2ML Base/Neutrals Compounds 2A - WP

LRAB9409

Analyte Reported Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

EPA 625 10107401

Base/Neutrals

1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,2

81.6 ug/L

80.6 ug/L

9.32 - 152 ug/L

0.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5921, b:3.0260, c:0.1787, d:0.3464

1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2 ug/L ug/L

15.2 - 189 ug/L

0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5671, b:3.6005, c:0.1640, d:0.4826

2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane)2

<1.0 µg/L µg/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Hexachlorobutadiene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Hexachloroethane1,2 ug/L ug/L

15.5 - 187 ug/L

0.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5921, b:-0.0657, c:0.1640, d:0.5308

Nitrobenzene1,2

58.2 ug/L

62.0 ug/L

26.6 - 97.4 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7463, b:0.9864, c:0.1388, d:0.4589

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Benzidine2

<15.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 15 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether1,2

94.2 ug/L ug/L

57.0 - 172 ug/L

-1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8081, b:3.0645, c:0.1325, d:0.8996

Butyl benzyl phthalate2

94.9 ug/L ug/L

36.6 - 168 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8496, b:-2.1863, c:0.1776, d:0.0752 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane1,2

44.5 ug/L

45.6 ug/L

19.7 - 71.6 ug/L

-0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7615, b:0.4890, c:0.1193, d:1.5633 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether1,2

65.0 ug/L

65.7 ug/L

23.3 - 108 ug/L

-0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7090, b:2.3607, c:0.1529, d:0.4801

2-Chloronaphthalene1,2 ug/L ug/L

45.6 - 197 ug/L

-0.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7102, b:2.4854, c:0.1477, d:0.5079

4-Chlorophenyl phenylether1,2

41.5 ug/L

44.0 ug/L

21.0 - 67.0 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7669, b:3.7466, c:0.1417, d:0.2303

Dibenzofuran1,2

86.7 ug/L ug/L

55.0 - 159 ug/L

-1.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7411, b:2.7181, c:0.1159, d:1.0735

Di-n-butyl phthalate1,2 ug/L ug/L

61.0 - 224 ug/L

-0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7797, b:5.1233, c:0.1490, d:0.8776

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine1,2

<4.7 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 16 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score* bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)1,2

61.0 ug/L

61.9 ug/L

24.5 - 99.2 ug/L

-0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8065, b:2.5761, c:0.1474, d:1.6124

Diethyl phthalate1,2

70.2 ug/L

77.8 ug/L

17.9 - 138 ug/L

-0.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7492, b:3.3637, c:0.1805, d:2.0213

Dimethyl phthalate1,2 ug/L ug/L

0 - 248 ug/L

0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6375, b:3.9631, c:0.2524, d:0.8174

2,4-Dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT)1,2

71.8 ug/L

80.8 ug/L

40.9 - 121 ug/L

-0.7

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8219, b:0.4137, c:0.1183, d:1.7449

2,6-Dinitrotoluene (2,6-DNT)1,2 ug/L ug/L

58.0 - 172 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7999, b:0.4770, c:0.1316, d:0.1368

Di-n-octyl phthalate1,2

56.2 ug/L

67.8 ug/L

23.1 - 113 ug/L

-0.8

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8186, b:2.8779, c:0.1724, d:1.2382

Hexachlorobenzene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene1,2

<4.5 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Isophorone1,2 ug/L ug/L

54.9 - 186 ug/L

0.5

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7981, b:0.7053, c:0.1437, d:0.3000

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 17 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

2-Methylnaphthalene1,2

42.9 ug/L

42.5 ug/L

12.4 - 72.6 ug/L

0.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.6983, b:2.0844, c:0.1361, d:2.1436 n-Nitrosodimethylamine1,2

81.4 ug/L

66.1 ug/L

0 - 141 ug/L

0.6

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.4665, b:7.3433, c:0.1652, d:3.9997 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 n-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine1,2

74.1 ug/L

79.9 ug/L

32.8 - 127 ug/L

-0.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7913, b:-0.0510, c:0.1541, d:0.1328

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Group Analysis Summary Acceptable: 32/32 Score: 100% - Acceptable

EPA 8270D (2007) 10186002

Base/Neutrals

1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

81.6 ug/L

80.6 ug/L

9.32 - 152 ug/L

0.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5921, b:3.0260, c:0.1787, d:0.3464 ug/L ug/L

15.2 - 189 ug/L

0.2

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5671, b:3.6005, c:0.1640, d:0.4826

2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane)2

<1.0 µg/L µg/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 18 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acceptance Window z-score*

Hexachlorobutadiene1,2

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Hexachloroethane1,2 ug/L ug/L

15.5 - 187 ug/L

0.0

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.5921, b:-0.0657, c:0.1640, d:0.5308

Nitrobenzene1,2

58.2 ug/L

62.0 ug/L

26.6 - 97.4 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7463, b:0.9864, c:0.1388, d:0.4589

<1.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

Benzidine2

<15.0 ug/L

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether1,2

94.2 ug/L ug/L

57.0 - 172 ug/L

-1.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8081, b:3.0645, c:0.1325, d:0.8996

Butyl benzyl phthalate2

94.9 ug/L ug/L

36.6 - 168 ug/L

-0.3

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.8496, b:-2.1863, c:0.1776, d:0.0752 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane1,2

44.5 ug/L

45.6 ug/L

19.7 - 71.6 ug/L

-0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7615, b:0.4890, c:0.1193, d:1.5633 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether1,2

65.0 ug/L

65.7 ug/L

23.3 - 108 ug/L

-0.1

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7090, b:2.3607, c:0.1529, d:0.4801

2-Chloronaphthalene1,2 ug/L ug/L

45.6 - 197 ug/L

-0.4

Acceptable

Analyst: JZ

Analysis Date: 2018-08-20 Evaluation Criteria – 1*

Parameters*: a:0.7102, b:2.4854, c:0.1477, d:0.5079

* Evaluation parameters used for the statistical analysis: explanation at the end of report; A questionable result is acceptable but to be checked.

1 NELAC Compliant, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert. AP-1469 2 ISO 17043 Accredited, covered by Sigma-Aldrich RTC’s ANAB Proficiency Testing Provider accreditation, Cert AP-1469

2018-09-17 49647437 WP18-3B Page 19 of 368

Value

Assigned Value

Acce…