DDRP_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 132 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Drug Demand Reduction Program (DDRP)
- Solicitation number
- W9133L-19-R-0001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire for Drug Demand Reduction Program solicitation
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q&A_DDRP.pdf | ||
| A07_Price_Model.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9133L-19-R-0001_P0002.pdf | ||
| DDRP_Q-A_Responses_14May2019.pdf | ||
| Price_Model.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9133L-19-R-0001_P0001.pdf | ||
| DDRP_Annual_Checklist.pdf | ||
| W9133L-19-R-0001_DDRP_QA_07May2019.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1_Questions.pdf | ||
| Past_Performance_Cover_Page.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_W9133L19R0001.pdf | ||
| DDRP_PWS.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor: Contract No.:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC: Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary).
The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:
Program Identification/Title: Contract Number:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name: Title: Date:
Telephone Number: Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization: Name:
Title: Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contract Specialists and the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
| Past Performance 1a |
| Past Performance 1b |
| Past Performance 1c |
| Past Performance 1d |
File details come from the government source that posted it.