Exhibit C Hangar.doc
DOC document 121 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace KC-135 Maintenance Hangar Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912JD-10-R-0001
About this file
Exhibit C Hangar
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Replace KC-135 Maintenance Hangar has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Title: Replace KC-135 Maintenance Hangar
RFP W912JD-10-R-0001
EXHIBIT C
PACKAGE INFORMATION AND FORMS
Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms: Prepare and submit to the owners of the projects listed in your Exhibit A “Performance Relevancy Questionnaires”, a Reference Package (Exhibit C). For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. Offerors should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner. If you have multiple references at one location (Base etc.), send one cover letter and questionnaire for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following:
Cover Letter (See SAMPLE) (Exhibit C1)
Respondent Info Rating Sheets (Exhibit C2)(the next 5 pages) - Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes.
Suggested - Pre Addressed stamped envelope to return to Contracting Officer.
OFFEROR SHOULD PLACE THEIR NAME ON TOP OF EACH QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE!!!
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
EXHIBIT C1
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTERAND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date: _________________
To: ______________________________________
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the USPFO for Maine. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN 20 January 2010. Do not return them to our company.
USPFO for Maine Contracting Office Building # 39 Camp Keyes, Augusta, ME 04333 If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact:
Contact Name: Mr. Robert B. Busch Phone:
(207) 990-7067 Fax:
(207) 990-7488 or email to: Mr. Robert Busch at robert.busch@ang.af.mil with a courtesy copy to Mr. David McPhail at david.mcphail@us.army.mil. Thank you for your assistance. E-Mail is preferred.
Signature and Title
RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (N/A) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
To obtain an electronic version of the form please contact: Mr. Robert Busch at robert.busch@ang.af.mil with a courtesy copy to Mr. David McPhail at david.mcphail@us.army.mil.
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Return via FAX Commercial: (207) 626-4533, DSN: 626-4533, or via email to the email address shown above. Forms may be mailed to USPFO for Maine, Contracting Office, Building # 39, Camp Keyes, Augusta, ME 04333.
Mark cover sheet: (Attention: RFP W912JD-10-R-0001 “Source Selection Sensitive Information”)
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****
(Exhibit C2) RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in)
Reference is provided for: ____________________________________
Contract Number or Project Title______________________________________________________
Date of Award/Completion Date______________________________________________________
Location_________________________________________________________________________
Dollar Amount____________________________________________________________________
Brief Description of work and your role in the referenced contract: ___________________________
(Part 2 Person providing Reference) Reference is provided by: ___________________________
Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________________
Business Address; ________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________________________________________
E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________
Relationship to Contract: ___________________________________________________________
If information above (Part 1) is not accurate, please indicate.
OFFEROR Name___________________________
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
Please circle the appropriate rating.
| (1) How responsive was the contractor’s quality program in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (2) How complete were the contractor’s quality procedures and how well did employees follow them? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (3) Adequacy of Submittals. Were Submittals well researched and were materials clearly identified to include substitute products’ salient material characteristics? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (4) Overall, how would you rate the quality of workmanship for this project? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (5) Rate timeliness in meeting requirements and adhering to contract schedules (delivery/performance), taking into account all excusable delays, including cooperation and attention to contract completion efforts. Was the project completed in a timely manner? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (6) Did the contractor provide timely notices of delays/schedule revisions and timely status to Government via progress schedule/critical path charts, etc.? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (7) How well did the contractor manage project, in terms of timely material delivery, accurate and timely submission of submittals, timely payment of subcontracts, and general business practices? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
OFFEROR Name______________________
| (8) Rate how well subcontractors/tradesmen were managed and work coordinated. Explain in remarks any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (9) Rate the adequacy of the contractor’s environmental program, oversight, compliance and management. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (10) Did the contractor provide adequate, competent and qualified management, key personnel and technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (11) How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:_____________________________________________________________________________________
| (12) How effectively did your contractor’s key management personnel support the initial contract startup, management of contingency situation, provide a quality plan, and respond to problems and changes? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (13) How effective was the contractor in meeting Cost/Price performance targets and controlling contingencies (i.e. changes, etc.)? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (14) How effective was the contractor in meeting the contract’s sustainability requirements? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
IF USGBC LEED® rating was required indicate level specified and level achieved in remarks.
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (15) Was the Site manager always present on site when work was performed? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: _____________________________________________________________________________________
| (16) How timely and effective were the contractor’s responses to and resolution of technical problems? Did the Site manager have sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (17) Overall, how would you rate this contractor’s business practices, customer relationship, and ability to successfully perform? Did the contractor demonstrate a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s contract management personnel? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (18) How effective was the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations? Did the contractor implement and follow their safety plan? Did they run a “safe” jobsite? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (19) Applicable to Federal Contracts – How well did the contractor comply with applicable Federal laws and regulations such as Davis Bacon Act- timely payrolls and compliance, Drug Free Workplace, Environmental Regulations and Use of Recovered Materials, Executive Order 13101? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________________
| (20) Applicable to Federal Contracts Only – How well did the contractor comply with Utilization of Small Business Concerns requirements? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (21) How innovative was the contractor in performing the technical aspects of this contract and resolving problems? How well did the contractor respond to and act on customer feedback? (Customer Satisfaction) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
| (22) How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Given the opportunity would you select this offeror again? (Yes___) (No___) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
(23) What were the contractor’s top documented strengths, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
(24) What were the contractor’s top documented weaknesses, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
(25) Please Provide Any Additional Information You Feel Is Important Not Covered Elsewhere:
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for your remarks. Please ensure that you return this questionnaire to the Contracting Agency. Do NOT return to the evaluated contractor.
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING REFERENCE
DATE_____________________
Contact Phone Number:____________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .