Evaluation_Factor_Amendment-0002.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Add Water Main Loops Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912JB-18-R-9003
About this file
Evaluation Factor Amendment-002
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912JB-18-R-9003-0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_to_instructions_to_offerors_section.docx | DOCX document | |
| W912JB-18-R-9003-0001.pdf | ||
| RFI-002_Water_Main_Loops.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_MI42.pdf | ||
| RFI-001_Water_main_loops.docx | DOCX document | |
| Water_Main_Loops_Site_Visit_Minutes.docx | DOCX document | |
| Water_main_loops_site_visit_sign_in_sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI_001.docx | DOCX document | |
| B-3_Replace_Water_Main_Loops-_Drawings.pdf | ||
| Alpena_Base_Access_requirements.pdf | ||
| W912JB-18-R-9003.pdf | ||
| B3_Specifications_-_Copy.doc | DOC document | |
| AF66_-_TDVG142913_Replace_Water_main_loops.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912JB-18-R-9003-002
Evaluation Factor amendment
The Technical Evaluation consists of one factor: Construction Schedule.
Provide a construction schedule with a period of performance (POP) not to exceed 60 days after NTP. The schedule shall be task oriented, capturing all Statement of Work (SOW) requirements and indicate dates by which milestones are to be achieved. The offeror shall use a either a GANTT chart or an equivalent critical path scheduling approach. Equivalents shall include start dates, end dates and duration for each task and demonstrate the order in which tasks will be completed.
Acceptability will be based on the offeror’s demonstration of execution of the construction schedule outlining completion within the desired POP. The schedule shall capture all SOW requirements, execution timelines, and critical path items.
| RATING |
| DESCRIPTION |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal does not clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
File details come from the government source that posted it.