Specifications_Package_1_of_4.pdf
PDF 957 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DW19R0017
About this file
Specifications 1 of 4
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905 19006
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
00 01 15 LIST OF DRAWINGS - R0002
DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK
01 14 00 SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS FOR JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD
01 22 00.00 10 PRICE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES - R0002
01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE
01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING
01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL
01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE(RMS CM)
01 45 35 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS
01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT
01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS
01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA
01 78 23.33 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR AVIATION FUEL
SYSTEMS
01 78 36 WARRANTY OF CONSTRUCTION
DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
02 41 00 DEMOLITION
02 65 00 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL
02 82 00 ASBESTOS REMEDIATION
02 83 00 LEAD REMEDIATION
DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE
03 11 13.00 10 STRUCTURAL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FORMING
03 15 00.00 10 CONCRETE ACCESSORIES
03 20 00.00 10 CONCRETE REINFORCING
03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
03 35 00.00 10 CONCRETE FINISHING
03 35 43 GROUND AND POLISHED CONCRETE
03 39 00.00 10 CONCRETE CURING
DIVISION 04 - MASONRY
04 20 00 UNIT MASONRY
DIVISION 05 - METALS
05 05 23.16 STRUCTURAL WELDING
05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL
05 21 00 STEEL JOIST FRAMING
05 30 00 STEEL DECKS
05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS
05 51 00 METAL STAIRS
05 51 33 METAL LADDERS
05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1
W912DW19R0017 R0002
DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES
06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY
06 41 16.00 10 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CABINETS
06 61 16 SOLID POLYMER (SOLID SURFACING) FABRICATIONS
DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION
07 05 23 PRESSURE TESTING AN AIR BARRIER SYSTEM FOR AIR TIGHTNESS
07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION
07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION
07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION
07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS
07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL
07 61 14.00 20 STEEL STANDING SEAM ROOFING
07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING
07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS
DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS
08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES
08 51 13 ALUMINUM WINDOWS
08 51 23 STEEL WINDOWS
08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE
08 81 00 GLAZING
08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS
DIVISION 09 - FINISHES
09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR GYPSUM BOARD
09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD
09 30 10 CERAMIC AND PORCELAIN TILING
09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING
09 67 23.16 FUEL RESISTIVE RESINOUS FLOORING, 5-COAT SYSTEM
09 68 00 CARPETING
09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS
09 97 13.17 THREE COAT EPOXY INTERIOR COATING OF WELDED STEEL
PETROLEUM FUEL TANKS
09 97 13.27 EXTERIOR COATING OF STEEL STRUCTURES
DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES
10 14 00.20 INTERIOR SIGNAGE
10 21 13 TOILET COMPARTMENTS
10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES
10 44 16 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS
12 21 00 WINDOW BLINDS
12 35 70 LABORATORY CASEWORK
DIVISION 13 - SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
13 34 20 METAL CANOPY SYSTEMS (CANOPIES)
13 48 00 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT
13 48 00.00 10 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2
DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION
21 13 13.00 10 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION
DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING
22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE
DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC)
23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS
23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC
23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
23 09 23 DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL FOR HVAC AND OTHER LOCAL BUILDING
SYSTEMS
23 81 00.00 20 UNITARY AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT
DIVISION 25 - INTEGRATED AUTOMATION
25 05 11 CYBERSECURITY FOR FACILITY-RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS
DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL
26 00 00.00 20 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS
26 05 19.10 10 INSULATED WIRE AND CABLE
26 05 48.00 10 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING
26 12 19.10 THREE-PHASE PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS
26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
26 27 13.10 30 ELECTRIC METERS
26 28 01.00 10 COORDINATED POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION - R0002
26 32 14.00 10 DIESEL-GENERATOR SET, STATIONARY 15-300 KW, STANDBY
APPLICATIONS
26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM
26 42 14.00 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM (SACRIFICIAL ANODE)
26 42 17.00 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM (IMPRESSED CURRENT)
26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING
26 56 00 EXTERIOR LIGHTING
26 56 20.00 10 AIRFIELD LIGHTING AND VISUAL NAVIGATION AIDS
DIVISION 27 - COMMUNICATIONS
27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM
DIVISION 28 - ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM
DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK
31 00 00 EARTHWORK
DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
32 01 16.71 COLD MILLING ASPHALT PAVING
32 01 19 FIELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALING JOINTS IN RIGID
PAVEMENTS
32 05 33 LANDSCAPE ESTABLISHMENT
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3
32 11 20 BASE COURSE FOR RIGID PAVING
32 11 23 AGGREGATE BASE COURSES
32 12 13 BITUMINOUS TACK AND PRIME COATS
32 12 15.13 HOT-MIX ASPHALT AIRFIELD PAVING
32 12 16 HOT-MIX ASPHALT (HMA) FOR ROADS
32 13 13.06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SITE
FACILITIES
32 13 14.13 CONCRETE PAVING FOR AIRFIELDS AND OTHER HEAVY DUTY
PAVEMENTS
32 13 73 COMPRESSION JOINT SEALS FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
32 16 13 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND CURBS AND GUTTERS
32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKINGS
32 31 13.53 HIGH-SECURITY CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES
32 92 19 SEEDING
32 93 00 EXTERIOR PLANTS
DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES
33 08 53 AVIATION FUEL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM START-UP
33 08 55 COMMISSIONING OF FUEL FACILITY SYSTEMS
33 09 53 AVIATION FUEL PUMP CONTROL AND ANNUNCIATION SYSTEM
33 11 00 WATER UTILITY DISTRIBUTION PIPING
33 30 00 SANITARY SEWERAGE
33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES
33 52 10 FUEL SYSTEMS PIPING (SERVICE STATION)
33 52 23.15 POL SERVICE PIPING WELDING
33 52 43 AVIATION FUEL DISTRIBUTION (NON-HYDRANT)
33 52 43.11 AVIATION FUEL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - R0002
33 52 43.12 AVIATION FUEL PANTOGRAPHS
33 52 43.13 AVIATION FUEL PIPING - R0002
33 52 43.14 AVIATION FUEL CONTROL VALVES - R0002
33 52 43.23 AVIATION FUEL PUMPS
33 52 43.28 FILTER SEPARATOR, AVIATION FUELING SYSTEM
33 52 80 LIQUID FUELS PIPELINE COATING SYSTEMS
33 56 10 FACTORY-FABRICATED FUEL STORAGE TANKS
33 57 55 FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS (NON-HYDRANT)
33 58 00 LEAK DETECTION FOR FUELING SYSTEMS
33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)
-- End of Project Table of Contents --
PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4
FILE NAME SHEET SHEET TITLE REVISION NO. DATE
NO.
W912DW19R0017 00 01 15-A – Page 1 R0002
ATTACHMENT 00 01 15-A
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
1. GENERAL
WA13G-001.PDF G-001 COVER
WA13G-002.PDF G-002 INDEX
WA13G-003.PDF G-003 ABBREVIATIONS
WA13GI101.PDF GI101 HAUL ROUTE AND NOTES
2. SITE/CIVIL
WA13B-101.PDF B-101 SOIL TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN
WA13B-301.PDF B-301 SOIL TEST PIT LOGS, LEGEND AND NOTES
TEST PITS LM18-01 THROUGH LM18-08
WA13B-302.PDF B-302 TEST LOGS LM18-10 THROUGH LM18-16 AND LM18-18
WA13B-303.PDF B-303 TEST PIT LOGS LM18-19 THROUGH LM18-26
WA13GC100.PDF GC100 PHASING PLAN - OVERALL
WA13GC101.PDF GC101 PHASING PLAN - PHASE 1 CAZ
WA13GC102.PDF GC102 PHASING PLAN - PHASE 2 CAZ
WA13GC103.PDF GC103 LOW PROFILE BARRICADE DETAILS
WA13VF100.PDF VF100 EXISTING CONDITIONS
WA13CD100.PDF CD100 CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN - OVERALL
WA13CD101.PDF CD101 CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CD102.PDF CD102 CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CD103.PDF CD103 CIVIL OVEREXCAVATION PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CD201.PDF CD201 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT REMOVAL SECTIONS
WA13CD202.PDF CD202 EXISTING STRUCTURAL PAVEMENT REMOVAL SECTIONS
WA13CS100.PDF CS100 SITE PLAN - OVERALL
WA13CS101.PDF CS101 SITE PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CS102.PDF CS102 SITE PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CS103.PDF CS103 TRUCK OFFLOAD - ENLARGED PLAN
WA13CS104.PDF CS104 FILLSTANDS ENLARGED PLAN
WA13CS105.PDF CS105 REFUELER PARKING - ENLARGED PLAN
WA13CS106.PDF CS106 FUEL STORAGE AREA - ENLARGED PLAN
WA13CS107.PDF CS107 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CS108.PDF CS108 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CS501.PDF CS501 REMOTE CONTAINMENT BASIN DETAILS
WA13CS502.PDF CS502 FILLSTAND & OFFLOAD DETAILS
WA13CS503.PDF CS503 MISCELLANEOUS SITE DETAILS
WA13CS504.PDF CS504 FENCING DETAILS
WA13CS505.PDF CS505 FENCING DETAILS
WA13CS506.PDF CS506 PROJECT SIGN DETAILS
WA13CS507.PDF CS507 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS
WA13CP100.PDF CP100 PAVING PLAN - OVERALL
WA13CP101.PDF CP101 PAVING PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CP102.PDF CP102 PAVING PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CP401.PDF CP401 JOINT LAYOUT PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CP402.PDF CP402 JOINT LAYOUT PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CP501.PDF CP501 PAVEMENT SECTIONS
WA13CP502.PDF CP502 PAVEMENT DETAILS
WA13CP503.PDF CP503 AURFIELD PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SECTIONS
WA13CP504.PDF CP504 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT JOINT DETAILS
WA13CP505.PDF CP505 AIRFIELD PAVEMENT JOINT SEALANT DETAILS
WA13CG100.PDF CG100 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - OVERALL
WA13CG101.PDF CG101 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CG102.PDF CG102 GRADING PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CG103.PDF CG103 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - TRUCK OFFLOAD AREA
WA13CG104.PDF CG104 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - FILLSTANDS
WA13CG105.PDF CG105 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - REFUELER PARKING
WA13CG106.PDF CG106 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - FUEL STORAGE AREA
WA13CG107.PDF CG107 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - HOT FUEL POINT CONTAINMENT
BASIN
W912DW19R0017 00 01 15-A – Page 2 R0002
WA13CG108.PDF CG108 STORM DRAIN ALIGNMENTS
WA13CG201.PDF CG201 ROAD PROFILES - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CG202.PDF CG202 REFUELING TAXIWAY CENTERLINE PROFILE
WA13CG203.PDF CG203 REFUELING APRON CENTERLINE PROFILES
WA13CG204.PDF CG204 STORM PROFILES - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CG205.PDF CG205 STORM PROFILES - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CG206.PDF CG206 STORMWATER INFILTATION AREA PROFILES
WA13CG401.PDF CG401 SPOT ELEVATION PLAN - BULK FUELS AREA
WA13CG402.PDF CG402 SPOT ELEVATION PLAN - HOT FUEL POINTS
WA13CG501.PDF CG501 STORM WATER INFILTRATION DETAILS
WA13CG502.PDF CG502 GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS
WA13CG503.PDF CG503 HOT FUEL POINTS TRENCH DRAIN DETAILS
WA13CE100.PDF CE100 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
WA13CE501.PDF CE501 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
WA13CU100.PDF CU100 CIVIL UTILITY PLAN - OVERALL
WA13CU201.PDF CU201 WATER LINE PROFILES SHEET 1 OF 4
WA13CU202.PDF CU202 WATER LINE PROFILES SHEET 2 OF 4
WA13CU203.PDF CU203 WATER LINE PROFILES SHEET 3 OF 4
WA13CU204.PDF CU204 WATER LINE PROFILES SHEET 4 OF 4
WA13CU205.PDF CU205 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE
WA13CU501.PDF CU501 WATER DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 4
WA13CU502.PDF CU502 WATER DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 4
WA13CU503.PDF CU503 WATER DETAILS SHEET 3 OF 4
WA13CU504.PDF CU504 WATER DETAILS SHEET 4 OF 4
WA13CU505.PDF CU505 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 3
WA13CU506.PDF CU506 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 3
WA13CU507.PDF CU507 SANITARY SEWER DETAILS SHEET 3 OF 3
WA13CU508.PDF CU508 STORMWATER INFILTRATION GALLERY CONCEPT LAYOUT
3. STRUCTURAL SITE
WA13SS001.PDF SS001 SITE CANOPY FOUNDATION LOADS
WA13SS101.PDF SS101 SITE STRUCTURAL PLAN
WA13SS101A.PDF SS101A SITE STRUCTURAL PLAN WITH CANOPY /
(ADDITIONAL OPTION)
WA13SS102.PDF SS102 50,000 GALLON TANK / CONTAINMENT SLAB LAYOUT
WA13SS103.PDF SS103 PIPE SUPPORT SITE PLAN R0002 June 2019
WA13SS104.PDF SS104 LARGE CANOPY LAYOUT / CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE LAYOUTS
WA13SS104A.PDF SS104A FILLSTAND/OFFLOAD CANOPY LAYOUT / (ADDITIONAL OPTION)
WA13SS301.PDF SS301 FOUNDATION AND SLAB SECTIONS
WA13SS302.PDF SS302 TANK PEDESTAL SECTIONS / TANK PEDESTAL REINFORCEMENT
TIE DETAILS
WA13SS303.PDF SS303 CONTAINMENT BASIN SECTIONS
WA13SS304.PDF SS304 LOW POINT DRAIN PIT
WA13SS305.PDF SS305 FILLSTAND/OFFLOAD CANOPY FOUNDATIONS / (OPTION)
WA13SS501.PDF SS501 TYPICAL DETAILS
WA13SS502.PDF SS502 RC WALL PIPE PENETRATION REINFORCING DETAIL
WA13SS503.PDF SS503 PIPE SUPPORT DETAILS
WA13SS504.PDF SS504 STEEL PIPE RACK DETAILS
WA13SS505.PDF SS505 ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORTS / SMALL DIAMETER PIPE
SUPPORTS
WA13SS601.PDF SS601 PIPE SUPPORT SCHEDULE R0002 June 2019
4. MECHANICAL SITE
WA13MD100.PDF MD100 DEMOLITION PLAN - OVERALL
WA13MS101.PDF MS101 MECHANICAL OVERALL SITE PLAN
WA13MS102.PDF MS102 MECHANICAL ENLARGED PLAN SHEET 1 OF 2 R0002 June 2019
WA13MS103.PDF MS103 MECHANICAL ENLARGED PLAN SHEET 2 OF 2
WA13MS104.PDF MS104 HOT REFUELING ENLARGED PLAN
WA13MS105.PDF MS105 RETAIL FUELING SITE PLAN
WA13MS201.PDF MS201 OFFLOAD PLANS AND PROFILES
WA13MS202.PDF MS202 FILLSTAND PLANS AND PROFILES
W912DW19R0017 00 01 15-A – Page 3 R0002
WA13MS203.PDF MS203 LOOP PLANS AND PROFILES SHEET 1 OF 4 R0002 June 2019
WA13MS204.PDF MS204 LOOP PLANS AND PROFILES SHEET 2 OF 4
WA13MS205.PDF MS205 LOOP PLANS AND PROFILES SHEET 3 OF 4
WA13MS206.PDF MS206 LOOP PLANS AND PROFILES SHEET 4 OF 4 R0002 June 2019 WA13MS501.PDF MS501 FUEL PIT DETAILS (OFF APRON) R0002 June 2019
WA13MS502.PDF MS502 TRUCK FILLSTAND DETAILS
WA13MS503.PDF MS503 PANTOGRAPH HOSE END TYPE SHEET 1/2 R0002 June 2019 WA13MS504.PDF MS504 PANTOGRAPH HOSE END TYPE SHEET 1/2 R0002 June 2019 WA13MS505.PDF MS505 TRUCK OFFLOAD SECTIONS AND DETAILS R0002 June 2019
WA13MS506.PDF MS506 TRUCK OFFLOAD DETAILS
WA13M-001.PDF M-001 FUEL SYSTEM LEGEND R0002 June 2019 WA13M-101.PDF M-101 PIPING PLAN R0002 June 2019 WA13M-201.PDF M-201 FLOW DIAGRAM R0002 June 2019 WA13M-202.PDF M-202 ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM R0002 June 2019 WA13M-203.PDF M-203 SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS (SOO) 1/2 R0002 June 2019 WA13M-204.PDF M-204 SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS (SOO) 2/2 R0002 June 2019
WA13M-301.PDF M-301 FILTER SHELTER PIPING SECTIONS
WA13M-302.PDF M-302 FILTER SECTIONS
WA13M-303.PDF M-303 TANK (FRONT) SECTIONS
WA13M-401.PDF M-401 JET FUEL STORAGE TANK SECTIONS R0002 June 2019 WA13M-402.PDF M-402 PRODUCT RECOVERY TANK SECTIONS AND DETAILS R0002 June 2019
WA13M-403.PDF M-403 DS2 TANK (OPTION) SECTIONS AND DETAILS
WA13M-501.PDF M-501 MECHANICAL DETAILS
WA13M-502.PDF M-502 MECHANICAL DETAILS
WA13M-601.PDF M-601 DS2 FUEL SYSTEM (OPTION) DISPENSER DETAILS
SHEET 1 OF 2
WA13M-602.PDF M-602 DS2 FUEL SYSTEM (OPTION) DISPENSER DETAILS
SHEET 2 OF 2
WA13M-701.PDF M-701 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES R0002 June 2019
5. ELECTRICAL SITE
WA13E-001.PDF E-001 SUPPLEMENTAL LEGEND
WA13EA101.PDF EA101 ENLARGED SITE DETAIL SHEET 1 OF 1 AIRFIELD LIGHTING
WA13EA501.PDF EA501 AIRFIELD LIGHTING DETAILS
WA13EA502.PDF EA502 ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE DETAILS
WA13EC101.PDF EC101 CATHODIC PROTECTION SITE PLAN
WA13EC501.PDF EC501 CATHODIC PROTECTION DETAILS - SHEET 1
WA13EC502.PDF EC502 CATHODIC PROTECTION DETAILS - SHEET 2
WA13EC503.PDF EC503 CATHODIC PROTECTION DETAILS - SHEET 3
WA13ED101.PDF ED101 DEMOLITION PLAN-BULK FUELS AREA
WA13ED102.PDF ED102 DEMOLITION PLAN - AIRFIELD LIGHTING AREA
WA13EG101.PDF EG101 BUILDING GROUNDING DETAIL
WA13EG102.PDF EG102 ENLARGED LIGHTNING & GROUNDING PLAN
WA13EG103.PDF EG103 AIRFIELD GROUNDING PLAN
WA13EG104.PDF EG104 OFFLOAD GROUNDING PLAN (BID OPTION)
WA13EG121.PDF EG121 GROUNDING FLOOR PLAN
WA13EG401.PDF EG401 ENLARGED TYPICAL AIRFIELD GROUNDING PLAN
WA13EG501.PDF EG501 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS
WA13EG502.PDF EG502 GROUNDING DETAILS
WA13EG503.PDF EG503 GROUNDING DETAILS
WA13EG504.PDF EG504 GROUNDING DETAILS
WA13EG505.PDF EG505 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS
WA13EG506.PDF EG506 STATIC GROUND RECEPTACLE ASSEMBLY
WA13ES100.PDF ES100 KEYPLAN
WA13ES101.PDF ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHEET 1 OF 4
WA13ES102.PDF ES102 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHEET 2 OF 4 R0002 June 2019 WA13ES103.PDF ES103 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHEET 3 OF 4 R0002 June 2019
WA13ES104.PDF ES104 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SHEET 4 OF 4
WA13ES401.PDF ES401 ENLARGED AIRFIELD PLANS
WA13ES402.PDF ES402 ENLARGED OFFLOAD SITE PLAN
WA13ES403.PDF ES403 ENLARGED TANK SITE PLAN R0002 June 2019
W912DW19R0017 00 01 15-A – Page 4 R0002
WA13ES404.PDF ES404 ENLARGED OFFLOAD CANOPY SITE PLAN (BID OPTION)
WA13ES405.PDF ES405 ENLARGED BUILDING SITE PLAN
WA13ES501.PDF ES501 SITE DETAILS
WA13ES502.PDF ES502 TYPICAL RACK DETAIL
WA13ES504.PDF ES504 ELECTRICAL TRENCH DETAILS
WA13ES505.PDF ES505 HAZARDOUS AREA DETAILS
WA13ES506.PDF ES506 HAZARDOUS AREA DETAILS R0002 June 2019
WA13ES507.PDF ES507 TYPICAL AIRFIELD HAZAARDOUS AREA
WA13ES508.PDF ES508 TYPICAL AIRFIELD RACK DETAIL
WA13ES510.PDF ES510 DISPENSER AND SUBMERSIBLE PUMP DETAIL
WA13ES511.PDF ES511 TYPICAL DISPENSER DIAGRAM
WA13ES512.PDF ES512 TYPICAL DISPENSER SYSTEM DIAGRAM
WA13ES513.PDF ES513 OFFLOAD STAND DETAIL
WA13ES514.PDF ES514 SITE DETAIL
WA13ES515.PDF ES515 PRODUCT RECOVERY TANK SECTION AND DETAILS
WA13ES516.PDF ES516 TYPICAL PUMP CONDUIT CONNECTION
WA13ET101.PDF ET101 COMMUNICATION PLAN
WA13ET500.PDF ET500 COMMUNICATION DETAILS
WA13ET501.PDF ET501 COMMUNICATION DETAILS
WA13ET502.PDF ET502 COMMUNICATION DETAILS
WA13FA001.PDF FA001 FIRE ALARM SUPPLEMENTAL LEGEND
WA13FA101.PDF FA101 FIRE ALARM PLAN
WA13FA501.PDF FA501 FIRE ALARM MATRIX
WA13FA502.PDF FA502 FIRE ALARM RISER DIAGRAM
6. POL OPERATIONS BUILDING
A. STRUCTURAL
WA13S-001.PDF S-001 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
WA13S-002.PDF S-002 GENERAL CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT NOTES
WA13S-003.PDF S-003 MASONRY REINFORCEMENT NOTES
WA13S-101.PDF S-101 COMPONENTS & CLADDING WIND LOAD DIAGRAMS
WA13S-102.PDF S-102 OPERATIONS BUILDING ROOF JOIST LOADING DIAGRAM
WA13S-500.PDF S-500 CMU AND ROOF STEEL DECK DETAILS
WA13S-501.PDF S-501 FOOTING, STOOP, AND SLAB DETAILS
WA13S-502.PDF S-502 TYPICAL OVEREXCAVATION
WA13SB101.PDF SB101 OPERATIONS BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SLAB PLAN
WA13SF101.PDF SF101 OPERATIONS BUILDING ROOF SUPPORT PLAN
WA13ST101.PDF ST101 OPERATIONS BUILDING MASONRY WALL PLAN
WA13ST301.PDF ST301 OPERATIONS BUILDING SHEAR WALL SECTION PAGE 1 OF 2
WA13ST302.PDF ST302 OPERATIONS BUILDING SHEAR WALL SECTION PAGE 2 OF 2
B. ARCHITECTURAL
WA13A-011.PDF A-011 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN
WA13A-101.PDF A-101 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - FLOOR PLAN
WA13A-102.PDF A-102 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN
WA13A-103.PDF A-103 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - ROOF PLAN
WA13A-104.PDF A-104 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - ENLARGED PLANS
WA13A-201.PDF A-201 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - BUILDING ELEVATIONS
WA13A-202.PDF A-202 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - BUILDING ELEVATIONS
WA13A-301.PDF A-301 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - BUILDING SECTIONS
WA13A-311.PDF A-311 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - WALL SECTIONS
WA13A-401.PDF A-401 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - WALL TYPES AND TOILET ACCESSORIES
WA13A-501.PDF A-501 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - ROOF DETAILS
WA13A-601.PDF A-601 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - ROOM FINISH AND DOOR SCHEDULES -
DOOR AND WINDOW TYPES
WA13A-602.PDF A-602 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - WINDOW AND LOUVER - SCHEDULES AND
TYPES
WA13A-701.PDF A-701 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - DOOR DETAILS
WA13A-702.PDF A-702 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - WINDOW AND LOUVER DETAILS
WA13A-901.PDF A-901 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - CASEWORK ELEVATIONS
WA13A-902.PDF A-902 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - CASEWORK SECTIONS AND DETAILS
W912DW19R0017 00 01 15-A – Page 5 R0002
C. FIRE PROTECTION
WA13FX101.PDF FX101 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - FIRE SUPPRESSION PLAN
D. MECHANICAL
WA13P-101.PDF P-101 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - WASTE & VENT PLAN
WA13P-102.PDF P-102 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - DOMESTIC WATER PLAN
WA13P-501.PDF P-501 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - PLUMBING DETAILS
WA13P-502.PDF P-502 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - PLUMBING DETAILS
WA13P-601.PDF P-601 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - PLUMBING SCHEDULES
WA13MH101.PDF MH101 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - HVAC PLAN
WA13MH102.PDF MH102 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - HVAC ROOF PLAN
WA13MH601.PDF MH601 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - HVAC SCHEDULES
WA13MH701.PDF MH701 POL OPERATIONS BUILDING - HVAC CONTROLS
E. ELECTRICAL
WA13EI501.PDF EI501 PUMP CONTROL PANEL R0002 June 2019 WA13EI502.PDF EI502 GRAPHIC DISPLAY R0002 June 2019 WA13EI503.PDF EI503 TERMINAL BLOCK CONNECTIONS R0002 June 2019 WA13EI504.PDF EI504 TERMINAL BLOCK CONNECTIONS R0002 June 2019
WA13EI601.PDF EI601 CONTROL SYSTEM DIAGRAM
WA13EI602.PDF EI602 CONTROL SYSTEM DIAGRAM R0002 June 2019 WA13EI603.PDF EI603 CONTROL SYSTEM DIAGRAM R0002 June 2019 WA13EI604.PDF EI604 CONTROL SYSTEM DIAGRAM R0002 June 2019
WA13EI605.PDF EI605 CONTROL SYSTEM DIAGRAM
WA13EL101.PDF EL101 LIGHTING PLAN
WA13EL501.PDF EL501 LIGHT FIXTURE DETAILS
WA13EL502.PDF EL502 LIGHTING DETAILS FIXTURE SCHEDULE
WA13EL503.PDF EL503 LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
WA13EL504.PDF EL504 AIRFIELD FUEL LIGHTING DETAILS
WA13EL505.PDF EL505 LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
WA13EP101.PDF EP101 POWER PLAN
WA13EP502.PDF EP502 TYPICAL PUMP CONDUIT CONNECTION
WA13EP601.PDF EP601 ONE-LINE & DETAILS R0002 June 2019
WA13EP602.PDF EP602 EPDS CONTROLS
WA13EP603.PDF EP603 MOTOR DIAGRAMS R0002 June 2019 WA13EP604.PDF EP604 PANEL SCHEDULES R0002 June 2019 WA13EP605.PDF EP605 PANEL SCHEDULES R0002 June 2019 WA13EP606.PDF EP606 SCHEDULES R0002 June 2019
WA13EP607.PDF EP607 OFFLOAD PUMP CONTROL DIAGRAM
WA13EP609.PDF EP609 EMERGENCY CONTROLS
WA13EP610.PDF EP610 EMERGENCY CONTROLS
7. CANOPIES
A. ARCHITECTURAL
WA13A-111.PDF A-111 FILLSTAND/OFFLOAD CANOPY - FLOOR AND REFLECTED CEILING
PLANS (BID OPTION)
WA13A-112.PDF A-112 FILLSTAND/OFFLOAD CANOPY - ROOF PLAN (BID OPTION)
WA13A-121.PDF A-121 FILTER SEPARATOR EQUIPMENT CANOPY - FLOOR, REFLECTED
CEILING, ROOF PLAN, AND ELEVATIONS (BID OPTION)
WA13A-211.PDF A-211 FILLSTAND/OFFLOAD CANOPY - CANOPY ELEVATIONS (BID OPTION)
Final Geotechnical Report
Construct Hot Refueling System Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA
Geotechnical Engineering & Sciences Branch Geotechnical Engineering Section
August 2018
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-1
W912DW19R0017
R0002
Contents Scope Subsurface Investigation
Soil Sampling Disturbed Sampling Bulk Sampling
Laboratory Testing Geotechnical Profile
General Geology Site Specific Geology Groundwater Soil Percolation Testing Seismic Evaluation
Engineering Recommendations Expansive Soil Structural Fill Foundation Design
Chemistry Testing General Sulfate Risk Corrosion Potential
Pavement Design Design and Construction Consideration Geotechnical Risk and Limitations References Appendices
Appendix A – Boring Location Plan Appendix B – Boring Logs Appendix C – Soil Test Results Appendix D – Chemistry Test Results Appendix E – Groundwater Report
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-2
Scope This report provides soil information and engineering properties for the proposed construction of the hot refueling system located at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Washington. The information in the report was obtained from a subsurface investigation and laboratory testing programs performed for the site.
Gray Army Airfield is located between 2nd Division Drive and Striker Drive. The new hot fuel system project has multiple components to it; which includes the construction of a fuel unloading facility, four 50,000 gallon storage tanks and operations buildings. Airfield pavements that are related to this project include expanding the taxiway, shoulder and constructing concrete refueling pads for the hot refuel area.
Subsurface Investigation Native soils range from large gravel to small cobbles with some sand. These in-situ conditions prevent conventional drilling and disturbed sampling methods from being conducted. The geotechnical investigation for this project consisted of excavating test pits and laboratory testing for soil properties. Lab test results and information on the test pit logs were referenced to determine engineering properties, identify site conditions and provide geotechnical recommendations.
Exploration operations for the project were conducted from 31 March to 2 April 2018 and consisted of 26 test pits numbered LM18-01 through LM18-26, with the exception of LM18-09 and LM18-17 being omitted due to utility conflicts. Subsurface data from previous test pits and subsurface investigations conducted in 1991 were reviewed and used for this geotechnical report. The test pit location plan layouts can be referenced in Appendix A of this report. The 24 test pits excavated in 2018 ranged from 8 – 10 feet bgs and groundwater was not encountered.
Test pit locations were marked by the geotechnical engineer. Utility clearances and dig permits were provided by the Joint Base Lewis McChord Department of Public Works.
Excavating, soil sampling and logging was performed by the USACE – Omaha District Drill Crew using a Case 580N Loader Backhoe for all test pits. The drill crew experienced cobbles throughout the soil profile. Excavation of the test pits indicated that the material medium dense to dense. The contractor should anticipate encountering cobbles and boulders during excavation and prepare a separate line item in his bid to accommodate this material.
Bulk samples of soil were collected from borings throughout the project. Each bulk sample consisted of a five gallon bucket with lids sealed with electrical tape. This particular project did not collect any disturbed or undisturbed samples.
Groundwater information, boring depths, sampling information, and top of weathered bedrock where refusal was encountered are shown below in tables one and two. This information is also notated on the boring logs which are included in Appendix B of this report. The following notations are defined as: N/E – Not Encountered and N/A – Not Available. The test pit information in table 1 and table 2 represent different geotechnical investigations. The test pit information in table 1 represents data taken from the current investigation, while table 2 represents information taken from the 1991 investigation.
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-3
Table 1: 2018 Test Pit Information
Test Pit Northing Easting Depth (ft)
24 Hour Depth to
Groundwater Table (ft)
24 Hour Cave In Depth
LM18-01 1123078.2 641898.3 8.5 N/E N/E
LM18-02 1123256.1 641933.3 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-03 1123431.7 641967.8 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-04 1123547.8 641991.0 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-05 1123584.6 641799.2 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-06 1123622.4 641605.2 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-07 1123327.4 641546.2 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-08 1123904.9 641409.9 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-10 1123813.0 641431.3 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-11 1123744.9 641457.9 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-12 1123656.1 641543.0 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-13 1123693.9 641360.7 10.0 N/E N/E
LM18-14 1123624.7 641381.5 10.0 N/E N/E
LM18-15 1123485.0 641414.4 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-16 1123718.0 641310.1 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-18 1123743.8 641264.9 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-19 1123675.7 641291.1 10.0 N/E N/E
LM18-20 1123604.0 641313.8 9.0 N/E N/E
LM18-21 1123700.8 641251.8 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-22 1123659.5 641111.7 10.0 N/E N/E
LM18-23 1123569.9 641194.3 10.0 N/E N/E
LM18-24 1123252.3 641117.3 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-25 1123496.8 640936.8 8.0 N/E N/E
LM18-26 1123337.9 640985.9 8.5 N/E N/E
Table 2: 1991 Test Pit Information
Test Pit Northing Easting Depth (ft)
24 Hour Depth to
Groundwater Table (ft)
24 Hour Cave In Depth
91-BH-52 N/A N/A 7.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-53 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-54 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-55 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-4
Table 2 Continued: 1991 Test Pit Information
Test Pit Northing Easting Depth (ft)
24 Hour Depth to
Groundwater Table (ft)
24 Hour Cave In Depth
91-BH-56 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-57 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-58 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-59 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-60 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-61 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-62 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-63 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-64 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-65 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-66 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-67 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-68 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-69 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-70 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-71 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-72 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-73 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-74 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-75 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-76 N/A N/A 6.0 N/E N/E
91-BH-77 N/A N/A 6.5 N/E N/E
General Notes N/E - Not Encountered; N/A - Not Available
The nomenclature for test pit naming is broken down by the project location, year drilled and the test pit number. All test pits from the 2018 exploration were backfilled with excavated material.
Soil Sampling There are various means and methods that geotechnical engineers depend on to obtain field samples for laboratory testing. The soil investigation depended on bulk sampling for various laboratory testing.
Disturbed Sampling Soil consisted of large gravel with some cobbles to extending approximately ten feet bgs. These conditions did not allow the drill crew to utilize vertical drilling or collect disturbed samples.
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-5
Bulk Sampling Bulk sampling consisted of collecting soil from a given depth specified by the geotechnical engineer. Soil samples were collected from every layer, extending ten feet below ground surface.
In total, there were 24 bulk samples were taken. Bulk samples were required for index tests, modified proctor and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests. Bulk samples were placed in five gallon buckets and the lids sealed airtight with electrical tape. Each bulk sample was labeled, denoting the hole and sample number, depth, date collected, and the project name.
Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing was assigned by the geotechnical engineer. Specific laboratory testing for typical index properties included the following testing: visual manual classification, mechanical sieve analysis, moisture content, modified proctors and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests. Soil samples were also tested for general chemistry values; which include the following tests: pH, chloride, sulfates, conductivity, and resistivity. The soil index testing was performed by Terracon;
whereas the chemistry testing was performed by Midwest Laboratories located in Omaha, Nebraska. Test results are notated on the boring logs and in the appendix of this report.
Geotechnical Profile General Geology JBLM is located in the Puget Lowland region, which is a wide low-lying area between the Cascade Range to the east and the Olympic Mountains to the west. These lowlands are east of the Olympic Mountains and the west of the Cascade Mountains. Puget Bay extends south into Washington and north into British Columbia, Canada. The Puget Sound Lowlands also include the land along the Chehalis River that runs into the Pacific Ocean between the Olympic Mountains in the north and the Willapa Hills in the south.
Site Specific Geology JBLM sits on a large area of glacial recessional outwash that mostly consists of the Steilacoom Gravel. The Steilacoom Gravel is made up of pebble to boulder sized material that is consistently coarse. Locally, there can be crossbedding. The Steilacoom gravel is commonly less than 20 feet thick, but can range up to 60 feet thick or more. Kettle hole ponds and other ice contact features are common. The undifferentiated part of the recessional outwash can consist of clay, silt, sand and gravel that forms kames, eskers, kettles, drumlins and deltas. The glacial outwash overlies the Vashon Till which has both low permeability and porosity.
Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered while conducting the current geotechnical investigation. The primary investigation method involved digging test pits; collapse depths were not taken. Soils in the test pits were described as dry, slightly damp, or slightly moist. Test pits, LM18-19 and LM18- 20 had slightly moist to moist gravel from approximately 4 feet to the bottom of the test pits. Test pit LM18-26 had moist silt from the ground surface to a depth of 0.9 feet. No free water was observed. A Groundwater Monitoring Plan from JBLM Public Works Department in 2017 indicated that groundwater is typically 25-35 feet bgs near Gray Army Fuel Facility, which can be referenced to in Appendix E.
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-6
Soil Percolation Testing Soil percolation testing was attempted at five locations. In three of these, the water pumped into the pit percolated into the subsurface so quickly that no test could be done. In the other two test pits, percolation tests were performed using the fast method. In percolation test 1; 2,000 gallons of water was pumped into the excavation in 27 minutes. At the end of the pre-saturation period there was 4 inches of water in the test pit which took 4 seconds to percolate out. In percolation test 2; 1,200 gallons of water was pumped into the excavation in 21 minutes. At the end of the pre-saturation period there was 8 inches of water in the test pit which took 16 seconds to percolate out.
In percolation test 3; 2,000 gallons of water was pumped into the excavation in 27 minutes. At the end of the pre-saturation period there was 8 inches of water in the test pit which took 2 seconds to percolate out. In percolation test 4; 600 gallons of water was pumped into the excavation in 35 minutes. At the end of the pre-saturation period there was 12 inches of water in the test pit which took 2 minutes to percolate out. The water level was then brought back to 6 inches and five tests using the fast test method were run and used to determine the average percolation rate, which was
31.2 seconds per inch. In percolation test 5; 500 gallons of water was pumped into the excavation in 11 minutes. At the end of the pre-saturation period there was 12 inches of water in the test pit which took 4 minutes to percolate out. The water level was then brought back to 6 inches and five tests using the fast test method were run and used to determine the percolation rate, which was
26.6 seconds per inch. It was not possible to calculate the average infiltration rate in tests one through three since water percolated out too fast to accurately measure. The average infiltration rate at test pit 4 is 115 inches per hour and 135 inches per hour at test pit 5.
Seismic Evaluation In reference to the American Society of Civil Engineers “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures” (ASCE 7 – 16), the Department of Defense (DoD) “Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) Seismic Design for Buildings (UFC 3 – 310 – 04) dated 1 May 2012, and the International Building Code (IBS) 2012, JBLM has a 0.2 second spectral response acceleration (Ss) of 1.281g and a 1.0 second spectral response acceleration (S1) of 0.507g.
These accelerations are interpolated from a 1:5,000,000 scale map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), and the ASCE 7 Seismic Subcommittee for the 0.2 second spectral response acceleration (5% critical damping), Site Class B, and a 1.0 second spectral response acceleration (5% critical camping), Site Class D, respectively. These accelerations were confirmed by using the USGS Seismic Design Maps web based tool.
For all structures located within regions of the maps having Ss values greater than 0.15g, or values of S1 greater than 0.04g, the spectral response accelerations taken from these maps must be adjusted for site class effects using coefficients provided in the aforementioned guidance. Chapter 20 of ASCE 7-16, Site Classification provides six site classes: Class A through Class F, which are defined on various geotechnical parameters (shear wave velocity, standard penetration resistance or undrained shear strength values). For this investigation, shear wave velocity and undrained shear strength were not determined. Additionally, since there were no standard penetration resistance tests (SPT / blow counts), default values were used. For design purposes, the reference site condition for this project is taken as site class D.
00 01 15-B-7
Chapter 20 of ASCE 7-16 defines a site class D as having an average standard penetration resistance of 15-50 for the top 100 feet of the site profile. Since no SPTs were obtained, the default site class D was used with a default N value for the site of 15-50.
The adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration parameters (USGS values) using the site class D response coefficients for Ss greater than or equal to 1.25 and S1 greater than or equal to 0.550 are as follows:
The short-period spectral acceleration (SMS = FaSS) is (1.0 x 1.281) = 1.281
The 1-second period spectral acceleration (SM1 = FvS1) is (1.5 x 0.507) = 0.761
Engineering Recommendations Engineering properties utilized for pavement and or foundation design are based on both previous geotechnical investigations and the current geotechnical investigation. This geotechnical report also identifies soil conditions that the contractor must consider for proper foundation design.
Expansive Soil Foundation materials that exhibit volume change from change in soil moisture are referred to as expansive or swelling soils. Typically, soils that are classified as highly plastic clay can be considered expansive or swelling. Below, listed in table 3, are parameters developed by the Department of the Army; Technical Manual 5 – 818 – 7 “Foundations in Expansive Clays” which use Atterberg limits to correlate the potential for swell.
Table 3: Swell Potential (TM 5-818-7)
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Index
Swell Potential
< 50 < 25 Low 50-60 25 - 35 Marginal > 60 > 35 High
Native in-situ soils were primarily poor graded and well graded gravel, with some poorly graded sand layers. Sieve analysis indicated that the percent of material passing the #200 sieve ranged from 0.3 – 12.8 percent by weight. Laboratory analysis determined that the fines classified as silt, thus expansive soil conditions do not apply to this site.
Structural Fill Structural fill shall be used as backfill for over-excavations below both pavement and foundation systems – to include spread footings, continuous footings and slab on grade foundations and grading requirements. Where structural fill is required to accommodate the parameters identified above, the following soils and in-situ soils are acceptable as noted. If the fill is imported, these soils should be classified according to ASTM D2487 as GW, GP, GM, SM, SP, SW, or SP-SM.
Imported fill with fines shall have the following Atterberg limit properties: a liquid limit not greater than 35 and a plasticity index not greater than 15. Soils not classified as acceptable or soils that do not meet the specified Atterberg limit requirements are not acceptable to be used as
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-8 structural fill. All soil deemed acceptable as structural fill shall be compacted to 95% modified proctor, +/- 2% optimal moisture content. Lift thickness for either fine or coarse materials should not exceed 8 inches in any circumstance. It is the contractors’ responsibility to complete all proctor and relative density tests to determine required in field densities and submit them to USACE construction representative.
Foundation Design The frost depth at Joint Base Lewis McChord is nine inches below ground surface (UFC-3-301- 01). Thus, to mitigate the threat of frost heave, foundation embedment depth must be a minimum of one foot bgs. For continuous, spread, and slab on grade foundations; a minimum of two feet of material shall be excavated and reworked from the bottom of foundation and or footing. In addition to the contractor meeting all compaction requirements and lift thickness, the contractor shall ensure that there is no material larger than 4” in the compacted section, which is dependent on the lift thickness placed in the field. The contractor may excavate and scalp all material through a screen to separate material larger than 4 inches. Requirements for satisfactory placed structural fill is outlined in the Structural Fill section and must be used for any backfill. For foundation systems that require structural fill, an allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be used for all design. Total settlement should be limited to one inch and differential settlement shall not exceed one half of an inch between any two members.
Chemistry Testing General Soil resistivity, conductivity, pH and sulfate tests were performed on two representative samples obtained from near surface depths and the results can be reviewed in table 4.
Table 4: Joint Base Lewis McChord Chemistry Results
Boring Depth
(ft) pH Sulfate
(mg/L) Resistivity (ohm-cm)
Conductivity (µS/cm)
LM18-01 3.0-4.5 7.18 12 6620 151
LM18-15 3.0-4.5 7.19 25 5890 170
Chemistry testing revealed that the soil was neutral. Soils having a pH of 8 (alkaline) or above can lead to extreme corrosion rates and premature pitting of metallic objects, however resistivity is better suited for determining corrosion potential.
Sulfate Risk Sulfate attack is an issue that can be damaging to any concrete pavements and or foundations.
Sulfate ion content tests were performed on three representative samples from various depths across the project site and can be seen in table 3 above. According to table 5, taken from the American Concrete Institution publication 201.2R a “Guide to Durable Concrete”, there is a moderate exposure of Sulfate Attack when sulfate in water exceeds 150 ppm.
00 01 15-B-9
Table 5: Sulfate Classification
Exposure Classification
Sulfate (SO4 2-) in water (ppm)
N/A < 150 Moderate 150 to 1500
Severe 1500 to 10,000 Very Severe > 10,000
Based on criteria outlined in ACI 201.2, native soils near the surface do not pose a risk of sulfate attack and preventative measures do not need to be incorporated.
Corrosion Potential Resistivity is another measure that gages corrosion potential. Test results shown in table three ranged from 5,890 to 6,620 ohm-cm. According to table 6, the reported soil resistivity values indicate that there is a moderate corrosion potential.
Table 6: Soil Resistivity Classification
Resistance Classification
Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm)
Corrosion Potential
Low 0 - 2,000 Severe Medium 2,000 - 10,000 Moderate
High 10,000 - 30,000 Mild Very High > 30,000 Unlikely
There are several methods of preventing corrosion of buried pipes, though most of these methods are only practical for application prior to installation of the piping. Design engineers should strongly consider the use of nonmetallic pipes for underground utilities. However, if steel pipes and or foundations are used, design engineers may increase the thickness of steel members and or steel walled pipes. Cathodic protection is another method to control corrosion. Incorporating cathodic protection early on can prevent corrosion from the start.
Pavement Design It is anticipated that there will be hardstand pavement sections composed of hot mix asphalt (HMA) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC); supported by a subbase material to accommodate pavement design. Exploration of subgrade material located below existing and located in the near vicinity of existing pavements revealed that the subgrade contained predominantly poorly graded gravels, well graded gravel and some poorly graded sand layers, extending from the surface to approximately ten feet bgs in some areas. As built drawings for the fueling aprons were provided prior to the original investigation. These drawings indicated that there was a 0.5 to 6 foot layer of silty gravel above the sandy gravel. The existing air field pavement footprint constructed under the Hot Refueling Point project over excavated all unsatisfactory subgrade materials (organic material) and backfilled with satisfactory materials. It is reasonable to assume that these materials
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-10 were compacted to a minimum of 95% standard proctor to meet engineering requirements in original design. New airfield pavement areas that fall outside of the original Hot Refueling Point project unsatisfactory material limits under this project will be excavated and replaced with satisfactory material and appropriate compaction requirements must be adhered to as defined in 31 00 00.
In-situ materials on this project are typically excavated a minimum of 18” and reworked and compacted. Material larger than four inches located within the base is not acceptable for paving sections. When an acceptable structural fill for grading purposes is required a coefficient of subgrade reaction of 200 pounds per cubic inch (pci) and a CBR of 20 are suitable design values. However, for portions of the grading that require cut and fill, the contractor shall excavate and scarify a minimum of 18 inches such that all requirements listed above are met. In the event that pavement is placed on native soils, the contractor shall scarify eight inches and design engineers are restricted to using a value of 20 for the California Bearing Ratio and a coefficient of subgrade reaction of 200 pci.
Proof-rolling of pavement subgrade should be performed prior to placing base course or other pavement layers. A loaded tandem-axle dump truck should traverse the subgrade area and a visual inspection for excessive rutting or deflection (greater than 0.75-inch typically) made.
Deflecting or rutting subgrade is to be reworked or otherwise improved to bring performance within tolerance. If the area is too soft to achieve adequate compaction, during construction they may be reinforced with a tri-axial geogrid with a minimum radial stiffness of 15,000 pounds/foot. Tensar TX130S meets this specification; similar suitable products are available from other suppliers. A layer of one-inch minus crushed aggregate between 6 and 12 inches thick may be placed over the geogrid for particularly soft zones if required.
Materials, quality assurance, quality control and any construction and maintenance methods shall meet all requirements outlined in the project specifications. If materials cannot meet their recommendations, then the pavement design should be re-evaluated based upon available materials. For this project, the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Subgrade Coefficient (k) provided in this report were determined from laboratory testing under ASTM D1883 using ASTM D1557 and USCS soil classifications, respectively.
Design and Construction Consideration The addition of new utility lines requires either open trench or trenchless construction. For any open trench construction, both EM 385-1-1 Section 25 titled “Excavation and Trenching” and 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1926, Subpart P titled “Excavations” should be consulted to ensure adequate trench and or excavation protection is in place. Cobbles and or boulders may be encountered at any depth of this site. Excavation sidewalls were subject to collapse through many of the test pits.
It is critical that all recommendations in this report are reviewed during construction. Construction managers and project engineers must assume responsibility for using appropriate practices. The project site is located in a drainage pathway that has the potential to experience a large water volume. Diversion of storm water around the construction site is critical for proper placement of structural foundations and pavement subgrades. The recommendations made in this report are
FY19 GAAF REFUELING FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. DESC 1905
Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 19006
00 01 15-B-11 based on the assumption that the site will have surface and subsurface water controls typical of any construction site. Despite dewatering efforts, soft subgrade due to high moisture content may exist.
Subgrade that cannot be dried sufficiently to achieve proper compaction may be bridged using rock or crushed concrete.
Improvements made after construction shall be completed in accordance with recommendations provided in this report and may require additional soil investigation and consultation.
Geotechnical Risk and Limitations The concept of risk is an important aspect with any geotechnical evaluation, primarily because the methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. We never have complete knowledge of the subsurface conditions. Any analysis must be tempered with engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the recommendations presented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk-free. The borings were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of the subsurface conditions for the COF Company project.
The borings are representative of conditions encountered only at the boring locations. The recommendations presented in this report are based on the proposed site development as currently planned and described in this report. Revisions to the site development could affect the provided recommendations. If any of the directions or recommendations in this report are not clear please seek clarification of the intent Omaha District, Geotechnical Engineering Branch, Geotechnical Engineering Section.
00 01 15-B-12
References ACI 201.2R-16, Guide to Durable Concrete, ACI Committee 201, 27 March 2018
ASCE 7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, Reston, VA, 2017
ASTM C150 / C150M-17, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA, 2017
ASTM D1557-12e1, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil
Using Modified Effort, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012
ASTM D2487-17, Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified
Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017
Department of the Army USA, Technical Manual TM 5-818-7, Foundations in Expansive Soils, 1 September 1983
J. Eric Schuster, Ashley A. Cabibbo, Joseph H. Schilter, and Ian J. Hubert, 2015, Geological
Map of the Tacoma 1:100,000-scale Quadrangle, Washington. Map Series 2015-03, Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “Safety and Health Regulations for
Construction.” U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
OSHA, 2012.
United Facilities Criteria 3-301-01. “Structural Engineering.” Naval Facilities Engineering
Command. 2016.
00 01 15-B-13
SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
DOCUMENT 00 01 15
LIST OF DRAWINGS
02/11
PART 1 GENERAL
1.1 SUMMARY
1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS
1.3 SUPPLEMENTARY DRAWINGS
1.3.1 Boring Logs
1.3.2 Subsurface Data
-- End of Section Table of…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.