Specs.pdf

NEW YORK DISTRICT

Specifications

Small Business Set - Aside

IFB NO. W912DS-11-B-0006

Soundview Park Section 206 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Bronx, NY

MTOC - 1

MAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

00010 SF 1442 AND BIDDING SCHEDULE

00100 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

00600 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00700 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00 80 00 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS & OTHER ATTACHMENTS

00900 WAGE RATES

00901 NYSDEC WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATE

00902 NYSDEC TEMPORARY REVOCABLE PERMIT

00903 NYSDEC SOIL REUSE DETERMINATION

00904 AUTHORIZATION FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE (SPDES)

00905 ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

01 12 00.00 18 DESIGN AND RECORD DRAWING REQUIREMENTS

01 31 10.00 18 PROJECT SCHEDULE: BAR CHART

01 33 00.00 18 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 35 26 GOVERNMENT SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 02.00 18 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)

01 45 04.00 18 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

01 50 20 DEWATERING

01 56 10 HERBIVORY FENCE

01 57 00 ACCESS ROADS AND STAGING AREA

01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Soundview Park Section 206 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Bronx, NY

MTOC - 2

TECHNICAL PROVISIONS

02 22 70 EXCAVATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL WITH

REGULATORY EXCEEDANCES

02 23 10 CLEARING AND GRUBBING EXISTING VEGETATION AND

DEBRIS

02 23 20 SURVEYING

02 27 50.00 18 FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER

02 36 80 SILT FENCE

02 38 10.00 18 ANTI-TRACKING PAD

02 56 16.00 18 SOIL DEMARCATION BARRIER

02 82 10 FENCING

02 93 00 EXTERIOR PLANTS

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 00 10 CLEAN FILL (MEASURED IN PLACE)

31 05 22 GEOTEXTILES USED AS FILTERS

32 11 16 SUBBASES FOR FLEXIBLE PAVING

32 12 17 HOT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVING

32 92 19 SEEDING

SECTION 00901

NYSDEC WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATE

SECTION 00902

NYSDEC TEMPORARY REVOCABLE PERMIT

SECTION 00903

NYSDEC SOIL REUSE DETERMINATION

NOTES:

1. NYSDEC SOIL REUSE DETERMINATION DATED 8 SEPTEMBER 2008

SPECIFIES ALLOWABLE SOILS WORK.

2. NYSDEC SOIL REUSE DETERMINATION DATED 20 OCTOBER 2010 IS A

MODIFICATION TO NYSDEC SOIL REUSE DETERMINATION DATED

8 SEPTEMBER 2008.

SECTION 00904

AUTHORIZATION FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE (SPDES)

SECTION 00905

ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT

SOUNDVIEW PARK APPENDIX

The New York District Army Corps of Engineers (District) has partnered with the City of New York Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks) in efforts to restore park land to its historical state. One such effort is located in Soundview Park. The park is located in the Borough of the Bronx, at the confluence of the Bronx River and the western end of Long Island Sound. The area slated for restoration was, before development, a mix of mudflats and tidal wetlands. Over time these areas have been covered with municipal waste, demolition and construction debris. The goal in this restoration is to re-construct tidal wetlands on approximately three acres at the southeastern edge of the park. The proposed site is currently upland composed of the refuse and debris mentioned earlier.

This upland area is the result of past dumping activities that filled in the wetlands. In some places thickness of the land filling is greater than 20 feet above original soil surface. Restoration would involve the excavation and removal of the overburden down to original contours (or elevation).

There have been two sampling events at Soundview Park; the first was December 2003, the second was January 2007. Both sampling events collected sub-surface soil samples from areas slated for wetlands restoration and placement of excavated soil. The goal of the sampling was to determine what environmental contaminants were present along with their vertical and lateral distribution and concentration throughout the soil.

Soil sampling was accomplished using three methods; a hand auger for shallow sampling (zero to 18 inches below ground surface), truck mounted drilling tool that drilled down to depths of greater than 20 feet below ground surface and a truck mounted hydraulic coring tool. The hydraulic tool was also capable of advancing downward to 20 feet or greater. Soil samples were collected using these tools and assorted attachments.

Both truck mounted drill tool (drill rig) and hydraulic coring tool (“GeoProbe”) both used a collection attachment referred to as a split spoon. Both drill rig and GeoProbe would advance the drill bit to the specified depth. Once at that depth, the hollow cylinder with an opening, the a split spoon would be dropped into the soil boring. The split spoon would be pushed into the soil collecting a sample from that depth. Collected soil would be contained within the hollow cavity of the spoon. The spoon would be retrieved to the surface, split open and the soil sample inspected. Portions of the soil sample would be placed in glass containers and shipped to a laboratory for analysis. What portion(s) of the split spoon sample would be placed in the jars was a determination made by the District representative on site during this work.

The 2003 and 2007 sampling events were similar. Both collected soil samples from varying depths and were analyzed for the same constituents. The same laboratory conducted the analytical work. Field protocols for sample management were the same in both events. Those protocols were as follows; All soil samples were placed in clear glass jars (two or four ounce containers), there were no preservative agents added to the samples, all sample jars were labeled, each sample had its own unique sequential number.

All sample labels had the following information; date of sampling, initials of the person collecting the sample, time of day collected, site location name, types of analyses requested, who was requesting the analyses, letter or number identifier and if any preservative agent was added.

All samples were placed on ice to chill them down. This step is necessary in order to preserve contaminants present in the soil. All samples were placed in a shipping container and shipped over-night to the laboratory conducting the environmental analyses. Accompanying the samples was a document, Chain of Custody. This document is a record on how many samples were shipped, who prepared them for shipping, what analysis is requested and signature of the person creating this record.

In both sample events the following environmental parameters were analyzed for;

Volatile Organics+15 (VOA+15). The VOA analysis would cover 47 compounds. The “plus” are compounds less common than the 47 but still prevalent enough to be analyzed for. The 15 would be labeled as Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC).

Acid Based Neutrals+25 (ABN+25). ABN analyses covers 70 compounds. The “plus” 25 compounds are less common but still prevalent enough to be analyzed for. The 25 compounds would be labeled separately as Tentatively Identified Compounds (TIC).

Other environmental parameters analyzed for were Pesticides, PCBs RCRA Metals (Resource, Conservation, Recovery Act). Laboratory analysis time to complete the task was a standard four week turn-around.

All environmental sample results were compared to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) guideline; Technical Administrative Guidance Memorandum # 4046 (TAGMs). Within this guideline is the Recommended Soil Cleanup Objective (RSCO). It was the RSCO that sample results were compared to. All TAGMs and RSCO guidelines are in parts per million (ppm). The RSCO has two soil cleanup standards; Soil cleanup standards to protect groundwater and RSCO itself.

In April 2007 the DEC implemented a new guideline policy. Under the DEC’s Remedial Program Soil Cleanup Objectives, a new set of guidelines were published. Referred to Subpart 375-6.8(b), the new guidelines are more liberal in the metals category and more conservative in the pesticides. Within Subpart 375-6.8(b) are seven categories;

Unrestricted soil use, Residential, Restricted residential, Commercial, Industrial, Protection of ecological resources and Protection of groundwater. In the Volatile Organics and Acid Based Neutrals there is little difference between it and TAGMs 4046.

In January 2003 the first round of sub-surface soil sampling took place. To accomplish the task a hand auger and GeoProbe were used. The hand auger collected shallow (0 – 24 inches) and the GeoProbe collected at that depth and downwards to 24 feet. The shallow samples were collected from a park area slated for on-site placement of the excavated soil. The GeoProbe collected deep soil samples from the area to be excavated to create the tidal wetlands.

A total of 19 samples were collected during the 2003 sampling what follows is an explanation of the laboratory results.

Volatile Organics+15 (VOAs) under the TAGMs guideline have a threshold of less than 10 ppm for all compounds detected in one sample collected from one location. Meaning regardless of how many compounds are detected in one sample, if the VOAs totals from that one sample is less than 10 ppm, then there is no issue. Under the TAGMs rule the highest number of VOAs detected in one sample was a total of 1.462 ppm. There is with TAGMs, thresholds for each listed VOA compound. Laboratory showed no detect above any of the assigned thresholds.

Under subpart 375-6.8(b) there is no threshold of combined total of VOAs. Like TAGMs, 375-6.8 has thresholds for listed VOAs. There were no exceedences of VOAs per 375-6.8 guidelines.

Acid Based Neutrals+25 (ABNs) under TAGMs 44 compounds are listed with various threshold levels. Within the TAGMs guidelines is a limit of 500 ppm total from the all the compounds found within one sample. In this sampling event the highest number of ABN was 346.55 ppm in one sample, substantially below the 500 ppm limit. TAGMs also list individual thresholds for the ABNs on the list. If anyone of these individual compounds exceeds that threshold then the sample is flagged. There were no exceedences of these threshold numbers during this laboratory analyses.

Under Subpart 375-6.8(b) only 21 compounds are analyzed for and there is no combined total number threshold. During this laboratory analyses, no exceedences were detected.

Pesticides Six pesticides were found; alpha chlordane, gamma chlordane, 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, 4,4’-DDT and dieldrin. Of the levels of concentration, all detections were below the TAGMs soil cleanup threshold. The two most frequently appearing pesticides were 4,4’-DDD and 4,4’-DDT; DDD in ten samples and DDT in eight. When detected levels were compared to Subpart 375-6.8(b) the samples would be acceptable for the first four categories within 375, but not for the last one; protection of ecological resources.

The next pesticides in order of number of detects were 4,4’-DDE and dieldrin. DDE appeared in seven samples and dieldrin in four. Again the same pattern of acceptable to TAGMs and not to Subpart 375, these two pesticides exceeded the threshold for protection of ecological resources but would be acceptable to the four other less stringent categories. The last two pesticides were alpha chlordane and gamma chlordane. Both appeared in two samples. TAGMs list only gamma and not alpha. Subpart list alpha but not gamma. When gamma chlordane is compared to Subpart 375 threshold it is below that number, hence not an issue.

PCBs under TAGMs are managed by two standards; one ppm on the surface (zero to six inches depth) or 10 ppm at depths greater than that. The highest value sample, 0.80 ppm came from a deep soil sample at 20 feet. All other samples had levels less than this.

Interestingly all samples with measurable PCBs had the same type, Arochlor 1254. The sample with 0.80 ppm was Arochlor 1260. Under Subpart 375-6.8(b) the PCB levels found would not be an issue. Levels detected were below the Subpart threshold.

Metals analyzed came from the RCRA list. They are; arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium and silver.

Arsenic exceeded the TAGMs limit of 7.5 ppm or SB in seven samples. Four samples were below the 7.5 ppm and these samples came from depths of 16 to 21 feet below surface. Exceedences ranged from 9.37 ppm to 198 ppm, again these detections came from deep soil samples. All high levels came from deep soil samples of 10 to 21 feet.

There was no pattern to the distribution of the levels found.

Under 375-6.8(b), samples greater than 13 ppm would exceed the threshold for protection of ecological resources and thresholds of the six other categories (residential, restricted residential, commercial, industrial, protection of groundwater and unrestricted use).

Barium exceeded the TAGMs limit of 300 ppm or SB in six samples. The high numbers ranged from 67.2 to 2040 ppm. These high numbers came from deep soil samples from 15 to 20 feet deep. There was no pattern to the distribution. Samples from10-13 foot depth had low and high levels and samples collected deeper had the same mix of high and lower concentrations.

Under 375-6.8(b) guidelines the threshold is higher, 350 ppm for soil cleanup objective.

Five samples would exceed that threshold. The remaining six would be acceptable to the respective thresholds for the six categories.

Cadmium TAGM limits are 1 ppm or site background. In seven samples the threshold was exceeded. Those numbers were 1.39 ppm to 15.2 ppm. There was no pattern to the distribution of the exceedences. .

The 375-6.8(b) guidelines would allow higher cadmium levels. Acceptable levels for cadmium ranged from 2.5 ppm to 9.3 ppm, depending on which soil cleanup objective was chosen. The most conservative was residential and highest was industrial.

Chromium TAGMs limits are 10 ppm or SB. All samples in this round of sampling exceeded the threshold. Sample numbers ranged from 19.5 ppm to 541 ppm.

Under 375-6.8(b) the limits are more defined under the soil cleanup objectives. The threshold levels range from 41 to 6800 ppm. Three samples would pass the threshold for protection of ecological resources and residential. All others would pass the threshold of commercial use.

Lead TAGMs limits are SB. Generally accepted lead background levels range from 60 ppm in rural areas to 200-500 ppm in urban areas. Only one sample exceeded the 500 ppm limit. That sample was from a 14 feet depth and had 3570 ppm. The remaining samples ranged from 50 to 400 ppm.

Under 375-6.8(b) the standards are further defined. Soil cleanup objectives range from 63 to 3900 ppm, depending on which end use is chosen. The most conservative is protection of ecological resources and the highest threshold is industrial.

Mercury has the most conservative TAGMs limit: 0.1 ppm and no SB. There were three samples with non-detects. Detected levels ranged from 0.066 ppm to 3.24 ppm. There was no pattern to the distribution of detects and concentrations.

Under 375-6.8(b) the acceptance levels are higher. They range from 0.18 ppm to 5.7 ppm, depending on which soil cleanup objective is chosen. Using the Subpart threshold, only three samples would be lower, thus acceptable for the category of protection of ecological resources.

Selenium was the least appearing metal, non-detect in nine samples. TAGMs guideline for selenium is 2 ppm or SB. The highest level of selenium found was 2 ppm. It may appear the level found is site background.

Under 375-6.8(b) selenium guidelines is not an issue. The levels found are lower than threshold levels.

Silver was non-detect is eight samples. Under TAGMs there is no threshold for silver, only SB. The levels ranged from 6.39 ppm to 3.03 ppm. There was no pattern to the distribution of the levels found. It was found at all depths and sporadically, meaning it is not concentrated in any particular area Under Subpart 375-6.8(b), soil cleanup objectives were higher than the silver levels found in this sampling event.

In December 2007, the second round of sub-surface soil sampling took place. The purpose of this was to fill data gaps from the 2003 sampling. Tools used on this were a hand auger and GeoProbe. As in the 2003 sampling areas slated for excavation (where the proposed wetland areas would be) and placement (where the excavated soil would be placed). A total of 18 soil samples were collected. The soil would be analyzed for the following environmental constituents; Volatile Organics+15 (VOA+15), Acid Based Neutrals+25 (ABN+25), Pesticides, PCBs, RCRA Metals. Laboratory analysis time would be the standard four weeks.

Volatile Organics+15 (VOAs) laboratory results showed minimal presence within the soil. VOAs were found in shallow (less than 18 inches) and deep (four to fourteen feet deep). Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) were found in two samples. When the levels of the TICs and of acetone and carbon di-sulfide are compared to the TAGM’s Recommended Soil Cleanup Objective there is no issue, no exceedences.

With Subpart 375-6.8(b), carbon di-sulfide is not on the list of compounds to monitor.

VOAs detected under 375-6.8(b) criteria are so low in quantity they would not an issue.

Acid Based Neutrals+25 (ABN+25) laboratory results showed TICs in every sample.

TIC levels ranged from 0.45 ppm to 86 ppm. Within the ABN list of compounds is a sub-list that are referred to as Policyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). These compounds were present in all samples at all depths. The amounts present in the samples varied from single digit ppm to greater than 100 ppm. When compared to the TAGMs threshold of a combined total of 500 ppm ABN per sample no sample exceeded that level. Of the 18 samples only four exceeded the combined total of 100 ppm. When the ABN levels are compared to Subpart 375-6.8(b) there is no combined total threshold. For many of the compounds on the 375-6.8(b) list the threshold levels are actually higher than on the TAGMs guidelines. When the threshold for protection of ecological resources is used, for many of the ABNs found there is no threshold (not specified, NS).

Where there is a threshold number some samples were at that number or slightly above.

In samples where there were exceedences, there was no pattern to the distribution. The levels were at shallow and deep samples and dispersed over the sample area.

Pesticides were found in 15 samples. Six compounds were found, the two most common were 4,4’-DDT and 4,4’-DDE. Fourteen samples had 4,4’DDT, eleven had 4,4’DDE.

The next two in order of detection were gamma-Chlordane and alpha-Chlordane.

Gamma Chlordane was detected in 10 samples and alpha Chlordane was detected in nine.

The last two found were endrin aldehyde and 4,4’-DDD. Endrin aldehyde was detected in three samples and 4,4’DDD was detected in five. All detected pesticides were found in shallow and deep soil samples. When compared to the TAGMs guidelines there were no pesticide exceedences.

When compared to Subpart 375-6.8(b) those pesticides present exceeded the threshold for protection of ecological resources. All other Subpart categories had thresholds higher than what was detected.

PCBs were not detected in any sample.

Metals analyzed came from the RCRA Metals list. There are eight on the list; arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, silver. The metals were found at varying concentrations and at all depths (shallow, mid-range and deep).

Arsenic has a TAGM limit of 7.5 ppm or Site Background (SB). Two samples had high numbers; a shallow (one foot) sample with 26 ppm and one deep (14 feet) with 96 ppm.

The remaining samples had levels ranging from 1 to 9 ppm.

Under Subpart 375-6.8(b) arsenic would be an issue for all seven categories within Subpart 275.

Barium has a TAGM guideline of 300 ppm or SB. It was found in all samples. There was a consistent pattern of high numbers in the shallow samples (0.5 to 1.0 feet). Six samples collected from the area slated to be where excavated soils will be placed had barium levels ranging from 466 to 1870 ppm. Four samples from the mid-range depth had levels from 355 to 863 ppm. The remaining samples had levels below 300 ppm.

When compared to Subpart 375-6.8(b), which has higher threshold levels than TAGMs, there will be locations with the high levels that will be an issue at the time of excavation.

The only category that barium will not be an issue is industrial. Barium levels did not exceed the threshold for that.

Cadmium has a TAGMs guideline of 1 ppm or SB. Cadmium was found in all samples at all depths. The levels found were from 2.88 ppm to 7.96 ppm. This level was most prevalent in the shallow samples (0.5 to three feet deep). The highest level found was from a deep sample (14 feet) with 8.97 ppm. Using TAGMs all samples exceeded the guideline of one ppm. Using the Site Background guideline and the number of samples in the three to four ppm range it could be stated the levels found are the background levels for this site.

When compared to Subpart 375-6.8(b), seven samples exceeded the most conservative threshold, protection of ecological resources. Five of the seven samples are a fraction above the limit and two are substantially above. The samples with high levels are deep samples. The others were from shallow depths.

Chromium has a TAGM level of 10 ppm or SB. It was found in all samples. Its distribution had no pattern. Concentration ranged from 28 ppm – 70 ppm. The highest level was from a shallow sample. The next highest concentration was 68.9 ppm at 14 feet deep. All of the shallow samples had levels ranging from 20 ppm – 50 ppm. Using the Site Background criteria it could be stated the background levels for chromium in this area is what is shown in the shallow samples.

Using Subpart 375-6.8(b) the levels of concentration would be acceptable in the restricted residential, commercial and industrial categories. When detected levels were compared to the threshold for protection of ecological resources, seven samples exceeded the Subpart guideline. The locations of these exceedences varied from shallow to deep.

Lead has no TAGMs threshold, only SB and that is qualified as rural, suburban or urban locations. Urban locations are assigned a range of 200 – 500 ppm. Lead numbers within the samples ranged from 2 ppm at mid-range depths to 1970 ppm in shallow depths. The most consistent high numbers were in the shallow soil samples. The nine shallow samples had levels range from 94.9 ppm to 1970 ppm.

Under Subpart 375-6.8(b) 15 of the samples would exceed the threshold for protection of ecological resources which has a limit of 63 ppm.

Mercury has the most strict of the TAGMs threshold levels, 0.1 ppm. There is no SB guideline. Mercury was found in 14 of the 18 samples. The highest level was 6.4 ppm at shallow depth (0.5 – 1.0 foot). The lowest concentration was 0.195 ppm, also at a shallow depth. The remaining samples had levels range from 0.264 ppm to 1.31 ppm.

The distribution was primarily in the shallow surface samples. When the samples are compared to the Subpart 375-6.8(b) threshold for protection of ecological resources 0.18 ppm, all samples would fail. When compared to the six other categories all of the remaining samples would pass or fail depending on which desired end use was chosen.

Selenium was not found in any of the samples.

Silver has no TAGM threshold only a SB designation. It was found in 16 of the 18 samples. The levels of concentration ranged from 4.19 ppm in a shallow location to

11.20 ppm in a deep sample. The rest of the samples were in a range of 8.28 ppm to 4.19 ppm. All the shallow samples had silver, with concentrations ranging from 4 to 6 ppm.

Under Subpart 375-6.8(b) all the samples would exceed the threshold for protection of ecological protection, 2ppm. Levels found would be acceptable to the other six categories.

Contaminant Residential Restricted-Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

B1-03 (20-22')

B1 -03 (14-16')

B2-03 (15-17')

B2-03 (20-22')

B3-03 (16')

B4-03 (10')

B5-03 (8')

B6-03 (24')

B7-03 (20')

B9-03 (24')

Arsenic 16 16 16 16 13 17.4 18.7 3.78 9.37 1.02 3.35 198 62 80.6 4.73 Barium 350 400 400 10,000 433 286 2070 455 106 67.2 1260 445 343 370 156 Cadmium 2.5 4.3 9.3 60 4 5.35 2091 0.824 0.664 1.39 2.41 1.82 11.7 15.2 0.693 Chromium, hexavalent 22 110 400 800 1 112 46.7 23.6 43.6 19.5 27 66.8 405 541 48.5 Chromium, trivalent 36 180 1,500 6,800 41 Lead 400 400 1,000 3,900 63 269 3570 245 24.6 90.4 411 44 419 436 52.1 Total Mercury 0.81 0.81 2.8 5.7 0.18 1.088 1.349 0.177 ND 0.066 0.652 0.19 ND 3.24 0.11 Selenium 36 180 1,500 6,800 3.9 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2 ND ND Silver 36 180 1,500 6,800 2 3.03 ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.05 6.39 ND

ND= Not Detected

NYSDEC REMEDIAL PROGRAM Part 375 SOIL CLEANUP OBJECTIVES (ppm)

METALS ACOE 2003 SOIL SAMPLINGS

Contaminant Residential Restricted- Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

B4-07 (1.5-2')

B4-07 (3.5-4')

B4-07 (5.5-6')

B4-07 (7.5-8')

B8-07 (4.5-5')

B8-07 (10.5-11')

B9-07 (4.5-5')

B9-07 (9.5-10')

B9-07 (14-15')

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,1-Dichloroethane 19 26 240 480 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,1-Dichloroethene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,2-Dichloroethane 2.3 3.1 30 60 10 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 59 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 17 49 280 560 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 9.8 13 130 250 20 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,4-Dioxane 9.8 13 130 250 0.1 Acetone 100 100 500 1,000 2.2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.021 0.0017 0.002 0.005 0.011 0.008 Benzene 2.9 4.8 44 89 70 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS Carbon tetrachloride 1.4 2.4 22 44 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Chlorobenzene 100 100 500 1,000 40 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Chloroform 10 49 350 700 12 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Ethylbenzene 30 41 390 780 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Hexachlorobenzene 0.33 1.2 6 12 NS Methyl ethyl ketone 100 100 500 1,000 100 Methyl tert-butyl ether 62 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Methylene chloride 51 100 500 1,000 12 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 n-Propylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS sec-Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS tert-Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS Tetrachloroethene 5.5 19 150 300 2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 Toluene 100 100 500 1,000 36 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.0003 0.002 0.002 0.0002 0.003 Trichloroethene 10 21 200 400 2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 47 52 190 380 NS 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 47 52 190 380 NS Vinyl chloride 0.21 0.9 13 27 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003

Xylene (mixed) 100 500 1,000 0.26 1.6

0.004 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.004 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.006 (m+p)

0.003 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.0002 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.006 (m+p)

0.003 (o)

NS= Not Specified

VOLATILE ORGANICS ACOE 2007 SOIL SAMPLINGS

Contaminant Residential Restricted- Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

SA1

(0.5-1')

SA2

(0.5-1')

SA3

(0.5-1')

SA4

(0.5-1')

SA5

(1-1.5')

SA6

(0.5-1')

SA7

(0.5-1')

SA8

(0.5-1')

SA9

(0.5-1')

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,1-Dichloroethane 19 26 240 480 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,1-Dichloroethene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,2-Dichloroethane 2.3 3.1 30 60 10 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 59 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 17 49 280 560 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 9.8 13 130 250 20 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,4-Dioxane 9.8 13 130 250 0.1 Acetone 100 100 500 1,000 2.2 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.021 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Benzene 2.9 4.8 44 89 70 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS Carbon tetrachloride 1.4 2.4 22 44 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Chlorobenzene 100 100 500 1,000 40 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Chloroform 10 49 350 700 12 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Ethylbenzene 30 41 390 780 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Hexachlorobenzene 0.33 1.2 6 12 NS Methyl ethyl ketone 100 100 500 1,000 100 Methyl tert-butyl ether 62 100 500 1,000 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Methylene chloride 51 100 500 1,000 12 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 n-Propylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS sec-Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS tert-Butylbenzene 100 100 500 1,000 NS Tetrachloroethene 5.5 19 150 300 2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Toluene 100 100 500 1,000 36 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 Trichloroethene 10 21 200 400 2 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 47 52 190 380 NS 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 47 52 190 380 NS Vinyl chloride 0.21 0.9 13 27 NS 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.003

Xylene (mixed) 100 500 1,000 0.26 1.6

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.003 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.003 (o)

0.005 (m+p)

0.002 (o)

0.006 (m+p)

0.003 (o)

NS= Not Specified

VOLATILE ORGANICS ACOE 2007 SURFACE SAMPLES

Contaminant Residential Restricted-Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

SV1-A

(2')

SV1-B

(4')

SV1-C

(7-7.5')

SV2-A

(3')

SV2-B

(6')

SV3-A

(2.5')

SV3-B

(5')

Arsenic 16 16 16 16 13 2.40 1.34 4.93 2.69 3.51 2.63 10.2 Barium 350 400 400 10,000 433 293 74.9 465 110 891 102 295 Beryllium 14 72 590 2,700 10 U U U U U U U Cadmium 2.5 4.3 9.3 60 4 0.519 0.263 0.831 0.399 0.393 0.402 0.694 Chromium, hexavalent 22 110 400 800 1 Chromium, trivalent 36 180 1,500 6,800 41 Copper 270 270 270 10,000 50 164 33.5 34.8 36.7 33.5 31.3 114 Total Cyanide 27 27 27 10,000 NS Lead 400 400 1,000 3,900 63 166 82.4 344 44.7 202 103 408 Manganese 2,000 2,000 10,000 10,000 1600 226 213 296 241 114 291 198 Total Mercury 0.81 0.81 2.8 5.7 0.18 0.122 0.178 0.343 0.189 0.171 0.173 1.28 Nickel 140 310 310 10,000 30 17.6 22.3 16.5 20.3 13.8 15.7 16.3 Selenium 36 180 1,500 6,800 3.9 0.630 U U 0.577 0.912 0.842 0.713 Silver 36 180 1,500 6,800 2 U U U U U U U Zinc 2200 10,000 10,000 10,000 109 210 108 334 100 326 98.2 248

16,900 18,400 20,900 18,700 14,300 15,500 16,700 Magnesium 8,790 7,120 5,060 4,950 2,990 5,980 4,170 Iron

U= Not Detected NOTE: Lab analysis for Chromium shows Total Chromium

NYSDEC REMEDIAL PROGRAM Part 375 SOIL CLEANUP OBJECTIVES (ppm)

METALS PARKS 2007 TRENCH SAMPLES

19.7 16.7 18.715.2 20.8 20.2 15.6

Contaminant

Reccomended Soil Clean-up

Objectives (ppm) Contaminant Residential Restricted- Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

SV1-A

(2')

SV1-B

(4')

SV1-C

(7-7.5')

SV2-A

(3')

SV2-B

(6')

SV3-A

(2.5')

SV3-B

(5')

Aldrin 0.041 Aldrin 0.019 0.097 0.68 1.4 0.14 0.0057 0.0058 0.0064 0.0057 0.0065 0.0056 0.0059 alpha- BHC 0.11 alpha-BHC 0.097 0.48 3.4 6.8 0.04 beta - BHC 0.2 beta-BHC 0.072 0.36 3 14 0.6 delta - BHC 0.3 delta-BHC 100 100 500 1,000 0.04 Chlordane 0.54 Chlordane (alpha) 0.91 4.2 24 47 1.3 2,4-D 0.5 4,4'- DDD 2.9 4,4'-DDD 2.6 13 92 180 0.0033 0.062 0.0058 0.33 0.0057 0.17 0.0059 0.0066 4,4'-DDE 2.1 4,4'-DDE 1.8 8.9 62 120 0.0033 0.014 0.0014 0.064 0.0057 0.056 0.013 0.0093 4,4'-DDT 2.1 4,4'-DDT 1.7 7.9 47 94 0.0033 0.041 0.011 0.028 0.0057 0.13 0.045 0.035 Dibenzo-P-dioxins

(PCDD) 2,3,7,8 TCDD N/A

Dieldrin 0.044 Dieldrin 0.039 0.2 1.4 2.8 0.006 0.042 0.0014 0.043 0.0057 0.0065 0.002 0.0059 Endosulfan I 0.9 Endosulfan I 4.8 24 200 920 NS Endosulfan II 0.9 Endosulfan II 4.8 24 200 920 NS Endosulfan Sulfate 1 Endosulfan sulfate 4.8 24 200 920 NS Endrin 0.1 Endrin 2.2 11 89 410 0.014 0.057 0.0058 0.0064 0.0057 0.097 0.0056 0.0059

NS= Not Specified

NYSDEC TAGM 4046

ORGANIC PESTICIDES / HERBICIDES

and PCBs

PESTICIDES/PCBs PARKS 2007 TRENCH SAMPLES

Contaminant

Reccomended Soil Clean-up

Objectives (ppm) Contaminant Residential Restricted- Residential Commercial Industrial

Protection of Ecological Resources

SV1-A

(2')

SV1-B

(4')

SV1-C

(7-7.5')

SV2-A

(3')

SV2-B

(6')

SV3-A

(2.5')

SV3-B

(5')

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.224 or MDL Benz(a)anthracene 1 1 5.6 11 NS 3.6 2.5 1.2 1.9 5.8 1.3 2.8 Benzo (a) pyrene 0.061 or MDL Benzo(a)pyrene 1 1 1 1.1 2.6 3.3 1.7 1.3 1.7 4.1 1.1 2.3 Benzo (b) fluoranthene 1.1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 1 5.6 11 NS 2.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 4.2 1 2.2 Benzo (k) fluoranthene 1.1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3.9 56 110 NS 2.8 1 1.1 1.2 3.1 0.85 1.8 Chrysene 0.4 Chrysene 1 3.9 56 110 NS 3.5 2.6 1.3 2 6 1.3 3.2 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.014 or MDL Dibenz(a,h) anthracene 0.33 0.33 0.56 1.1 NS 0.37 0.29 0.24 0.39 0.62 0.22 0.35 Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3.2 Indeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene 0.5 0.5 5.6 11 NS 1.70 0.87 0.81 0.98 2.40 0.97 1.3

NS= Not Specified

NYSDEC TAGM 4046

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS PARKS 2007 TRENCH SAMPLES

2007 SOIL SAMPLING ANALYSIS

l

FORT MONMOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL

" TESTING LABORATORY J

DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

PHONE: (732) 532-4359 FAX: (732) 532-6263

WET-CHEM - METALS - ORGANICS - FIELD SAMPLING

CERTIFICATIONS: NJDEP #13461, NYSDOH #11699

.~;J

ANALYTICAL DATA REPORT

Fort Monmouth Environmental Laboratory

ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

Fort Monmouth, New Jersey

PROJECT: USACE

Soundview Park, Bronx, NY Field Sample Location Laboratory

Sample ID Matrix Date and Time of

Collection Date Received

SP-B9, 4.5-5.0' 7002501 Soil 23-Jan-07 10:00 01/24/07 SP-B9,9.5-10.0' 7002502 Soil 23-Jan-07 13:30 01/24/07

SP-B9, 14-15' 7002503 Soil 23-Jan-07 13:50 01/24/07 SP-B8,4.5-5.0' 7002504 Soil 23-Jan-0716:00 01/24/07

SP-B8, 10.5-11.0' 7002505 Soil 23-Jan-07 10:50 01/24/07 SP~B4, 1.5-2.0' 7002506 Soil 23-Jan-07 12:20 01/24/07 SP~B4, 3.5-4.0' 7002507 Soil 23~Jan-07 12:30 01/24/07 SP-B4,5.5-6.0' 7002508 Soil 23-Jan-07 12:40 01/24/07 SP~B4, 7.5-8.0' 7002509 Soil 23-Jan-07 12:50 01/24/07

SP-SA1, 0.5~1.0' 7002510 Soil 23-Jan-07 13:58 01/24/07 SP-SA2,0.5-1.0' 7002511 Soil 23-Jan-0714:05 01/24/07 SP-SA3,0.5-1.0' 7002512 Soil 23-Jan-0714:20 01/24/07 SP-SA4,0.5-1.0' 7002513 Soil 23-Jan-0714:40 01/24/07 SP~SA5, 1.0-1.5' 7002514 Soil 23-Jan-0715:00 01/24/07 SP-SA6,0.5-1.0' 7002515 Soil 23-Jan-07 15: 15 01/24/07 SP-SA7,0.5-1.0' 7002516 Soil 23-Jan-0715:30 01/24/07 SP-SA8,0.5-1.0' 7002517 Soil 23-Jan-0715:40 01/24/07 SP-SA9,0.5-1.0' 7002518 Soil 23-Jan-07 15:50 01/24/07

ANALYSIS:

FORT MONMOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL LAB

VOA+ 15, ABN+25, PESTIPCBs, RCRA METALS, % SOLIDS

J

The enclosed report relates only to the items tested. The report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of the U.S. Army Fort Monmouth Directorate of Public Works, Table of Contents

Section Pages

1-6

Method Summary

Chain of Custody

7-9

Volatile Organics 10-71

Qualifier Codes 11

Semi-Volatile Organics 72-130

Pesticides 131-149

PCB's 150-168

RCRA Metals 169-187

TCOOOO

AGOLSIl:l

~O

NIVH:l i L

Fort Monmouth Environmental Testing Laboratory

Bldg. 173, SELFM-PW-EV, Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703

Tel (732)532-4359 Fax (732)532-6263 EMail:Daniel.Wright@maill.monmouth.anny.mil Chain of Custody Record NJDEP Certification #13461

Q Q ,...hi """ o o

Type: 'UFull, UReduced, (X)Standard, UScreen I non-certified, UEDD

Remarks I Preservation Method cE"

F I Received by (signature): _on ,------

Relinquished by (signature): Dateffime: IReceived by (signature):

I

Remarks:

Hrs.

print legibly Page _, of ::2. RulherfordCOC1n?I?007 mailto:EMail:Daniel.Wright@maill.monmouth.anny.mil

I Date Received: --'----""v<..:.'---'-'--r-----'--

SitelProject Nam/'-;"'4""'7-":"~-;'-'c_~+,.__--'---_

,e: v L.q I'

SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM

Work Order ID#: ---ZOO cl§ Cooler Temp (deg. C): / ~F

II I Sier""<. 'I- ...1;;;;'" "r - ~ ~ v """" I.e j A

Check the appropri pHSample ID pH Sample ID PreservativePreservative

J I -

Comments:,___________________________________________________~-----

Received By: ,) . v .... :

(print name)

1. Did the samples come in a cooler?

2. Were the samples rec'd in good condition?

3. Were the chain ofcustody papers filled out correctly and legibly?

4. Was the chain ofcustody signed in the appropriate place?

5. Did all the labels agree with the chain ofcustody

6. Were the correct containers andlor preservatives used?

7 . Was a sufficient amount of sample supplied for the tests indicated?

8. Were bubbles absent from aqueous VOC sample containers?

9. Were samples received on ice?

8. Were analyze-immediately tests performed within 15 minutes?

Fill out the following table for each sample bottle

~?UnoDNA ~~s D no

~s Uno

~,s 0 no ..£f yes no.-/ oo~ye ' 0 no~' NA

~yes, ' o'no Dyes ,;rIio

..J

J j

J

000003

Fort Monmouth Environmental Testing Laboratory

Bldg. 173, SELFM-PW-EV, Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703

Tel (732)532-4359 Fax (732)532-6263 EMail:DanieI.Wright@mail1.monmouth.army.mil Chain of Custody Record NJDEP Certification #13461

ICustomer: us Army Corps of Engineers IProject No:.

o o ~f.J!, Ie!

Relinquished by (signature): Date'!ime: IReceived by (signature):

Relinquished by (signature): Date'!ime: IReceived by (signature):

Remarks:

Drlnt leaiblv paae:L of· J Rllth",rfl'lrrlr.nr.1 f??l?nn7 mailto:EMail:DanieI.Wright@mail1.monmouth.army.mil te answer

SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM

Work Order ID#: =I00dS-

Sample ID pH Preservative Sample ID pH Preservative

I - ..

Connnents:._____________________________________________--------------

I

Received By: \ I. V ..0.;' bFJ!tI1t Si (print name)

Check the approp ,.

1. Did the samples come in a cooler?

2. Were the samples rec'd in good condition?

3 . Were the chain ofcustody papers filled out correctly and legibly?

4. Was the chain of custody signed in the appropriate place?

5. Did all the labels agree with the chain of custody

6. Were the correct containers and/or preservatives used?

7. Was a sufficient amount of sample supplied for the tests indicated?

8. Were bubbles absent from aqueous VOC sample containers?

9. Were samples received on ice?

8. Were analyze-immediately tests performed within 15 minutes?

Fill out the folJowing table for each sample bottle

~/ Dno D ~~. Dno NA

.~ Dno r~~s Dno ~ 'Dno -~ D no ~-r.: 0 no ~ ~:ees 0 no NA

Dyes~ no

OOOOJ5

U.S. Army Corp of Engineers

Soundview Park, Bronx, NY

Soil Boring. Hand Auger. Test Pit GPS POSITIONS & COORDINATES

US STATE PLANE 1983. NJ (NY EAST) 2900, NAD 1983 (CONUS)

POSITION/DESCRIPTION

SV PARK B4

SV PARK B8

SV PARK B9

SV PARK SA1

SVPARKSA2

SV PARK SA3

SV PARK SA4

SV PARK SA5

SV PARK SA6

SVPARKSA7

SV PARK SA8

SV PARK SA9

SV PARK TRENCH 1

SV PARK TRENCH 2

SV PARK TRENCH 3

(IN US SURVEY FEET)

SAMPLE POINTS

Y COORDINATE (NORTHING)

720659.6735

720657.5516

720693.55

720856.069

·720988.8137

720868.7265

720763.5402

720750.296

721113.5841

720926.7402

720827.5897

720986.5316

720626.7773

720574.1545

720652.2247

X COORDINATE (EASTING)

669173.844

669364.296

669494.733

668993.441

668863.897

668789.692

669079.738

668970.925

668437.429

668372.103

668414.355

668219.734

669262.059

669226.177

669317.958

_.J

000036 http:720693.55 r

L

AlIVWWilS

(lOHL:tIW

... J

'-d

,.1

Method Summary

EPA SW-846 Method 8260 Gas Chromatographic Determination of Volatiles in Soil

A 5-gram volume of soil sample is added to a 5-ml aliquot of water. Surrogates and internal standards are added and the sample is placed on a purge and trap concentrator. The sample as purged and desorbed into a GC/IVIS system.

Volatiles are identified and quantitated. The final concentration is calculated using soil weight, percent moisture and concentration .

EPA SW-846 Method 8270 Gas Chromatographic Determination of Semi-volatiles in Soil

Surrogates are added to a 10-gram soil sample that has been dried with sodium sulfate. The sample is then extracted using a soxtherm extractor. The extract is concentrated to 1 ml. Internal standards are added and the sample is injected into a GC/MS system. Semi-volatiles are identified and quantitated. The final concentration is calculated using soil weight, percent moisture and concentration.

EPA SW-846 Method 8081/8082 Gas Chromatographic Determination of Pesticides and PCB's in Soil

Surrogates are added to a 10-gram soil sample, which has been dried with sodium sulfate. The sample is then extracted using a soxtherm extractor. The extract is concentrated to 10 ml. Internal standards are added and the extract is injected into a GC/ECD system. Pesticide and PCB's are identified and quantitated. The final concentration is calculated using soil weight, percent moisture and concentration.

EPA SW-846 Method 3051, 3rd Edition base manual with final Updates I, II, IIA, liB and III: Digestion of RCRA Metals

Milestone MLS 1200 MEGA A representative sample of 1.0 to 5.0 grams is digested in 10 ml of concentrated nitric acid for 10 minutes heating with a suitable laboratory microwave unit. Tile sample and acid are placed in a fluorocarbon (TFM) microvessel. This vessel is capped and heated in the microwave unit. After cooling the vessel contents are filtered and then diluted to a 1 OO-ml volume and analyzed by ICP.

no"';' 0 '\0U v ·i..I';:' l EPA SW-846 Method 6010B, 3rd Edition Base Manual with Final Updates I, II, .1 IIA, liB and III: ICP RCRA Metals

~l Perkin Elmer OPTIMA 3000 DV The method measures element-emitted light by optical spectrometry. Samples are nebulized and the resulting aerosol is transported to the plasma torch.

Radio-frequency inductively coupled plasma produces element-specific atomic line emission spectra. The spectra are dispersed by a grating spectrometer and a Segmented-array Charged-coupled-device Detector (SCD) monitors the intensities of the lines. Background and interelemental correction is used for trace element determinations.

EPA SW-846 Method 7471A, 3rd Edition Base Manual with Final Updates I, II, IIA, liB and III: Mercury

Varian SpectrAA-640, VGA-77 The flameless AA procedure is a physical method based on the absorption of radiation at 253.7 nm by mercury vapor. The mercury is reduced to the elemental state and aerated from solution in a closed system. The mercury vapor passes through a cell positioned in the light path of an atomic absorption spectrometer. Absorbency (peak height) is measured as a function of mercury concentration and recorded in the usual manner.

J

J ".,J

J OC{Hh}9 o 000

S:JINVDHO

:tl'1ILV'10 A r L~

US ARMY FT. MONMOUTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

NJDEP CERTIFICATION # 13461

Definition of Qualifiers

method blank as well as in the sample.

J: Indicates an estimated value. This flag is used:

(1) When the mass spec and retention time data indicate the presence of a compound however the result is less than the MDL but greater than zero.

(2) When estimating the concentration of a tentatively identified compound (TIC), where a 1:1 response is assumed.

D: This flag is used to identify all compounds (target or TIC) that required a dilution.

E: Indicates the compound's concentration exceeds the calibration range of the instrument for that specific analysis.

N: This flag is only used for TICs. It indicates the presumptive evidence of a compound. For a generic characterization of a TIC, such as unknown hydrocarbon, the flag is not used.

J

J

__ ~J o 011

1A FIELD 10:

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

1 MB 31 JAN 2007 1

Lab Name: FMETL NJDEP#: 13461

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1 st Otr

Matrix: (soiliwater) SOIL Lab Sample ID: MB 31 JAN 2007

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/ml) G Lab File ID: VB024362.D

Level: (Iow/med) LOW Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 0 Date Analyzed: 1/31/2007

GC Column: RTX502. ID: 0.25 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Extract Volume: ____ (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

J CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG a

:-71 J j

-~J.

--J

6/99

107028 107131 75650 1634044 108203 75718 74-87-3 75-01-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 67-64-1 75-15-0 75-09-2 156-60-5 75-34-3 108-05-4 78-93-3 156-59-2 67-66-3 71-55-6 56-23-5 71-43-2 107-06-2 79-01-6 78-87-5 75-27-4 110-75-8 10061-01-5 108-10-1 108-88-3 10061-02-6 79-00-5 127-18-4 591-78-6 124-48-1 108-90-7 100-41-4

Acrolein Acrylonitrile tert-Butvl alcohol Methyl-tert-Butyl ether Di-isopropvl ether

Acetone

Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane

1 ,1-Dichloroethene

Carbon Disulfide Methvlene Chloride trans-1 2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane Vinyl Acetate 2-Butanone cis-1 2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,1 1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Benzene 1 2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene 1.2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane 2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether cis-1 3-Dichloropropene 4-MethYI-2-Pentanone Toluene trans-1 3-Dichloropropene 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethene --

2-Hexanone Dibromochloromethane Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene

FORMIVOA

10 U 10 U 10 U 2 U

2 UI

2 U 2 U 2 U !

2 U U

2 U 2 U 2 J 2 U I 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U i

2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U I

000012

1A FIELD ID:

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I

MB 31 JAN 2007

Lab Name: FMETL NJDEP#: 13461

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1 st Qtr

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: MB 31 JAN 2007

Sample wtlvol: 5.0 (g/ml) G Lab File ID: VB024362.D

Level: (Iow/med) _LO-=--W_~ Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 0 Date Analyzed: 1/31/2007

GC Column: RTX502.

Soil Extract Volume:

CAS NO.

1330-20-7 95-47-6 100-42-5 75-25-2 79-34-5 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1

J

-.J

J

ID: 0.25 (mm)

(uL)

Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Aliquot Volume:

COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG m+p-Xylenes o-XYlene Styrene Bromoform 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene

(uL)

Q

U U I U I U I U I U U i

U I

FORM I VOA

6/99

000013

1E

FIELD ID:

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

1MB 31 JAN 2007 1

Lab Name: FMETL NJDEP#: 13461

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1st Qtr

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: MB 31 JAN 2007

Sample wtlvol: 5.0 (g/ml) _G__ Lab File ID: VB024362.D

Level: (Iow/med) LOW Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 100 Date Analyzed: 1/31/2007

GC Column: RTX502. ID: 0.25 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Extract Volume: 1 (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Number TICs found: o

J

FORM I VOA-TIC 6/99

000014 l 1A FIELD ID:

J

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I I

MB 01 FEB 2007

~.1 Lab Name: FMETL NJDEP#: 13461 J

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1st atr

Matrix: (soil/water) _S_O_'L__ Lab Sample ID: MB 01 FEB 2007

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/ml) G Lab File 10: VB024378.D

Level: (Iow/med) LOW

Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 0 Date Analyzed: 2/1/2007

GC Column: RTX502. ID: 0.25 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

J CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG a

6/99

107028 Acrolein 10 • U 107131 Acrylonitrile 10 U 75650 tert-Butvl alcohol 10 U 1634044 Methyl-tert-Butyl ether 2 U 108203 Di-isopropvl ether 2 U 75718 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 U 74-87-3 Chloromethane 2 U 75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 2 U 74-83-9 Bromomethane 2 U 75-00-3 Chloroethane 2 U 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 2 U 75-35-4 1 1-Dichloroethene 2 U 67-64-1 Acetone 2 J 75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 2 U 75-09-2 I Methylene Chloride 2 U 156-60-5 trans-1 2-Dichloroethene 2 U 75-34-3 1 1-Dichloroethane 2 U 108-05-4 Vinyl Acetate 2 U 78-93-3 2-Butanone 2 U 156-59-2 cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 2 U 67-66-3 Chloroform 2 U 71-55-6 1 1 1-Trichloroethane 2 U 56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 2 U 71-43-2 Benzene 2 U 107-06-2 1 2-Dichloroethane 2 U 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 2 U 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 2 U 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 2 U 110-75-8 2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2 U 10061-01-5 cis-1 3-Dichloropropene 2 U 108-10-1 4-MethYI-2-Pentanone 2 U 108-88-3 Toluene 2 U 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2 U 79-00-5 • 1 1 2-Trichloroethane 2 U 127-18-4 T etrach loroethene 2 U 591-78-6 2-Hexanone 2 U 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 2 U 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 2 U 100-41-4 Ethvlbenzene 2 U

FORMIVOA

~~1

000015

1 1A FIELD ID:

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I I

MB 01 FEB 2007

J

FMFTI ____

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1 st atr

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: MB 01 FEB 2007

Lab Name: __________ NJDEP#: _13-=-4-'.6_1__ 1...- ----'

Sample wtlvol: 5.0 (g/ml) G Lab File ID: VB024378.D

Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 0 Date Analyzed: 2/1/2007

GCColumn: RTX502. ID: 0.25 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1.0

Soil Extract Volume: (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

l CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG a .

1330-20-7 m+~lenes

95-47-6 100-42-5 75-25-2 79-34-5 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 o-Xvlene Styrene Bromoform 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.2-Dichlorobenzene

FORM I VOA 6/99

003 (;

l 1E fl

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FIELD ID:

TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I I

MB 01 FEB 2007

. Lab Name: FMETL NJDEP#: 13461

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1 st Qtr

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: MB 01 FEB 2007

Sample wt/vol: 5.0 (g/ml) G Lab File ID: VB024378.D

Level: (Iow/med) LOW Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 100 ---- Date Analyzed: 2/1/2007

GC Column: RTX502. ID: 0.25 (mm) Dilution Factor: 1 .0 ----- Soil Ex1ract Volume: 1 (uL) Soil Aliquot Volume: _1___ (uL)

CONCENTRATION UNITS:

Number TICs found: o (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG

,J

6/99FORM I VOA-TIC

fHH;017

1A FIELD ID:

VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

SP-89 4.5-5.0

Lab Name: FMETI NJDEP#: 13461 '---____

Project: 70025 Case No.: SOUNDV Location: BRON SDG No.: 1 st Otr

Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL Lab Sample ID: 7002501

Sample wtlvol: 5.1 (g/ml) _G_ Lab File ID: VB024363.D

Laval: (low/mad) LOVV Date Received: 1/24/2007

% Moisture: not dec. 13.64 Date Analyzed:…