Attachment_11_-_Weekly_Report_Format_Example.xls
XLS spreadsheet 161 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Navy Temecula Outpatient Clinic Initial Outfitting Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9127S-16-R-6032
About this file
Attachment 11
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Overview
| REPORT DATE: | BUDGET | PROJECT TEAM (Key Personnel) | |||
| Amount ($) | As of Date | USACE Contracting Office: | USACE - Tulsa (SWT) | ||
| PROJECT INFORMATION | Original Contract Award: | Name: | Mr. Allen R. Bassett | ||
| Project Title: | Modifications: | Phone: | 918-669-7136 | ||
| Contract Name: | Total Current Contract: | E-mail: | Allen.R.Bassett@usace.army.mil | ||
| Contract #: | Pending Changes: | USACE Contract Specialist | USACE - Tulsa (SWT) | ||
| Task Order #: | Total Estimated Contract: | Name: | Rudy Morales | ||
| Base: | % Over Budget: | Phone: | 918-669-7275 | ||
| Location: | E-mail: | Rudolfo.Morales@usace.army.mil | |||
| General Contractor: | Bid Schedule | Award Amount ($) | Scope Description | Senior Health Facilities Planning & Project Officer | |
| Architect-Engineer: | Base Bid: | Name: | LT Felix Villanueva | ||
| IO Contractor: | Option 1: | Phone: | 011-8-190-6861-1565 | ||
| Option 2: | E-mail: | Felix.Villanueva@med.navy.mil | |||
| SCOPE | Option 3: | Senior Health Facilities Planning & Project Officer | |||
| Total NSF: | Option 4: | Name: | LCDR Craig Rowland | ||
| Total GSF (Proposed): | etc… | Phone: | (619) 767-6592; 619-681-4514 | ||
| System Upgrades (Proposed): | E-mail: | Craig.Rowland@med.navy.mil | |||
| GSF Change: | 0 | USACE Project Manager: | USACE - Little Rock (SWL) | ||
| System Changes: | TOTAL: | Name: | Angela Curtis | ||
| Phone: | 501-340-1039 | ||||
| SCHEDULE | E-mail: | Angela.D.Curtis@usace.army.mil | |||
| Award Date: | |||||
| Notice to Proceed Date: | Name: | ||||
| Performance Period (Proposed): | Phone: | ||||
| Original Completion Date (BOD): | E-mail: | ||||
| Revised Completion Date (BOD): | |||||
| % Over Schedule: | Name: | ||||
| Phone: | |||||
| PROGRESS | E-mail: | ||||
| Scheduled Progress %: | USACE Quality Assurance Rep: | USACE-[servicing district office] | |||
| Actual Progress %: | Phone: | ||||
| Progress Payments (to date): | E-mail: | ||||
| Contractor POC: | |||||
| Phone: | |||||
| E-mail: |
&CNAVY MEDICAL - RISK/PERFORMANCE REPORT
&L&D&C&N&R&F Rudolfo.Morales@usace.army.mil Angela.D.Curtis@usace.army.mil
Budget
| BUDGET - AWARDS & MODIFICATIONS | ||||||||
| No. | Award / Modification | Type | RFP Received (date) | Proposal Submitted (date) | Award Date | Impact to Critical Path (days) | Award Amount ($) | Description |
| 1 | Initial Award | |||||||
| 2 | Notice to Proceed | |||||||
| 3 | MOD #1 | |||||||
| 4 | MOD #2 | |||||||
| 5 | ||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||
| 7 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 9 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| TOTAL: | ||||||||
| % Billed: | ||||||||
| % Complete: |
Add numbers as needed, however, 1 & 2 need to be present at all times.
Add numbers as needed, however, 1 & 2 need to be present at all times.
Unforeseen/Owner/Contractor
Schedule
| SCHEDULE - KEY MILESTONES | |||
| No. | Activity | Scheduled (Proposed) | Actual (Revised) |
| 1 | Contract Award | ||
| 2 | Notice-to-Proceed (Design) | ||
| DESIGN | |||
| 3 | Charette/Design User Interviews | ||
| 4 | Charette Report/35% Design Due | ||
| 5 | 35% Design Comments Due | ||
| 6 | 35% Design Review Conference | ||
| 7 | IO-Submittal #1 - Site Visit/User Interviews | ||
| 8 | IO - Submittal #1 - Due | ||
| 9 | IO - Submittal #1 - Gov't Comments Due | ||
| 10 | IO- Submittal #1 - Review Conference | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | 65% User Interviews/Site Visit (if req'd) | ||
| 13 | 65% Design Due | ||
| 14 | 65% Design Comments Due | ||
| 15 | 65% Design Review Conference | ||
| 16 | IO-Submittal #2 - Site Visit/User Interviews | ||
| 17 | IO - Submittal #2 - Due | ||
| 18 | IO - Submittal #2 - Gov't Comments Due | ||
| 19 | IO- Submittal #2 - Review Conference | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | 95% User Interviews/Site Visit (if req'd) | ||
| 22 | 95% Design Due | ||
| 23 | 95% Design Comments Due | ||
| 24 | 95% Design Review Conference | ||
| 25 | IO-Submittal #3 - Site Visit/User Interviews | ||
| 26 | IO - Submittal #3 - Due | ||
| 27 | IO - Submittal #3 - Gov't Comments Due | ||
| 28 | IO- Submittal #3 - Review Conference | ||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | 100% User Interviews/Site Visit (if req'd) | ||
| 31 | 100% Design Due | ||
| 32 | 100% Design Comments Due | ||
| 33 | IO-Final Submittal - Due | ||
| 34 | IO - Submittal #3 - Gov't Comments Due | ||
| CONSTRUCTION | |||
| 35 | Notice-to-Proceed (Construction) | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | Phase 1 - Move/Prep Departments | ||
| 38 | Phase 1-Precon | ||
| 39 | Phase 1-Demo | ||
| 40 | Phase 1- Construction End | ||
| 41 | Phase 1-Transition/IO Start | ||
| 42 | Phase 1- BOD/Open for Business | ||
| 43 | Phase 1-Commissioning | ||
| 44 | Phase 1-Punchlist/Inspection | ||
| 45 | Phase 1-Final Acceptance | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | Phase 2 - Move/Prep Departments | ||
| 48 | Phase 2-Precon | ||
| 49 | Phase 2-Demo | ||
| 50 | Phase 2- Construction End | ||
| 51 | Phase 2-Transition/IO Start | ||
| 52 | Phase 2- BOD/Open for Business | ||
| 53 | Phase 2-Commissioning | ||
| 54 | Phase 2-Punchlist/Inspection | ||
| 55 | Phase 2-Final Acceptance | ||
| 56 | |||
| 57 | Phase x - Move/Prep Departments | ||
| 58 | Phase x-Precon | ||
| 59 | Phase x-Demo | ||
| 60 | Phase x- Construction End | ||
| 61 | Phase x-Transition/IO Start | ||
| 62 | Phase x- BOD/Open for Business | ||
| 63 | Phase x-Commissioning | ||
| 64 | Phase x-Punchlist/Inspection | ||
| 65 | Phase x-Final Acceptance | ||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | Total Project -Commissioning | ||
| 68 | Total Project-Inspection/Warranty | ||
| 69 | Total Project-Final Acceptance |
Add numbers as needed, however, 1 & 2 need to be present at all times.
Add numbers as needed, however, 1 & 2 need to be present at all times.
Scope
| BLDG # | DEPARTMENT/SYSTEM | GSF/LEVEL OF RENOVATION | COSTS | COST/SF | |||||||||
| level of renovation (proposed) | level of renovation (revised) | GSF (proposed) | GSF (revised) | Design ($) (proposed) | Design ($) (revised) | Construction ($) (proposed) | Construction ($) (revised) | TOTAL (proposed) | TOTAL (revised) | ||||
| TOTAL: | |||||||||||||
| USE THIS TABLE IF PROJECT INCLUDES FACILTY ADDITIONS: | |||||||||||||
| BLDG # | DEPARTMENT/SYSTEM | GSF/LEVEL OF RENOVATION | COSTS | COST/SF | |||||||||
| add/alt (proposed) | add/alt (revised) | level of renovation (proposed) | level of renovation (revised) | GSF (proposed) | GSF (revised) | Design ($) (proposed) | Design ($) (revised) | Construction ($) (proposed) | Construction ($) (revised) | TOTAL (proposed) | TOTAL (revised) | ||
| TOTAL: |
USAF User:
Level I,II,III (light/medium/heavy) USAF User:
Level I,II,III (light/medium/heavy)
Current Risks
| CURRENT RISK REPORT | |||||||||
| (a NEGATIVE impact and a POSITIVE impact to the critical path cannot be identified in the same risk) | |||||||||
| # | Date Entered | Risk | Plan to Minimize Risk | Planned Resolution Date | Actual Date Resolved | Impact to Critical Path (Days) | Impact to Cost | Risk Type | Level of Risk |
(G/Y/R)
| 1 | R |
| 2 | G |
| 3 | Y |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 |
red=definite impact (schedule/cost/quality/safety) yellow=potential to impact green = little impact
Original Risk Assessment
| ORIGINAL RISK ASSESSMENT | |||||
| (include Risk Assessment provided in original technical proposal) | |||||
| # | Risk | Plan to Mitigate Risk | Impact of Risk On Project | Level of Risk | Risk Type |
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | |||||
| 8 | |||||
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 17 | |||||
| 18 | |||||
| 19 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| 22 | |||||
| 23 | |||||
| 24 | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 27 | |||||
| 28 | |||||
| 29 | |||||
| 30 |
Owner/Contractor/Unforeseen
PDT
| IO PROJECT DELIVERY TEAM & DISTRIBUTION LIST | ||||||
| PROJECT: | CONTRACT #: | |||||
| # | NAME | OFFICE | ROLE/POSITION | ADDRESS | PHONE | |
| USACE | ||||||
| Navy Med West | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 | ||||||
| Contractor |
RFI Log
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .