Soils Survey Materials Report, Gulf Pines-Phase 1, East 2nd Street Improvements.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- GULF PINES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
- Solicitation number
- 2026-0811
- Issued by
- Baldwin County, Alabama
About this file
This is a Soils Survey and Materials Report prepared by Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. for the City of Gulf Shores, Alabama, in support of the East 2nd Street Improvements project, Phase I. The report documents subsurface soil conditions, geotechnical investigations, and pavement design recommendations for the reconstruction of East 2nd Street between East 22nd Avenue and East 23rd Avenue. The project scope includes roadway reconstruction with one 13-foot travel lane in each direction separated by a 24-foot median, side street parking along each lane, and reconstruction of the storm drainage system. The investigation consisted of one pavement core location and nine soil test borings advanced to depths of 6 to 10 feet, with samples classified and tested according to AASHTO procedures. Groundwater was encountered at depths of 6 to 8 feet below ground surface at the time of drilling. The report, dated April 3, 2026, includes boring logs, laboratory test results, traffic data analysis, and detailed pavement design worksheets prepared using the ADAPT (Alabama Design & Analysis of Pavement Thickness) software.
The geotechnical recommendations establish a required Structural Number of 3.72 based on projected 2026 and 2046 traffic volumes (11,811 and 28,500 average daily traffic, respectively), an estimated subgrade resilient modulus of 8,000 psi for compacted A-2-4 materials, and an ESAL Range C/D asphalt mix classification. The recommended pavement buildup for East 2nd Street consists of Superpave bituminous concrete layers totaling 3 inches of wearing and binder courses, a 6-inch crushed aggregate base course, and bituminous treatment, with provisions for roadbed processing and foundation backfill beneath storm drainage structures. Laboratory testing identified primarily firm silty sands and silty clayey sands (A-2-4 soils) in the upper 5 to 6 feet, with clayey sands and sandy clay soils below. The report notes no muck, soft, or unsuitable soils were encountered and recommends concrete pipe for drainage structures with local foundation backfill support. All construction shall comply with the Alabama Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, 2026 Edition, with specific provisions for managing moisture during construction and delayed equipment use following inclement weather.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
904 Butler Drive, Mobile, AL 36693
251.666.7197 FAX: 251.666.7380
www.geoengr.com
~ Geotechnical Evaluations ~ Construction Materials Testing ~ Geosciences ~ Infrastructure Management Services ~
P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s S i n c e 1 9 7 4
SOILS SURVEY AND MATERIALS REPORT
GULF PINES PHASE I
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF GULF SHORES
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc.
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
Geotechnical Evaluations - Geosciences - Construction Materials - Pavement Management
904 Butler Drive • Mobile, Alabama 36693 • 251.666.7197 www.geoengr.com
April 3, 2026
Paul Marcinko, P.E.
Jade Consulting 208 Greeno Road North, Suite C Fairhope, AL 36532
Email: pmarcinko@jadengineers.com
Re: Soils Survey and Materials Report Gulf Pines Phase I East 2nd Street Improvements City of Gulf Shores
Mr. Marcinko:
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. (GET) is pleased to provide this soils survey and materials report for this phase of the project. This phase of the proposed project will include the reconstruction of East 2nd Street between East 22nd Avenue and East 23rd Avenue. The preliminary plans indicate that the roadway will be reconstructed with one travel lane in each direction separated by a median. Side street parking will be added along each lane. The project will also include the reconstruction of the storm drainage system in this area.
This report includes the results of the soil borings and physical laboratory tests that were performed for these evaluations along with our recommendations. This report has been prepared in general accordance with ALDOT procedures and our proposal dated October 1, 2025. This report has been prepared to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist in the design of the project. The recommendations provided are based in part on the project information provided to GET and only apply to the specific project and site discussed in this report.
Please call Curt Doyle, P.E. if you have any questions or if you need additional information.
Sincerely, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
Curt Doyle, P.E.
Principal Engineer Alabama License No. 25733 Date:__________________ 4/3/2026 mailto:pmarcinko@jadengineers.com CurtD Curt - AL
Gulf Pines Phase I East 2nd Street Improvements City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Pavements
Soil Conditions
Groundwater
Muck
Soft/Unsuitable Soils
Hazardous Materials Site
PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Data
Subgrade Soil Resilient Modulus
Drainage Coefficients
Pavement Section Design
Recommended Pavement Buildup
Required Project Notes
Leveling
Planing
DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDED PAY ITEMS
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
SOILS SURVEY
Field Investigation
Laboratory Testing
BASIS OF REPORT
LIMITATIONS
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
FIGURES
Highway Location Map Figure 1
APPENDICES
TRAFFIC DATA.......................................................................................................... A
ESAL RANGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.................................................... B
DRAINAGE COEFFICIENTS.................................................................................... C
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN WORKSHEETS.............................................. D
BORING LOCATION PLAN SHEETS..................................................................... E
LOGS OF BORINGS................................................................................................... F
LABORATORY TEST REPORTS............................................................................. G
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 1
INTRODUCTION
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. (GET) has completed the soil explorations and geotechnical engineering studies for Phase I of this project. The soils survey for this phase of the proposed project has included coring the existing roadway in 1 location, performing 9 soil test borings and conducting laboratory tests on selected soil samples recovered from the boring operations. The engineering study has included the planning, coordination, and supervision of the soils explorations program, evaluations of the results of the soils explorations, development of recommendations, and the preparation of this report. These services were performed in general accordance with our proposal dated October 1, 2025. Our professional services for this project have been performed, findings obtained, and recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This phase of the proposed project will include the reconstruction of East 2nd Street between East
22nd Avenue and East 23rd Avenue. The preliminary plans indicate that the roadway will be reconstructed with approximately one 13 ft wide travel lane in each direction separated by an approximate 24 ft wide median. Side street parking will be added along each lane. The project will also include the reconstruction of the storm drainage system in this area.
The general project location is identified on a Highway Location map included as Figure 1 of this report.
GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Pavements
The existing asphalt concrete pavements of East 2nd Street was approximately 5.5 inches thick based upon core, C-102, obtained from the roadway. At the location of HA-103, the existing driveway was cored and measured to be approximately 1.1 inches thick. Granular soil base materials were encountered beneath the pavements at the core locations.
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 2
Soil Conditions
The natural soils generally consisted of firm silty sands and silty clayey sands (A-2-4) soils that generally extended to a depth of about 5 to 6 ft below ground surface. Below the upper silty sand soils, clayey sands and sandy clay soils were encountered.
Groundwater
Groundwater was encountered in the deeper soil test borings at about 6 to 8 ft below ground surface at the time of drilling. Borings were backfilled upon completion for safety purposes, therefore delayed groundwater measurements were not made.
Muck
There does not appear to be any muck areas within the project limits based upon our site visits and the soils encountered in the borings.
Soft/Unsuitable Soils
There does not appear to be any soft/unsuitable soils within the project limits based upon the soils encountered in the borings.
Hazardous Materials Sites
There were no visible signs of hazardous materials located within the right of way of the project.
However, the evaluation of hazardous materials is beyond the scope of this investigation.
PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Data
Traffic data was not provided for this project. However, a portable traffic counter listed on the
ALDOT website provided 2018 through 2024 traffic volumes on East 2nd Street at a location approximately 1500 ft south of the project. An average daily traffic ADT of 8300 and 10,816 was indicated for 2018 and 2024, respectively. This corresponds to an annual growth rate of about 4.5%. Using a growth rate of 4.5%, 2026 and 2046 traffic was projected to be 11,811 and
28,500, respectively. The average daily truck traffic (TADT) percentage of 3.59% was indicated
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 3 for 2024. The traffic data collected from the ALDOT website has been included in Appendix A of this report.
Based upon the traffic data and assumptions made, an ESAL Range C/D asphalt mix is required for the project. The ESAL range computations have been included in Appendix B of this report.
Subgrade Soil Resilient Modulus
Based upon the soils encountered in the borings performed, insitu resilient modulus values of similar soils in the area and typical strengths of well compacted A-2-4 materials, we estimate that the average resilient modulus of these compacted A-2-4 subgrade soils to be about 8000 psi.
Drainage Coefficients
The drainage coefficients selected are based upon an average annual rainfall of 64 inches for the project site location. The ALDOT drainage coefficient worksheets are included in Appendix C of this report.
Pavement Section Design
Based upon using ALDOT standard guidelines the ADAPT Alabama Design & Analysis of
Pavement Thickness software was used to compute the pavement section designs for this project.
Based upon the utilizing the traffic data outlined above and the design subgrade soil strength of
8000 psi, the required Structural Number, SNreq, for East 2nd Street was computed to be 3.72.
Details of the required pavement sections for East 2nd Street along with the input and output parameters are shown on the ADAPT Flexible Pavement Design worksheets included in
Appendix D of this report.
Recommended Pavement Buildup
We recommend constructing the roadways and pavement areas for this project in accordance with the Alabama Department of Transportation “Standard Specifications for Highway
Construction”, 2026 Edition. The recommended pavement buildups for each of the roadway sections are as follows:
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 4
• East 2nd Street
Pay Item 424A-360: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, 1/2”
Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (165 Lb/SY)
Pay Item 424B-651: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Upper Binder Layer, 1” Maximum
Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (250 Lb/SY)
Pay Item 424B-681: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Lower Binder Layer, 1” Maximum
Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (250 Lb/SY)
Pay Item 401A-000: Bituminous Treatment A
Pay Item 301A-012: Crushed Aggregate Base Course, Type B, Plant Mixed, 6” Compacted
Thickness
Pay Item 230A-000: Roadbed Processing
Note 1: Pay Item 301A-012 should extend a minimum one (1) ft beyond the edge of pavement.
Note 2: Pay Item 230A-000 should extend a minimum two (2) ft beyond the limits of the overlying Crushed Aggregate Base layer.
• Roadway Overlay & Tie-Ins
Pay Item 424A-360: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, 1/2”
Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (165 Lb/SY)
Note 1: The require Planing Existing Pavement at Tie-Ins should be paid for as a subsidiary obligation of Pay Item 424A-360.
• Residential Asphalt Driveways & Side Street Parking
Pay Item 424A-369: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, Widening, 1/2” Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (165 Lbs/SY)
Pay Item 401A-000: Bituminous Treatment A
Pay Item 301A-012: Crushed Aggregate Base Course, Type B, Plant Mixed, 6” Compacted
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 5
• Commercial Asphalt Driveway (If Applicable)
Pay Item 424A-369: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, Widening, 1/2” Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (165 Lbs/SY)
Pay Item 424B-662: Superpave Bituminous Concrete Upper Binder Layer, Widening, 1”
Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (250 Lb/SY)
Pay Item 401A-000: Bituminous Treatment A
Pay Item 301A-012: Crushed Aggregate Base Course, Type B, Plant Mixed, 6” Compacted
• Gravel Driveway (If Applicable)
Pay Item 430B-040: Aggregate Surfacing (Crushed Aggregate Base, Type B)
(6” Compacted Thickness)
Required Project Notes
• Roadbed processing is waived in areas where the required processing width is less than six (6) ft. In these areas the subgrade shall be compacted to 100% of AASHTO T-99.
Leveling
If a minor amount of leveling is required, Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing, Leveling, 1/2" Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D (Pay Item 424A-366) is recommended.
Planing
If any minor planing is required, we recommend that it be a subsidiary item of Pay Item 424A-
DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS
Based upon preliminary plans, we understand that the storm drainage structures will be reconstructed as part of this project. As indicated by the preliminary drawings, the structures will have invert elevations of +4 to +5 ft. The deeper borings indicated that clay sand and sandy soils were generally encountered at about this elevation. Furthermore, groundwater can be expected to
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 6 perch above these materials. It is our recommendation that concrete pipe be used for the roadway required on the project. It is also recommended that Foundation Backfill, Local (Pay Item 214B-
000) be placed beneath these structures for support. Based upon the materials encountered in the borings, the materials above an elevation of about +5 ft should generally be suitable for backfill materials.
RECOMMENDED PAY ITEMS
210A-000 Unclassified Excavation
210D-020 Borrow Excavation (Loose Truckbed Measurement) (A-2 or Better)
214B-000 Foundation Backfill, Local
230A-000 Roadbed Processing
301A-012 Crushed Aggregate Base Course, Type B, Plant Mix, 6" Compacted Thickness
401A-000 Bituminous Treatment A
405A-000 Tack Coat
424A-360 Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, ½" Maximum
Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D
424A-366 Superpave Bituminous Concrete Wearing Surface Layer, Leveling, ½"
Maximum Aggregate Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D
424B-651 Superpave Bituminous Concrete Upper Binder Layer, 1” Maximum Aggregate
Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D
424B-681 Superpave Bituminous Concrete Lower Binder Layer, 1” Maximum Aggregate
Size Mix, ESAL Range C/D
430B-040 Aggregate Surfacing (Crushed Aggregate Base, Type B)
650A-000 Topsoil
This is only a list of recommended Pay Items. The owner and designer may select additional
Pay Items required for the project.
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 7
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
• The contractor should maintain proper drainage during construction. Entrapment of water could cause softening of the materials that may require additional excavation.
• After a period of inclement weather has occurred, the use of heavy construction equipment on the site may need to be delayed several days until soils have adequately dried. If inclement weather appears imminent, we recommend that the exposed surface be graded to drain and sealed off (or covered) to the greatest extent possible to prevent saturation.
SOIL SURVEY
Field Investigation
The field investigation program for this phase of the project has consisted of GET drill crews coring the existing pavement in 1 location and performing shallow and deep auger borings within areas to be widened in 9 locations. The soil boring locations were selected by GET engineers and staked in the field by GET personnel using a submeter GPS. Some borings were offset from original planned location due to utility conflicts. The approximate boring locations are shown on the Plan sheets, provided by the design engineer, Jade Consulting, and on an aerial image included in Appendix E of this report.
The pavement was cored in two locations to measure the asphalt thickness and determine base materials type and thickness. At the shallow soil boring locations (HA-103 and HA-104), borings were advanced using a 3-inch diameter hand auger. Samples were collected at each change in soil strata as visually described by field personnel. At the deeper boring locations (B-104 through
B-109), these borings were advanced with soil stem augers using a SIMCO 2400 drill rig.
Samples were collected continuously with a split spoon sampler to 7.5 ft and then at 2.5 ft interval until the boring termination depth of 10 ft. The samples collected during the boring operations by the drill crew were visually described and logged in the field, placed in moisture tight plastic bags and transported to GET’s soils laboratory. As a quality control measure, the samples were visually examined at the laboratory to confirm or adjust the field classifications.
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 8
The depths where samples were collected, visual description of materials encountered and laboratory classification tests performed are shown on the Logs of Boring included in Appendix
F of this report.
The soil borings provided with this report are representative of subsurface conditions at their respective locations and for their respective vertical reaches. However, local variations characteristic of the subsurface materials of the region are anticipated and may be encountered during construction. The boring logs and related information are based on the driller’s logs and visual examination of selected samples in the laboratory. The delineation between soil types shown on the logs is approximate and the description represents the interpretation of subsurface conditions at the designated boring locations on the particular date drilled.
Groundwater elevations shown on the boring logs represent groundwater surfaces encountered on the dates shown. Fluctuations in water table levels should be anticipated throughout the year.
Absence of groundwater data on certain borings implies that no data is available, but does not necessarily mean that groundwater will not be encountered at these locations or within the vertical reaches of these borings in the future.
Laboratory Testing
The materials study for the project has consisted of performing classification tests on selected samples that were collected. These tests included natural moisture content, grain size, and
Atterberg limits on the selected samples. Soil samples, on which applicable tests were performed, were classified in accordance with the AASHTO System. Results of the material study testing program have been included in the summary of the classification tests and other test report forms included in Appendix G of this report.
BASIS OF REPORT
The evaluations and recommendations submitted in this report are based on the data obtained from the field explorations, selected laboratory testing performed and the project information provided to us by the project designer. Our evaluations for the project roadways were based
City of Gulf Shores April 3, 2026
Geotechnical Engineering-Testing, Inc. P a g e | 9 upon the most current plans that we received in February 2026. Additional assumptions have been outlined in the discussions contained in previous sections of this report.
LIMITATIONS
The recommendations only apply to the specific project and site discussed in this report. If the project information section in this report contains incorrect information or if additional or revised information is available, correct or additional information should be conveyed to GET for review. We can then modify our recommendations, if they are inappropriate for the project.
We have completed the services identified herein in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality and under similar conditions as this project. No other representation, express or implied, is included or intended, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this report or any other instrument of service.
FIGURES
City of Gulf Shores
Gulf Shores, Al
Highway Location Map
Figure 1
Source – General Highway Map Baldwin County, Alabama, Alabama Dept. of Transportation, 2010
Site
N
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC DATA
Source – Alabama Department of Transportation website
Source – Alabama Department of Transportation website
APPENDIX B
ESAL RANGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
ESALS = ( Current Traffic + Projected Traffic) (TADT) (0.99) (FDD) (FLD) (7300)
= 11,811 = 28,500 = 4% = 50%
FLD (Lane Distribution) = 100%
(11,811 + 28,500 ) (0.04) (0.99) (0.50) (1.00) (7300) = 2,614,665 ESALS
= C/D
GULF PINES PHASE I
ESAL Range Calculations
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ESAL RANGE
East 2nd Street Current Traffic(2026) Projected traffic (2046) Current Traffic TADT FDD (Direction Dist.)
APPENDIX C
DRAINAGE COEFFICENTS
Curt Doyle Oval
Curt Doyle Text Box
Curt Doyle Text Box
Curt Doyle Callout
PROJECT LOCATION
Text Box
Text Box
CRUSHED
AGGREGATE
BASE
GRANULAR
SOIL BASE
Curt Doyle Line
Line
APPENDIX D
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN WORKSHEETS
P:\2026 Project Files\26-115 City of Gulf Shores Streets\adapt run 1
ADAPT Version 5.04 Alabama Design & Analysis of Pavement Thickness
File Location and Name:
P:\2026 Project Files\26-115 City of Gulf Shores Streets\adapt run 1.xlsx
Project Name:
Project Description:
Project Setting:
Urban
Route Type:
Non-Interstate
Project Type:
New Design
Pavement Type(s):
Flexible
Gulf Pines Phase I
East 2nd Street from East 22nd Ave. to East 23rd Ave.
4/3/2026 @ 12:10 PM Page 1 of 4 Pages
Traffic Inputs
Two Way Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT): 11,811 Number of Lanes in Design Direction: 1
Growth Rate (%): 4.50% Truck Percentage (Classes 5 - 13): 3.59%
Percent Trucks (Classes 5 - 13) in Design Lane: 100.00% Percent Trucks (Classes 5 - 13) in Design Direction: 50.00%
4/3/2026 @ 12:10 PM Page 2 of 4 Pages
Flexible Pavement Design Parameters
Performance Period (years): 12 Construction Stages: 3 Standard Deviation: 0.49
Reliability: 85.00% Standard Normal Deviate: -1.62
Subgrade Modulus, psi: 8,500 Initial Serviceability: 4.2
Terminal Serviceability: 2.5 Change in Serviceability: 1.7
Design Structural Number: 3.72 Design Structural Number, Rounded: 4
Total Trucks (Classes 5-13): 1,197,466 Total Other Vehicles (Classes 1-4): 32,158,201
Truck Damage Factor: 1.0223 Other Damage Factor: 0.0002
ESALs in Both Lanes and All Directions During First Year: 159,157 Flexible Pavement Total Design ESALs (W18): 1,230,601
4/3/2026 @ 12:10 PM Page 3 of 4 Pages
Flexible Pavement Design Option 1
Material Modulus, Structural Drainage Required Design Layer Type psi Coefficient Coefficient Required SN Thickness, in. Thickness, in. Design SN
1 AC 800,000 0.54 1 2.05 5.44 5.44 2.94
2 Granular Base 40,000 0.14 0.93 3.72 6 6 3.72 3 Soil 7,200
Enter brief description of the option here...
4/3/2026 @ 12:10 PM Page 4 of 4 Pages
APPENDIX E
PLAN/PROFILE SHEETS
Aerial Boring Location Plan
Source – Google Earth
APPENDIX F
LOGS OF BORINGS
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
21 A-2-6 (1)
Very loose brown and reddish yellowish brown silty sand with organics and trace clay
Loose reddish yellowish brown and grayish brown silty clayey sand
Firm brown and yellowish light brown silty sand
Firm yellowish light brown silty sand
Firm light yellowish red silty clayey sand
Firm light gray and light red silty clayey sand
B.T. @ 10 FT
36 21.3
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 8 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 88+95
28' R OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 9.75 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-104
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
T O
-1
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3 /2
S-1 S-2
S-3
S-4
1.1" Asphalt Brown sandy gravel Brownish red silty sand with shells
Brown silty sand
Yellowish brown silty sand
B.T. @ 6 FT
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: HAND AUGER
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: NWTE
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 89+22
35' L OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 6 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG:
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 10 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: HA-103
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
5.5" Asphalt
Yelloish brown and brown silty sand
B.T. @ 3 FT
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: CORING
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: NWTE
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 89+95
10' R OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 3 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG:
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 10 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: C-102
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
NP
A-2-4 (0)
A-2-4 (0)
Firm brown and red silty clayey sand with trace organics
Firm light yellowish brown, light gray, and red silty clayey sand
Firm to loose yellowish brown silty sand
Loose reddish yellowish brown and gray silty clayey sand
Loose yellowish light gray and light red silty clayey sand
B.T. @ 10 FT
NP
22.3
19.7
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 8 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 90+50
23' R OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 11 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-105
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
NP
A-2-4 (0)
A-2-6 (1)
Firm brown silty sand with gravel
Firm brownish gray silty sand
Loose yellowish brown silty sand
Loose yellowish light gray and light red silty clay
B.T. @ 10 FT
NP
13.5
26.2
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 6 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 90+60
34' L OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 9.5 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-106
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
A-2-4 (0)
A-6 (3)
2.5" Asphalt
Firm to loose brown and yellowish red sitly clayey sand
Loose yellowish brown silty sand with trace clay
Firm light gray silty clayey sand
B.T. @ 10 FT
30.0
42.6
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 7.5 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 91+26
35' R OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 10.75 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-107
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
NP
NP
A-2-4 (0)
A-2-4 (0)
Firm brown silty sand with gravel
Firm brown silty sand
Firm to loose yellowish light brown silty sand
Loose yellowish brown, gray, and red clayey sand
Medium consistency light gray and red silty sandy clay
B.T. @ 10 FT
NP
NP
11.7
12.3
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 6 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 91+37
20' L OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 8.25 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-108
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
17 A-2-6 (0)
Firm brown silty sand with organics
Firm brown and red clayey sand
Loose yellowish brown silty sand
Very loose yellow and red silty clayey sand
Loose light yellow and red silty clayey sand
B.T. @ 10 FT
37.0
20.6
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: MUD ROTARY
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: 7 FT.
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 92+09
22' R OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 10 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/10/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG: SIMCO 2400
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 10.5 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: B-109
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
8S-1
S-2
NP A-2-4 (0)
4" Topsoil
Brown silty sand
Yellowish brown silty sand
B.T. @ 6 FT
NP 12.7
SAMPLE
NO.
S.P.T.
DRILL METHOD: HAND AUGER
REMARKS:
W.C.
%LOG DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: GULF PINES - PHASE 1
EAST 2ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SHEAR
STRENGTH
tsf
DRY
UNIT
WT.
pcf
WATER DEPTH: NWTE
AASHTO
CLASS
P.I.
BORING LOCATION: EAST 2ND ST.
STA. 92+38
38' L OF CL
Nf
DRILL CREW: ES, BT, RS(LOGGER)
DATUM:
BORING DEPTH: 6 FT.
NOTE: The stratification lines shown represent the approximate boundary between soil types and the transition may be gradual. The groundwater level stated is for conditions at the time of boring and the level may fluctuate large amounts for other conditions or seasons.
Reviewed By:
DATE DRILLED: 3/9/26
DEPTH
IN
FEET NC
DRILL RIG:
MINUS
#200L.L.
BORING ELEV.: 9.25 FT.
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
BORING NUMBER: HA-104
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
M O
D D
E E
P B
O R
IN
G
L O
G W
/ A A
S H
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
APPENDIX G
LABORATORY TEST REPORTS
N: 100316
E: 1910734 B-104 S-5 6.5 15 36 15 21 0.0 78.7 21.3 0.187 SC A-2-6 (1)
N: 100465
E: 1910730 B-105 S-1 0.5 9 NP NP NP 0.0 77.7 22.3 0.199 SM A-2-4 (0)
N: 100465
E: 1910730 B-105 S-5 6.5 16 22 16 6 0.0 80.3 19.7 0.178 SC-SM A-2-4 (0)
N: 100478
E: 1910673 B-106 S-3 3.5 8 NP NP NP 0.0 86.5 13.5 0.282 SM A-2-4 (0)
N: 100478
E: 1910673 B-106 S-6 9.0 19 33 15 18 0.0 73.8 26.2 0.162 SC A-2-6 (1)
N: 100539
E: 1910747 B-107 S-1 0.5 10 18 9 9 1.9 68.1 30.0 0.293 SC A-2-4 (0)
N: 100539
E: 1910747 B-107 S-5 6.5 20 27 11 16 0.0 57.4 42.6 0.161 SC A-6 (3)
N: 100560
E: 1910684 B-108 S-1 0.5 5 NP NP NP 11.9 76.3 11.7 0.316 SP-SM A-2-4 (0)
N: 100560
E: 1910684 B-108 S-4 5.0 6 NP NP NP 0.0 87.7 12.3 0.278 SM A-2-4 (0)
N: 100622 E: 1910728 B-109 S-1 0.5 11 0.0 63.0 37.0 0.124
N: 100622
E: 1910728 B-109 S-5 6.5 20 29 12 17 0.0 79.4 20.6 0.164 SC A-2-6 (0)
N: 100649
E: 1910669 HA-104 S-1 0.3 8 NP NP NP 0.0 87.3 12.7 0.247 SM A-2-4 (0)
Water Content
(%) PI
Boring Location
Atterberg Limits
% Sand
(if hydrometer data available)
PLLL
Boring No. AASHTO
Class
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY
% Silt
USCSDepth (ft)
% Clay
Sample
ID
% Passing 200 D50
(mm) % Gravel
GET PROJECT NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
COUNTY: BALDWIN
S O
IL
C
LA
S
S
IF
IC
A
T
IO
N S
U M
M A
R Y
N
-E
6-
C
IT
Y
O F
G U
LF
S
H O
R E
S S
T R
E E
T S
.G P
J G
E T
I_ A
L.
G
D T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-5;6.5 ft.B-104 CLAYEY SAND (SC) 15 21
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.234 78.76.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-104 21.30.00.103
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-1;0.5 ft.B-105 SILTY SAND (SM) NP NP
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
4.75 0.234 77.70.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
NP
B-105 22.30.00.125
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-5;6.5 ft.B-105 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM) 16 6
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.216 80.36.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-105 19.70.00.104
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-3;3.5 ft.B-106 SILTY SAND (SM) NP NP
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.329 86.53.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
NP
B-106 13.50.00.171
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-6;9.0 ft.B-106 CLAYEY SAND (SC) 15 18
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.2 73.89.0 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-106 26.20.00.086
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-1;0.5 ft.B-107 CLAYEY SAND (SC) 9 9
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
9.5 0.364 68.10.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-107 30.01.9
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-5;6.5 ft.B-107 CLAYEY SAND (SC) 11 16
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.242 57.46.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-107 42.60.0
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL
1.39
PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-1;0.5 ft.B-108 POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM) NP NP 5.66
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
19 0.378 76.30.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
NP
B-108 11.711.90.188
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL
1.45
PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-4;5.0 ft.B-108 SILTY SAND (SM) NP NP 5.05
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2 0.328 87.75.0 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
NP
B-108 12.30.00.175
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-1;0.5 ft.B-109
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2.36 0.172 63.00.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
ATT-INSUF SAMPLE
B-109 37.00.0
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-S-5;6.5 ft.B-109 CLAYEY SAND (SC) 12 17
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
2.36 0.199 79.46.5 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
B-109 20.60.00.098
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
0.0010.010.1110100 coarse
SILT OR CLAY
141 3 166 60 1403 2
REMARKS:
Specimen Identification LL PL CuPI CcClassification S-1;0.3 ft.HA-104 SILTY SAND (SM) NP NP
Test Method:
4 3/8 20 30 40 2001.5 medium fine
COBBLES
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
D100 D60Specimen Identification %Clay%GravelD30
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
P E
R C
E N
T F
IN
E
R B
Y W
E
IG
H T
503/4 1/2
SAND
fine
4.75 0.305 87.30.3 ft.
%Sand %SiltD10
HYDROMETERU.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
6 810
GRAVEL
coarse
NP
HA-104 12.70.00.161
PROJECT NAME: CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
G.E.T. PROJ. NUMBER: 26-115
PROJECT LOCATION: GULF SHORES, AL
G E
T _G
R A
IN
S
IZ
E
6-
C
IT
Y O
F G
U
LF
S H
O R
E S
S T
R E
E T
S .G
P J
G E
T I_
A L.
G D
T
/3
A-2-6(1)
21.3 86.6 78.7
21.3 71.0 86.6 99.9
100.0
6.5 - 7.5
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-104 1003+16 1910734 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
26-115
3/10/26
A-2-4(0)
NP
NP
NP
22.3 92.2 77.7
22.3 75.3 92.1 99.5 99.9 99.9
100.0
0.5 - 1.5
In Situ Soils
A-2-4(0)
19.7 89.9 80.3
19.7 76.5 89.9 99.9
100.0
6.5 - 7.5
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-105 1004+65 1910730 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
NP
NP
13.5 80.3 86.5
13.5 52.5 80.3 99.9
100.0
3.5 - 4.5
In Situ Soils
A-2-6(1)
26.2 92.1 73.8
26.2 79.4 92.1 99.9
100.0
9 - 10
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-106 1004+78 1910673 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
30.9 69.7 69.1
30.0 50.4 67.7 96.3 97.0 97.1 98.1
100.0
0.5 - 1.5
In Situ Soils
A-6(3)
42.6 83.1 57.4
42.6 65.3 83.1 99.9
100.0
6.5 - 7.5
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-107 1005+39 1910747 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
NP
NP
13.8 78.2 86.2
11.7 47.1 66.5 82.3 84.2 85.0 88.1 95.1 97.4
100.0
0.5 - 1.5
In Situ Soils
A-2-4(0)
NP
NP
NP
12.3 79.8 87.7
12.3 53.3 79.8 99.9
100.0
5 - 6
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-108 1005+60 1910684 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
37.0 92.4 63.0
37.0 80.4 92.4 99.3 99.6
100.0
0.5 - 1.5
In Situ Soils
A-2-6(0)
20.6 92.8 79.4
20.6 81.3 92.8 99.8 99.9
100.0
6.5 - 7.5
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
B-109 1006+22 1910728 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
NP
NP
12.8 81.9 87.2
12.7 59.0 81.6 98.8 99.5 99.7
100.0
0.33 - 2.17
In Situ Soils
Sampled by Producer
Project No.
County Division Date
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-TESTING, INC.
904 Butler Drive
Mobile, Alabama 36693 251-666-7197
Material Passing 2.36 mm Clay Silt Total Sand Mat'l. Pass. 425 µm Mat'l. Pass. 75 µm
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index
Group Crushed Particle Count Meets Specifications
Laboratory No.
Marks Source Location Quantity
Rev. 04/18/94
Report of Analysis on Sample of
Date Tested
Remarks
Specification Section Number
Project:
Inspector
75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
37.5 mm 25 mm 19 mm
12.5 mm
9.5 mm
4.75 mm
2.36 mm
2.00 mm
1.18 mm 425 µm 300 µm 75 µm
Sieve (3") Sieve (2½") Sieve (2") Sieve (1½") Sieve (1") Sieve (3/4") Sieve (½") Sieve (3/8") Sieve (#4) Sieve (#8) Sieve (#10) Sieve (#16) Sieve (#40) Sieve (#50) Sieve (#200)
BMT-5
Copies:
Dist. Engr.
Proj. Engr.
File
CITY OF GULF SHORES STREETS
Date ReceivedDate Sampled
Source of Material
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SOILS AND BASE COURSE ANALYSIS
GET
In Situ Soils
Submitted by GET
HA-104 1006+49 1910669 Ft Rt of C/L
TOTAL PASSING %
BALDWIN
3/9/26
| cssendmail dot state al us_20140620_104146 |
| report cover - Draft - Bridge Culvert Fnd. and Slope Study Report - Project No. ERPR-8960 (918) - SR 69 Box Culvert Repair and Slope Restoration, Clarke Co. |
| Binder1 |
| Binder1 |
| Binder1 |
| Binder1 |
| APPENDIX A |
| APPENDIX A |
| title sheet |
| 001 |
| Saved Views |
| TTL_E |
| TTL_M |
| DTTL_M |
| DTTL_E |
| References |
| choctaw.dgn |
| clarke.dgn |
| washington.dgn |
| hgwymapword |
| Site |
| Source – General Highway Map Clarke County, Alabama, Alabama Dept. of Transportation, 2007 |
| sink hole map word.pdf |
| Job |
| Site |
| geomapword.pdf |
| Site |
| APPENDIX B |
| APPENDIX B |
| 705_SR69 PLN01-BORINGS6-4-14 Model (1) |
| 705_SR69 PRF01-BORINGS Model (1) |
| APPENDIX C |
| APPENDIX C |
705_SR69 dxs01=BORINGS Model (1)
| APPENDIX D |
| APPENDIX D |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (1) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (2) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (3) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (4) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (5) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (6) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C1) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C2) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C3) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C4) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C5) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C6) |
| 705_XSN SR69-GET 6-6-14 Model (C7) |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .