Section L Appendix 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modify Vehicle Assembly Building High Bay-3 Platforms for Block 1B Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80KSC021R0020
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The solicitation seeks a contractor to modify vehicle assembly building platforms at Kennedy Space Center. The work includes fabricating and erecting new platforms weighing approximately 300,000 pounds each, along with associated mechanical, electrical and control systems. Additional scope involves constructing new floors, walls and ceilings in heights ranging from 280 to 450 feet. The contractor must complete the work within operational downtimes between launches while allowing for dual occupancy. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Kennedy Space Center issued the solicitation, which includes split specification and drawing files due to size limitations. The past performance questionnaire requires references to rate the offeror's previous relevant work on a scale from poor to excellent across various criteria such as technical requirements, scheduling, management and safety. References must submit the completed questionnaires by the specified due date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC020R0001
SECTION L - APPENDIX 4
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Modify VAB High Bay 3 Platforms for SLS Block 1B, Kennedy Space Center, FL.
NASA Kennedy Space Center’s solicitation requires offerors to provide this Past Performance Questionnaire to customers to complete and return to NASA. Past performance raters are requested to submit the completed questionnaires to the contracting officer identified below via e-mail, to arrive not later than the proposal submission date.
NOTE: The references provided must be relevant to the type of work required in the above project and those questionnaires with comments may be deemed more relevant due to the additional information provided in the comments, so please provide comments.
Return completed questionnaires, by e-mail, to Anthony.M.Caruvana@nasa.gov
NOTE: Questionnaires will not be accepted from the offeror. Raters must send evaluation to the contracting officer.
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR:
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:_______________________________________
Name of Client: ________________________________________________________
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number: ________________________________
Period of Contract Performance (dates): ____________________________________
Place of Contract Performance: ___________________________________________
Contract Value at Award: _______________________________________________
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount: ______________________
Contract Status (Prime or Subcontract?): ___________________________________
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Phone Number/E-Mail Address:
Brief Description of Work Performed:
TO BE COMPLETED BY RATER:
This questionnaire, when completed, shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government.
Name of Contractor being evaluated: _________________________________
Prime or Subcontractor?____________________________________________
Name of Project and Contract / Order Number: _________________________
Contract Type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost, etc.): ___________________________
Place of Contract Performance: _____________________________________
Concur with Offeror’s Description of Work Performed? Yes No
If no, please describe the work: ______________________________________
Period of Performance: ____________________________________________
Contract or Subcontract Value at Award: $_____________________________
Contract or Subcontract Value at Completion or Current: $_________________
PLEASE FILL IN THE FOLLOWING RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Names of Evaluator(s): _____________________________________________
Office Symbol and Organization: _____________________________________
Telephone: ______________________________________________________
E-mail address: __________________________________________________
Dates of Involvement in Project/Contract: _____________________________
Date Questionnaire Completed: _____________________________________
For each question below, please rate the contractor from Poor to Excellent (as defined below) and please elaborate on the specifics, which explain your rating. A rating of N/A should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. This rating is neutral and will have no impact on the assessment of Present and Past Performance. The Contracting Officer may contact the respondent for additional information, if needed. When rating the contractor per the statement’s below, choose “N/A” or a number on the scale from 1 to 5 (with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent”, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. The scale is as follows:
1. POOR: Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance. Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is very low confidence that the offeror will successfully and safely perform the required effort
2. FAIR: Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance; and experience is at least somewhat relevant to this procurement. Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is low confidence that the offeror will successfully and safely perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.
3. GOOD: Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance; and experience is relevant to this procurement. Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. There may be strengths or weaknesses, or both.
4. VERY GOOD: Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, safe and economical manner for the most part; only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance; and experience is very relevant to this procurement. Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high level of confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
5. EXCELLENT: Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, safe and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance; and experience that is highly relevant to this procurement. Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a very high level of confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
6. N/A: Not applicable or unknown: Did not observer performance in this area.
1. In regards to performance, rate the contractor's adherence to the technical requirements of the contract:
| Steel Fabrication | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |
| Steel Erection | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Steel Fabrication to stringent Tolerances 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Welding Documentation (Procedures, Welder Qualifications,
| Weld Maps and Inspections) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
| Work at Heights (>100ft) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Integration of trades such as High pressure piping, electrical power, fire sprinklers and fire alarm 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| 2. | Performance was completed in accordance with the planned schedule. (Please Comment) | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. In terms of their performance in meeting schedules, how would you rate them in the following areas?
Submission of Shop Drawings/ Material Submittals 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Scheduling construction around facility
| availability | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |||
| Delivery of long lead items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |||
| Meeting Major/Critical Milestones | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Progress Reports of actual versus planned schedule 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Overall performance of the Management Team
| Project Manager | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
| Superintendent | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Preparation for and
| responsiveness to changes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
| Workers were all qualified | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Management and integration of
| Subcontractors | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |||
| Subcontracting Goals Achieved | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |||
| Monetary targets for SDB’s achieved | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS
5. In terms of timely response to problems/issues during performance and ability to avoid unnecessary schedule delays, how would you rate the contractor?
| Identified and mitigated risks effectively | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |
| Identified problems in a timely manner | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |
| Worked with project team effectively | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
Proposed acceptable solutions in a
| proactive and timely manner | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | ||
| Limited number of unsubstantial RFI’s | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. How would you rate their response to providing necessary documentation?
Provided adequate information and pricing and schedule data for modifications 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Provided timely close out documentation (e.g., release of claims, O&M manuals, warranties) 1 2 3 4 5 N/A Accuracy and completeness of documentation 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Any known payment problems to the subcontractors, suppliers or manufacturers?
Yes( ) No( ) N/A( )
If YES, please explain: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Any known labor violations (Davis Bacon Act) or labor claims?
Yes( ) No( ) If YES, please explain: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. Ability/Willingness to identify and resolve problems in:
a. Management (relative to the contract)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | |||||
| b. Personnel (quantity and/or | ||||||||||
| quality) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | ||||
| c. Scheduling | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | ||||
| d. Quality Control | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A |
e. Flexibility and Cooperation with Customer Operations 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner, pursuant to their quality control procedures, and without significant reliance on Government or industry customer oversight. 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. Contractor quality control procedures 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
12. Contractor’s overall construction quality 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. Has the contractor’s performance required you to issue to this contractor any cure notices/show cause, or termination for cause or for default: (If YES, please explain). Yes( ) No( )
COMMENTS/REMARKS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. How would you rate their OVERALL safety performance?
Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Any safety violations, mishaps or close calls?
(If YES, please explain). Yes( ) No( ) N/A( )
COMMENTS/REMARKS
15. How would you rate their OVERALL performance based on customer satisfaction?
Overall Rating 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS
16. Would you select this contractor again? ( ) YES ( ) NO
COMMENTS/REMARKS
ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/REMARKS ON MATTERS NOT ASKED ABOVE:
THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .