Attachment_5_QASP_1.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
ILEA Maintenance, Management and Logistics Support
Solicitation number
SAQMMA17R0042A
Issued by

About this file

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
QA_FORM_1_-_Site_Visit_V1.docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(Revised)_.doc DOC document
SCOPE_OF_WORK_Roswell_2017__Version_3__Edits_(3).docx DOCX document
SF-30_(Revised).pdf PDF
SF-30_Site_Visit_(Revised).pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Monthly_Report_Format_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_ILEA_Roswell_2017_Schedule_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SCOPE_OF_WORK_Roswell_2017__Version_3__Edits_(3).docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_ILEA_Construction_Documents.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_MRPT_Procedures.docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_Past_Performance_Profile.docx DOCX document
QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS.docx DOCX document
Attachment_8_Furnishings_and_Equipment.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_Weekly_Inspection.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_ILEA_Inventory_OY4_(Oct_2016).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_12_REVISED_PRICING_TABLE_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_Pricing_Table_Instructions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF-30_Q&A.far —
Attachment_2_Non_Disclosure.docx DOCX document
Attachment__7_Cyber_Security.docx DOCX document
SF-33.docx DOCX document
Attachment_14_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
SF-1449.pdf PDF
Pricing_Table_2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Past_Performance_Profile.pdf PDF
MRPT_Procedures.docx DOCX document
SCOPE_OF_WORK_Roswell_2017__Version_2_Edits.docx DOCX document
Pricing_Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ILEA_Construction_Documents.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Furnishings_and_Equipment.docx DOCX document
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5 – Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed to evaluate the Contractor’s actions while implementing the requirements/objectives listed in the Statement of Work (SOW). It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring the Contracting firm’s performance for each listed objective in the SOW.

The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services the Contractor is required to furnish. It is based on the premise the Government desires to maintain a quality standard in supporting, providing recommendations, addressing planning and budgetary needs, and an evaluation that a service contract is the best means of achieving those objectives.

The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for implementing their own management and quality control procedures to meet the terms of the contract. The role of the Government is quality assurance to ensure contract standards are achieved.

In this contract the hotel inspection report, food meal plan and inspection reports are the drivers for ensuring the delivery of quality products. The Contractor is required to develop a comprehensive program of activities for all tasks for each management area. The first major step to ensuring a “self-correcting” contract is to ensure that the approved work plan provides the measures needed to lead the contractor to success. Once the work plan is approved, careful application of the process and standards presented in the remainder of this document will ensure a robust quality assurance program.

SURVEILLANCE: The Government Contracting Officer’s Representatives (COR’s) will monitor the contractor’s work and will be the designated person to receive complaints directly from the designated Government Point of Contact (POC) for that specific management area.

STANDARD: Timeliness of the reports and plans shall not exceed the thresholds cited below in Table 1 for each performance standard. The COR shall notify the Contracting Officer for appropriate action in accordance with FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items (May 1997) or the appropriate Inspection of Services clause, if any of the above service areas exceed the thresholds.

The Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) in Table 1 outlines the Government’s performance requirements for this contract.

Performance Objective

Performance Standard
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
Surveillance Method
Incentive

Identification of Responsible Officials,

Emailed to the CO and COR within one (1) working day of changes in personnel.
Two (2) working days of changes in personnel.
100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative
Hotel Inspection Report
E-mailed to the COR within one (1) working day following the beginning of each week. Shall be in electronic form in Microsoft office compliant format.
Two (2) working days following the end of each week.

< 5% rejection rate of all formal deliverables submitted under the performance provisions of the contract;

<10% rejection rate of draft submissions.

100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative)
Food Meal Plan
E-mailed to the COR within one (1) working days following the beginning of each week. Shall be in electronic form in Microsoft office compliant format.
One (1) working day following the end of each week.

< 5% rejection rate of all formal deliverables submitted under the performance provisions of the contract;

<10% rejection rate of draft submissions.

100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative)
Reports/plans
Provide various reports/plans as required under the OSHA standards, Host Nation Food Service regulations and noted in section.2.12.1 Deliverables.
Provide report to the COR for review within three working days from the date of the request. Maximum requirement 1x per week; minimum requirement 1x per month.
100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative
Maintenance Report
Provide monthly maintenance report that identifies level, methods and frequencies of required equipment and building inspections
Provide report to the COR for review on a bi weekly basis within three working days of the end of the work week.

< 5% rejection rate of all formal deliverables submitted under the performance provisions of the contract;

<10% rejection rate of draft submissions.

100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative
Delegate Complaints
Provide action to CO and COR regarding Contractors response to resolving complaints by the delegates. Emailed to the CO/COR within 24 hours of receipt and acknowledgement of the complaint.
Two (2) working days following the end of each week.

< 5% rejection rate of all formal deliverables submitted under the performance provisions of the contract;

<10% rejection rate of draft submissions.

100% inspection
CPARS report (positive or negative)

Table 1: PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .