Past Performance Evaluation Survey.doc
DOC document 46 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12339520R0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation survey and details of a federal contract opportunity for bridge construction services. The survey is to be sent by an offeror to three references for a previous contract to provide feedback on quality, customer satisfaction, responsiveness, and timeliness. The federal contract opportunity is with the US Forest Service for the demolition and rebuilding of the Jordan Bridge on Forest Service Road 76 near Natural Bridge, Virginia. The 100% small business set-aside contract has a performance period of 210 days and estimated value between $500,000 to $1,000,000. Offerors must be registered in SAM and submit responses by the deadline of May 1, 2020. A pre-bid site visit is scheduled for May 11, 2020.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Evaluation Survey
Instructions: Offeror shall send this survey to a minimum of three references. Offeror shall complete Sections A, B, and C before sending.
A. FROM: Your Company Name
Contact Person
B. TO:
Reference Company/Agency:
Address:
Contact Person:
C. Reference Contract:
Contract number
Date of award
Dollar value
Completion date
Description of work
Dear Client:
Our firm is preparing a proposal for the U.S. Forest Service for FS 76 Jordan Bridge Replacement in Amherst, VA. Please provide a reference for our work under the contract identified above. If you have any questions, you may contact the Contracting Officer, Kelvin Jackson 540-265-5111 (DUE TO RECENT USFS GUIDELINES REGARDING COVID-19, EMAIL IS RECOMMENDED). Please return the completed survey form to: Kelvin Jackson at kelvin.jackson1@usda.gov.
1) What role did you play (Contracting Officer/COR/Inspector/Other), and for how long?
2) Please provide a more complete description of the work.
3) How well did the contractor’s crew(s) perform?
4) Was the contractor cooperative in resolving issues? Please offer an example.
5) Did the contractor provide sufficient tools, equipment, and vehicles to perform the work?
6) Did the contractor devote sufficient effort to performing the work? If not, please describe.
7) If the Contracting Officer may contact you with further questions, please provide the contact information here:
8) Name
Phone e-mail
9) How was contractor’s performance in terms of:
a) Quality of Service Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
b) Customer Satisfaction:
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
c) Business Relations/Responsiveness (ex: RFI responses, negotiations on change orders) Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
d) Timeliness (i.e., how well met project schedule) Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .