RFP Attach 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 252 KB Posted

Attached to
ADVANCED ANALYTICS TECHNICAL SOLUTION (AATS)
Solicitation number
N65236-16-R-0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP Attach 13 - Delivery Order 0001 Statement of Work.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20161116 - Pre-Solic Conference Agenda.docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 11 - Quality Assurance SurveillancePlan.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20161128 - Draft - Solic Attach 7.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend 2 - RFP Attach 2 (Rev) - Past Perform Quest (Word Format).docx DOCX document
(Pre-Solic) 20161116 - Special Notice - Pre-Solicitation Conference.pdf PDF
20170505 - Updated Solicitation Q&As (#10 - #18).docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 15 - Software Licensing Disclosure.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) Draft of RFP Attach 6 - IAS Hardware and Software Info.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20170511 - Updated Solicitation QAs (#19 - #55).docx DOCX document
Amendment 0001 (As Issued).pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 (As Issued).pdf PDF
Amend 3 - RFP Exhib A (Rev 2) - CDRLs.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20161205 - Industry Day - Pre-Solic Conference Slides.pptx PPTX presentation
Amendment 0002 (As Issued).pdf PDF
Amend 2 - RFP Attach 16 - AATS Ontology Sample (Zip).zip ZIP file
RFP Attach 7 - PWS Section 3.2 Compliance Cklist.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend 2 - RFP Attach 14 (Rev) - Cross Ref CLIN to PWS Section.docx DOCX document
(Pre-Solic) 20161128 - Draft Solicitation.pdf PDF
RFP Attach 8 - AATS Software Ftnality in DIL Environ.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attach 10 - DD254 - Contr Security Classific Spec.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20161208 - Pre-Solic Conf Attendees.docx DOCX document
(Pre-Solic) 20170403 - Revised Draft Solicitation.docx.mcgn5pg.partial —
(Pre-Solic) 20170217 - Draft Solic Q&A Update.docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 3 - Small Business Participation Data.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20170412 - Draft Solic Q&A Update.docx DOCX document
20170503 - Solicitation Q&As for Posting.docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 5 - Small Bus Subcontr Plan Matrix.xls XLS spreadsheet
(Pre-Solic) 20161011 - Revised Pre-Solic Notice Q&As.docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 12 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20161128 - Draft - Solic Attach 8.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend 3 - RFP Attach 4A (Rev 2) - Prime Pricing Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
(Pre-Solic) 20161128 - Draft Solic Attach 9.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attach 6 - IAS Hardware and Software Info.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attach 1B - Ref Info Sheet - Contract Specific Data.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) Supplies and Svcs - Graphic.docx DOCX document
RFP N65236-16-R-0001 - As Issued.pdf PDF
(Pre-Solic) 20170404 - Draft Solic of 3 April 2017 - Q&A Update.docx DOCX document
RFP Attach 9 - AATS Software Capabil Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP Attach 1A - Ref Info Sheet - Summary Data.pdf PDF
Amend 3 - RFP Attach 4B (Rev 2) - Sub Pricing Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION N65236-16-R-0001

Competition Sensitive [DATE]

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 5

SPAWAR Systems Center – Atlantic [BUYER’S NAME], CODE __

CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,

P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022

TO: AGENCY:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

PAST PERFORMANCE

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

1. Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

2. Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

3. Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

4. Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;

5. Key Personnel - How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.

6. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned

Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business

Subcontracting.

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, within ten (10) working days to calvin.howard@navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Respectfully, Calvin Howard

Contract Negotiator mailto:calvin.howard@navy.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 5

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

Information to be completed by OFFEROR Contractor Name:

Contract / Delivery Order Number:

Contractor Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code

Contract/Delivery Order Value:

Contracting Officer Name:

Phone Number: Award Date:(DD MM YYYY) Completion Date:(DD MM YYYY)

Program Manager Name:

Phone Number: Contract Type: Was Effort Performed as Prime

Contractor or Subcontractor?

Information to be completed by EVALUATING ORGANIZATION

Name:

Title:

Organization:

Phone: (commercial, not DSN)

Email Address:

Observed Period of Performance (MMM YYYY):

From: To:

Summary Description of Contract:

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 5

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER:

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY

GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 5

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY

GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting

Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or

Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.

6. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small

Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned

Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small

Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business

Subcontracting.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 5

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

File details come from the government source that posted it.