Amend 2 - RFP Attach 2 (Rev) - Past Perform Quest (Word Format).docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ADVANCED ANALYTICS TECHNICAL SOLUTION (AATS)
- Solicitation number
- N65236-16-R-0001
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Competition Sensitive
[DATE]
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 1 of 5 |
| SPAWAR Systems Center – Atlantic |
| [BUYER’S NAME], CODE __ |
CONTRACTS DEPARTMENT,
P.O. BOX 190022, NORTH CHARLESTON, SC 29419-9022
TO: AGENCY:
PHONE: EMAIL:
INFORMATION REQUEST
PAST PERFORMANCE
This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:
1. Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;
2. Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;
3. Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;
4. Business Relationships - Effective management, businesslike correspondence, responsive to contract requirements, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, proactive, effective Contractor recommended solutions, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program;
5. Key Personnel - How long key personnel stayed on the contract, how well they managed their portion of the contract, the quality and relevancy of the products/services generated by key personnel.
6. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, within ten (10) working days to calvin.howard@navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
Respectfully, Calvin Howard Contract Negotiator
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 2 of 5 |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
Information to be completed by OFFEROR Contractor Name:
Contract / Delivery Order Number:
Contractor Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code
Contract/Delivery Order Value:
Contracting Officer Name:
| Phone Number: |
| Award Date:(DD MM YYYY) |
| Completion Date:(DD MM YYYY) |
Program Manager Name:
| Phone Number: |
| Contract Type: |
| Was Effort Performed as Prime Contractor or Subcontractor? |
Summary Description of Contract:
Information to be completed by EVALUATING ORGANIZATION Name:
Title:
Organization:
Phone: (commercial, not DSN)
Email Address:
Observed Period of Performance (MMM YYYY):
From: To:
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 3 of 5 |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY CONTINUED
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER:
Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
2. SCHEDULE:
(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
3. COST CONTROL:
(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(c) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(d) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION N65236-16-R-0001
NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 4 of 5 |
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER:
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(f) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
(g) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
5. KEY PERSONNEL:
(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(b) The Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.
6. Commitment to Small Business, HUBZone Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Women-Owned Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, and Veteran-Owned Small Business Subcontracting.
NOTE: For statements indicating “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the attached page.
| Competition Sensitive |
| [DATE] |
| For Official Use Only |
| Page 5 of 5 |
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER:
NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:
File details come from the government source that posted it.