RFC_027_Answer.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS JOHN LENTHALL (T-AO 189) MTA
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-4006
Issued by

About this file

RFC 027

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0009.docx DOCX document
J-3_Category_B_Items_REVISED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0008.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0007.docx DOCX document
RFC_030_REV-B_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_030_Answer.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0006.docx DOCX document
Copy_of_J-2_Category_A_Items.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFC_029_Answer.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0005.docx DOCX document
RFC_028_Answer.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0004.docx DOCX document
RFC_026_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_007_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_020_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_005_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_018_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_008_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_001_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_017_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_003_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_025_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_012_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_016_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_019_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_011_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_023_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_022_Answer.docx DOCX document
RRF_009_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_013_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_021_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_002_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_010_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_006_Answer.doc DOC document
RFC_024_Answer.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0003.docx DOCX document
RFC_015_Answer.docx DOCX document
RFC_014_Answer.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
RFC_004_Answer.docx DOCX document
J-4_GFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-14_NON_DISCLOSRE_AGREEMENT_FOR_GOVN'T_TECHNICAL_DATA.docx DOCX document
CDRL,_WI-0010.pdf PDF
CDRL,_WI-0016.pdf PDF
CDRL,_WI-0017.pdf PDF
CDRL,_WI-0019.pdf PDF
CDRL,_WI-0012.pdf PDF
CDRL,_WI-0020.pdf PDF
J-9_Disclsr_Lobbying_Activities_SF-LLL.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 71 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N32205-18-R-4006

USNS JOHN LENTHALL (TAO-189)

REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION

RFC 027

NAME OF CONTRACTOR: ______________________

SPECIFICATION ITEM NO.: ____501_________________

PARAGRAPH / SECTION NO:__Various__________________

TITLE: _No. 3 SSDG Resilient Mount Replacement_

QUESTION:

The following was received from Fairbanks Morse:

I am trying to accurately quote Work Item 501, No. 3 SSDG Resilient mount replacement and I have some concerns.

I have spoken at length with our most qualified ALCO technical representative and we have come to the conclusion that there may not be enough time in the current period of performance to complete the overhaul and the resilient mount replacement. I have been informed that it would take approximately three weeks to replace the resilient mounts, maybe a little less to be determined by the experience of the outside machinists that are to be provided according to the SOW.

In order for the mounts to be replaced, all interferences will need to be removed first, turbo, intercooler, exhaust, etc. Additionally, the engine should be stripped to the crankshaft to reduce the amount of weight that the jacks will be required to support. That would mean that the overhaul would have to come to a stop and then continue after the resilient mounts have been replaced. The engine will be sitting on jacks and therefore it would not be safe to have people working underneath and above at the same time.

Additionally, the aftermarket mounts were not in the correct specifications when they were installed last year under the No. 4 SSDG. Would MSC be willing to accept the same situation if they are indeed out of specification?

ANSWER:

The intention of MSC is to just replacement the Resilient mounts with-out Overhauling the Engine. In the past MSC has replaced the resilient mounts on the other MSC Ships with-out totally removing all internal components without this ever being brought up as an issue from the OEM. At this time we do not know what the measurements of the new resilient mounts will be, so MSC will deal with any issues once they are identified.

ATTACHMENT J - 8

File details come from the government source that posted it.