J-13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS RAPPAHANNOCK REGULAR OVERHAUL AND DRY DOCKING (ROH/DD)
Solicitation number
N32205-15-R-1009
Issued by

About this file

J-13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Copy_of_J-4.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amd_0013.doc DOC document
J-3_Category_B_Items_RAPP_8-19-2015.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0012.pdf PDF
J-4.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amd_0011.pdf PDF
Amendment_0010.docx DOCX document
J-2_Category_A_Items_RAPP_7-16-2015.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Request for Spec Clarification 16.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 15.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 18.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 17.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0009.docx DOCX document
Request_for_Spec_Clarification_14.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0008.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 6.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 10.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 13.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 11.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 9.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 7.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 12.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 5.docx DOCX document
Request for Spec Clarification 8.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0007.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0006.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0005.docx DOCX document
J-3_Category_B_Items_RAPP_6-24-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-2_Category_A_Items_RAPP_6-24-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RAPPAHANNOCK_N32205-15-R-1009-0004.pdf PDF
Request_for_Spec_Clarification_4.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0003.docx DOCX document
Request_for_Spec_Clarification_3.docx DOCX document
J-2_Category_A_Items_RAPP_6-22-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0002.docx DOCX document
Request_for_Spec_Clarification_1.docx DOCX document
Request_for_Spec_Clarification_2.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0001.docx DOCX document
J-4 RAPPAHANOCK MASTER GFM LIST.pdf PDF
RAPP_Solicitation_15-R-1009_Final2.pdf PDF
RAPPAHANNOCK_ROH_J_and_A_FedBizOps.pdf PDF
J-14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure_RAPP.docx DOCX document
J-5 Subcontracting Plan_RAPP.docx DOCX document
J-6 WI 015 CDRL.pdf PDF
J-9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.docx DOCX document
J-2 Category A Items_RAPP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form.docx DOCX document
J-10 Interport Differential.docx DOCX document
J-7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.docx DOCX document
J-3 Category B Items RAPP_6-9-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 52 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION to Ian Keller. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Ian Keller at Ian Keller@navy.mil . Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Ian Keller
Contract Officer

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Ian Keller

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Ian Keller
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443- 3072
(E-mail Address)Ian Keller@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .