J - 13 Past Performance Questionnaire - 20-R-4084.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS ZEUS MTA SHIP REPAIR
Solicitation number
N3220520R4084
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing ship repair services to the Military Sealift Command. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on the contractor's performance in areas such as quality of service, timeliness, business relations, and staffing. It is to be completed regarding the contractor's work on Contract No. N3220520R4084 for the midterm availability of the USNS ZEUS, set to begin on or about November 16, 2020 and last ninety calendar days. The completed questionnaire should be emailed to Samuel Queen at Military Sealift Command by May 22, 2020 at 2:00 pm Eastern Time to be considered in their evaluation. Definitions are provided for ratings of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4084 REV 9.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 1 Work Item Package - 20-R-4084 REV 9.docx DOCX document
Conform Amendment 9.docx DOCX document
J - 3 Category B Items - 20-R-4084 REV 9.xls XLS spreadsheet
Mod Amendment 9.docx DOCX document
J - 1 Work Item Package - 20-R-4084 REV.docx DOCX document
J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4084 REV.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220520R4084-008.docx DOCX document
J - 3 Category B Items - 20-R-4084 REV.xls XLS spreadsheet
Conform Copy N3220520R4084-008.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy N3220520R4084-0007.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0007.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy N3320520R4084-0006.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 10 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0006.docx DOCX document
Conform Copy N3220520R4084-0005.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 9 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0005.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 8 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.doc DOC document
N3220520R4084-0004.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0004 Conform Copy.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 7 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 6 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0003.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0003 Conform Copy.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0002.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0002 Conformed Copy.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 5 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 2 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 3 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0001.docx DOCX document
RFC QandA 1 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
Revised J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4084.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFC QandA 4 Solicitation N32205-20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
N3220520R4084-0001 Conformed Copy.docx DOCX document
Revised J - 1 Work Item Package - 20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
J - 10 Interport Differential - 20-R-4084.doc DOC document
J - 2 Category A Items - 20-R-4084.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 1 Work Item Package - 20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
J - 8 Request for Spec Clarification - 20-R-4084.doc DOC document
J - 7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey - 20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
USNS ZEUS FY20 MTA JA.doc DOC document
J - 12 Past Performance Data - 20-R-4084.doc DOC document
J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form - 20-R-4084.docx DOCX document
J - 4 MSC Government Furnished Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLForms 3.zip ZIP file
J - 3 Category B Items - 20-R-4084.xls XLS spreadsheet
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities - 20-R-4084.doc DOC document
ZEUS MTA Solicitation 4084.docx DOCX document
Show all 49

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, 22 May 2020 at 2:00 pm E.T. to Mr. Samuel Queen. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Mr. Samuel Queen at Samuel.queen@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Samuel Queen
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Mr. Samuel Queen

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Mr. Samuel Queen
(Facsimile Number)(757) 341-5625
(E-mail Address)Samuel.queen@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .