Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 149 KB Posted Mar 24, 2015

Attached to: Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: HSHQEC-15-R-00002
Issued by: Department of Homeland Security Office of Procurement Operations

About this file

From the source

Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (MSWord)

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
HSHQEC-15-R-00002 _Amendment_0002.pdf	PDF	Apr 7, 2015
Exhibit_4B _SMARTBOOK.pdf	PDF	Mar 24, 2015
HSHQEC-15-R-00002 _Amendment_0001.pdf	PDF	Mar 24, 2015
Attachment_6_-_Price_Element_Breakdown.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 24, 2015
Nationwide_DHS_PIV_Card_Issuance_Facility_(PCIF)_List_3-6-2015.pdf	PDF	Mar 24, 2015
Attachment_3_-_Past_Project_Form.docx	DOCX document	Mar 24, 2015
Exhibit_4E _SMARTBOOK.pdf	PDF	Mar 24, 2015
RFP_HSHQEC-15-R-00002 _Mk._I.pdf	PDF	Mar 19, 2015
Pre-Proposal_Conference_Notice _HSHQEC-15-Q-00002.pdf	PDF	Mar 17, 2015

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: HSHQEC-15-R-00002

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services at various Federal buildings located in Rockville, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to john.c.hofmann@hq.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please call John Hofmann at (215)521-3108. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS:_________________________________________

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____	Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.
b. _____	Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.
c. _____	Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name:		______________________________
Your Position:	______________________________
Company:		______________________________
Telephone No:	______________________________
Fax:			______________________________
E-mail address:	______________________________

August 2013 Version image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.