Attachment_1_RRU_Statement_of_Work_Final.pdf

PDF 287 KB Posted

Attached to
Remote Readout Units
Solicitation number
H9224115R0012
Issued by

About this file

Statement of Work

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
H92241-15-R-0012-0002.pdf PDF
H92241-15-R-0012-U0001.pdf PDF
09-02-2015_Response_to_Questions.pdf PDF
08-24-2015_Response_to_Questions.pdf PDF
08-15-2015_Clarification_on_Performance_Specifications.pdf PDF
CDRL A004.pdf PDF
CDRL A008.pdf PDF
CDRL A009.pdf PDF
CDRL A005.pdf PDF
CDRL A010.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Performance_Specification_Final.pdf PDF
CDRL A007.pdf PDF
CDRL A011.pdf PDF
CDRL A002.pdf PDF
H92241-15-R-0012.pdf PDF
CDRL A003.pdf PDF
CDRL A006.pdf PDF
CDRL A001.pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 1

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU Statement of Work

1.0 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the effort to procure a Remote Readout Unit (RRU) for the A/MH-6M special operations aircraft. The new line replaceable unit (LRU) shall interface with the Avionics Management System (AMS) on the A/MH-6M. A total of 133 units will be procured, 9 pre-production units that will be used for qualification testing and systems integration, and 124 production units. The contractor/supplier shall be responsible for providing the RRU, conducting and documenting the airworthiness qualification testing of the LRU, and providing the documentation necessary to integrate and operate the system.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The current issues of following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent they are specifically addressed in the SOW and CDRLs. In case of a conflict between this SOW and any referenced document, this statement of work shall take precedence. The Contractor, if it detects a conflict, will notify the Government Procuring Contracting Officer and Program Office technical point of contact of such conflicts for resolution.

2.1 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GUIDELINES

MIL-STD-882E Standard Practice for System Safety

MIL-STD-810G

w/ Change 1

Environmental Engineering Considerations And Laboratory Tests

MIL-STD-461F Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic

Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment

MIL-STD-704F Aircraft Electrical Power Characteristics

2.2 OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

ADS-37A-PRF Aeronautical Design Standard Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Performance and Verification Requirements

AR 71-SP Aeronautical Design Standard Practice Environmental

Airworthiness and Qualification Requirements For

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 2

Electronics, Avionics, and Mission Equipment Installed on Army Aircraft

2.3 AVAILABILITY OF DOD DOCUMENTS

Copies of Government Specifications and Standards may be obtained on-line from https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/index.cfm. Other government documents can be obtained from the defense technical information center (http://www.dtic.mil/). The documents pertaining to the A/MH-6M will be provided as Government Furnished Information (GFI) at contract award.

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

The system requirements are documented in the Remote Readout Unit Performance Specification. The contractor shall provide an interface control document (CDRL A001) that defines the mechanical and electrical interfaces of the RRU. The Contractor shall provide a RRU that adheres and does not deviate from the attached RRU Performance Specification.

Prior to delivery of the first pre-production unit, the Contractor shall perform a System Test to verify compliance and operation of the RRU including, but not limited to:

RRU System Software and BDF software load

System boot-up, IP address assignment.

BIT status reporting

ARINC 661 operation, including bezel key events

3.2 AIRWORTHINESS SUBSTANTIATION

The contractor shall provide a product that is fully qualified to U.S. Army airworthiness standards.

3.2.1 Documentation

The documentation required to substantiate airworthiness is listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Airworthiness Documentation

CDRL Description DIDs

A001 Interface Control Document DI-CMAN-81248A

A002 Qualification Test Plans DI-NDTI-80566

A003 Qualification Test Reports DI-NDTI-80809B

A004 Failure Mode Effects and Criticality DI-ILSS-81495

A005 Acceptance Test Procedures DI-QCIC-80553A

A006 Operation and Maintenance Manual MIL-STD-40051-2 https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/index.cfm http://www.dtic.mil/

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 3

A007 Computer Operation Manual DI-IPSC-81446A

A008 Software Version Description DI-IPSC-81442A

A009 Software User Manual DI-IPSC-81443A

A010 Software Test Description DI-IPSC-81439A

A011 Test Report DI-NDTI-80809B

3.2.2 Environmental Testing

The contractor shall develop a test plan (CDRL A002), conduct the MIL-STD- 810G tests necessary to qualify the RRU, and provide a test report documenting the test results (CDRL A003). The required tests are listed below.

3.2.2.1 Temperature, Humidity, Altitude

The RRU shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 520.4 (Procedure III). The maximum operating altitude shall be 15,000 feet pressure altitude. The minimum operating temperature is -40°C and the maximum operating temperature is 71°C.

3.2.2.2 High Temperature Storage

The RRU shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 501.6 (Procedures I and II).

3.2.2.3 Low Temperature Storage

The RRU shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 502.6 (Procedures I and II).

3.2.2.4 Low Pressure (Altitude)

The RRU shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 500.6 (Procedure I).

3.2.2.5 Temperature Shock

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in during exposure to variable temperature conditions ( 5C/min, within the range of operating temperatures specified in paragraph above as specified in MIL-STD- 810G, Method 503.6 Proc I-C, 3 cycles minimum). The RRU design is intended to withstand changes in temperature without damage due to extreme temperature military operations.

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 4

3.2.2.6 Humidity

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in without damage or loss of function after exposure to 95% relative humidity conditions for MIL-STD-810G, Method 507.6 Procedure II.

3.2.2.7 Salt Fog

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in without damage or loss of function after exposure to salt atmosphere or salt spray for MIL-STD-810G, Method 509.6.

3.2.2.8 Sand and Dust

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in after exposure to blowing sand and dust for MIL-STD-810G, Method 510.6, Proc I & II.

Marking, paint, and surface deterioration on control panels is permissible.

3.2.2.9 Rain

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in without damage or loss of function during exposure to falling water for MIL-STD-810G, Method 506.6, Proc III. As an internally mounted piece of equipment the RRU design is intended to withstand leaks and aircraft washes.

3.2.2.10 Fungus

The RRU shall meet the performance characteristics specified here in without damage or loss of function during exposure to fungus MIL-STD-810G, Method

508.7. Fungus requirement may be met by analysis.

3.2.2.11 Vibration

The RRU shall provide the required performance specified here in when exposed to vibration levels and duration’s experienced in the aircraft operating environment (background vibration and rotor modulation sine tones) for MIL- STD-810G, Method 514.7, Proc I, Cat 14-Rotary Wing Aircraft – Helicopter: 1P =

7.92 Hz, 1T = 44.38 Hz, n=6, m=4, Method 516.7, Proc I, V & VI, and Method

519.7 Proc III.

3.2.2.11.1 Shock

The RRU product shall meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 516.7 for functional shock (Procedure I), crash hazard shock (Procedure V), and bench handling test (Procedure VI).

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 5

3.2.2.11.2 Gunfire Shock

The RRU shall meet meet the requirements of MIL-STD-810G, Method 519.7 Procedure III, functional performance characteristics specified in Figure 3-4 of the RRU Performance Specification.

3.2.2.11.3 Explosive Atmosphere

When operating in an explosive gas and air ambient mixture the RRU shall not cause ignition of the mixture for MIL-STD-810G, Method 511.6, Proc I.

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 6

3.2.3 Electromagnetic Interference Testing

The contractor shall develop a test plan (CDRL A002), conduct the MIL-STD- 461E testing required to qualify the RRU, and provide a test report (CDRL A003) documenting the test results. The required tests are listed below.

Test Requirement Description

CE101 Power Leads 30Hz to 10kHz

CE102 Power Leads 10kHz to 10MHz

RE102 Electric Field 10kHz to 18GHz

CS101 Power Leads 30Hz to 150kHz

CS114 Bulk cable injection 10kHz to 200MHz

CS115 Bulk cable/impulse 5A, 30 ns

RS103, per

ADS-37A-PRF

Table I, Parts A/B

Electric Field

CS116 Damped sinusoidal transients 10kHz to 100MHz

RE101 Magnetic field 30Hz to 100kHz

3.2.4 System Safety

The contractor shall conduct a failure mode effects and criticality analysis of the RRU system in accordance with MIL-STD-882 and provide a Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Report (CDRL A004)

4.0 DELIVERIES

The contractor is responsible for delivering 9 pre-production units and 124 production units. The pre-production units are systems that have not been through qualification testing. The contractor shall provide a schedule for delivery of the pre-production units, data deliverables, testing, and production units.

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 7

4.1 Pre-Production

The 9 pre-production units are for system integration and testing. The first 5 pre-production units shall be delivered within 8 months after contract award. The remaining 4 shall be pre-production units shall be delivered after successful completion of all environmental and electromagnetic interference testing within 12 months after contract award.

Two of the first 5 pre-production units will be utilized to complete environmental and electromagnetic interference testing per paragraphs 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, but will be sent to the Program Office at the completion of testing. The Government reserves the right to review test preparation, set-up and/or witness the execution of these tests.

The remaining 4 prototypes are Low-Rate Initial Production units and shall be delivered after successful completion of all environmental and electromagnetic interference testing per paragraphs 3.2.2 and 3.2.3.

4.2 Production

Production shall not begin until all qualification testing has been completed and the unit meets the qualification standard. The 124 production units shall be delivered according to the schedule negotiated in the IDIQ contract orders.

Acceptance procedures shall be submitted to support delivery of the first production unit (CDRL A005).

The anticipated quantities are shown below.

FY 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total

RRU procurements 34 34 28 28 124

4.3 Documentation

4.3.1 Interface Control Document (ICD)

The Initial Draft ICD (CDRL A001) shall be submitted within 45 days of contract award.

4.3.2 Software Version Description (SVD)

The contractor shall maintain the Software Version Description (A008) document up-to-date as needed by extent of changes to the baseline.

4.3.3 Computer Operation Manual

The contractor shall provide a computer operation manual (A007) providing information needed to operate the RRU (I.E. bezel key operations, instructions for loading software).

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 8

4.3.4 Software User Manuals

The contractor shall provide software user manuals providing documentation for operation unique of the RRU as necessary beyond data provided within the ICD, and in support of utilization of the ARINC 661 Cockpit Display System GUI (A009). This includes, but not limited to1:

ARINC-661 Style Guide, including widget specifications for any widgets that deviate from ARINC-661

ARINC-661 run-time interface specification consistent with Appendix F of

ARINC-661

instructions, spec, tools for dataloading the RRU

BDF specification consistent with 4.5.3.2 of the ARINC-661 specification

BDF example consistent with Appendix C of the ARINC-661 specification

All defined configuration files, font files, and specifications defining them.

4.3.5 RRU System Test Procedure and Report

The contractor shall provide a System Test Description document (A010) developed to demonstrate compliance and operation of the RRU.

The contractor shall provide a Test Report (A011) documenting results of the execution of the test cases/procedures as documented in the System Test Description.

5.0 LIFE CYCLE SUPPORT

5.1 Supportability

The contractor shall describe the maintenance processes and procedures required for unit and intermediate level maintenance (CDRL A006).

5.2 Obsolescence

The contractor shall provide an overview of their obsolescence management approach and address Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS).

5.3 Technical Manuals

The contractor shall create operation and maintenance manuals (CDRL A006) for the RRU.

1 ARINC-661 specification paragraph references assumes version 661-5

A/MH-6M Block 3.0 RRU 9

6.0 ENGINEERING SUPPORT

The contractor shall provide engineering support for RRU integration into the platform. Support may include, but is not limited to, addressing system integration issues such as physical installation and cabling, and software integration topics such as system interface, definition file format and load, and system initialization. The anticipated PoP of this effort is 24 months (in ~FY’16- 17 timeframe).

7.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The contractor shall provide the management necessary to oversee the program.

Close cooperation with the Army management and technical team shall be maintained.

In addition to the reports already required by this SOW, the contractor shall prepare and maintain an integrated schedule of events and accomplishments that provides an overview of this effort against the baseline plan, including program milestones for key internal and external deliverables.

7.1 Travel

The Contractor will be required to travel to support technical meetings and activity in support of RRU integration during the engineering support period.

Anticipated travel includes one trip, three people, for two days to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and one trip, three people, for three days to Blue Grass Army Depot in Richmond, Kentucky.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .