DRAFT_C-21_CLS_Industry_Day_Group_Briefing.pdf

AFLCMC… Providing the Warfighter’s Edge

C-21 CLS Industry Day 6 August 2018

Michael Kreft, Acq Program Manager michael.kreft@us.af.mil 405-734-2053

Matthew Tonay, Contracting Officer matthew.tonay.1@us.af.mil 405-739-4148

AF Life Cycle Management Center

• 0800 – 0900

– Welcome and Introductions

– Sign in

– Question Forms

– Group Briefing

• 0910 – 1600

– One on one discussions

Agenda

• Any presentation points in the following briefing or any ensuing discussions DO NOT constitute direction to the contractor

• The acquisition strategy has not been approved;

therefore, all information provided is preliminary and subject to change

• Government is not currently soliciting proposals

• All questions must be submitted in writing to the

PCO

– Official written responses will be posted on FedBizOps website with non-attribution

– Verbal questions and answers are not binding

• Email contact only through the PCO with courtesy copy to Mr. Kreft

Disclaimer

• Aircraft and Locations

• C-21 Warfighter Support

• Program Description

• Requirements Overview

• Preliminary Solicitation Overview

• Preliminary Milestones

• Discussion

• Questions/Answers

Overview

C-21 Aircraft

C-21 Sites

Scott AFB

AMC HQ

Xx aircraft

Joint Base Andrews MD Xx aircraft

Ramstein AB GE Xx aircraft

Tinker AFB OK Program Office

AFLCMC/WLV

• Special Air Missions

– World-wide transport for Senior Leaders (VIP)

– World-wide light cargo transport

– Medevac

• Multi-based

– Scott AFB

– JB Andrews

– Ramstein AB

C-21 Warfighter Support

• C-21 Aircraft Fleet is a derivative of Learjet 35A commercial business jets

• Modified to meet DoD requirements

• Powered by two Garrett Engines

• Maintained to FAA certification

• Maintained under the CLS concept

Program Description

• All Organizational and Depot Level Maintenance

– Maintain FAA certification

• Contractor Operated and Maintained Base Supply

(COMBS)

– Government provides very few required parts, material, and equipment

– Contractor responsible for most spares necessary to meet supply rate

Requirements Overview Fleet Logistics Support

• COMBS

– Government provides a portion of required parts, material, & equipment

– Contractor responsible for any additional spares above GFP levels necessary to meet supply rate

– Operations, Inventory Management (levels, storage and reporting)

– Worldwide supply support to include MOB, Depot and Off-station

– Packaging, handling, shipping and transportation

• Current Contractor’s C-21 spare parts at the MOB COMBS will not transfer to the next contract

– The Government does not own these spare parts

– Government will not pay direct costs for establishing initial spare levels

• Contractor shall be responsible for providing a supply management system to meet performance rates in the

PWS

Fleet Logistics Support

• The Government owns C-21 spare engines

• A comprehensive engine management system shall be employed

– The only authorized over and above charges will be related to causes outside contractor’s control

• FOD, accident, misuse or non-Engine Management Program required SBs

C-37 Engine Management

• All Depot Level Maintenance FAA FAR 145 Aircraft Depot Maintenance & Repair

– Maintain FAA certification and support Military Air

Worthiness Certification processes

– Scheduled/Drop-in Maintenance

– Field team/Deployment support

– Modification/Technical Order (TCTO) Kit purchase/installation

– Aircraft status reporting

– VIP quality paint

– Interior refurbishment

Fleet Sustainment Support

• Higher Level Quality Management System IAW commercial standards

– ISO 9001 or AS 9110

• Reliability and Maintainability analysis, trends and forecasting and Deficiency Reporting per T.O. 00-35D-54

– Root cause analysis/tear-down analysis/corrective action validation

• Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and

Material Shortages analysis, forecasting and resolution

• Security

– DD 254, Contract Security Classification

• DSS Facility Clearance Required (Secret)

– Secret clearance required – most personnel

– OPSEC awareness and compliance

– Common Access Card

– Protection and control of For Official Use Only and

Classified material

• Must be able to transmit and receive sensitive information

• MOB Experience

– Site leads must possess an A&P and Learjet airframe experience

– Mechanics must be experienced with Learjet aircraft 14

• Scott AFB, JB Andrews, Ramstein AB, GE, are Full

CLS

– Provide flight line (O-level) maintenance personnel

– FAA Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) licensed as necessary

– Ability to maintain/support all aircraft and mission systems

• Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance

– Service Actions/TCTOs

• Germany requires special Technical Expert Status Accreditation (TESA) for non-local employees at Ramstein

Full CLS Sites

• Metrics* – all locations

– Home Station Departure Reliability ≥ 95%

– Mission Capable (MC) ≥ 80%

– Not Mission Capable Supply < 3%

Metrics

• Performance Based Requirements

– Performance Work Statement (PWS)

• Government states minimum requirements in outcome based terms

• Offeror’s proposed approach/solutions to meeting the requirements by offering industry innovations, best practices and commercial enhancements, etc.

– Goal of Performance Based Requirements is to allow offerors to use their own processes and procedures that save time, reduce schedule and cost

Program Management

• Program Management Plan

– Transition Plan

• Configuration management

• Quality program

• COMBS operations

– Supply chain management

• Data deliverables – CDRLs

– Maximize on-line submissions to Government

• Subcontract management

• Secret security clearances required for most personnel

• Contractor-hosted annual Program Review in

OKC

• Support program meetings

– System Safety Working Group

– Aircraft Information Working Group

– Maintenance Working Group

• Service Action Review Board support

• Technical Interchange Meetings

• Bi-weekly status telecom

• Services Contract Act

• Wage Determination

• Collective Bargaining Agreement

• Performance Price Trade Off approach

• Contract Type

– Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

– Example Contract Number FA8106-19-D-XXXX

– Work authorized on task orders

– Commercial FAR Part 12

– Firm-fixed-price

Solicitation Overview

• Phase-in/Transition (120 days)

– Address risk and mitigation

• Special Contract Terms

– Changes in aircraft fleet quantity

• Increase/decrease in fleet size

• Site activation/de-activation

– Small Business

• Subcontracting requirement for percentage of total obligated dollars

• Technical factors evaluated as pass/fail

– Additional credit will not be given to proposals exceeding requirements

• Past performance evaluated and assigned a performance confidence rating

• Price will be evaluated for reasonableness

• Contractor statement of work is not required

– PWS will be incorporated into the contract

• Small business subcontracting plan required

– If full and open

• Firm-fixed-price (FFP)*

– Recurring

• Base Operations

• Flying Hours

• Data- NSP (not separately priced)

• Overseas Tuition

• Southwest Asia Deployment

– Non-Recurring

• Transition/phase-in

• Engine Inspections

• Phase Inspections

• Main/Nose Gear Replacement

• 20K Hour Flight Control Replacement

• Demil/Disposal

*Not all Inclusive, may be other requirements 23

Preliminary CLIN Structure

• Firm-fixed-price (FFP)

– Over and Above CLINs

• Depot Maintenance

• Organization Maintenance

• Other Maintenance

• Travel

• Transportation

Preliminary CLIN Structure Cont.

Preliminary Milestones

• Issue Draft RFP

• Aug – Sep 2018

• Pre-Solicitation Conf

• Aug – Sep 2018

• Issue Formal RFP

• Nov – Jan 2018

• Phase-in/Transition – 120 Days

• Sep 2020

• Full Contract Performance Begins

• Jan 2021

• This strategy is preliminary and subject to change

• The final RFP will detail the final strategy

• Draft PWS provided for comment via FedBizOps

• Draft RFP will be provided for comment via

FedBizOps

• Pre-proposal conference is expected within 2-3 weeks following release of draft RFP

Discussion