NukDEW_TO_1_(12_Jul_16).doc
DOC document 260 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AFOTEC Test Services (ATS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7046-16-R-0003
About this file
ATS PWS Task Order 0001 - NukDEW
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
AFOTEC Test Services (ATS) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AIR FORCE OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION CENTER (AFOTEC)
TEST SERVICES (ATS)
NUCLEAR WEAPONS, DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS, AND NATURAL SPACE ENVIRONMENT SURVIVABILITY SERVICES (NukDEW) 12 July 2016
1.1 SCOPE
The objective of this Task Order is to provide technical services to Headquarters Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (HQ AFOTEC) in very specialized areas, across a wide variety of programs. This task is within the scope of the AFOTEC Test Services (ATS) contract Performance Work Statement (PWS), Section 3. Specifically, this task order requests services in the following areas: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. The programs to be supported may be at any point in their progress through the AFOTEC process. Responsibility for the programs may be at HQ AFOTEC, any Detachment or Operating Location.
Services may be needed through every phase of an AFOTEC test program, or they may taper off as operational requirements and missions become clear. The contractor shall calculate the nuclear, directed energy, and natural space environment survivability levels the acquisition programs should have based on current and projected threats. The contractor will then compare these calculated levels to the levels the system is designed to have, and identify any differences. AFOTEC’s goal is to improve Integrated Test (combined Developmental Test (DT)/Operational Test (OT)) by engaging the System Program Office (SPO) and developers to ensure the goals and needs of AFOTEC and the other Operational Test Agencies (OTAs) are considered, included, and met.
1.2 BACKGROUND
There are various existing and future strategic programs that may involve nuclear weapons survivability. These include space programs such as Advanced EHF (AEHF), Weather System Follow-on (WSF), Space Based Infrared Satellite System (SBIRS), ground terminal programs, Family of Advanced Beyond Line of Sight Terminals (FAB-T), and aircraft programs such as the KC-46A replacement tanker and the B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber (LRSB).
There may be various existing and future systems that may involve directed energy survivability. For the purpose of this task order, directed energy weapons are laser or high power microwave weapons.
In addition, there may be future tactical aircraft and radio systems, or hypersonic craft with similar required capabilities.
2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
The contractor shall follow the guidance contained in section 2.0 of the PWS.
3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
These contractor shall perform the requirements within the service task areas listed in this section.
3.1 Management Requirements. The contractor shall provide a management structure to accomplish this task order in compliance with the provisions in Section 3.1 of the PWS. (A001, A002)
3.2 The contractor shall:
3.2.1 For AFOTEC test programs, as assigned by the COR, follow the sequential steps below to perform a complete analysis of each major system being acquired. After each step, report interim results to the COR. (Contractor's format is acceptable.) After each step is finished, decide whether the process should stop, and if so, inform the COR who will make the decision. When the last step is finished, document the effort and conclusions from each step in a single technical report (A015). Over the period of involvement with a particular program, some of these steps may need to be repeated due to changes in the threats or in the program.
1a Research and perform analysis to identify the mission of the system.
1b Research and perform analysis to identify the system’s mission critical functions and equipment.
1c Identify the potential impacts upon the mission critical functions and equipment from the following threats and effects:
i) Nuclear threat
Effects:
HEMP (High-altitude Electromagnetic Pulse)
Blast
Overpressure Fall-out
Scintillation
ii) Natural radiation threat
iii) Directed Energy Weapons threat, Laser
iv) Directed Energy Weapons threat, High Power Microwave (HPM)
1d Identify any potential mission impacts that may result from the potential impacts identified in step 1c.
1e Calculate the survivability requirements of the system that would avoid the results of step 1d, and support mission accomplishment.
2a. Research the survivability requirements and specifications that are planned for the system by the users and the SPO.
2b Research the SPO’s plans for Developmental Test (DT) of survivability.
2c Research the SPO's plans for Hardness Assurance, Maintenance, and Surveillance (HA/HM/HS) procedures.
3. Identify any deficiencies in program survivability requirements, specifications, DT plans, data requirements, and maintenance procedures by comparing the results of steps 1 and 2.
4. Identify any program survivability requirements, specifications, DT plans, data requirements, and maintenance procedures that are beyond adequate by comparing the results of steps 1 and 2.
5. Identify and recommend appropriate test tools, facilities, and methods.
3.2.2 For AFOTEC test programs, as assigned by the COR, ensure that the system being procured has adequate survivability requirements, and is adequately tested.
Advocate for integrated tests between the SPO, development contractors, and operational test agencies (OTAs) in order to save government funds and reduce acquisition program risk.
Work with AFOTEC test teams to ensure that AFOTEC’s test plans include adequate survivability measures of effectiveness (MOE) and suitability (MOS).
Participate in all relevant DT and integrated test, and conduct OT, collect data where appropriate, perform data analysis, and report the results of each test event (A015).
Assist AFOTEC test teams in the evaluation and reporting of survivability MOEs and MOSs. (Contractor's format is acceptable.)
3.3 Perform the following activities as needed:
3.3.1 Attend meetings: teleconferences, VTCs, test working groups, system design reviews, technical interchange meetings, Initial Test Designs (ITD), Measures Workshops, and core team meetings.
3.3.2 Review documents: Capabilities Development Documents (CDD), Test and Evaluation Master Plans (TEMP), System Threat Assessment Report (STAR), system description information, development program specifications, equipment interface specifications, HA/HM/HS program concepts and plans, DT and OT test plans and reports, design documentation, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and/or AF/IN approved threats, Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), and/or Concepts of Employment (CONEMPs).
3.3.3 When appropriate, recommend to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) any of the listed threats that do not impact the particular program, or any threats which no longer require attention due to completion of adequate testing. Removing threats from consideration requires approval of the COR in writing or e-mail.
3.3.4 Monitor related plans for DT, monitor system or operational measures to counter threats.
3.3.5 Research and analyze the available test options, develop adequate test concepts, test methods, analyses, determine test resources and schedules adequate to achieve the suggested methods, identify appropriate test support tools for use in testing survivability.
3.3.6 Witness or participate in all relevant DT and integrated test. Investigate problems found with the system under test (SUT), and develop work arounds to allow mission accomplishment.
3.3.7 Write notes and memos to the COR, test directors or analysts, and SPO personnel. Examples include: memo for record (MFR), deficiency list, weekly activity report (during tests), monthly activity notes, meeting notes, test event progress report, test event quick-look summary, draft sections of a report, and some technical analyses. Where possible, these shall be delivered via e-mail (Contractor's format is acceptable.)
3.3.8 Write documents in specified formats if required, such as conference minutes (A003), sections of the final report briefing (A012), technical reports (A015), test event reports (A015), and technical analyses (A016).
3.3.9 Develop briefings to show the technology behind threats, the technology to overcome the threats, test methods and techniques. (A012)
3.3.10 Collect, compile, review, analyze, and evaluate test results. Run computer models and simulations; analyze/characterize the resulting output.
3.3.11 Determine the capability of the system to withstand the natural and man-made threat environments, and quantify the degree of impairment of its ability to accomplish its designated mission.
3.3.12 Aid in the determination of system effectiveness, suitability, and survivability. Prepare test documentation for inclusion in test and evaluation reports (contractor's format is acceptable). Prepare briefings or slides as a part of the report coordination process (A012). Prepare lessons learned reports (contractor's format is acceptable).
4.0. Surveillance Matrix
Table 4.1. Surveillance Matrix
| Performance Objective |
| PWS |
Ref
| Performance Threshold |
| Method of Assessment |
| Item 1: Provide responsive Task Order/team management including quick response to contingencies, to include timely and accurate task order document and report requirements, customer interaction and feedback, contributions to meetings and reviews, and Task Order modifications and change orders. |
| All |
| Clear, consistent, and timely written and verbal communication (i.e., returns phone calls, emails or other communication attempts within 24 hours) with no customer complaints. Unsatisfactory performance must be resolved within 5 working days. |
| Customer complaint as validated by COR and Primary Contracting Officer (PCO). |
| Item 2: The contractor must effectively monitor funding on each individual Task Order and effectively control the expenditures of all Other Direct Costs (ODCs). |
| 3.1.1 |
| Actual Task Order expenditures shall be within 10% (COR determined) of approved projected budget. Meets Task Order schedule requirements. |
| Monthly Status and/or Funds and Man-Hours Expenditure Reports. |
| Item 3: The contractor must be responsive to Government requirements, ensure PWS compliant performance, provide prompt identification and resolution of problems, effectively communicate concerns with the COR and meet the delivery schedule required in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). |
| All |
| Within each Task Order, no more than one late document per month and no more than three total customer complaints, to include timely CDRL delivery, per assessment period. Unsatisfactory performance must be resolved within 5 working days |
| Customer complaint as validated by COR and PCO. |
| Item 4: Comply with applicable portions of the DD Form 254 for Task Order requirements. |
| All |
| Compliance is mandatory; failure to meet security requirements are unacceptable. Each security incident, inadvertent disclosure and violation must be reported to the government within 1 working day and violations resolved within 30 working days to the government’s satisfaction. |
| Customer complaint as validated by COR and PCO and cognizant security authority. |
| Item 5: Overall quality of performance: the contractor must efficiently perform all PWS tasks, including those requiring contributions to meetings and reviews. |
| All |
| Contractor receives no more than three formal discrepancy reports per year from all Task Orders of failure to meet PWS requirements, listed in the above items per assessment period. |
| Customer complaint as validated by COR and PCO. |
Item 6: AFOTEC Safety Requirements: contractors shall ensure their employees and subcontractors comply with all applicable OSHA standards, identify and mitigate hazards, and report pertinent facts regarding mishaps involving damage or injury. Contractors will cooperate in any safety investigation, to include toxicology testing.
| 7.6 |
| Compliance is mandatory. Contractor must meet minimum Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. Per quarter, contractor must have zero “willful” OSHA violations; zero “serious” violations; no more than 2 “other than serious” violations (violation is defined in OSHA standards). |
Each OSHA violation must be resolved to the government’s satisfaction within 3 working days, except imminent danger situations which must be mitigated or resolved and reported immediately.
Incidents as reported in Status Reports, or violations reported to/observed by customer or COR.
5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
5.1 Base Support/Government Furnished Property (GFP)/Government Furnished Information (GFI) – Government Furnished Property (GFP)/Government Furnished Information (GFI) AFOTEC will provide program documentation such as the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD), CDD, TEMP, Preliminary Design Review (PDR) slides, Critical Design Review (CDR) slides, STAR, etc. as appropriate.
5.2 Travel Requirements
Contractor employees may be required to travel to various locations, both within in continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS). For OCONUS travel, contractor employees shall possess passports, visas, and medical clearance for designated operations areas. The Government will not directly reimburse the contractor for these types of expenses. Travel will be cost reimbursable (no fee) in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation. The travel ceiling for this Task Order is $20K per year.
5.3 Transition
It’s anticipated that some important work will be in progress through the phase-in and phase-out periods of this contract. Interruptions or delays to the work would impact the mission. Its essential attention be given to minimizing any interruption, therefore, the contract must provide for maximum cooperation between successor and incumbent, while also insuring that no work receives inadequate attention during phase-in/phase-out. The contractor shall plan for the transfer of work control, delineating the method for processing and assigning tasks, during phase-in/phase-out.
5.3.1 Phase-In. As a successor, the ATS contractor shall insure a smooth transition with the incumbent Operational Test and Evaluation Services (OTES) contractor(s) during the phase-in period. There will be no phase-in if the successor contractor subcontracts to an OTES incumbent. The contractor shall develop plans for assumption of awarded Task Orders. The contractor must provide an orderly transition of work such that any impact to a program is minimized. The phase-in time period is 30 days and is the first month of the period of performance.
5.4 Deliverables. Where feasible, delivery shall be made by electronic means compatible with AFOTEC software. All deliverables shall be marked with: Export Control Warning: WARNING- This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et. seq.) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, U.S.C., App. 2401 et. seq. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provisions of DoD Directive 5230.25. Classified deliverables shall be marked in accordance with Executive Order 13526, DoD 5200.1-R, DoDM 5200.01 Vol 3-8, DoDI 5210.02, AFI 31-401, AFI 31-407, and ISSO Marking Classification Handbook. Reports shall be delivered to the COR via e-mail.
5.4.1 Funds and Manhour Expenditure Report (A001). The contractor shall provide a funds and manhour expenditure report via e-mail to the COR and hard copy to A-7K 15 calendar days after the end of prime contractor's monthly accounting period. These reports shall include the status of each program, in the form of bar charts.
5.4.2 Status Reports (A002). Reports shall provide status of all programs. Reports are due 15 calendar days after the end of prime contractor's monthly accounting period.
5.4.3 Conference Minutes (A003). The contractor shall provide conference or trip minutes to the COR and test director within 5 working days after any trip, meeting, or conference. These shall take the form of a memo for record (MFR), and shall be delivered in electronic form. Reports shall be delivered to the COR via e-mail.
5.4.4 Briefing Materials (A012). The contractor shall provide briefing material as requested by COR. COR will provide draft and final submission schedule for each briefing request.
5.4.5 Scientific and Technical Reports (A015). The contractor shall provide scientific and technical reports to the COR for each program at significant milestones as needed. Draft submission is due within 20 days, final within 30 days. Final version shall be delivered in both paper and electronic formats.
5.4.6 Reports shall be delivered to:
HQ AFOTEC/A2A9O
Attn: Survivability COR 8500 Gibson Blvd. SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5558
5.5 Period of Performance. Ordering Period is DOA plus 60 months.
6.0 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
6.1 Security
6.1.1 The contractor shall comply with all security requirements in accordance with DD Form 254, DoD Contractor Security Classification Specification.
6.1.2 The contractor will require access to classified and Special Access Program source data up to and including Top Secret Special Compartmental Information (SCI). The contractor must have a Top Secret security clearance current within five years and be SAP and SCI eligible. The contractor must have a current clearance in place by the first day of the task order.
6.1.3 The contractor shall provide the Government with required information for program access requests to include justifications, letters of compelling need, and any other information to support program access packages. The contractor must ensure they are accurate and complete IAW applicable guidance.
6.1.4 The contractor submits classified visit requests via the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) in support of tasks within the DoD. Classified visits outside of the DoD require visit authorization letters IAW the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual. Direct requests must be approved by AFOTEC with coordination by the COR, Test Manager, and/or Test Director prior to travel.
6.1.5 Report to an appropriate authority any information or circumstances of which they are aware may pose a threat to the security of DoD personnel, contractor personnel, resources and classified or unclassified defense information. Contractor employees shall be briefed by their immediate supervisor upon initial on-base assignment.
6.1.6 Any failure to adhere to security regulations will result in a security incident and will be processed according to DoDM 5200.01, Volume 3, SAF/AQ Security Pamphlet 5, AFI 31-401, AFMAN 14-304, JAFAN 6.0, 1-301a (10), and/or DoD 5105.21-M-1.
6.1.7 Safeguarding Information. The contractor shall:
6.1.7.1 Comply with DoD 5400.7-R, Chapter 4, DoD Freedom of Information Act Program, and AFI 33-332, Privacy Act Program requirements. These regulations set policies and procedures for the disclosure of records to the public and for marking, handling, transmitting, and safeguarding official material.
6.1.7.2 Report to an appropriate authority any information or circumstances, of which they are aware, that may pose a threat to the security of DoD personnel, contractor personnel, resources, and/or classified or unclassified defense information. Contractor employees shall be briefed by their immediate Contractor supervisor upon their initial on-base assignment. Government personnel do not supervise contract employees.
6.1.7.3 The contractor is prohibited from attaching any computer hardware to the USAF network, or running any computer software unless it has been certified and accredited according to current USAF Instructions. Any such requests for reconfiguration, upgrade, or addition of computer hardware or software must be approved by the USAF Designated Approval Authority (DAA) Representative via the contractor's submission of a written request to the COR. Contractor use of computer modems, thumb drives, and external hard drives on any machine attached to the USAF network is prohibited. Use of commercial internet service providers is prohibited.
6.1.7.4 Contractor personnel using computer assets shall comply with all computer security requirements. In addition, should contractor personnel require access to computer networks or databases, they shall inform the COR or Alternate COR, who will arrange for the contractor personnel to complete the required documentation for a new computer account. IAW 5352.242-9001. The contractor shall notify the COR or Alternate COR of any contractor personnel who no longer require an open account.
6.1.7.5 All contractor personnel who will be using C4 systems belonging to the federal government to generate, process, store, transfer, or communicate information shall attend mandatory C4 systems security training. The format for the training may be either the USAF C4 Systems Security Awareness Training program format or an in-house contractor program that meets DoD requirements, subject to agreement by the COR. The training must be completed within the first thirty calendar days of the start of the contract or within the first 10 calendar days for contracts that have duration of 60 days or less. The contractor shall inform the COR when the training has been completed. The notice shall include the contract number and any applicable task order number, names of contractor personnel who attended and dates of training.
6.1.7.6 The contractor shall immediately notify the COR of any government C4 system problems or issues which come to their attention which may impact the contractor's or the government's ability to access the systems.
6.1.7.7 All contractor personnel who require access to C4 systems are required to obtain a National Agency Check (NAC) consistent with Public Trust Positions (Standard Form 85P or most current form). The contractor may submit a request to the COR that the government grant contractor employee(s) interim access to the C4 network while awaiting the results of a NAC. Interim access to the C4 network will only be granted after the contractor employees obtain at least a local background files check, and have submitted the appropriate documentation to obtain a NAC. These requests will be processed in accordance with government information security regulations and policy, and must include Security Office and DAA representative approval. These requests may be subject to disapproval. In no case will a contractor be given access to the network, including a group account, until a favorable NAC has been completed or interim access granted by the DAA representative. Any interim accesses that may be granted may be rescinded at any time by the Persistent Cyber Operations Forces, COR, Directorate Security Office or DAA representative at the government’s discretion. Any individual who subsequently does not pass the requirements for a full NAC shall not be authorized to work under this effort.
7.1 ATTACHMENTS/MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION
7.1.1 Environmental Controls. The contractor shall comply with all environmental requirements imposed by the Federal Government, the USAF, and at locations where services are being performed. Such requirements are delineated in USAF Policy Directive 32-70, “Environmental Quality,” and other laws and regulations.
7.1.2 Administrative Dismissal for Safety Reasons. The contractor will provide alternate work sites for personnel during local emergency situations when the Base Commander has declared an emergency and has stated personnel should not report to base or should leave the base during a workday. Local emergency conditions include inclement weather (i.e., snow, tornados, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc.). NOTE: only the Base or AFOTEC Commander can declare such an emergency (not a Government Director, Division Chief, Site Commander, Program Manager, COR, PCO, etc.).
7.1.3 Performance of Services during crisis declared by the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, or Overseas Combatant Commander. The performance of these services is not considered to be mission essential during time of crisis. Should a crisis be declared, the PCO or his/her representative will verbally advise the contractor of the revised requirements, followed by written direction.
7.1.4 Conflict of Interest. In accepting and performing the work required by this Task Order, and all amendments thereto, the contractor certifies that the requirements of clause AFFARS 5352.209-9000, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) have been or will be adhered to. The contractor must immediately bring any OCI issues to the attention of the PCO for a determination of whether a mitigation plan is required.
7.1.5 AFOTEC Safety Requirements. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure its employees and managers have a comprehensive understanding of and full compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. Detailed information is available on the OSHA website at http://www.osha.gov.
8.0 CONTRACTOR FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT REPORTING.
Contractor Full-Time Equivalent Reporting: The contractor shall report all contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for AFOTEC via a secure data collection site. Data may be collected by task order. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields at http://www.ecmra.mil.
Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance for each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs 1 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the Contracting Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) help desk.
Uses and Safeguarding of Information: Information from the secure website is considered to be proprietary in nature when the contract number and the contractor identity are associated with the direct labor hours and direct labor dollars. At no time will any data be released to the public with the contractor name and contract number associated with the data.
User Manuals: Data for Air Force service requirements must be input at the Air Force CMRA link. However, user manuals for government personnel and contractors are available at the Army CMRA link at http://www.ecmra.mil.
Attachment 1: Security Reference Documents
Applicable to All
| 1. |
| Title 18, U.S. Code |
| Crimes and Criminal Procedures |
| 2. |
| Title 50, U.S. Code |
| War and National Defense |
| 3. |
| EO 12829 |
| National Industrial Security Program - |
Note: Source: The provisions of Executive Order 12829 (PDF format), as amended by Executive Order 12885, Vol. 58, No. 240, 16 Dec 1993
| 4. |
| EO 12968 |
| Access to Classified Information - |
NOTE: Amended by: EO 13467, June 30, 2008
See: Final rule of March 26, 1997 (62 FR 17683); Final rule of July 1, 1997 (62 FR 36984); EO 13284, January 23, 2003; EO 13311, July 29, 2003; EO 13462, February 29, 2008; EO 13516, October 28, 2009; EO 13539, April 21, 2010; EO 13549, 18 August 2010
| 5. |
| EO 13526 |
| Classified National Security Information, 29 Dec 09 |
| 6. |
| EO 13526 |
| Presidential Implementation Memo, 29 Dec 09 |
| 7. |
| EO 13556 |
| Controlled Unclassified Information, 4 Nov 10 |
| 8. |
| EO 13587 |
| Structural Reforms to Improve the Security of Classified/Unclassified Information, 07 Oct 11 |
| 9. |
| DoD 5200.1.PH-1 |
| Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement (SF 312) and Verbal Attestation Briefing Pamphlet |
| 10. |
| DODD 5210.50 |
| Management of Serious Security Incidents Involving Classified Information |
| 11. |
| DODD 5210.83 |
| DoD Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information (DoD UCNI) |
| 12. |
| DoDM 5200.01 |
VOL. 1
DOD INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM: OVERVIEW, CLASSIFICATION, AND DECLASSIFICATION
| 13. |
| DoDM 5200.01 |
VOL. 2
DOD INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM: MARKING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
| 14. |
| DoDM 5200.01 |
VOL. 3
DOD INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM: PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
| 15. |
| DoDM 5200.01 |
VOL. 4
DOD INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM: CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)
SCI Documents
| 16. |
| EO 12333 |
| United States Intelligence Activities |
| 17. |
| ICD 101 |
| Intelligence Community Policy Systems, Amended 12 June 2009 |
| 18. |
| ICD 503 |
| Intelligence Community Information Technology Systems Security: Risk Management, Certification and Accreditation, |
Amended 21 July 2015
| 19. |
| ICD 700 |
| Protection of National Intelligence, 21 Sep 2007 |
NOTE: Superseded by ICD 700 on 7 June 2012
| 20. |
| ICD 702 |
| Technical Surveillance Countermeasures, 18 Feb 2008 |
| 21. |
| ICD 703 |
| Protection of SCI and Sources & Methods, 21 June 2013 |
| 22. |
| ICD 704 |
| Personnel Security Standards and Procedures Governing Eligibility for Access to Sensitive Compartmented Information and Other Controlled Access Program Information, |
1 Oct 2008
| 23. |
| ICPG 704.1 |
| Personnel Security Investigative Standards and Procedures Governing Eligibility for Access to Sensitive Compartmented Information and Other Controlled Access Program Information |
2 October 2008
| 24. |
| ICPG 704.2 |
| Personnel Security Investigative Standards and Procedures Governing Eligibility for Access to Sensitive Compartmented Information and Other Controlled Access Program Information |
2 October 2008
| 25. |
| ICPG 704.3 |
| Denial or Revocation of Access to Sensitive Compartmented Information, Other Controlled Access Program Information, and Appeals Process, 2 October 2008 |
| 26. |
| ICPG 704.4 |
| Reciprocity of Personnel Security Clearance and Access Determinations, 2 Oct 2008 |
| 27. |
| ICPG 704.5 |
| Intelligence Community Personnel Security Database Scattered Castles, 2 Oct 2008 |
| 28. |
| ICD 705 |
| Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, 26 May 2010 |
| 29. |
| ICS 705-1 |
| Physical and Technical Security Standards for Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, 17 Sep 2010 |
| 30. |
| ICS 705-2 |
| Standards for the Accreditation and Reciprocal Use of Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, 17 Sep 2010 |
| 31. |
| IC Tech Spec- for ICD/ICS 705 |
| Technical Specifications for Construction and Management of Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities, 23 Apr 12 |
| 32. |
| ICD 707 |
| Center for Security Evaluation, 17 Oct 2008 |
| 33. |
| ICPG 707.1 |
| Center for Security Evaluation Construction Security Review Board, 12 Jun 08 |
| 34. |
| ICD 710 |
| Classification Management and Control Marking System, 21 Jun 2013 |
| 35. |
| DoDI 5200.01 |
| DoD Information Security Program and Protection of Sensitive Compartmented Information, 21 Apr 2016 |
| 36. |
| DoDM 5105.21 Volumes 1-3 |
| Sensitive Compartmented Information Administrative Security Manual, 19 Oct 2012 |
| 37. |
| DoDD 5143.01 |
| Under Secretary of Defense for Intel (USD(i)), Amended 22 Apr 2015 |
| 38. |
| Joint DoD IIS |
| Cryptologic SCI Information Systems Security Standards, 31 Mar 2001 |
| 39. |
| AFI 14-302 |
| Control, Protection, and Dissemination of Sensitive Compartmented Information, 18 Jan 1994 |
| 40. |
| AFI 14-303 |
| Release of Intelligence to US Contractors, 01 April 1999 |
| 41. |
| AFPD 14-3 |
| Control, Protection, and Dissemination of Intelligence Information, 1 May 1998 |
| 42. |
| AFMAN14-304 |
| THE SECURITY, USE AND DISSEMINATION OF SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (FOUO) |
01 May 1999
SAP Documents
| 43. |
| DoD Instruction 5205.11 |
| Management, Administration, and Oversight of DoD SAPs, 6 Feb 13 |
| 44. |
| DoDD 5205.07 |
| Special Access Program (SAP) Policy, 1 Jul 10 |
| 45. |
| SAF/AG Security Pamphlet 5 Security |
| Guide to Conducting Preliminary Inquiries & Formal Investigations (In Special Access Programs), Feb 1998 |
| 46. |
| DoDM 5205.07, Vol 1 |
| SAP Security Manual: General Procedures, 18 Jun 15 |
| 47. |
| DoDM 5205.07, Vol 2 |
| SAP Security Manual: Personnel Security, 24 Nov 15 |
| 48. |
| DoDM 5205.07, Vol 3 |
| SAP Security Manual: Physical Security, 23 Apr 15 |
| 49. |
| DoDM 5205.07, Vol 4 |
| SAP Security Manual: Marking, 10 Oct 13 |
| 50. |
| AFI 16-701 |
| Special Access Programs, 8 Feb 14 |
| 51. |
| AFOTECI 16-701 |
| Special Access Programs, 15 Oct 15 |
| 52. |
| AF Sup to DODM 5205.07, Vol 3 |
| AF Manual 16-703, SAP |
Security Manual: Physical Security, 31 Dec 15
53.
Organizational Standard Operating Procedures
54.
Organizational Master System Security Plans and Annexes
Collateral Documents
| 55. |
| DoD 5200.08-R, IC1 May 2009, see also DTM-09-012 |
| PHYSICAL SECURITY PROGRAM |
| 56. |
| DoD 5230.30-M |
| DOD MANDATORY DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW (MDR) PROGRAM |
| 57. |
| DoD 5220.22-M |
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY PROGRAM OPERATING MANUAL (NISPOM)
| 58. |
| DoD 5220.22-R |
| Industrial Security Program Regulation |
| 59. |
| AFI 10-245 |
| Antiterrorism, 25 Jun 15 |
| 60. |
| AFI 31-101 |
| Integrated Defense (FOUO), 8 Oct 09 |
| 61. |
| AFPD 31-1 |
| Integrated Defense, 28 Oct 11 |
| 62. |
| AFI 16-1404 |
| Air Force Information Security Program |
| 63. |
| AFI 31-501 |
| Personnel Security Program Management |
| 64. |
| AFI 16-1406 |
| Industrial Security |
| 65. |
| AFI 35-102 |
| Security and Policy Review Process |
| 66. |
| CAPCO |
| Controlled Access Program Coordination Office Marking Guide |
ISOO
| 67. |
| 32 CFR Parts 2001 and 2003 |
| ISOO, Classified National Security Information; Final Rule |
Information Assurance Documents
| 68. |
| DoD 5400.7-R; IC-1 |
| DOD Freedom of Information Act Program, 11 Apr 06 |
| 69. |
| DoD 8570.01-M, IC3 |
| Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program |
| 70. |
| DODI 4525.8 |
| DOD Official Mail Management |
| 71. |
| DODM 4525.8 |
| DOD Official Mail Manual |
| 72. |
| DoDI 8520.02 |
| Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key (PK) Enabling |
| 73. |
| DoDI 8520.03 |
| Identity Authentication for Information Systems |
| 74. |
| DoDI 8510.01 |
| RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (RMF) FOR DON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) |
| 75. |
| DoDI 8523.01 |
| Communications Security (COMSEC) |
| 76. |
| DoDI 8520.01 |
| Cybersecurity Activities Support to DoD Information Network Operations |
| 77. |
| AFMAN 33-282 |
| COMPUTER SECURITY (COMPUSEC) |
| 78. |
| AFMAN 33-283 |
| COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) OPERATIONS |
| 79. |
| AFSSI 7700 |
| Emission Security |
| 80. |
| AFSSI 7702 |
| EMISSION SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES REVIEWS |
| 81. |
| AFI 33-200 |
| Information Assurance (IA) Management |
| 82. |
| AFI 33-212 |
| Reporting COMSEC Deviations |
| 83. |
| AFI 10-712 |
| CYPERSPACE DEFENSE ANALYSIS (CDA) OPERATIONS AND NOTICE AND CONSENT PROCESS |
| 84. |
| AFI 33-230 |
| INFORMATION ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM |
| 85. |
| AFMAN 33-363 |
| Management of Records |
| 86. |
| AFPD 33-1 |
| Information Resources Management |
| 87. |
| AFPD 33-2 |
| Information Assurance Program |
| 88. |
| CJCSM 6510.01B |
| Cyber Incident Handling Program |
OPSEC Documents
| 89. |
| CJCSI 3213.01D |
| Joint Operations Security, 7 May 12 |
| 90. |
| NSDD No. 298 |
| National Operations Security Program, 22 Jan 88 |
| 91. |
| DODD 5205.02E |
| DoD Operations Security (OPSEC) Program, Jun 2012 |
| 92. |
| DoDM 5205.2-M |
| DoD Directive Operations Security Program Manual, Nov 08 |
| 93. |
| JOINT PUBLICATION 3-13.1 |
| Electronic Warfare, 8 Feb 12 |
| 94. |
| DODI 5200.39 |
| Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), 28 May 15 |
| 95. |
| AFI 10-701 |
| Operations Security (OPSEC), Jun 11 |
| 96. |
| Kirtland Sup to AFI10-701 |
| Operations Security (OPSEC) |
| 97. |
| AFI 10-704 |
| Military Deception, Jan 15 |
| 98. |
| AFPD 10-7 |
| Information Operations, Aug 14 |
| 99. |
| AFOTEC |
| OPSEC Plan, Oct 15 |
NATO Documents
| 100. |
| DODD 5100.55 |
| United States Security Authority for North Atlantic Treaty Organization Affairs (USSAN), 27 Feb 06 |
| 101. |
| USSAN 1-70 |
| Implementation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Industrial Security Procedures, Apr 07 |
CNWDI- RD/FRD
| 102. |
| DODI 5210.02 |
| Access to and Dissemination of Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data |
NC2-ESI
| 103. |
| AFI 13-502 |
| Safeguarding Nuclear Command and Control Extremely Sensitive, Dec 11 |
Policy Letters
| 104. |
| AFMAN-33-302 |
| SECAF Policy, FOIA, 14 Sep 10 |
| 105. |
| OUSD(I) |
| Memo, Implementation of Revised Classified National Security Information Policy, 1 Oct 10 |
| 106. |
| National Security |
| National Security Staff – Change in Declassification Review Policy, 24 Aug 10 |
| 107. |
| Air Force |
| HAF/IM Policy, Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR), 18 Mar 10 |
| 108. |
| SAF/AA |
| SAF/AA Policy, RedactXpress, 30 Apr 10 |
| 109. |
| SAF/AA |
| SAF/AA Policy, Clarification on Transmission of UCNI over the NIPRNet, 6 Jan 09 |
| 110. |
| SAF/AA |
| SAF/AA Policy, CAPCO Markings, 30 May 06 |
| 111. |
| SAF/AA |
| North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Policy Update, 12 Apr 02 |
| 112. |
| AFOTECI 99-103 |
| AFOTEC OT&E Guide |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .