FA5000-17-R-0010-A0002.pdf

F1W3EE6154A001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make corrections to the solicitation resulting from the (attached) Q&A2. Changes w ere made to:

A: FAR 52.212-1 & 52.212-2 (Adendums)

B: PWS dated 12 April 17 (Attached)

C: CHANGE the PART I due date to 17 Apr/same time

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Apr-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA5000-17-R-0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Mar-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Apr-2017

CODE

FA5000 - 673D CONTRACTING SQUADRON

10480 SIJAN AVE

JBER AK 99506-2501

FA5000 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

X 1

FA5000-17-R-0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 PWS 10-APR-2017

Attachment 2 WD 05-2017 Rv-22 19 20-FEB-2017

Attachment 3 PPQ 3 29-MAR-2017

Attachment 4 Price Schedule 07-APR-2017

Attachment 5 GFP 2 21-MAR-2017

Attachment 6 QA1 10-APR-2017

Attachment 7 Site-Visit Attendance &

Slides

10-APR-2017

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 PWS 12-APR-2017

Attachment 2 WD 05-2017 Rv-22 19 20-FEB-2017

Attachment 3 PPQ 3 29-MAR-2017

Attachment 4 Price Schedule 07-APR-2017

Attachment 5 GFP 2 21-MAR-2017

Attachment 7 Site-Visit Attendance &

Slides

10-APR-2017

Attachment 8 QA2 13-APR-2017

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

Addenda to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items

(a) Paragraphs 52.212-1(b), “Submission of offers”, and 52.212-1(f), “Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers”, are deleted in their entirety and replaced with 52.215-1(c), “Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals, by reference”.

(b) Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers, is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

(c) The following is inserted as new paragraph (m) of the provision:

Proposal Preparation Instructions.

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts: Part I - Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part

II – Price Proposal and Part III Past Performance.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA. Limited to no more than fifteen (15) pages. Submit one (1) electronic. Provision FAR 52.212-3 doesn't count against the page count.

(a) The offeror shall provide a Table of Contents for Part I of the proposal.

(b) Standard Form (SF) 1449. Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation.

(i) Discount terms offered, if any.

(ii) Contractor/Offeror business name, address, cage code, and telephone no.

(iii) A signed statement acceding to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation.

(iv) Name and Title of Signatory Official in para. (iii), above.

(v) Date of signature of the statement in para. (iii), above.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions/clauses and in the on-line

Representations and Certifications at www.sam.gov. Return the provision FAR 52.212-3, along with all other provisions and clauses with completed fill-ins, as part of Part I.

(d) Submit an acknowledgment of the all solicitation amendments, if issued.

(e) RESERVED

(f) If none proposed, submit an Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations, or Waivers.

2. PART II – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit one (1) electronic.

(a) This Part shall contain a completed copy of the Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION

SHEET (pgs 3-17) proposed pricing information along with a completed copy of Attachment 4, Price

Schedule.

(b) Insert proposed unit price(s) and extended amount(s) in the SF 1449 Schedule of

Supplies/Services for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including all option periods. The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units. It is imperative that mathematical calculations are correct; particular care should be taken to ensure the amounts match when using the

EXCEL program and the rounding of figures.

(c) Use the Excel work sheet (Attachment 4) to provide the pricing information that matches the

SF 1449 Schedule of Supplies/Services for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001-0006 and for each option year (1001-1006, 2001-2006, 3001-3006, and 4001-4006)

(d) All dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar.

(e) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no price data of any kind are included in any other Part of the proposal.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL - Limited to five (5) contracts with no more than five (5) pages per contract listed. Only references for past efforts/contracts of relevance are desired. Submit one (1) Electronic copy.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating of Contracts: Provide any information currently available

(letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) that demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and/or quality of completed and/or ongoing contracts. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems, such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. (See 52.212-

2(d)(2))

(b) Performance Surveys/Questionnaires: Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) shall be used by the offeror in obtaining and providing past performance information. The government requires the offeror send out a PPQ to each of the Points-of-Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Proposal

(paragraph (c) below).

The offeror shall send out the PPQ (Attachment 3), using the Past Performance Evaluation Cover

Letter and Questions to each of their references.

THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND OUT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RESTS SOLELY

WITH THE OFFEROR.

Once the questionnaires are completed by the POCs, the information contained therein will be considered source selection sensitive and will not be released outside the government. The

POCs shall forward their completed questionnaires directly to the government – NOT BACK TO THE

OFFEROR.

PPQs shall be sent directly from your reference to this office marked to the attention of Theresa Derby and Stuart

McElhinney via e-mail to theresa.derby@us.af.mil and 673CONS.LGCB.Acquisition@us.af.mil, or mailed to the following address: 673 CONS/LGCB

Attn: Theresa Derby/Stuart McElhinney

Sijan Avenue, Suite 240

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, AFB AK 99506

(c) Past Performance Information: Provide a list of no more than five (5), of the most relevant contracts performed for any customer in the last five (5) years. (See addendum to 52.212-2, paragraph (d)(2))

Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(x) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

If an offeror has no past performance history of relevance, the offeror must affirmatively state it possesses no past performance history of relevance.

(d) The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance regarding (i) predecessor companies, (ii) will take into account past performance of key personnel who have relevant experience, and/or (iii) will take into account past performance regarding subcontractors that will perform major aspects identified in PWS Sectios1.3.1.1.3 (Warehouse Management), 1.4.1.1 (Pick-up and Delivery) and

1.4.1.1.6 (furnishings and Appliance Repair Program) of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition.

If subcontractors are going to be utilized, the prime contractor shall provide the percentage of work and type of work to be performed by each subcontractor.

(e) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past contracts of relevance.

(f) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from each subcontractor consenting to the release of its past performance information to the prime contractor that will perform major aspects identified in PWS sections 1.3.1.1.3 (Warehouse Management), 1.4.1.1 (Pick-up and Delivery) and

1.4.1.1.6 (furnishings and Appliance Repair Program) of the requirement.

C. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (CLINs and PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items, of this solicitation.

3. If a Part in a proposal exceeds the specified page limit cited in the Part Content, the excessive pages will not be evaluated.

(i) Each Part shall be complete in itself and shall not reference information contained in other Parts. Page

1 of a Part is defined as the first page after the Table of Contents. All pages shall be numbered.

(j) Price data of any kind shall be presented only in the Price Proposal Part.

(k) Elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required.

The following table summarizes the proposal submission:

Table 1:

PART TITLE ELECTRONIC

COPY

PAGE LIMIT DUE DATE

I Summary and Misc. Data

(File Name: Part I) via AMRDEC 15 pages 17 Apr 17; 01:00 PM

(Central Time Zone)

II Price

(File Name: Part II) via AMRDEC No page limit 24 Apr 17; 01:00 PM

(Central Time Zone)

III Past Performance (File Name:

Part III) via AMRDEC 25 pages 24 Apr 17; 01:00 PM

(Central Time Zone)

4. Format for proposal Parts I and III shall be as follows:

*NOTE – The following information is to be understood if the Contracting Office were to print the proposals*

(a) Each written Part of the proposal shall contain a Table of Contents, Cross References, and the List of Tables and Drawings (if applicable). Cover pages, Table of Contents, and Tabs will not be counted against the page limits. However, pages depicting tables, charts, graphs and figures will count toward the page limit. The number of copies of each part is specified in Table 1.

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) All pages shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

(d) Typing shall not be less than 12 point font; a minimum of 10 point font will be accepted for charts and graphs.

(e) Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

(f) Proposal Parts must be uploaded via AMRDEC by the date/time stated in Table 1. The proposal shall be submitted in a PDF format or format readable by Microsoft Office 2010 which includes software programs such as EXCEL, MS WORD or PowerPoint. Attachment 4, Price Schedule, must be submitted in MS-Excel format compatible with MS 2010. The Price Part shall be submitted in spreadsheet format, such as EXCEL, and MS WORD for price narrative.

(g) Each Part shall be complete in itself and shall not reference information contained in other Parts. Page 1 of a Part is defined as the first page after the Table of Contents. All pages shall be numbered.

(h) Price data of any kind shall be presented only in the Price Proposal Part.

(i) Elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required.

D. General Information:

1. Proposals will only be accepted via the AMRDEC upload. The AMRDEC website is accessed at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/. When submitting Offerors should use the non-CAC user instructions. Include the following in requested blocks; “Description of Files” [FMO-company name and Proposal Part] and enter:

theresa.derby@us.af.mil and stuart.mcelhinney@us.af.mil as “Recipients”. You will receive a “Verification is

Required” email from AMRDEC with instructions which include a link and a password. Once upload has occurred, you will receive a confirmation on the website and a “Package Status”. The Recipients will receive a similar email stating “download is available” and will send an acknowledgement email back to the originator.

The Date/Time stamp on the Recipients “download available” email stating the upload time/date (Central Time

Zone) will be used as the government’s Official Receipt of the proposal.

2. Questions/requests for clarifications shall be submitted in writing via email to all of the following personnel:

Theresa Derby; theresa.derby@us.af.mil

Stuart McElhinney; stuart.mcelhinney@us.af.mil

3. Responses to questions and request for clarifications will be posted no later than seven calendar days before the

SF 1449 block 8 date. No additional questions will be received after that time

(End of Addenda)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) price; (ii) past performance

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

(d) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive Limited Tradeoff (LTO) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 15 and Air Force FAR

Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP)

5315.3 in which competing offerors’ past performance information will be evaluated on a basis approximately equal to price. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications and evaluation factors. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), if the difference in the Past Performance Confidence

Rating of another offeror justifies the higher price premium. In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating. The evaluation process will include the following:

(1) Price Evaluation Factor. The government will evaluate all offers by price, including all option prices. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis either to ascertain the offeror’s understanding of the requirement or to evaluate the feasibility of successful performance of the contract requirements at the proposed price.

Total Evaluated Price: A TEP will be computed for each offer in order to meet the requirements of FAR Parts 6 and

17. The price of a six-month extension authorized by 52.217- 8, Option to Extend Services, will be added to the proposed price for each potential contract performance period.

The TEP is a two-part computation. First, the offeror’s total proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule (SF 1449, continuation of blocks 19 – 24) by the unit price, limited to two decimal places, for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the extended total amount for each

CLIN; the sum of all extended amounts will be the offeror’s total proposed price. Second, the total proposed price

(total amount for CLINs 0001-0006) plus the sum of Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8 formula (shown below) will constitute the TEP.

The formula for the Option to Extend Services amount is as follows:

Base Year = Total Cost of CLINs 0001-0006 x 6

Option Year 1 = Total Cost of CLINs 1001-1006 x 6

Option Year 2 = Total Cost of CLINs 2001-2006 x 6

Option Year 3 = Total Cost of CLINs 3001-3006 x 6

Option Year 4 = Total Cost of CLINs 4001-4006 x 6

(2) Past Performance Factor. The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) the references provided by the offeror, and (ii) any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment 3), and (iii) any data independently obtained by the government. If a reference identified by the offeror in accordance with 52.212-1B(3)(c) does not submit a survey/questionnaire, the government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a survey/questionnaire.

The government will evaluate past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, key personnel, and subcontractors that will perform major aspects identified in PWS Sections

1.3.1.1.3 (Warehouse Management), 1.4.1.1 (Pick-up and Delivery) and 1.4.1.1.6 (furnishings and Appliance Repair

Program)of the requirement, if applicable (see 15.305(a)(2)(iii)), but will not be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

(A) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last five (5) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.

(B) The government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below:

Table 1. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as the effort required by this solicitation

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(C) Performance Quality Assessment: For each of the recent past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be assessed based on the (i) Quality Assessment Criteria received in response to the Present/Past Performance Survey/Questionnaire and (ii) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Past

Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), if available.

(D) The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of performance.

The assessment process will result in an offeror’s overall performance confidence assessment rating of

Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence.

Offerors with no recent past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Neutral Confidence,” meaning the offeror is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral). As a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments, offerors will receive an integrated past performance confidence assessment rating as described in Table 2:

TABLE 2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL CONFIDENCE No recent/relevant performance is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE

government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully

NO CONFIDENCE

government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully

Note: In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

(1) The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

(2) Integrated Assessment. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest

Total Evaluated Price (TEP). In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating.”

(End of addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)