FA4830-12-R-0004-0007.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to announce the new closing date of 7 Nov 2013 at 2:00pm EST. There are also administrative changes in the solicitation including but not limited to the list below . See summary of details for further information.

1. Revised Statement of Objectives, Attachment 8.

2. Revised Section C

3. Revised Section L

4. Revised Section M

5. Revised Section J

6. Delete Section 01 04 00 (pages 37-40) from Specif ications, Attachment 2

All other items remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Oct-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4830-12-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Jun-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Oct-2013

CODE

23 CONTRACTING SQUADRON - FA4830

8227 KNIGHTS WAY, BLDG 706

MOODY AFB GA 31699

FA4830 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4830-12-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 06-Aug-2014 02:00 PM to 07-Nov-2013 02:00 PM.

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The following have been modified:

MACC DESCRIPTION

MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

Post Award Procedures for issuing task orders: MACC awardees will be notified that a requirement exists by 23

CONS Request for Proposal (RFP). The RFP will identify the requirement as bid-build or design build.

Bid-Build RFP will be issued and describe some or all of the following to be required, as applicable, and list is not all inclusive:

Project title, project number, location, point of contact (POC), project magnitude, performance time

Site visit date

Pricing Schedule

List of Submittal Expectations

General proposal information to include, but not limited to: statement of work (SOW), list of submittal expectations, drawings, if available.

Offer acceptance period

Closing date

Bonding requirements

Project specific liquidated damages

Applicable wage determination

Funding/Authority

Proposal Preparation Instructions – what to submit.

o Generally only price o May be required to submit other documents

Evaluation Procedures o Notwithstanding the exceptions to fair opportunity, lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) selection procedures will be used.

This RFP will result in a task order issued and will be the actual award document to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer.

NOTES:

1. Orders will be placed in accordance with FAR 16.505(b).

2. Projects will either be set aside for one socioeconomic category of small business or open to all MACC contractors

3. Competition may be restricted in the base year in order to meet minimum ordering requirements in accordance with FAR part 16.

4. The government intends to award a single task order without discussions with MACC offerors; therefore, offerors should propose their best price. The government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

5. Any changes that are required during the RFP stage will be accomplished via amendment to the RFP.

6. Failure to provide a complete proposal (including but not limited to price, assumptions, and proposed performance time) at the designated closing time and date will be handled as a late proposal in accordance with FAR

52.215-1.

7. If the stated offer acceptance period expires, the contractor will be given the opportunity to justify and update pricing.

Design-Build RFP projects under the MACC are designed to streamline the design process when complex designs are not required. The contractor is required to utilize the attachments in the IDIQ contract to develop their proposal.

Design/Build RFP will be issued and describe some or all of the following to be required, as applicable and list is not all inclusive:

Project title, project number, location, point of contact (POC), programmed amount, preferred performance time

Site visit date

General proposal information to include, but not limited to: statement of objectives (SOO), statement of work (SOW), list of submittal expectations, drawings, if available.

Offer acceptance period

Closing date

Pricing Schedule

Bonding requirements

Project specific liquidated damages

Applicable wage determination

Funding/Authority

Proposal Preparation Instructions- Preliminary Design level is either 15% or 35%and the following items should be submitted for review as applicable.

o SOW o Site plan, floor plan, elevation and cross section drawings o Detailed technical approach o Proposed period of performance o Design Cost o Construction cost broken down in CSI or similar division breakdown relative to the programmed amount

Evaluation Procedures (based on LPTA) o Evaluation factors: Price of Design and Construction, Technical Design, Past Performance

A task order written will be the actual award document to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer.

A modification will be issued to add funding for construction when available.

At time of construction (or if authority is received) the additional documents below are expected and this list is not all inclusive:

o 65% design – requirement is met when construction documents are approved by the government o Specification identification o AF Form 66 submittal register o Design analysis

NOTES:

1. Orders will be placed in accordance with FAR 16.505(b).

2. Projects will either be set aside for one socioeconomic category of small business or open to all MACC contractors

3. Competition may be restricted in the base year in order to meet minimum ordering requirements in accordance with FAR part 16.

4. The government intends to award a single task order without discussions with MACC offerors; therefore, offerors should propose their best price. The government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

5. Any changes that are required during the RFP stage will be accomplished via amendment to the RFP.

6. Failure to provide a complete proposal (including but not limited to price, assumptions, and proposed performance time) at the designated closing time and date will be handled as a late proposal in accordance with FAR

52.215-1.

7. If the stated offer acceptance period expires, the contractor will be given the opportunity to justify and update pricing.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

POP 01-AUG-2013 TO

31-JUL-2014

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

FOB: Destination

F3E362

To:

POP 01-NOV-2013 TO

31-OCT-2014

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

POP 01-AUG-2014 TO

31-JUL-2015

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

POP 01-NOV-2014 TO

31-OCT-2015

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

POP 01-AUG-2015 TO

31-JUL-2016

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

POP 01-NOV-2015 TO

31-OCT-2016

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 3001 has been changed from:

POP 01-AUG-2016 TO

31-JUL-2017

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

POP 01-NOV-2016 TO

31-OCT-2017

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 4001 has been changed from:

POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

31-JUL-2018

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

POP 01-NOV-2017 TO

31-OCT-2018

N/A 23 CES/CEC (CONSTRUCTION) - F3E362

KATIE CARR

3485 GEORGIA ST

MOODY AFB GA 31699-1707

229-257-3830

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment # Title Date Pages

Attachment 1 Architecture Engineering Mar 31, 2012 97 Design Guide – Moody AFB GA

Attachment 2 Specifications Mar 16, 2010 3015

Attachment 3 Air Force Category Codes/ CSI Format 2010 451

Attachment 4 Conventional Construction Parameters Feb 9, 2012 6

Attachment 5 AF Form 1354 (blank) Sep 2009 2

Attachment 6 AF Form 66 (blank) Mar 24, 2009 1

Attachment 7 Wage Determinations

Lowndes Cty, GA

GA120012 Highway Jan 6, 2012 7

GA120251 Heavy Sep 21, 2012 7

GA120323 Building Sep 28, 2012 8

Highlands Cty, FL

FL120056 Building Sep 28, 2012 10

FL120136 Heavy Jan 6, 2012 3

FL120192 Highway Jan 6, 2012 4

Polk Cty, FL

FL120035 Building Sep 28, 2012 11

FL120174 Heavy Sep 28, 2012 9

FL120234 Highway Mar 9, 2012 5

Attachment 8 Statement of Objectives (Revised) Sep 29, 2013 1

Attachment 9 Drawings:

As Built Building 648 Mar 6, 2006 11

Building 648 Floor Plan Jun 25, 2013 1

Attachment 10 Deleted

Attachment 11 Deleted

Attachment 12 SF LLL Lobbying Disclosure 3

Attachment 13 Site Visit Reservation Form 1

Attachment 14 Question Submittal Form 1

Attachment 15 Contractor Information 1

Project specific attachments pertaining to the sample project will be attached to any resulting task order award of the sample project.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

Preparation of Proposals:

General Instructions: This section of the RFP provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format of the proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested in the RFP.

ONLY THE REQUIRED MINIMUM AMOUNT OF INFORMATION IS REQUESTED

TO PROVIDE FOR EVALUATION. EFFORTS SHOULD BE MADE TO KEEP

OFFERS AS BRIEF AS POSSIBLE, CONCENTRATING ON SUBSTANTIVE

INFORMATION ESSENTIAL FOR PROPER EVALUATION. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for evaluation and for substantiating its validity.

Elaborate format and color representations are not desirable. Offers are required to meet solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Offerors must identify all of the small business and socioeconomic categories for which they qualify for consideration of award. While the intent is to keep the pre-award effort to a minimum, proposals must provide adequate detail for effective evaluation.

Restrictions: Incomplete proposals – failure to submit the data indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for further technical evaluation or for award.

Who May Submit: Proposals may be submitted by Small Business Firms. 8(a) companies involved in joint ventures (JV) must have the JV approved by the Small Business Administration at time of solicitation closing. The government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer or, for arrangements entered into after submission of an offer, before the arrangement becomes effective. If team arrangements are in place prior to closing of this solicitation, include team arrangment documents in Volume I. Cage codes for all companies must be identified and small business status certified in ORCA through System for

Award Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov.

Preparation Instructions: Proposals shall be prepared in three volumes:

Volume I – Past Performance

Volume II – Technical Approach

Volume III – Price Proposal

Specific guidance regarding content of these volumes is discussed below.

Each volume shall not require extensive searching throughout the document(s) to locate and evaluate any items or area. Sub-categories of information in each of the volumes should be highlighted for ease of evaluating the information contained therein. All information and data shall be in an 8 ½” x 11” format and shall be provided in a standard 3-ring binder (maximum 2 inches). Drawings shall be placed on 30” x 42” sheets. 8 ½” x 14” sheets will be allowed for charts and tables. Every binder shall contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables or Figures (if required), and List of Appendices where applicable. Text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper (black and white requirement does not apply to graphics, photos, etc). Font size shall be 12 point, Times New Roman. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. The offeror shall not submit verbatim sections or attachments of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Only written proposals will be accepted.

Oral, emailed, and/or facsimiles of initial proposals will not be accepted. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

A cover sheet identifying the offeror and the project shall be provided and must include the following:

(a) Solicitation number

(b) Names, titles, e-mail, telephone, and facsimile numbers for POCs, of the offeror

(c) Name, address, e-mail, telephone and facsimile numbers of person authorized to negotiate with the government on the offeror’s behalf in connection with this solicitation.

(d) Name, title, and signature(s) of the person(s) authorized to sign the proposal and any resulting contract.

(e) Acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation (if applicable)

(f) CAGE code

The terms “identifying name/or logo”, mean a company logo or company name imposed into the background of the pages of the proposal. This is only authorized on the Cover Page of Volume I.

The offeror may use their company name on all pages of all “Original Volumes” of the proposal.

However, offerors shall sanitize/redact/omit or blackout any reference to the offeror’s company name in the copies for evaluation process. Firms submitting proposals shall limit submission to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies are expended in preparing information required by the RFP. Data submitted must reflect the offeror’s interpretation of criteria contained in the RFP. Unnecessarily elaborate or voluminous brochures or other presentations, beyond those sufficient to present a complete and effective response, are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper and bindings, and expensive/extensive visual and other presentation aids are unnecessary.

Proposals will be evaluated for conformance with the stated RFP criteria. While the intent is to keep the pre-award effort to a minimum, proposals must provide adequate detail for effective evaluation.

Proposal Submission: Mailing Requirement for Proposal Data: Envelopes or other cover for material submitted in response to this RFP shall be opaque, and must be so presented that they may easily be identified. At a minimum, the outside cover must show:

(a) Destination of Proposal (23 CONS/LGCA)

(b) Name of project as described in the RFP documents (MACC)

(c) Solicitation number (FA4830-12-R-0004)

(d) Name and address of offeror

(e) Volume Number

Mail or deliver the proposal to the address listed in the solicitation.

The proposal submitted shall include an original and copies as indicated in the table below. Each proposal shall be marked to clearly identify the original from the copies. The binders shall be numbered (i.e. 1 of 3, 2 of 3, etc.).

VOL TITLE 1 Original & 1 copy CD COPIES

I Past Performance Information 2 1

II Technical 2 1

III Price Proposal 2 1

Electronic Material: One copy on CD-ROM of Volume I, II and III is required to be submitted with the proposal. All textual material, catalog cuts, and other non-drawing material shall be in

Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (.pdf), arranged in the same order as the hard copy version with each section or part book marked. Copies will not be returned.

Past Performance (Volume I):

When addressing past performance evaluation criteria set forth in Section M of the solicitation, the offeror shall provide, as a minimum, a list of their most recent and relevant past performance data for design-build and/or bid-build projects, from Federal, State and Local Government and private industry contracts. Relevant being defined as multidiscipline horizontal and/or vertical construction projects that have been successfully completed. Recent past performance is defined as any relevant projects (as defined previously) in progress or completed within five (5) calendar years prior to closing date of solicitation. A minimum of three (3), but not more than five (5) relevant and recent past performance examples are requested for evaluation. Limit your reference list to 20 pages. All the items identified below shall be addressed in the listing.

(1) Contract number, type;

(2) Whether the offeror performed as the prime or a subcontractor;

(3) Name of contracting office and verified name, address, phone/fax number of point(s) of contact

(4) Project title and/or brief description of construction project.

(5) Initial price and final or current price, contract start date, scheduled completion date, and current or final completion date.

(7) Percent complete as of the date of submission of the proposal; and

(8) Brief comments, if desired.

The evaluation may take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontract work where your firm performed major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition. However, the proposal should clearly define who accomplished the work if performed by other than the prospective contractor (e.g., a key personnel) and define the role

(e.g., prime contractor, subcontractor, sub-tier subcontractor, etc.) performed by the offeror. The government shall consider the information provided from the offeror and may well consider any other source when evaluating the offeror’s past performance.

Technical (Volume II):

Technical Standards – Provide your “step-by-step” Technical Approach/Scope of Work in reference to the attached Statement of Objectives (SOO), to design and construct HC-130J

Aircraft Maintenance Unit Facility, B648 in accordance with the Architecture Engineering

Design Guide and Specifications. As-builts are provided to you in the solicitation attachments.

Your construction proposal shall be broken down by division as stated in the Construction

Specification Institute (C.S.I.) format.

The offeror should submit for technical review such items as: floor, site, elevations, cross sections, HVAC, utility site, fire suppression, plumbing, life safety code analysis, structural, electrical, submittal registration, progress schedule, and any other applicable plans to support their technical approach (list is examples and not all inclusive).

Sample Project: ADD HC-130J Aircraft Maintenance Unit Facility, B648

Project Number: QSEU 12-3003

Project Magnitude: Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 IAW FAR 32.604(f)

Budgeted Amount: $1,900,000.00

Preparation of Price Proposal (Volume III):

Volume III must set forth all pricing information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for the government's evaluation of price as set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The offeror is requested to provide a design proposal and construction proposal, separated, and then the sum of both. The government is not requesting certified cost or pricing information. Price will be evaluated in terms using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the government receives a fair, reasonable, and balanced price. Volume III shall contain the following:

(a) Section A. Complete in its entirety the "offeror" portion of the Standard Form 1442

(Page 2). An official having the authority to bind your company contractually must sign and date the SF 1442. One copy of the SF 1442 must bear an original, authorized signature. Include cage code.

(b) Section B. Prices on the CLINS should remain blank, but sample project pricing should be completed.

(c) Section K. Submit all pages that require contractor fill in.

(d) Representations and Certifications. Complete and submit ALL required representations and certifications in electronic form (your CD copy). All representations and certifications shall be completed in SAM (www.sam.gov) and submitted in both, paper and electronic forms.

(e) Attached Contractor Information. This information will be used to determine contractor responsibility in the event your proposal is considered for award.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Evaluation Procedures

1. Award will be made based on the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA), meaning award will be made to the lowest evaluated priced proposal meeting or exceeding acceptability standards for non-price factors.

2. While the government and the contracting officer will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process, by its nature, is subjective and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire evaluation process.

3. The government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without discussions (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the contracting officer later determines them to be necessary.

4. The government reserves the right to reject any or all offers if such action is in the government's best interests.

5. The government intends to award nine (9) indefinite-delivery contracts for the MACC program from the pool of offers received. The government intends to award three (3) contracts to offerors in each of the following categories: Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, 8(a) concerns, and other Small Business offerors. The government reserves the right to award no less http://www.sam.gov/ than six (6) or no more than nine (9) contracts if doing so is in the best interest of the government.

The evaluation will proceed as follows. Proposals will be listed in order by total evaluated price from lowest price to highest price. For efficiency purposes, a minimum of the three (3) lowest price proposals submitted by offerors in each category identified above will be evaluated for technical acceptability and past performance acceptability. First, awards will be made to three

(3) SDVOSB without consideration in any other category. Next, awards will be made to three (3)

8(a) concerns without consideration in any other category. Finally, awards will be made to three

(3) Small Business offerors without consideration in any other category. If fewer than three (3) offers are submitted or are determined to not meet acceptability criteria in any of the categories identified above, offers submitted by other offerors qualifying under a small business program may be substituted to meet the government intent to award nine (9) indefinite-delivery contracts.

Evaluations will cease once the government's goal of nine (9) offers identified for award has been reached.

Source Selection

Evaluation Factors:

The proposals will be evaluated for the entire performance period on the basis of the evaluation factors listed below.

Evaluation Factor 1 – Past Performance

Evaluation Factor 2 – Technical Approach

Evaluation Factor 3 – Price Proposal

(1) Past Performance:

(a) Past Performance is based upon an Acceptable/Unacceptable rating. Offerors must receive an acceptable rating for Past Performance to be considered for award.

Relevancy is rated as follows:

DEFINITION RATING

Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant

(b) Recent past performance is defined as any projects in progress or completed within five (5) calendar years prior to closing date of solicitation.

Past Performance is rated as follows:

DEFINITION RATING

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform

Acceptable the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable

(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of recent, relevant past performance or for which information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance, and the contractor will be considered acceptable.

(d) If the past performance receives an unacceptable rating, the offeror may be eliminated from consideration for award.

(e) An offeror may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposals, such as, the relevance of an offeror’s past performance information (as related to this acquisition), and adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond or to resolve minor clerical errors.

(2) Technical Approach:

(a) The Technical Approach is based on an Acceptable/Unacceptable scale. Offerors must meet the Technical Standards to be considered for award.

(b) Technical Standards – Technical approach will be evaluated to ensure all the

Statement of Objectives (SOO) are addressed, in accordance with the Architecture

Engineering Design Guide and Specifications. As-builts are provided to you in

Attachments. Your construction proposal shall be broken down by division as stated in the Construction Specification Institute (C.S.I.) format.

(c) The Technical Evaluation Team will rate the technical proposals according to the chart listed below:

DEFINITION RATING

Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Acceptable

Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable

(d) If the proposal receives an Unacceptable for Technical Approach requirements, regardless of an Acceptable rating for Past Performance, the offeror may be excluded from the competitive range if established.

(3) Price:

(a) Price Proposals will not be rated or scored. Price will be evaluated in terms using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the government receives a fair, reasonable, and balanced price. The offeror’s total proposed price for the design and construction of the sample project will be the evaluated factor. The offeror is requested to provide a design and construction proposal separated and then the sum of both. Should funding become available for the project, the government reserves the right to award to the lowest priced technically acceptable offer.

(b) Award will be based on lowest price for those contractors that have received an acceptable rating for Past Performance and are determined to be acceptable in their

Technical Approach and are identified in one of the three small business categories

(Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business, 8a, Small Business).

(End of Summary of Changes)