Additional Questions and Answers 17 May 2010.docx

Additional Questions and Answers 17 May 2010

1. QUESTION: In reference to the Cover Sheet (preceding the Offeror Checklist): The instructions here state that the offeror should “complete and return an original plus two copies” of the listed proposal material. However, Block 13 of Standard Form 1442 and the instructions in Section L indicate that the offeror should submit an original plus three copies of each volume. Please confirm that the Government requires an original plus three copies (not two copies) of each volume.

Answer: See Amendment 0003, in addition to Question. #28 on site visit/preproposal question and answers.

2. QUESTION: In reference to Section C-102.i(1), Guide Spec: This section states that MASTERSPEC shall be provided by the contractor and that “all specifications are filed under Divisions 1 through 16.” As the latest versions of R.S. Means data will be in the expanded CSI format, which version of MASTERSPEC should be provided: MASTERSPEC 95 (16 Division CSI) or MASTERSPEC 04 (expanded division CSI)?

Answer: See Amendment 0003, in addition to Question. #26 on site visit / preproposal question and answers.

3. QUESTION: In reference to Section C-104, Coefficients: This section states that work in restricted areas “will have the Controlled/Restricted area coefficient applied to it due to the fact that escorts may be required.” Are we to propose a separate coefficient for working in a controlled/restricted area? If so, will the bid schedule be amended to provide the appropriate CLINS?

Answer: C-104 Coefficients--Reference to Controlled/Restricted area will be amended to reflect Non-Standard Hours Coefficient.

4. QUESTION: In reference to Section C-133, Contractor Provided Equipment / Materials: Will the Government please clarify which version of 4 CLICKS the contractor is required to provide with the contract: Basic, Professional, or Premier?

Answer: The Government is currently 4 CLICKS Premier, Version 2.605.

5. QUESTION: Does the Government have an Architectural Design Guide/Standard that applies to this contract, including the Demonstration Project?

Answer: Yes. Architectural compatibility Standards for Seymour Johnson AFB are included by Amendment.

6. QUESTION: Will the Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) apply to this contract?

Answer: Yes.

7. QUESTION: SF 1442, Box 10, Item 5 indicates a task order statutory cost limitation of $2,000,000 for 522 funding. However, clause 52.216-19, Order Limitations (page 66 of 118), references orders for a single item up to $5,000,000. Please clarify the maximum cost for a task order funded with 522 funds.

Answer: SF1442, Block 10, item 5 will be changed by amendment to $5,000,000.00 (522 funding).

8. QUESTION: In referenced to the Demonstration Project: Does the Base Engineering Department require soil borings for any new structures constructed on base?

Answer: For the demo project, the contractor is to assume 2,000 PSF bearing capacity. Additional projects will be determined on an individual basis.

9. QUESTION: When does the current SABER contract at Seymour Johnson AFB expire?

Answer: Jul 2011.

10. QUESTION: Will the Government please provide the current SABER contractor’s coefficient and cost data basis?

Answer: Current SABER contractor's coefficient and cost data information is prohibited from release to the public because this information in proprietary to the contractor.

11. QUESTION: It is our understanding that the contractor will make the water and sewer utility connections. Can the sanitary sewer connection be made to the pipe located in the roadway, or does the pipe need to be routed to the nearest manhole also located in the roadway?

Answer: Request the sewer line tie in to the nearest sanitary sewer manhole.

12. QUESTION: How are electrical connections (primary and secondary power) made on base? Are there any contractor incurred/paid fees required? If so, will the Government please indicate how much these fees will be?

Answer: There are no fees required. "T" splices are not recommended. All other connections/terminations shall be in accordance with NEC and NFPA 70.

13. QUESTION: In reference to Section C-130.b, Pricing: Page 45 of the RFP states, “If there is a price difference between 4 CLICKS and R.S. Means the 4 CLICKS software shall take precedence over the R.S. Means Master File.” Since R.S. Means is the company responsible for producing the cost/pricing data, would the Government consider allowing the R.S. Means pricing to take precedence in the case of a pricing conflict?

Answer: Section C-130.b (7) will be amended as follows: " If there is a price difference in 4 CLICKS and R.S. Means, the R.S. Means master file shall take precedence over the 4 CLICKS software."

14. QUESTION: Page 116 of Section M notes that the standard is met when the proposal “indicates technical specifications used is Masterspec (or equal).” Are full specifications written using Masterspec (or equal) required to be submitted with the demonstration project or can the offeror state in the statement of work submitted with the demonstration project that specifications using Masterspec will be provided in performance of the contract?

Answer: Reference III c(1). The Standard is met when the proposal indicates technical specifications used is Masterspec (or equal).

15. QUESTION: Please confirm that the information requested in Attachment 4, Determination of Responsibility, should be included in Volume I, Price.

Answer: See Question #36 on the site visit/preproposal conference questions and answers.

16. QUESTION: Please confirm that Attachment 7, AF Form 66 (Basic Contract) was provided for reference and does not need to be included in the offeror’s proposal.

Answer: See AF Form 66, Submittal Codes.

17. QUESTION: The task magnitude project history information provided in Attachment 8 seems to match exactly the project history information provided by the Air Force in 2006 for SABER VII, Solicitation No. FA4809-06-R-0002. Will the Government please confirm the project history for the past three years on all SABER projects at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base?

Answer: See Revised Attachment 8, entitled, "Task Magnitude Project History" incorporated by Amendment.

18. QUESTION: Will the Government please provide the historical contract value data for each remote site (Dare County Bomb Range and Fort Fisher) over the last three years?

Basic Year: (Jul 06 - Jul 07)No awarded contracts for FFRC or DCR Bombing Range

First Option Yr: (Jul 07 - Jul 08)

TO 5043, Const Back Up Power, DCR, $191.5K

TO 5045, Const OPS Bldg, DCR, $636.3K

FFRC:

TO 5056, Inst Smoke Detectors, $33K

Second Option Yr: (Jul 08 - Jul 09)

TO 5078, Rpr HVAC/Paint Tower, DCR $41.6K

FFRC:

TO 5085, Inst Backflow Prevention $18.7K

TO 5090, Cont City Water Tap & Main $303.6K

TO 5112, Rpr Pool Drain Covers, $11.8K

Third Option Yr: (Jul 09 - May 10)

Currently no awarded contracts at FFRC or DCR

19. QUESTION: If the offeror intends to hand-deliver the proposal to Seymour Johnson AFB, are there any arrangements that need to be made or requirements to consider to gain entry?

Answer: Hand-delivered proposals must be received at the 4th Contracting Squadron not later than the date and time specified in the solicitation. Individuals hand delivering proposals should ensure adequate time is allowed to obtain a base pass from the Security Forces Visitor's Center, Building No. 1700. The following information will be needed in order to gain a Base pass and entry on to SJAFB: Current Driver's License, Current Registration, and Proof of Insurance Beginning and Expiration Dates. Someone from the 4th Contracting Squadron will come to the Visitor's Center to sponsor the individual on to the Base.