Attach 24 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 19 Jul 10.doc

DOC document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
3d Generation Multiple Award Construction Contract Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4690-10-R-K102
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Solicitation Attach 24 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 19 Jul 10

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 3d Generation Multiple Award Construction Contract, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA4690-10-R-K102 Amendment 03.pdf PDF
Attach 15 - Revised Sample Project AF Form 3052(Page 2-3) 8 Mar 11.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 15 - Revised Sample Project Contractor Bid Schedule —
FA4690-10-R-K102 Ammendment 02.pdf PDF
Attach 2 - AF Form 103.pdf PDF
Attach 24 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 24 Feb.pdf PDF
Attach 9 - Material Approval Submittal Form 3000.pdf PDF
FA4690-10-R-K102 Ammendment 01.pdf PDF
Attach 6 - Design Standards - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 22 - Wage Det SD100009 03-12-2010 SD9.pdf PDF
Attach 12 - ACC Mechanical Room Standards.doc DOC document
Attach 20 - Wage Det SD100004 1-7-2011 SD4.pdf PDF
Attach 17 - Sample Project SOW.docx DOCX document
Attach 15 - Sample Project Contractor Bid Schedule.doc DOC document
Attach 3 - Submittal Schedule.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attach 18 - Wage Det SD100002 03-12-2010 SD2.pdf PDF
Attach 7 - Ellsworth AFB Fire Protection Standards.pdf PDF
Attach 8 - EAFB Sup 1 to ACC Instruction 32-1054 Exterior Signs - 10 Jun 05.pdf PDF
Attach 21 - Wage Det SD100006 01-07-2011 SD6.pdf PDF
Attach 13 - General Provisions MACC - 10 Feb 11.doc DOC document
Attach 19 - Wage Det SD100003 12-31-2010 SD3.pdf PDF
Attach 2 - AF Form 103.xfd —
Attach 6 - Base Overview Analysis - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 6 - Executive Summary - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 6 - Appendix 2 Standards - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 16 - MACC Sample Project Drawings 001.tif TIF image
Attach 6 - Introduction Base Mission - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 6 - Appendix1 Plants - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 5 - Spec Section 01800 - 17 Nov 10.doc DOC document
Attach 6 - Table of Contents - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
Attach 10 - ACC Supplement 1 to AFI 32-1063 - 16 Oct 06.pdf PDF
Attach 1 - Utility Outages.doc DOC document
Attach 23 - NAF General Provisions - 10 Sep 07.doc DOC document
Attach 9 - Material Approval Submittal Form 3000.xfd —
Attach 11 - Ellsworth AFB Underground Electrical Rqmts.pdf PDF
Attach 4 - Spec Section 01000 - 30 Oct 10.doc DOC document
FA4690-10-R-K102 solicitation.doc DOC document
Attach 14 - Sample Project General Information and Project Requirements —
Attach 25 - Historical Data.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4690-10-R-K102

Attachment 24

3rd Generation Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) 8(a)

19 July 2010

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

MEMORANDUM FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

(Place label/address of POC here)

FROM: 28 CONS/LGCB

1000 Ellsworth Street, Suite 1200

Ellsworth AFB SD 57706-4904 SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information for RFP FA4690-10-R-K102;

3rd Generation Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) 8(a)

1. The 28th Contracting Squadron is in the process of selecting contractors for the Multiple Award Construction Contract. In our proposal instructions to offerors we requested they provide a brief prospectus of all contracts over the past three years that are similar in size and scope of work as the sample project contained in the solicitation as well as point of contact (POC) information (e.g., contracting agency, phone number, name of primary person responsible for the contract, address, e-mail address, and fax number) as one of our award criteria includes the evaluation of the offeror's past performance on prior contracts and contracts currently in progress. It is for that purpose that your comments are solicited on the attached questionnaire. Please have the questionnaire completed by the person(s) most familiar with the contractor’s performance. A simple “N/A” answer may be appropriate when no evidence is available to you in a particular area. Indicate, based on the definitions provided in the questionnaire, the contractor’s performance on the identified contract. Please provide narrative rationales for your answers that are marked less than "satisfactory" or areas that the contractor clearly exceeded contract requirements, e.g., "exceptional." Hand written responses, printed clearly, are sufficient.

2. Please submit your past performance questionnaire directly to the 28th Contracting Squadron (not to the company) either by fax with a cover sheet marked SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION to commercial number 605-385-1734, DSN 675-1759, or via e-mail (which is preferred) to david.goff@ellsworth.af.mil as soon as possible but no later than 2 Feb 11, 4:30 p.m. Mountain Standard Time*.

3. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions regarding the questionnaire. If additional information is required, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

//SIGNED//

DAVID L. MENDELSOHN

Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire

Questionnaire on Contractor’s Present and Past Performance

Request you provide the following information on the contractor’s present and past performance by placing an X in the space provided by the most appropriate response. If you wish to elaborate on your answer, please provide comments on the lines provided after each question. If more space is needed, continue your comments on a separate sheet of paper and attach it to this questionnaire prior to submittal to the 28th Comptroller and Contracting Squadron. You are asked to provide frank, concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgement of others in your organization. The following definitions are applicable rating levels of the contractor’s performance on the identified program.

Performance Assessment Rating Description

Rating
Description
SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
LIMITED CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO

CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Individual’s Name, Title, and Phone Number Completing Questionnaire:

Company’s Name: ______________________________________________________________________

Contractor’s Name:

Contract Number:

Contract Title:

Period of Performance (Including Options): __________________________________________________

Contract Amount (Including Options): ______________________________________________________

Contract Type: Firm Price______ Cost Reimbursement______ Other (Specify)_____________________

MANAGEMENT

1. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond to surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies, and weather delays without falling behind the regular schedule.

Substantial Satisfactory Limited

No

Unknown

Confidence

Confidence

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________

QUALITY OF SERVICE

2. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements and their ability to take appropriate action to take to correct deficiencies when identified. (Does the contractor conform with the government accepted quality control plan? Does the contractor provide effective quality control and /or inspection procedures to meet contractual requirements?)

Limited

Confidence

3. Rate the contractor’s ability to proactively recognize and resolve unanticipated difficulties. (Does contractor display initiative to solve problems? Does contractor identify risks/problems as they occur?)

Limited

Confidence

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

4. Rate the contractor on their ability to provide a sufficient number of qualified personnel to ensure all contract requirements were successfully completed in an expedient manner. (Does contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?)

Limited

Confidence

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

5. Rate the working relationship between the contractor and your company and your designated representatives. (Includes inspection personnel)

Limited

Confidence

6. Rate the contractor on their environmental awareness. (Includes environmental compliance and environmental initiatives, such as affirmative procurement)

Limited

Confidence

7. Has the contractor ever been given a Cure Notice, Show Cause Notice, Letter of Concerns, or had payment withheld for services not rendered?

Number of Cure Notices: _____

Number of Show Cause Notices: _____

Number of Letter of Concerns: ____

Number of times payment withheld for services not rendered: _____

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY

8. Would you hire this contractor again? Highly Likely Likely Unlikely Highly Unlikely

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .