52.212-1 Atch 4 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA4452-12-R-0002
About this file
PPQ
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 ATTACHMENT 4
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________
B. Prime or Subcontractor for this contract: _________________________
C. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
D. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE RATING | |
| B | BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur. | |
| P | PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| G | GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. | |
| Y | YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. | |
| R | RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. | |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. | |
| Technical Approach | ||
| B | ||
| P | ||
| G | ||
| Y | ||
| R | ||
| N/A |
T1. How would you rate the contractor's Level 3 Technical/Engineering knowledge and experience of software and systems?
Remarks:
T2. How would you rate the level/quality of support that the contractor provides for the upgrade, sustainment, and maintenance of the infrastructure(s) and the system(s)?
T3. How was the quality of 24/7/365 on-call Level 3 technical and engineering support?
T4. If there were any penalties for non-performance assessed against the contractor, how well did they return to performing what was required by the contract?
T5. How would you rate the contractor’s overall technical approach and ability to meet the Performance Work Statement/Statement of Work requirements?
| Staffing Approach |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
S1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?
S2. How effective were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) used by the contractor in accomplishing the effort without Government intervention?
S3. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?
S4. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?
S5. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel?
| Configuration Management Approach |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
M1. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property, Equipment or Material)?
M2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to organize and manage multiple system configurations and baselines?
M3. How was the contractor’s ability to manage hardware and software assets for multiple systems?
M4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall Configuration Management and Asset Management approach?
M5. How successfully did the contractor keep the Government informed of configuration management concerns and maintenance contract renewal requirements?
| Cost Performance |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N/A |
C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?
C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?
C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?
C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?
2. Please discuss every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in remarks section of each of the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-mail to: jacqueline.mcglone@us.af.mil and jennifer.gasparich@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .